Phase II open-label study to assess efficacy and safety of lenalidomide in combination with cetuximab in KRAS-mutant metastatic colorectal cancer

Salvatore Siena, Eric Van Cutsem, Mingyu Li, Ulf Jungnelius, Alfredo Romano, Robert Beck, Katia Bencardino, Maria Elena Elez, Hans Prenen, Mireia Sanchis, Andrea Sartore-Bianchi, Sabine Tejpar, Anita Gandhi, Tao Shi, Josep Tabernero, Salvatore Siena, Eric Van Cutsem, Mingyu Li, Ulf Jungnelius, Alfredo Romano, Robert Beck, Katia Bencardino, Maria Elena Elez, Hans Prenen, Mireia Sanchis, Andrea Sartore-Bianchi, Sabine Tejpar, Anita Gandhi, Tao Shi, Josep Tabernero

Abstract

This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of combination treatment with lenalidomide and cetuximab in KRAS-mutant metastatic colorectal cancer patients. This was a phase II multicenter, open-label trial comprising a safety lead-in phase (phase IIa) to determine the maximum tolerated dose, and a randomized proof of concept phase (phase IIb) to determine the response rate of lenalidomide plus cetuximab combination therapy. Phase IIa treatment comprised oral lenalidomide (starting dose 25 mg/day) and intravenous cetuximab (400 mg/m(2) followed by weekly 250 mg/m(2)) in 28-day cycles. In phase IIb patients were randomized to either the phase IIa treatment schedule of lenalidomide plus cetuximab combination therapy or lenalidomide 25 mg/day monotherapy. Eight patients were enrolled into phase IIa. One patient developed a dose-limiting toxicity and the maximum tolerated dose of lenalidomide was determined at 25 mg/day. Forty-three patients were enrolled into phase IIb proof of concept. Best response was stable disease in 9 patients and study enrollment was terminated prematurely due to lack of efficacy in both treatment arms and failure to achieve the planned response objective. The majority of adverse events were grade 1 and 2. In both phases, the adverse events most commonly attributed to any study drugs were fatigue, rash and other skin disorders, diarrhea, nausea, and stomatitis. Thirty-nine deaths occurred; none was related to study drug. The combination of lenalidomide and cetuximab appeared to be well tolerated but did not have clinically meaningful activity in KRAS-mutant metastatic colorectal cancer patients.

Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT01032291.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: Salvatore Siena is a member of advisory boards for Sanofi-Aventis, AstraZeneca, Roche, Genentech, and Amgen, and was supported by Oncologia Ca' Granda Onlus (OCGO) Fondazione. Eric Van Cutsem has received research funding from Merck-Serono, Roche and Sanofi-Aventis. Andrea Sartore-Bianchi received lecture fees from Merck Serono and Roche, is a member of advisory board for Amgen, and was supported by Oncologia Ca' Granda Onlus (OCGO) Fondazione. Josep Tabernero has participated in advisory boards for Amgen, Celgene, Genentech, Merck-Serono, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi-Aventis, and Symphogen. Katia Bencardino was supported by Oncologia Ca' Granda Onlus (OCGO) Fondazione. Mingyu Li, Ulf Jungnelius, Alfredo Romano, Robert Beck, Anita Gandhi, and Tao Shi are Celgene employees and stockholders. This study was funded by Celgene Corporation. Cetuximab was provided by Merck KGaA. Medical writing services were provided by Kim Grootscholten, MSc, of Excerpta Medica BV, funded by Celgene Corporation. Mingyu Li, Ulf Jungnelius, Alfredo Romano, Robert Beck, Anita Gandhi and Tao Shi are employed by Celgene Coporation. The Lenalidomide (Revlimid®) used in this study is a Celgene Corporation product. There are no further patents, products in development or marketed products to declare. This does not alter the authors' adherence to all the PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials, as detailed online in the guide for authors.

Figures

Figure 1. Study design and enrollment in…
Figure 1. Study design and enrollment in patient groups.
Study was terminated before the expansion part of phase IIb. *One patient was randomized to the lenalidomide monotherapy group but discontinued before taking any study drug and was therefore excluded from the analyses. AE, adverse event; ITT, intention to treat; PD, progressive disease.
Figure 2. Reasons for discontinuation.
Figure 2. Reasons for discontinuation.
One patient in the lenalidomide monotherapy group of phase IIb discontinued on investigator's decision due to lack of efficacy, mentioned as “other” in the figure.

References

    1. Ferlay J, Shin HR, Bray F, Forman D, Mathers C, et al. (2010) GLOBOCAN 2008 v1.2, Cancer Incidence and Mortality Worldwide: IARC CancerBase No. 10. Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer. Available: . Accessed 07 November 2011.
    1. Weinberg RA (2007) Multi-steptumorigenesis. In: Weinberg RA. The biology of cancer. New York: Garland Science. pp. 399–462.
    1. Siena S, Sartore-Bianchi A, Di Nicolantonio F, Balfour J, Bardelli A (2009) Biomarkers predicting clinical outcome of epidermal growth factor receptor – targeted therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 101: 1308–1324.
    1. Gibson TB, Ranganathan A, Grothey A (2006) Randomized phase III trial results of panitumumab, a fully human anti-epidermal growth factor receptor monoclonal antibody, in metastatic colorectal cancer. Clin Colorectal Cancer 6: 29–31.
    1. Cunningham D, Humblet Y, Siena S, Khayat D, Bleiberg H, et al. (2004) Cetuximab monotherapy and cetuximab plus irinotecan in irinotecan-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med 351: 337–345.
    1. Saltz LB, Meropol NJ, Loehrer PJ Sr, Needle MN, Kopit J, et al. (2004) Phase II trial of cetuximab in patients with refractory colorectal cancer that expresses the epidermal growth factor receptor. J Clin Oncol 22: 1201–1208.
    1. Benvenuti S, Sartore-Bianchi A, Di Nicolantonio F, Zanon C, Moroni M, et al. (2007) Oncogenic activation of the RAS/RAF signaling pathway impairs the response of metastatic colorectal cancers to anti-epidermal growth factor receptor antibody therapies. Cancer Res 67: 2643–2648.
    1. Lièvre A, Bachet JB, Le Corre D, Boige V, Landi B, et al. (2006) KRAS mutation status is predictive of response to cetuximab therapy in colorectal cancer. Cancer Res 66: 3992–3995.
    1. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: Colon Cancer v3.2012. Available: . Accessed 21 November 2012.
    1. Grothey A, Cutsem EV, Sobrero A, Siena S, Falcone A, et al. (2012) Regorafenib monotherapy for previously treated metastatic colorectal cancer (CORRECT): an international, multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet In press.
    1. Bendell JC, Nemunaitis J, Vukelja SJ, Hagenstad C, Campos LT, et al. (2011) Randomized placebo-controlled phase II trial of perifosine plus capecitabine as second- or third-line therapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 29: 4394–4400.
    1. Bendell JC, Ervin TJ, Senzer NN, Richards DA, Firdaus I, et al. (2012) Results of the X-PECT study: A phase III randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled study of perifosine plus capecitabine (P-CAP) versus placebo plus capecitabine (CAP) in patients (pts) with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). J Clin Oncol 30 suppl 15 Abstract LBA3501.
    1. Jonker DJ, O'Callaghan CJ, Karapetis CS, Zalcberg JR, Tu D, et al. (2007) Cetuximab for the treatment of colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med 357: 2040–2048.
    1. Yan L, Hsu K, Beckman RA (2008) Antibody-based therapy for solid tumors. Cancer J 14: 178–183.
    1. Normanno N, Bianco C, De Luca A, Maiello MR, Salomon DS (2003) Target-based agents against ErbB receptors and their ligands: a novel approach to cancer treatment. Endocr Relat Cancer 10: 1–21.
    1. Li S, Schmitz KR, Jeffrey PD, Wiltzius JJ, Kussie P, et al. (2005) Structural basis for inhibition of the epidermal growth factor receptor by cetuximab. Cancer Cell 7: 301–311.
    1. Reilly AF, Norris CF, Surrey S, Bruchak FJ, Rappaport EF, et al. (1994) Genetic diversity in human Fc receptor II for immunoglobulin G: Fc gamma receptor IIA ligand-binding polymorphism. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol 1: 640–644.
    1. Sanders LA, van de Winkel JG, Rijkers GT, Voorhorst-Ogink MM, de Haas M, et al. (1994) Fc gamma receptor IIa (CD32) heterogeneity in patients with recurrent bacterial respiratory tract infections. J Infect Dis 170: 854–861.
    1. Breunis WB, van Mirre E, Bruin M, Geissler J, de Boer M, et al. (2008) Copy number variation of the activating FCGR2C gene predisposes to idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura. Blood 111: 1029–1038.
    1. Kavai M, Szegedi G (2007) Immune complex clearance by monocytes and macrophages in systemic lupus erythematosus. Autoimmun Rev 6: 497–502.
    1. Yesmin K, Hargreaves C, Newby PR, Brand OJ, Heward JM, et al. (2010) Association of FcGRIIa with Graves' disease: a potential role for dysregulated autoantibody clearance in disease onset/progression. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 73: 119–125.
    1. Cartron G, Dacheux L, Salles G, Solal-Celigny P, Bardos P, et al. (2002) Therapeutic activity of humanized anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody and polymorphism in IgG Fc receptor FcgammaRIIIa gene. Blood 99: 754–758.
    1. Nishio M, Endo T, Fujimoto K, Yamamoto S, Obara M, et al. (2009) FCGR3A-158V/F polymorphism may correlate with the levels of immunoglobulin in patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma after rituximab treatment as an adjuvant to autologous stem cell transplantation. Eur J Haematol 82: 143–147.
    1. List A, Dewald G, Bennett J, Giagounidis A, Raza A, et al. (2006) Lenalidomide in the myelodysplastic syndrome with chromosome 5q deletion. N Engl J Med 355: 1456–1465.
    1. Dimopoulos M, Spencer A, Attal M, Prince HM, Harousseau JL, et al. (2007) Lenalidomide plus dexamethasone for relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med 357: 2123–2132.
    1. Weber DM, Chen C, Niesvizky R, Wang M, Belch A, et al. (2007) Lenalidomide plus dexamethasone for relapsed multiple myeloma in North America. N Engl J Med 357: 2133–2142.
    1. Dredge K, Marriott JB, Macdonald CD, Man H, Chen R, et al. (2002) Novel thalidomide analogues display anti-angiogenic activity independently of immunomodulatory effects. Br J Cancer 87: 1166–1172.
    1. Wu L, Parton A, Lu L, Adams M, Schafer P, et al. (2011) Lenalidomide enhances antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity of solid tumor cells in vitro: influence of host immune and tumor markers. Cancer Immunol Immunother 60: 61–73.
    1. Dahut WL, Aragon-Ching JB, Woo S, Tohnya TM, Gulley JL, et al. (2009) Phase I study of oral lenalidomide in patients with refractory metastatic cancer. J Clin Pharmacol 49: 650–660.
    1. Miller AA, Case D, Harmon M, Savage P, Lesser G, et al. (2007) Phase I study of lenalidomide in solid tumors. J Thorac Oncol 2: 445–449.
    1. Sharma RA, Steward WP, Daines CA, Knight RD, O'Byrne KJ, et al. (2006) Toxicity profile of the immunomodulatory thalidomide analogue, lenalidomide: phase I clinical trial of three dosing schedules in patients with solid malignancies. Eur J Cancer 42: 2318–2325.
    1. López-Albaitero A, Lee SC, Morgan S, Grandis JR, Gooding WE, et al. (2009) Role of polymorphic Fc gamma receptor IIIa and EGFR expression level in cetuximab mediated, NK cell dependent in vitro cytotoxicity of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma cells. Cancer Immunol Immunother 58: 1853–1864.
    1. Zhang W, Gordon M, Schultheis AM, Yang DY, Nagashima F, et al. (2007) FCGR2A and FCGR3A polymorphisms associated with clinical outcome of epidermal growth factor receptor expressing metastatic colorectal cancer patients treated with single-agent cetuximab. J Clin Oncol 25: 3712–3718.
    1. Moroni M, Veronese S, Benvenuti S, Marrapese G, Sartore-Bianchi A, et al. (2005) Gene copy number for epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and clinical response to antiEGFR treatment in colorectal cancer: a cohort study. Lancet Oncol 6: 279–286.
    1. Sartore-Bianchi A, Moroni M, Veronese S, Carnaghi C, Bajetta E, et al. (2007) Epidermal growth factor receptor gene copy number and clinical outcome of metastatic colorectal cancer treated with panitumumab. J Clin Oncol 25: 3238–3245.
    1. Personeni N, Fieuws S, Piessevaux H, De Hertogh G, De Schutter J, et al. (2008) Clinical usefulness of EGFR gene copy number as a predictive marker in colorectal cancer patients treated with cetuximab: a fluorescent in situ hybridization study. Clin Cancer Res 14: 5869–5876.
    1. Sartore-Bianchi A, Fieuws S, Veronese S, Moroni M, Personeni N, et al. (2012) Standardisation of EGFR FISH in colorectal cancer: results of an international interlaboratory reproducibility ring study. J Clin Pathol 65: 218–223.

Source: PubMed

3
Subscribe