Safety and effectiveness of pembrolizumab combined with paclitaxel and cisplatin as neoadjuvant therapy followed by surgery for locally advanced resectable (stage III) esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a study protocol for a prospective, single-arm, single-center, open-label, phase-II trial (Keystone-001)

Xiaobin Shang, Gang Zhao, Fei Liang, Chen Zhang, Weihong Zhang, Liang Liu, Runmei Li, Xiaofeng Duan, Zhao Ma, Jie Yue, Chuangui Chen, Bin Meng, Xiubao Ren, Hongjing Jiang, Xiaobin Shang, Gang Zhao, Fei Liang, Chen Zhang, Weihong Zhang, Liang Liu, Runmei Li, Xiaofeng Duan, Zhao Ma, Jie Yue, Chuangui Chen, Bin Meng, Xiubao Ren, Hongjing Jiang

Abstract

Background: Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is one of the most refractory malignant tumors. Esophageal cancer (EC) is a malignant tumor with a high incidence worldwide, and over 50% of EC cases occur in China. Under the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines, concurrent chemoradiotherapy is the only standard neoadjuvant treatment for locally advanced ESCC. In the first-line treatment of advanced ESCC, the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) combined with systemic chemotherapy is significantly better than that of chemotherapy alone. Paclitaxel and cisplatin (TP), as one of the neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimens for locally advanced ESCC, have been widely used in China in recent years. ICIs combined with TP as neoadjuvant therapy seems promising.

Methods: This is an open-label, single-arm, single-center, phase-II trial. Locally advanced resectable (stage III) ESCC patients who have not undergone previous systemic treatments will be enrolled in this study. All the subjects will intravenously receive 3 cycles of pembrolizumab (200 mg) on day 1, paclitaxel (135 mg/m2) on day 2, and cisplatin (20 mg/m2) on days 2-4, every 3 weeks. After an efficacy evaluation, the subjects will undergo Da Vinci robot-assisted radical resection. If the postoperative pathologic results do not reveal a complete response, pembrolizumab will be administrated for at least 6 cycles as an adjuvant therapy with the same usage as before. The primary endpoints are the major pathological response and safety. The secondary endpoints include the objective response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), the R0 resection rate, and perioperative complications. The exploratory endpoint is to examine the correlation between related biomarkers and tumor responses to this neoadjuvant treatment regimen.

Discussion: This trial is the first enrolled study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of pembrolizumab combined with TP as neoadjuvant therapy for locally advanced ESCC. Currently, under the NCCN guidelines, neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) is the only recommended treatment for locally advanced ESCC. This phase-II study will provide preliminary evidence of the efficacy of pembrolizumab combined with TP as novel neoadjuvant therapy for patients with locally advanced ESCC.

Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov (Identifier: NCT04389177).

Keywords: Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC); locally advanced; neoadjuvant therapy; pembrolizumab.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at https://atm.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/atm-22-513/coif). The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

2022 Annals of Translational Medicine. All rights reserved.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study flowchart.
Figure 2
Figure 2
The therapeutic strategy for the enrolled patients.

References

    1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2016. CA Cancer J Clin 2016;66:7-30. 10.3322/caac.21332
    1. Chen W, Zheng R, Baade PD, et al. Cancer statistics in China, 2015. CA Cancer J Clin 2016;66:115-32. 10.3322/caac.21338
    1. Zeng H, Zheng R, Zhang S, et al. Esophageal cancer statistics in China, 2011: Estimates based on 177 cancer registries. Thorac Cancer 2016;7:232-7. 10.1111/1759-7714.12322
    1. van Hagen P, Hulshof MC, van Lanschot JJ, et al. Preoperative chemoradiotherapy for esophageal or junctional cancer. N Engl J Med 2012;366:2074-84. 10.1056/NEJMoa1112088
    1. Yang H, Liu H, Chen Y, et al. Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy Followed by Surgery Versus Surgery Alone for Locally Advanced Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Esophagus (NEOCRTEC5010): A Phase III Multicenter, Randomized, Open-Label Clinical Trial. J Clin Oncol 2018;36:2796-803. 10.1200/JCO.2018.79.1483
    1. Shapiro J, van Lanschot JJB, Hulshof MCCM, et al. Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy plus surgery versus surgery alone for oesophageal or junctional cancer (CROSS): long-term results of a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 2015;16:1090-8. 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00040-6
    1. Doi T, Piha-Paul SA, Jalal SI, et al. Safety and Antitumor Activity of the Anti-Programmed Death-1 Antibody Pembrolizumab in Patients With Advanced Esophageal Carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 2018;36:61-7. 10.1200/JCO.2017.74.9846
    1. Shah MA, Kojima T, Hochhauser D, et al. Efficacy and Safety of Pembrolizumab for Heavily Pretreated Patients With Advanced, Metastatic Adenocarcinoma or Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Esophagus: The Phase 2 KEYNOTE-180 Study. JAMA Oncol 2019;5:546-50. 10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.5441
    1. Kojima T, Shah MA, Muro K, et al. Randomized Phase III KEYNOTE-181 Study of Pembrolizumab Versus Chemotherapy in Advanced Esophageal Cancer. J Clin Oncol 2020;38:4138-48. 10.1200/JCO.20.01888
    1. Sun JM, Shen L, Shah MA, et al. Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for first-line treatment of advanced oesophageal cancer (KEYNOTE-590): a randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study. Lancet 2021;398:759-71. 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)01234-4
    1. Yamasaki M, Yasuda T, Yano M, et al. Multicenter randomized phase II study of cisplatin and fluorouracil plus docetaxel (DCF) compared with cisplatin and fluorouracil plus Adriamycin (ACF) as preoperative chemotherapy for resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (OGSG1003). Ann Oncol 2017;28:116-20. 10.1093/annonc/mdw439
    1. Zhang P, Xi M, Li QQ, et al. Concurrent cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil versus concurrent cisplatin and docetaxel with radiotherapy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a propensity score-matched analysis. Oncotarget 2016;7:44686-94. 10.18632/oncotarget.9301
    1. Bhansali MS, Vaidya JS, Bhatt RG, et al. Chemotherapy for carcinoma of the esophagus: a comparison of evidence from meta-analyses of randomized trials and of historical control studies. Ann Oncol 1996;7:355-9. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.annonc.a010601
    1. Fokas E, Rödel C. Definitive, Preoperative, and Palliative Radiation Therapy of Esophageal Cancer. Viszeralmedizin 2015;31:347-53.
    1. Ando N, Kato H, Igaki H, et al. A randomized trial comparing postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy with cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil versus preoperative chemotherapy for localized advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus (JCOG9907). Ann Surg Oncol 2012;19:68-74. 10.1245/s10434-011-2049-9
    1. Zheng Y, Li Y, Liu X, et al. Reevaluation of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials Over the Past 20 Years. Medicine (Baltimore) 2015;94:e1102. 10.1097/MD.0000000000001102
    1. Ajani JA, Ilson DH, Daugherty K, et al. Activity of taxol in patients with squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma of the esophagus. J Natl Cancer Inst 1994;86:1086-91. 10.1093/jnci/86.14.1086
    1. Huang X, Huang G, Song H, et al. Preconditioning chemotherapy with paclitaxel and cisplatin enhances the antitumor activity of cytokine induced-killer cells in a murine lung carcinoma model. Int J Cancer 2011;129:648-58. 10.1002/ijc.25702
    1. Hara H, Tahara M, Daiko H, et al. Phase II feasibility study of preoperative chemotherapy with docetaxel, cisplatin, and fluorouracil for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer Sci 2013;104:1455-60. 10.1111/cas.12274

Source: PubMed

3
Subscribe