Implementation and effectiveness of a multi-domain program for older adults at risk of cognitive impairment at neighborhood senior centres

Pei Ern Mary Ng, Sean Olivia Nicholas, Shiou Liang Wee, Teng Yan Yau, Alvin Chan, Isaiah Chng, Lin Kiat Philip Yap, Tze Pin Ng, Pei Ern Mary Ng, Sean Olivia Nicholas, Shiou Liang Wee, Teng Yan Yau, Alvin Chan, Isaiah Chng, Lin Kiat Philip Yap, Tze Pin Ng

Abstract

To address the paucity of research investigating the implementation of multi-domain dementia prevention interventions, we implemented and evaluated a 24-week, bi-weekly multi-domain program for older adults at risk of cognitive impairment at neighborhood senior centres (SCs). It comprised dual-task exercises, cognitive training, and mobile application-based nutritional guidance. An RCT design informed by the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, Maintenance framework was adopted. Outcome measures include cognition, quality of life, blood parameters, and physical performance. Implementation was evaluated through questionnaires administered to participants, implementers, SC managers, attendance lists, and observations. The program reached almost 50% of eligible participants, had an attrition rate of 22%, and was adopted by 8.7% of the SCs approached. It was implemented as intended; only the nutritional component was re-designed due to participants' unfamiliarity with the mobile application. While there were no between-group differences in cognition, quality of life, and blood parameters, quality of life reduced in the control group and physical function improved in the intervention group after 24 weeks. The program was well-received by participants and SCs. Our findings show that a multi-domain program for at-risk older adults has benefits and can be implemented through neighborhood SCs. Areas of improvement are discussed.Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04440969 retrospectively registered on 22 June 2020.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Participant flow diagram from initial contact to end of program.

References

    1. Lehtisalo J, et al. Nutrient intake and dietary changes during a 2-year multi-domain lifestyle intervention among older adults: secondary analysis of the Finnish Geriatric Intervention Study to Prevent Cognitive Impairment and Disability (FINGER) randomised controlled trial. Br. J. Nutr. 2017;118:291–302. doi: 10.1017/S0007114517001982.
    1. Chhetri JK, et al. Effects of a 3-year multi-domain intervention with or without omega-3 supplementation on cognitive functions in older subjects with increased CAIDE dementia scores. J. Alzheimer’s Dis. 2018;64:71–78. doi: 10.3233/JAD-180209.
    1. Moll van Charante EP, et al. Effectiveness of a 6-year multidomain vascular care intervention to prevent dementia (preDIVA): a cluster-randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2016;388:797–805. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30950-3.
    1. National Academies of Sciences, E. & Medicine . Preventing cognitive decline and dementia: A way forward. Washington: The National Academies Press; 2017.
    1. Carroll C, et al. A conceptual framework for implementation fidelity. Implement. Sci. 2007;2:40. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-2-40.
    1. Chan CK, Oldenburg B, Viswanath K. Advancing the science of dissemination and implementation in behavioral medicine: evidence and progress. Int. J. Behav. Med. 2015;22:277–282. doi: 10.1007/s12529-015-9490-2.
    1. Peters DH, Adam T, Alonge O, Agyepong IA, Tran N. Implementation research: what it is and how to do it. BMJ. 2013;347:f6753. doi: 10.1136/bmj.f7086.
    1. National Population and Talent Division, S. G., Prime Minister’s Office. What does a 0.1% population growth mean for Singapore and our economy?, (2018).
    1. National Medical Research Council. National Innovation Challenge on Active and Confident Ageing. (2019).
    1. Curran GM, Bauer M, Mittman B, Pyne JM, Stetler C. Effectiveness-implementation hybrid designs: Combining elements of clinical effectiveness and implementation research to enhance public health impact. Med. Care. 2012;50:217–226. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3182408812.
    1. Glasgow RE, Vogt TM, Boles SM. Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions: The RE-AIM framework. Am. J. Public Health. 1999;89:1322–1327. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.89.9.1322.
    1. Billingham SA, Whitehead AL, Julious SA. An audit of sample sizes for pilot and feasibility trials being undertaken in the United Kingdom registered in the United Kingdom Clinical Research Network database. BMC Med. Res. Methodol. 2013;13:104. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-13-104.
    1. Agency for Integrated Care Singapore. Introduction to Senior Activity Centre. (2019).
    1. Neeuro. SenzeBand. (2020).
    1. Neeuro. Memorie. (2020).
    1. Reed JL, Pipe AL. The talk test: A useful tool for prescribing and monitoring exercise intensity. Curr. Opin. Cardiol. 2014;29:475–480. doi: 10.1097/HCO.0000000000000097.
    1. Holmusk. Glycoleap. (2019).
    1. Randolph C, Tierney MC, Mohr E, Chase TN. The Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS): Preliminary clinical validity. J. Clin. Exp. Neuropsychol. 1998;20:310–319. doi: 10.1076/jcen.20.3.310.823.
    1. Luo N, Wang P, Thumboo J, Lim YW, Vrijhoef HJ. Valuation of EQ-5D-3L health states in Singapore: Modeling of time trade-off values for 80 empirically observed health states. Pharmacoeconomics. 2014;32:495–507. doi: 10.1007/s40273-014-0142-1.
    1. Cunningham M, Wells M. Qualitative analysis of 6961 free-text comments from the first National Cancer Patient Experience Survey in Scotland. BMJ Open. 2017;7:e015726. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015726.
    1. Lord SR, et al. The effect of group exercise on physical functioning and falls in frail older people living in retirement villages: A randomized, controlled trial. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 2003;51:1685–1692. doi: 10.1046/j.1532-5415.2003.51551.x.
    1. Liu X, Ng DH-M, Seah JW-T, Munro YL, Wee S-L. Update on interventions to prevent or reduce frailty in community-dwelling older adults: A scoping review and community translation. Curr. Geriatr. Rep. 2019;8:72–86. doi: 10.1007/s13670-019-0277-1.
    1. Yorks DM, Frothingham CA, Schuenke MD. Effects of group fitness classes on stress and quality of life of medical students. J. Am. Osteopath. Assoc. 2017;117:e17–e25. doi: 10.7556/jaoa.2017.140.
    1. Angevaren M, Aufdemkampe G, Verhaar HJ, Aleman A, Vanhees L. Physical activity and enhanced fitness to improve cognitive function in older people without known cognitive impairment. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2008;2:005381.
    1. Kirk-Sanchez NJ, McGough EL. Physical exercise and cognitive performance in the elderly: Current perspectives. Clin. Interv. Aging. 2014;9:51–62.
    1. Langlois F, et al. Benefits of physical exercise training on cognition and quality of life in frail older adults. J. Gerontol. B. Psychol. Sci. Soc. Sci. 2013;68:400–404. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbs069.
    1. Vestergaard S, Kronborg C, Puggaard L. Home-based video exercise intervention for community-dwelling frail older women: A randomized controlled trial. Aging Clin. Exp. Res. 2008;20:479–486. doi: 10.1007/BF03325155.
    1. Hill NT, et al. Computerized cognitive training in older adults with mild cognitive impairment or dementia: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Am. J. Psychiatry. 2017;174:329–340. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2016.16030360.
    1. Klusmann V, et al. Complex mental and physical activity in older women and cognitive performance: A 6-month randomized controlled trial. J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci. 2010;65:680–688. doi: 10.1093/gerona/glq053.
    1. Lampit A, Hallock H, Valenzuela M. Computerized cognitive training in cognitively healthy older adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis of effect modifiers. PLoS Med. 2014;11:e1001756. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001756.
    1. Nguyen L, Murphy K, Andrews G. Immediate and long-term efficacy of executive functions cognitive training in older adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychol. Bull. 2019;145:698–733. doi: 10.1037/bul0000196.
    1. Kueider AM, Parisi JM, Gross AL, Rebok GW. Computerized cognitive training with older adults: A systematic review. PLoS ONE. 2012;7:e40588. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0040588.
    1. Ministry of Communications and Information. MCI's response to PQ on available help for seniors for digital access. (2020).
    1. Lin T, Bautista JR, Core R. Seniors and mobiles: A qualitative inquiry of mHealth adoption among Singapore seniors. Inform. Health Soc. Care. 2020;45:360–373. doi: 10.1080/17538157.2020.1755974.
    1. Davis FD. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q. 1989;13:319–340. doi: 10.2307/249008.
    1. Peek STM, Wouters EJM, Luijkx KG, Vrijhoef HJM. What it takes to successfully implement technology for aging in place: Focus groups with stakeholders. J. Med. Internet Res. 2016;18:e98. doi: 10.2196/jmir.5253.
    1. Lee B, Chen Y, Hewitt L. Age differences in constraints encountered by seniors in their use of computers and the internet. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2011;27:1231–1237. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2011.01.003.
    1. Jia P, Lu Y, Wajda B. Designing for technology acceptance in an ageing society through multi-stakeholder collaboration. Procedia Manuf. 2015;3:3535–3542. doi: 10.1016/j.promfg.2015.07.701.
    1. Hunter SK, Pereira HM, Keenan KG. The aging neuromuscular system and motor performance. J. Appl. Physiol. 2016;121:982–995. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00475.2016.
    1. Saftari LN, Kwon OS. Ageing vision and falls: A review. J. Physiol. Anthropol. 2018;37:11. doi: 10.1186/s40101-018-0170-1.
    1. Facchin A, Daini R, Zavagno D. The glare effect test and the impact of age on luminosity thresholds. Front. Psychol. 2017;8:1132–1132. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01132.
    1. Harada CN, Natelson Love MC, Triebel KL. Normal cognitive aging. Clin. Geriatr. Med. 2013;29:737–752. doi: 10.1016/j.cger.2013.07.002.
    1. Langley LK, Overmier JB, Knopman DS, Prod'Homme MM. Inhibition and habituation: Preserved mechanisms of attentional selection in aging and Alzheimer’s disease. Neuropsychology. 1998;12:353–366. doi: 10.1037/0894-4105.12.3.353.

Source: PubMed

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

3
Subscribe