Accelerometer profiles of physical activity and inactivity in normal weight, overweight, and obese U.S. men and women

Catrine Tudor-Locke, Meghan M Brashear, William D Johnson, Peter T Katzmarzyk, Catrine Tudor-Locke, Meghan M Brashear, William D Johnson, Peter T Katzmarzyk

Abstract

Background: The 2005-2006 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) is used to describe an accelerometer-derived physical activity/inactivity profile in normal weight (BMI < 25 kg/m2), overweight (25 </= BMI < 30 kg/m2), and obese (BMI >/= 30 kg/m2) U.S. adults.

Methods: We computed physical activity volume indicators (activity counts/day, uncensored and censored steps/day), rate indicators (e.g., steps/minute), time indicators (employing NHANES activity counts/minute cut points to infer time in non-wear, sedentary, low, light, moderate, and vigorous intensities), the number of breaks in sedentary time (occasions when activity counts rose from < 100 activity/counts in one minute to >/= 100 activity counts in the subsequent minute), achievement of public health guidelines, and classification by step-defined physical activity levels. Data were examined for evidence of consistent and significant gradients across BMI-defined categories.

Results: In 2005-2006, U.S adults averaged 6,564 +/- SE 107 censored steps/day, and after considering non-wear time, they spent approximately 56.8% of the rest of the waking day in sedentary time, 23.7% in low intensity, 16.7% in light intensity, 2.6% in moderate intensity, and 0.2% in vigorous intensity. Overall, approximately 3.2% of U.S. adults achieved public health guidelines. The normal weight category took 7,190 +/- SE 157 steps/day, and spent 25.7 +/- 0.9 minutes/day in moderate intensity and 7.3 +/- 0.4 minutes/day in vigorous intensity physical activity. The corresponding numbers for the overweight category were 6,879 +/- 140 steps/day, 25.3 +/- 0.9 minutes/day, and 5.3 +/- 0.5 minutes/day and for the obese category 5,784 +/- 124 steps/day, 17.3 +/- 0.7 minutes/day and 3.2 +/- 0.4 minutes/day. Across BMI categories, increasing gradients and significant trends were apparent in males for sedentary time and decreasing gradients and significant trends were evident in time spent in light intensity, moderate intensity, and vigorous intensity. For females, there were only consistent gradients and significant trends apparent for decreasing amounts of time spent in moderate and vigorous intensity.

Conclusions: Simple indicators of physical activity volume (i.e., steps/day) and time in light, moderate or vigorous intensity physical activity differ across BMI categories for both sexes, suggesting that these should continue to be targets for surveillance.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Percent achieving public health guidelines by BMI category (normal weight 2, overweight 25 kg/m2 ≤ BMI < 30 kg/m2, and obese BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2) and sex
Figure 2
Figure 2
Sex-specific percent of the 1,440 minute day represented by all time indicators across BMI categories. * p

Figure 3

Percent of males classified by…

Figure 3

Percent of males classified by step-defined activity levels considering BMI category (normal weight…

Figure 3
Percent of males classified by step-defined activity levels considering BMI category (normal weight = NW, overweight = OW, obese = OB). Bars depict SE.

Figure 4

Percent of females classified by…

Figure 4

Percent of females classified by step-defined activity levels considering BMI category (normal weight…

Figure 4
Percent of females classified by step-defined activity levels considering BMI category (normal weight = NW, overweight = OW, obese = OB). Bars depict SE.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Percent of males classified by step-defined activity levels considering BMI category (normal weight = NW, overweight = OW, obese = OB). Bars depict SE.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Percent of females classified by step-defined activity levels considering BMI category (normal weight = NW, overweight = OW, obese = OB). Bars depict SE.

References

    1. Ogden CL, Carroll MD, McDowell MA, Flegal KM. Obesity among adults in the United States--no statistically significant chance since 2003-2004. NCHS Data Brief. 2007. pp. 1–8.
    1. Centers for Disease Control (CDC) Physical activity trends--United States, 1990-1998. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2001;50:166–169.
    1. Centers for Disease Control (CDC) Prevalence of regular physical activity among adults--United States, 2001 and 2005. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2007;56:1209–1212.
    1. McCrory MA, Suen VM, Roberts SB. Biobehavioral influences on energy intake and adult weight gain. J Nutr. 2002;132:3830S–3834S.
    1. Sobolski JC, Kolesar JJ, Kornitzer MD, De Backer GG, Mikes Z, Dramaix MM, Degre SG, Denolin HF. Physical fitness does not reflect physical activity patterns in middle-aged workers. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1988;20:6–13. doi: 10.1249/00005768-198802000-00002.
    1. Lanningham-Foster L, Nysse LJ, Levine JA. Labor saved, calories lost: the energetic impact of domestic labor-saving devices. Obes Res. 2003;11:1178–1181. doi: 10.1038/oby.2003.162.
    1. Nielsen reports television tuning remains at record levels, digital video recorders grow in popularity.
    1. Katzmarzyk PT, Mason C. The physical activity transition. J Phys Act Health. 2009;6:269–280.
    1. Sturm R. The economics of physical activity: societal trends and rationales for interventions. Am J Prev Med. 2004;27:126–135. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2004.06.013.
    1. Hill JO, Wyatt HR, Reed GW, Peters JC. Obesity and the environment: where do we go from here? Science. 2003;299:853–855. doi: 10.1126/science.1079857.
    1. Bassett DR Jr, Schneider PL, Huntington GE. Physical activity in an Old Order Amish community. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2004;36:79–85. doi: 10.1249/01.MSS.0000106184.71258.32.
    1. Wyatt HR, Peters JC, Reed GW, Barry M, Hill JO. A Colorado statewide survey of walking and its relation to excessive weight. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2005;37:724–730. doi: 10.1249/01.MSS.0000161750.84096.D4.
    1. Tudor-Locke C, Ham SA, Macera CA, Ainsworth BE, Kirtland KA, Reis JP, Kimsey CD Jr. Descriptive epidemiology of pedometer-determined physical activity. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2004;36:1567–1573. doi: 10.1249/01.MSS.0000139806.53824.2E.
    1. Monda KL, Gordon-Larsen P, Stevens J, Popkin BM. China's transition: the effect of rapid urbanization on adult occupational physical activity. Soc Sci Med. 2007;64:858–870. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2006.10.019.
    1. Esliger DW, Tremblay MS. Physical activity and inactivity profiling: the next generation. Can J Public Health. 2007;98(Suppl 2):S195–207.
    1. Strath SJ, Holleman RG, Ronis DL, Swartz AM, Richardson CR. Objective physical activity accumulation in bouts and nonbouts and relation to markers of obesity in US adults. Prev Chronic Dis. 2008;5:A131.
    1. Troiano RP, Berrigan D, Dodd KW, Masse LC, Tilert T, McDowell M. Physical activity in the United States measured by accelerometer. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2008;40:181–188.
    1. Matthews CE, Chen KY, Freedson PS, Buchowski MS, Beech BM, Pate RR, Troiano RP. Amount of time spent in sedentary behaviors in the United States, 2003-2004. Am J Epidemiol. 2008;167:875–881. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwm390.
    1. Tudor-Locke C, Johnson WD, Katzmarzyk PT. Accelerometer-determined steps per day in US adults. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2009;41:1384–1391. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e318199885c.
    1. Tudor-Locke C, Ainsworth BE, Thompson RW, Matthews CE. Comparison of pedometer and accelerometer measures of free-living physical activity. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2002;34:2045–2051. doi: 10.1097/00005768-200205001-01283.
    1. Healy GN, Dunstan DW, Salmon J, Cerin E, Shaw JE, Zimmet PZ, Owen N. Breaks in sedentary time: beneficial associations with metabolic risk. Diabetes Care. 2008;31:661–666. doi: 10.2337/dc07-2046.
    1. National Institutes of Health. Clinical guidelines on the identification, evaluation, and treatment of overweight and obesity in adults: The evidence report. Rockville, MD.: National Institutes of Health; 1998.
    1. Masse LC, Fulton JE, Watson KL, Mahar MT, Meyers MC, Wong WW. Influence of body composition on physical activity validation studies using doubly labeled water. J Appl Physiol. 2004;96:1357–1364. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00901.2003.
    1. Le Masurier GC, Tudor-Locke C. Comparison of pedometer and accelerometer accuracy under controlled conditions. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2003;35:867–871. doi: 10.1249/01.MSS.0000064996.63632.10.
    1. Le Masurier GC, Lee SM, Tudor-Locke C. Motion sensor accuracy under controlled and free-living conditions. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2004;36:905–910. doi: 10.1249/01.MSS.0000126777.50188.73.
    1. Tudor-Locke C, Bassett DR Jr. How many steps/day are enough? Preliminary pedometer indices for public health. Sports Med. 2004;34:1–8. doi: 10.2165/00007256-200434010-00001.
    1. Bassett DR, Jr, Wyatt HR, Thompson H, Peters JC, Hill JO. Pedometer-measured physical activity and health behaviors in United States adults. Med Sci Sports Exerc. in press .
    1. Tudor-Locke C, Hatano Y, Pangrazi RP, Kang M. Revisiting "how many steps are enough?". Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2008;40:S537–543. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e31817c7133.
    1. Ekelund U, Brage S, Besson H, Sharp S, Wareham NJ. Time spent being sedentary and weight gain in healthy adults: reverse or bidirectional causality? Am J Clin Nutr. 2008;88:612–617.
    1. Ekelund U, Brage S, Franks PW, Hennings S, Emms S, Wong MY, Wareham NJ. Physical activity energy expenditure predicts changes in body composition in middle-aged healthy whites: effect modification by age. Am J Clin Nutr. 2005;81:964–969.
    1. Hamilton MT, Hamilton DG, Zderic TW. Role of low energy expenditure and sitting in obesity, metabolic syndrome, type 2 diabetes, and cardiovascular disease. Diabetes. 2007;56:2655–2667. doi: 10.2337/db07-0882.
    1. Ball K, Brown W, Crawford D. Who does not gain weight? Prevalence and predictors of weight maintenance in young women. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2002;26:1570–1578. doi: 10.1038/sj.ijo.0802150.
    1. Brown WJ, Miller YD, Miller R. Sitting time and work patterns as indicators of overweight and obesity in Australian adults. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2003;27:1340–1346. doi: 10.1038/sj.ijo.0802426.
    1. Healy GN, Wijndaele K, Dunstan DW, Shaw JE, Salmon J, Zimmet PZ, Owen N. Objectively measured sedentary time, physical activity, and metabolic risk: the Australian Diabetes, Obesity and Lifestyle Study (AusDiab) Diabetes Care. 2008;31:369–371. doi: 10.2337/dc07-1795.
    1. Lopes VP, Magalhaes P, Bragada J, Vasques C. Actigraph calibration in obese/overweight and type 2 diabetes mellitus middle-aged to old adult patients. J Phys Act Health. 2009;6(Suppl 1):S133–140.
    1. Hibbert JM, Broemeling LD, Isenberg JN, Wolfe RR. Determinants of free-living energy expenditure in normal weight and obese women measured by doubly labeled water. Obes Res. 1994;2:44–53.
    1. Tudor-Locke C, Giles-Corti B, Knuiman M, McCormack G. Tracking of pedometer-determined physical activity in adults who relocate: results from RESIDE. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2008;5:39. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-5-39.
    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Prevalence of no leisure-time physical activity--35 States and the District of Columbia, 1988-2002. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2004;53:82–86.

Source: PubMed

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

3
Subscribe