Impact of human papillomavirus (HPV) 16 and 18 vaccination on prevalent infections and rates of cervical lesions after excisional treatment

Allan Hildesheim, Paula Gonzalez, Aimee R Kreimer, Sholom Wacholder, John Schussler, Ana C Rodriguez, Carolina Porras, Mark Schiffman, Mary Sidawy, John T Schiller, Douglas R Lowy, Rolando Herrero, Costa Rica HPV Vaccine Trial (CVT) Group, Bernal Cortés, Paula González, Roland Herrero, Silvia E Jiménez, Carolina Porras, Ana Cecilia Rodríguez, Allan Hildesheim, Aimée R Kreimer, Douglas R Lowy, Mark Schiffman, John T Schiller, Mark Sherman, Sholom Wacholder, Ligia Pinto, Troy Kemp, Mary Sidawy, Wim Quint, Leen-Jan van Doorn, Joel M Palefsky, Teresa M Darragh, Mark H Stoler, Allan Hildesheim, Paula Gonzalez, Aimee R Kreimer, Sholom Wacholder, John Schussler, Ana C Rodriguez, Carolina Porras, Mark Schiffman, Mary Sidawy, John T Schiller, Douglas R Lowy, Rolando Herrero, Costa Rica HPV Vaccine Trial (CVT) Group, Bernal Cortés, Paula González, Roland Herrero, Silvia E Jiménez, Carolina Porras, Ana Cecilia Rodríguez, Allan Hildesheim, Aimée R Kreimer, Douglas R Lowy, Mark Schiffman, John T Schiller, Mark Sherman, Sholom Wacholder, Ligia Pinto, Troy Kemp, Mary Sidawy, Wim Quint, Leen-Jan van Doorn, Joel M Palefsky, Teresa M Darragh, Mark H Stoler

Abstract

Background: Human papillomavirus vaccines prevent human papillomavirus infection and cervical precancers. The impact of vaccinating women with a current infection or after treatment for an human papillomavirus-associated lesion is not fully understood.

Objectives: To determine whether human papillomavirus-16/18 vaccination influences the outcome of infections present at vaccination and the rate of infection and disease after treatment of lesions.

Study design: We included 1711 women (18-25 years) with carcinogenic human papillomavirus infection and 311 women of similar age who underwent treatment for cervical precancer and who participated in a community-based trial of the AS04-adjuvanted human papillomavirus-16/18 virus-like particle vaccine. Participants were randomized (human papillomavirus or hepatitis A vaccine) and offered 3 vaccinations over 6 months. Follow-up included annual visits (more frequently if clinically indicated), referral to colposcopy of high-grade and persistent low-grade lesions, treatment by loop electrosurgical excisional procedure when clinically indicated, and cytologic and virologic follow-up after treatment. Among women with human papillomavirus infection at the time of vaccination, we considered type-specific viral clearance, and development of cytologic (squamous intraepithelial lesions) and histologic (cervical intraepithelial neoplasia) lesions. Among treated women, we considered single-time and persistent human papillomavirus infection, squamous intraepithelial lesions, and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2 or greater. Outcomes associated with infections absent before treatment also were evaluated. Infection-level analyses were performed and vaccine efficacy estimated.

Results: Median follow-up was 56.7 months (women with human papillomavirus infection) and 27.3 months (treated women). There was no evidence of vaccine efficacy to increase clearance of human papillomavirus infections or decrease incidence of cytologic/histologic abnormalities associated with human papillomavirus types present at enrollment. Vaccine efficacy for human papillomavirus 16/18 clearance and against human papillomavirus 16/18 progression from infection to cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2 or greater were -5.4% (95% confidence interval -19,10) and 0.3% (95% confidence interval -69,41), respectively. Among treated women, 34.1% had oncogenic infection and 1.6% had cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2 or greater detected after treatment, respectively, and of these 69.8% and 20.0% were the result of new infections. We observed no significant effect of vaccination on rates of infection/lesions after treatment. Vaccine efficacy estimates for human papillomavirus 16/18 associated persistent infection and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2 or greater after treatment were 34.7% (95% confidence interval -131, 82) and -211% (95% confidence interval -2901, 68), respectively. We observed evidence for a partial and nonsignificant protective effect of vaccination against new infections absent before treatment. For incident human papillomavirus 16/18, human papillomavirus 31/33/45, and oncogenic human papillomavirus infections post-treatment, vaccine efficacy estimates were 57.9% (95% confidence interval -43, 88), 72.9% (95% confidence interval 29, 90), and 36.7% (95% confidence interval 1.5, 59), respectively.

Conclusion: We find no evidence for a vaccine effect on the fate of detectable human papillomavirus infections. We show that vaccination does not protect against infections/lesions after treatment. Evaluation of vaccine protection against new infections after treatment and resultant lesions warrants further consideration in future studies.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00128661.

Keywords: cervical cancer; clinical trial; human papillomaviruses; prevention; vaccines.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors report no conflict of interest.

Published by Elsevier Inc.

Figures

Figure 1. Flow charts
Figure 1. Flow charts
A, Consort – evaluation of prevalent HPV infections. B, Consort – evaluation of recurrence after LEEP. HPV, human papillomavirus; HSIL, high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion; LEEP, loop electrosurgical excisional procedure.

References

    1. Kjaer SK, Sigurdsson K, Iversen OE, et al. A pooled analysis of continued prophylactic efficacy of quadrivalent human papillomavirus (Types 6/11/16/18) vaccine against high-grade cervical and external genital lesions. Cancer Prev Res. 2009;2:868–78.
    1. Lehtinen M, Paavonen J, Wheeler CM, et al. Overall efficacy of HPV-16/18 AS04-adjuvanted vaccine against grade 3 or greater cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: 4-year end-of-study analysis of the randomised, double-blind PAT-RICIA trial. Lancet Oncol. 2012;13:89–99.
    1. Hildesheim A, Wacholder S, Catteau G, et al. Efficacy of the HPV-16/18 Vaccine: Final according to protocol results from the blinded phase of the randomized Costa Rica HPV-16/18 Vaccine Trial. Vaccine. 2014;32:5087–97.
    1. Schiller JT, Lowy DR. Understanding and learning from the success of prophylactic human papillomavirus vaccines. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2012;10:681–92.
    1. De Bruijn MLH, Greenstone HL, Vermeulen H, et al. L1-specific protection from tumor challenge elicited by HPV16 virus-like particles. Virology. 1998;250:371–6.
    1. Hildesheim A, Herrero R, Wacholder W, et al. Effect of human papillomavirus 16/18 L1 virus-like particle vaccine among young women with preexisting infection: a randomized trial. JAMA. 2007;298:743–53.
    1. Haupt RM, Wheeler CM, Brown DR, et al. Impact of an HPV6/11/16/18 L1 virus-like particle vaccine on progression to cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in seropositive women with HPV16/18 infection. Int J Cancer. 2011;129:2632–42.
    1. Szarewski A, Poppe WAJ, Skinner SR, et al. Efficacy of the human papillomavirus (HPV)-16/18 AS04-adjuvanted vaccine in women aged 15–25 years with and without serological evidence of previous exposure to HPV-16/18. Int J Cancer. 2012;131:106–16.
    1. Joura EA, Garland SM, Paavonen J, et al. Effect of the human papillomavirus (HPV) quadrivalent vaccine in a subgroup of women with cervical and vulvar disease: retrospective pooled analysis of trial data. BMJ. 2012;344:e1401.
    1. Kang WD, Choi HS, Kim SM. Is vaccination with quadrivalent HPV vaccine after LEEP effective in preventing recurrence in patients with high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN2-3)? Gynecol Oncol. 2013;130:264–8.
    1. Swedish KA, Factor SH, Goldstone SE. Prevention of recurrent high-grade anal neoplasia with quadrivalent human papilloma-virus vaccination of men who have sex with men: a nonconcurrent cohort study. Clin Infect Dis. 2012;54:891–8.
    1. Herrero R, Herrero R, Hildesheim A, et al. Rationale and design of a community-based double-blind randomized clinical trial of an HPV 16 and 18 vaccine in Guanacaste, Costa Rica. Vaccine. 2006;26:4795–808.
    1. Nayar R, Solomon D. Second edition of ‘The Bethesda System for reporting cervical cytology’ – atlas, website, and Bethesda interobserver reproducibility project. Cytojournal. 2004;1:4.
    1. The Atypical Squamous Cells of Undetermined Significance/Low-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesions Triage Study (ALTS) Group. Human papillomavirus testing for triage of women with cytologic evidence of low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions: baseline data from a randomized trial. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000;92:397–402.
    1. Kleter B, van Doorn LJ, Schrauwen L, et al. Development and clinical evaluation of a highly sensitive PCR-reverse hybridization line probe assay for detection and identification of anogenital human papillomavirus. J Clin Microbiol. 1999;37:2508–17.
    1. Kleter B, van Doorn LJ, ter Schegget J, et al. Novel short-fragment PCR assay for highly sensitive broad-spectrum detection of anogenital human papillomaviruses. Am J Pathol. 1998;153:1731–9.
    1. van Doorn LJ, Molijn A, Kleter B, Quint W, Colau B. Highly effective detection of human papillomavirus 16 and 18 DNA by a testing algorithm combining broad-spectrum and type-specific PCR. J Clin Microbiol. 2006;44:3292–8.

Source: PubMed

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

3
Subscribe