Functional SARS-CoV-2-Specific Immune Memory Persists after Mild COVID-19

Lauren B Rodda, Jason Netland, Laila Shehata, Kurt B Pruner, Peter A Morawski, Christopher D Thouvenel, Kennidy K Takehara, Julie Eggenberger, Emily A Hemann, Hayley R Waterman, Mitchell L Fahning, Yu Chen, Malika Hale, Jennifer Rathe, Caleb Stokes, Samuel Wrenn, Brooke Fiala, Lauren Carter, Jessica A Hamerman, Neil P King, Michael Gale Jr, Daniel J Campbell, David J Rawlings, Marion Pepper, Lauren B Rodda, Jason Netland, Laila Shehata, Kurt B Pruner, Peter A Morawski, Christopher D Thouvenel, Kennidy K Takehara, Julie Eggenberger, Emily A Hemann, Hayley R Waterman, Mitchell L Fahning, Yu Chen, Malika Hale, Jennifer Rathe, Caleb Stokes, Samuel Wrenn, Brooke Fiala, Lauren Carter, Jessica A Hamerman, Neil P King, Michael Gale Jr, Daniel J Campbell, David J Rawlings, Marion Pepper

Abstract

The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) virus is causing a global pandemic, and cases continue to rise. Most infected individuals experience mildly symptomatic coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), but it is unknown whether this can induce persistent immune memory that could contribute to immunity. We performed a longitudinal assessment of individuals recovered from mild COVID-19 to determine whether they develop and sustain multifaceted SARS-CoV-2-specific immunological memory. Recovered individuals developed SARS-CoV-2-specific immunoglobulin (IgG) antibodies, neutralizing plasma, and memory B and memory T cells that persisted for at least 3 months. Our data further reveal that SARS-CoV-2-specific IgG memory B cells increased over time. Additionally, SARS-CoV-2-specific memory lymphocytes exhibited characteristics associated with potent antiviral function: memory T cells secreted cytokines and expanded upon antigen re-encounter, whereas memory B cells expressed receptors capable of neutralizing virus when expressed as monoclonal antibodies. Therefore, mild COVID-19 elicits memory lymphocytes that persist and display functional hallmarks of antiviral immunity.

Keywords: COVID-19; SARS-CoV2; adaptive immune response; human; memory B cell; memory T cell; monoclonal antibody; vaccine.

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Interests M.P., D.J.R., J.N., C.D.T., Y.C., and L.B.R. have filed a patent under the provisional serial no. 63/063,841. Other authors declare no competing interests.

Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Figures

Graphical abstract
Graphical abstract
Figure 1
Figure 1
Mild COVID-19 Induces Persistent, Neutralizing Anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG Antibody (A) Study timeline. Range is indicated by box and median indicated by line for each event. (B) ELISA dilution curves and AUC for anti-RBD IgG (left), IgM (center), and IgA (right) from HC and CoV2+ plasma samples at Visit 1 (V1) and Visit 2 (V2). Dashed line indicates mean + 3 SD of the HC AUC values. (C) Comparing V1 and V2 AUC in HC and CoV2+ individuals for each antibody isotype. V2 AUC values were normalized to V1 samples run with V2 samples. (D) Percent inhibition of RBD binding to ACE2 by plasma sVNT at 1:2 plasma dilution. (E) Spearman correlation between percent RBD inhibition by sVNT at a 1:2 plasma dilution and anti-RBD IgG AUC at both visits. (F) Percent RBD inhibition at 1:2 plasma dilution at V1 and V2, paired by sample. (G) Spearman correlation between percent RBD inhibition by sVNT at a 1:2 plasma dilution and percent virus neutralization by PRNT at a 1:160 plasma dilution. (H) CoV2+ percent virus neutralization by PRNT at a 1:160 plasma dilution normalized and paired as in (C). Statistics for unpaired data determined by 2-tailed Mann-Whitney tests and, for paired data, by 2-tailed Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. Multiple testing correction significance cutoff at FDR = 0.05 is p value 

Figure S1

Healthy Controls Do Not Have…

Figure S1

Healthy Controls Do Not Have SARS-CoV-2 RBD or Spike-Specific Antibodies, Related to Figure…

Figure S1
Healthy Controls Do Not Have SARS-CoV-2 RBD or Spike-Specific Antibodies, Related to Figure 1 ELISA dilution curves and area under the curve (AUC) for anti-RBD and anti-spike IgG (left) and IgM (right) in plasma collected from individuals prior to 2020 and the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic (historical negatives, HN, black), from healthy controls (HC, at Visit 2) and from individuals that tested PCR+ for SARS-CoV-2 (CoV2+, at Visit 1). Dashed line indicates mean + 3 SD of HN AUC values. Statistics determined by two-tailed Mann-Whitney tests. Multiple testing correction significance cutoff at FDR = 0.05 is p value 

Figure S2

PBMC Innate Populations in CoV2…

Figure S2

PBMC Innate Populations in CoV2 + Individuals Return to Immune Quiescence by Visit…

Figure S2
PBMC Innate Populations in CoV2+ Individuals Return to Immune Quiescence by Visit 1, Related to Figure 1 (A) Flow cytometry gating for CD15-CD3-CD19-CD56-HLADR+CD14+ monocytes (purple gate), which were further divided into CD14loCD16+ (red gate), CD14+CD16+ (blue gate), and CD14+CD16- monocytes (green gate), and CD15-CD3-CD19-CD56-CD14-CD304+CD123+ plasmacytoid dendritic cells (pDCs) (pink gate). (B) Percent monocytes and pDCs of live PBMCs from healthy controls (HC) and previously SARS-CoV-2 infected (CoV2+) individuals. (C) Percent subsets of monocytes from PBMCs. Statistics determined by two-tailed Mann-Whitney tests. Multiple testing correction significance cutoff at FDR = 0.05 is p value 

Figure S3

Bulk PBMCs Return to Immune…

Figure S3

Bulk PBMCs Return to Immune Quiescence by Visit 1, Related to Figure 1…

Figure S3
Bulk PBMCs Return to Immune Quiescence by Visit 1, Related to Figure 1 (A and B) Representative flow cytometry plots and frequencies of αβ and γδ T cell subsets at Visit 1 (V1) in PBMCs from healthy control (HC) and SARS-CoV-2-recovered (CoV2+) individuals. (C and D) Representative flow cytometry plots and frequencies of CD4+ and CD8+ T cell effector/activation states (Ki67+, T-bet+, HLA-DR+CD38+) of total non-naive, memory CD45RA+CCR7+/− CD4+ or CD8+ T cells at V1 in HC and CoV2+ PBMCs. (E and F) Representative flow cytometry plots and frequencies of CD4+ memory and T-helper subsets at V1 in HC and CoV2+ PBMCs. (G and H) Representative flow cytometry plots and frequencies of cTfh (CXCR5+CD45RA-) and cTfh activation (ICOS+PD-1+) and helper (CXCR3+/−CCR6+/−) subsets at V1 in HC and CoV2+ PBMCs. (I) Frequency of B cells (CD19+CD3-) at V1 in HC and CoV2+ PBMCs. Statistics determined by two-tailed Mann-Whitney tests. Multiple testing correction significance cutoff at FDR = 0.05 is p value 

Figure S4

Mild COVID-19 Induces Persistent, Neutralizing…

Figure S4

Mild COVID-19 Induces Persistent, Neutralizing Anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG Antibody, Related to Figure 1 (A)…

Figure S4
Mild COVID-19 Induces Persistent, Neutralizing Anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG Antibody, Related to Figure 1 (A) ELISA dilution curves and area under the curve (AUC) for anti-spike IgG (left), IgM (center), and IgA (right) from healthy control (HC) and SARS-CoV-2-recovered (CoV2+) individuals plasma at Visit 1 (V1). Dashed line indicates mean + 3 SD of the HC AUC values. (B) Spearman correlation of V1 anti-RBD and anti-spike IgG (left), IgM (center), and IgA (right) AUC. Statistics determined by two-tailed Mann-Whitney tests. Multiple testing correction significance cutoff at FDR = 0.05 is p value 

Figure S5

Mild COVID-19 Induces a Sustained…

Figure S5

Mild COVID-19 Induces a Sustained Enrichment of RBD-Specific IgG + Memory B Cells,…

Figure S5
Mild COVID-19 Induces a Sustained Enrichment of RBD-Specific IgG+ Memory B Cells, Related to Figure 2 (A) Representative flow cytometry gates for phenotyping RBD-specific B cells from PBMCs in Figure 2 set on total B cells from a healthy control (HC) (surface stain, top; intracellular stain, bottom). (B) Number of RBD-specific IgD+, IgM+ and IgA+ MBCs (CD20+RBD tetramer+decoy tetramer- CD27+CD21+/CD27+CD21-/CD27-CD21-) from healthy control (HC) and SARS-CoV-2-recovered (CoV2+) PBMCs at Visit 1 (V1) and Visit 2 (V2). Statistics for unpaired data determined by two-tailed Mann-Whitney tests and, for paired data, by two-tailed Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. Multiple testing correction significance cutoff at FDR = 0.05 is p value 

Figure 2

Mild COVID-19 Induces a Sustained…

Figure 2

Mild COVID-19 Induces a Sustained Enrichment of RBD-Specific IgG + Memory B Cells…

Figure 2
Mild COVID-19 Induces a Sustained Enrichment of RBD-Specific IgG+ Memory B Cells (A) Representative gating of live CD3–CD14–CD16– cells for SARS-CoV-2 RBD-specific cells (RBD tetramer+decoy tetramer–) from CoV2+ and HC PBMCs at V1 and V2. (B) Number of RBD-specific B cells (RBD tetramer+decoy tetramer–CD20+) per 1 × 106 PBMCs. (C) Representative flow cytometry plots and number of RBD-specific PBs (RBD tetramer+decoy tetramer−CD20−CD138hi) (na = could not be calculated because all values 0). (D) Representative gating of RBD-specific B cells for naive B cells (CD21+CD27−) and MBCs (CD21+CD27+/CD21–CD27+/CD21–CD27– populations outlined in green). (E) Proportion of RBD-specific B cells that are naive (CD21+CD27−), classical MBCs (CD21+CD27+), or activated MBCs (CD21−CD27+/−), statistics for the proportion that are MBCs. (F) Number of RBD-specific MBCs (classical and activated). (G) Representative gating of RBD-specific MBCs for BCR isotype (IgD, IgM, IgA, and IgG) expression. (H) Proportion of RBD-specific MBCs expressing the BCR isotypes IgD, IgM, IgA, and IgG. Statistics are for the proportion that are IgG+. (I) Number of RBD-specific IgG+ MBCs. (J) Representative gating of RBD-specific MBCs for T-bet expression and number of RBD-specific T-bet+ MBCs. Statistics for unpaired data determined by 2-tailed Mann-Whitney tests and, for paired data, by 2-tailed Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. Multiple testing correction significance cutoff at FDR = 0.05 is p value 

Figure 3

SARS-CoV-2 Infection Induces Durable, Functional…

Figure 3

SARS-CoV-2 Infection Induces Durable, Functional Spike-Reactive CD4 + T Cells (A) Representative flow…

Figure 3
SARS-CoV-2 Infection Induces Durable, Functional Spike-Reactive CD4+ T Cells (A) Representative flow cytometry plots of ICOS and CD40L expression on antigen-experienced (non-CD45RA+CCR7+) CD4+ T cells 20 h after incubation of PBMCs from HC and CoV2+ individuals at V1 and V2 with vehicle or SARS-CoV-2 spike. (B) Number of antigen-experienced ICOS+CD40L+CD4+ T cells per 1x106 CD4+ T cells from HC and CoV2+ samples after incubation with vehicle (Veh.) or spike (S) at both time points (right) and calculated number of spike-responsive CD4+ T cells (number after incubation with spike minus number after incubation with vehicle) compared across time points (left). (C) Number of antigen-experienced CXCR5+ICOS+CD40L+CD4+ T cells (cTfh) per 1 × 106 CD4+ T cells from HC and CoV2+ samples after incubation with Veh. or S at both time points (right) and calculated number of spike-responsive cTfh cells (number after incubation with spike minus number after incubation with vehicle) compared across time points (left). (D) Representative flow cytometry plots of sorted CD4+ naive (CD45RA+CCR7+), TCM (CD45RA−CCR7+), or TEM (CD45RA−CCR7−) T cells from HC and CoV2+ PBMCs after 5–6 days of co-culture with SARS-CoV-2 spike-protein-pulsed autologous monocytes and measuring proliferation by CPD dilution. (E) SARS-CoV-2 spike-specific expansion of sorted CD4+ naive T, TCM, and TEM cells from V1 (circles) and V2 (squares) reported as frequency of CXCR3+CPDlo cells after incubation with spike minus frequency after incubation with vehicle. (F) Number of cytokine-producing, antigen-experienced CD69+CD4+ T cells per 1 × 106 CD4+ T cells after incubation with Veh. or S (right) and calculated number of spike-responsive, cytokine-producing CD4+ T cells (number after incubation with spike minus number after incubation with vehicle) (left). (G) Frequency of antigen-experienced CD69+CD4+ T cell subsets, CCR6+/− Teff (CXCR5−), and CCR6+/− cTfh (CXCR5+) producing IL-2, IFN-γ, and IL-17A effector cytokines after incubation with spike for 20 h. (H) Representative flow cytometry plots of CD69 and IFN-γ expression on antigen-experienced CD8+ T cells from HC and CoV2+ PBMCs at V2 after 20 h of incubation with vehicle or SARS-CoV-2 spike. (I) Number of antigen-experienced IFN-γ+CD69+CD8+ T cells per 1 × 106 CD8+ T cells after 20 h of incubation with Veh. or S (right) and calculated number of spike-responsive CD8+ T cells (number after incubation with spike minus number after incubation with vehicle) (left). Statistics for unpaired data determined by 2-tailed Mann-Whitney tests and, for paired data, by 2-tailed Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. Multiple testing correction significance cutoff at FDR = 0.05 is p value 

Figure S6

SARS-CoV-2 Infection Induces Durable, Functional…

Figure S6

SARS-CoV-2 Infection Induces Durable, Functional Spike-Reactive CD4 + T Cells, Related to Figure…

Figure S6
SARS-CoV-2 Infection Induces Durable, Functional Spike-Reactive CD4+ T Cells, Related to Figure 3 (A) Flow cytometry sorting strategy for naive, T central memory (TCM), and T effector memory (TEM) cells from HC and CoV2+ PBMCs at Visit 1 and Visit 2 before 5-6 days of culture with autologous monocytes and SARS-CoV-2 spike protein or vehicle. (B) Representative flow cytometry gating on PMA/Ionomycin-activated PBMCs for cytokine expression by antigen experienced (non-CD45RA+CCR7+) CD4+ T cells subset into CCR6+/− T effector cells (Teff, CXCR5-) and circulating T follicular helper cells (cTfh, CXCR5+). (C) Representative flow cytometry gating on antigen-experienced (non-CD45RA+CCR7+) CD4+ T cells from HC and CoV2+ V2 PBMCs following incubation with SARS-CoV-2 spike for 20 h. Gating on CD69+ CCR6+/− T effector cells (Teff, CXCR5-) and CCR6+/− circulating T follicular helper cells (cTfh, CXCR5+) for IL-2, IFN-γ and IL-17A effector cytokines expression. (D) Number of IL-4-producing, antigen-experienced CD69+CD4+ T cells per 1x106 CD4+ T cells after incubation with vehicle (Veh.) or SARS-CoV2 spike (S) (left) and calculated number of spike-responsive, cytokine-producing CD4+ T cells (number after incubation with spike minus number after incubation with vehicle)(right). Statistics determined by two-tailed Mann-Whitney tests. Multiple testing correction significance cutoff at FDR = 0.05 is p value 

Figure S7

SARS-CoV-2-Specific MBCs Can Express Neutralizing…

Figure S7

SARS-CoV-2-Specific MBCs Can Express Neutralizing Antibodies, Related to Figure 4 and Table S1…

Figure S7
SARS-CoV-2-Specific MBCs Can Express Neutralizing Antibodies, Related to Figure 4 and Table S1 (A) Gating strategy for sorting RBD-specific B cells. (B) IgG ELISA to confirm expression of Visit 1 antibodies in transfected cell culture supernatants. Positive control is the kit standard (std) and negative control is supernatant from untransfected cells (no trans, green). (C) RBD ELISA of purified Visit 1 monoclonal antibodies. Negative control (green) is an irrelevant Plasmodium-specific antibody. (D) IgG ELISA to confirm expression of Visit 2 antibodies in transfected cell culture supernatants. (E) RBD ELISA of purified Visit 2 monoclonal antibodies. (F) Number of mutations in variable regions of RBD-specific monoclonal antibodies. (G) Mutation frequency of variable regions of RBD-specific monoclonal antibodies. Statistics determined by two-tailed Mann-Whitney tests. Multiple testing correction significance cutoff at FDR = 0.05 is p value 

Figure 4

SARS-CoV-2-Specific MBCs Can Express Neutralizing…

Figure 4

SARS-CoV-2-Specific MBCs Can Express Neutralizing Antibodies (A) Representative flow plots of index-sorted RBD-tetramer…

Figure 4
SARS-CoV-2-Specific MBCs Can Express Neutralizing Antibodies (A) Representative flow plots of index-sorted RBD-tetramer specific B cells (gating scheme in Figure S7A). BCRs cloned from cells are shown in red. (B) Anti-RBD ELISA of culture supernatants from cells transfected to express one of the Visit 1 monoclonal antibodies or supernatant from untransfected cells (no trans). Antibodies that did not bind RBD are shown in orange. (C) Inhibition of RBD binding to ACE2 by Visit 1 monoclonal antibody supernatants measured by sVNT assay, compared to a known RBD-specific neutralizing antibody (Ty1). Red indicates strong inhibitors, blue moderate inhibitors and black non-inhibitors. (D) Anti-RBD ELISA of culture supernatants from cells transfected to express one of the Visit 2 monoclonal antibodies. Antibodies that did not bind RBD are shown in orange. (E) Inhibition of RBD binding to ACE2 by Visit 2 monoclonal antibodies measured by sVNT assay. Red indicates strong inhibitors and black non-inhibitors. (F) Neutralization capacity of purified monoclonal antibodies as measured by PRNT. 2B04 and 2C02 are previously identified strong and weak neutralizing murine antibodies, respectively, and MSP-003 is an irrelevant Plasmodium-specific antibody. (G) IC50 values calculated from PRNT. Dotted line represents the limit of detection. See also Figure S7.

Figure 5

Recovered Individuals Formed Multifaceted SARS-CoV-2-Specific…

Figure 5

Recovered Individuals Formed Multifaceted SARS-CoV-2-Specific Immune Memory Heatmap of values for independent SARS-CoV2…

Figure 5
Recovered Individuals Formed Multifaceted SARS-CoV-2-Specific Immune Memory Heatmap of values for independent SARS-CoV2 RBD- or spike-specific immune memory components from each HC and CoV2+ individual at Visit 2. RBD-specific IgG measured by ELISA (AUC). Percent inhibition by sVNT calculated at 1:2 plasma dilution. Number of RBD-specific IgG+ MBCs per 1 × 106 PBMCs. Number of spike-responsive (CD69+), cytokine-producing (IL-2/IFN-γ/IL-17A), antigen-experienced CD4+ T cells calculated by number after 20 h incubation with spike minus number after incubation with vehicle. Number of spike-responsive (CD69+IFN-γ+), antigen-experienced CD8+ T cells calculated by number after 20 h incubation with spike minus number after incubation with vehicle. The color scales are set for each metric (row) with the mean + 1 SD of the HC set to white.
All figures (13)
Update of
  • Functional SARS-CoV-2-specific immune memory persists after mild COVID-19.
    Rodda LB, Netland J, Shehata L, Pruner KB, Morawski PM, Thouvenel C, Takehara KK, Eggenberger J, Hemann EA, Waterman HR, Fahning ML, Chen Y, Rathe J, Stokes C, Wrenn S, Fiala B, Carter LP, Hamerman JA, King NP, Gale M, Campbell DJ, Rawlings D, Pepper M. Rodda LB, et al. medRxiv. 2020 Aug 15:2020.08.11.20171843. doi: 10.1101/2020.08.11.20171843. Preprint. medRxiv. 2020. PMID: 32817957 Free PMC article. Updated.
  • Functional SARS-CoV-2-specific immune memory persists after mild COVID-19.
    Rodda LB, Netland J, Shehata L, Pruner KB, Morawski PA, Thouvenel C, Takehara KK, Eggenberger J, Hemann E, Waterman HR, Fahning ML, Chen Y, Rathe J, Stokes C, Wrenn S, Fiala B, Carter L, Hamerman JA, King NP, Gale M Jr, Campbell DJ, Rawlings D, Pepper M. Rodda LB, et al. Res Sq. 2020 Aug 13:rs.3.rs-57112. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-57112/v1. Preprint. Res Sq. 2020. PMID: 32818218 Free PMC article. Updated.
Similar articles
Cited by
References
    1. Addetia A., Crawford K.H.D., Dingens A., Zhu H., Roychoudhury P., Huang M.-L., Jerome K.R., Bloom J.D., Greninger A.L. Neutralizing Antibodies Correlate with Protection from SARS-CoV-2 in Humans during a Fishery Vessel Outbreak with a High Attack Rate. J. Clin. Microbiology. 2020;58 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ahmed R., Gray D. Immunological memory and protective immunity: understanding their relation. Science. 1996;272:54–60. - PubMed
    1. Alamyar E., et al. IMGT(®) tools for the nucleotide analysis of immunoglobulin (IG) and T cell receptor (TR) V-(D)-J repertoires, polymorphisms, and IG mutations: IMGT/V-QUEST and IMGT/HighV-QUEST for NGS. Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) 882(Chapter. 2012;32:569–604. - PubMed
    1. Alsoussi W.B., Turner J.S., Case J.B., Zhao H., Schmitz A.J., Zhou J.Q., Chen R.E., Lei T., Rizk A.A., McIntire K.M., et al. A Potently Neutralizing Antibody Protects Mice against SARS-CoV-2 Infection. J. Immunol. 2020;205:915–922. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Amanat F., Stadlbauer D., Strohmeier S., Nguyen T.H.O., Chromikova V., McMahon M., Jiang K., Arunkumar G.A., Jurczyszak D., Polanco J., et al. A serological assay to detect SARS-CoV-2 seroconversion in humans. Nat. Med. 2020;26:1033–1036. - PMC - PubMed
Show all 63 references
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
[x]
Cite
Copy Download .nbib
Format: AMA APA MLA NLM

NCBI Literature Resources

MeSH PMC Bookshelf Disclaimer

The PubMed wordmark and PubMed logo are registered trademarks of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). Unauthorized use of these marks is strictly prohibited.

Follow NCBI
Figure S1
Figure S1
Healthy Controls Do Not Have SARS-CoV-2 RBD or Spike-Specific Antibodies, Related to Figure 1 ELISA dilution curves and area under the curve (AUC) for anti-RBD and anti-spike IgG (left) and IgM (right) in plasma collected from individuals prior to 2020 and the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic (historical negatives, HN, black), from healthy controls (HC, at Visit 2) and from individuals that tested PCR+ for SARS-CoV-2 (CoV2+, at Visit 1). Dashed line indicates mean + 3 SD of HN AUC values. Statistics determined by two-tailed Mann-Whitney tests. Multiple testing correction significance cutoff at FDR = 0.05 is p value 

Figure S2

PBMC Innate Populations in CoV2…

Figure S2

PBMC Innate Populations in CoV2 + Individuals Return to Immune Quiescence by Visit…

Figure S2
PBMC Innate Populations in CoV2+ Individuals Return to Immune Quiescence by Visit 1, Related to Figure 1 (A) Flow cytometry gating for CD15-CD3-CD19-CD56-HLADR+CD14+ monocytes (purple gate), which were further divided into CD14loCD16+ (red gate), CD14+CD16+ (blue gate), and CD14+CD16- monocytes (green gate), and CD15-CD3-CD19-CD56-CD14-CD304+CD123+ plasmacytoid dendritic cells (pDCs) (pink gate). (B) Percent monocytes and pDCs of live PBMCs from healthy controls (HC) and previously SARS-CoV-2 infected (CoV2+) individuals. (C) Percent subsets of monocytes from PBMCs. Statistics determined by two-tailed Mann-Whitney tests. Multiple testing correction significance cutoff at FDR = 0.05 is p value 

Figure S3

Bulk PBMCs Return to Immune…

Figure S3

Bulk PBMCs Return to Immune Quiescence by Visit 1, Related to Figure 1…

Figure S3
Bulk PBMCs Return to Immune Quiescence by Visit 1, Related to Figure 1 (A and B) Representative flow cytometry plots and frequencies of αβ and γδ T cell subsets at Visit 1 (V1) in PBMCs from healthy control (HC) and SARS-CoV-2-recovered (CoV2+) individuals. (C and D) Representative flow cytometry plots and frequencies of CD4+ and CD8+ T cell effector/activation states (Ki67+, T-bet+, HLA-DR+CD38+) of total non-naive, memory CD45RA+CCR7+/− CD4+ or CD8+ T cells at V1 in HC and CoV2+ PBMCs. (E and F) Representative flow cytometry plots and frequencies of CD4+ memory and T-helper subsets at V1 in HC and CoV2+ PBMCs. (G and H) Representative flow cytometry plots and frequencies of cTfh (CXCR5+CD45RA-) and cTfh activation (ICOS+PD-1+) and helper (CXCR3+/−CCR6+/−) subsets at V1 in HC and CoV2+ PBMCs. (I) Frequency of B cells (CD19+CD3-) at V1 in HC and CoV2+ PBMCs. Statistics determined by two-tailed Mann-Whitney tests. Multiple testing correction significance cutoff at FDR = 0.05 is p value 

Figure S4

Mild COVID-19 Induces Persistent, Neutralizing…

Figure S4

Mild COVID-19 Induces Persistent, Neutralizing Anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG Antibody, Related to Figure 1 (A)…

Figure S4
Mild COVID-19 Induces Persistent, Neutralizing Anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG Antibody, Related to Figure 1 (A) ELISA dilution curves and area under the curve (AUC) for anti-spike IgG (left), IgM (center), and IgA (right) from healthy control (HC) and SARS-CoV-2-recovered (CoV2+) individuals plasma at Visit 1 (V1). Dashed line indicates mean + 3 SD of the HC AUC values. (B) Spearman correlation of V1 anti-RBD and anti-spike IgG (left), IgM (center), and IgA (right) AUC. Statistics determined by two-tailed Mann-Whitney tests. Multiple testing correction significance cutoff at FDR = 0.05 is p value 

Figure S5

Mild COVID-19 Induces a Sustained…

Figure S5

Mild COVID-19 Induces a Sustained Enrichment of RBD-Specific IgG + Memory B Cells,…

Figure S5
Mild COVID-19 Induces a Sustained Enrichment of RBD-Specific IgG+ Memory B Cells, Related to Figure 2 (A) Representative flow cytometry gates for phenotyping RBD-specific B cells from PBMCs in Figure 2 set on total B cells from a healthy control (HC) (surface stain, top; intracellular stain, bottom). (B) Number of RBD-specific IgD+, IgM+ and IgA+ MBCs (CD20+RBD tetramer+decoy tetramer- CD27+CD21+/CD27+CD21-/CD27-CD21-) from healthy control (HC) and SARS-CoV-2-recovered (CoV2+) PBMCs at Visit 1 (V1) and Visit 2 (V2). Statistics for unpaired data determined by two-tailed Mann-Whitney tests and, for paired data, by two-tailed Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. Multiple testing correction significance cutoff at FDR = 0.05 is p value 

Figure 2

Mild COVID-19 Induces a Sustained…

Figure 2

Mild COVID-19 Induces a Sustained Enrichment of RBD-Specific IgG + Memory B Cells…

Figure 2
Mild COVID-19 Induces a Sustained Enrichment of RBD-Specific IgG+ Memory B Cells (A) Representative gating of live CD3–CD14–CD16– cells for SARS-CoV-2 RBD-specific cells (RBD tetramer+decoy tetramer–) from CoV2+ and HC PBMCs at V1 and V2. (B) Number of RBD-specific B cells (RBD tetramer+decoy tetramer–CD20+) per 1 × 106 PBMCs. (C) Representative flow cytometry plots and number of RBD-specific PBs (RBD tetramer+decoy tetramer−CD20−CD138hi) (na = could not be calculated because all values 0). (D) Representative gating of RBD-specific B cells for naive B cells (CD21+CD27−) and MBCs (CD21+CD27+/CD21–CD27+/CD21–CD27– populations outlined in green). (E) Proportion of RBD-specific B cells that are naive (CD21+CD27−), classical MBCs (CD21+CD27+), or activated MBCs (CD21−CD27+/−), statistics for the proportion that are MBCs. (F) Number of RBD-specific MBCs (classical and activated). (G) Representative gating of RBD-specific MBCs for BCR isotype (IgD, IgM, IgA, and IgG) expression. (H) Proportion of RBD-specific MBCs expressing the BCR isotypes IgD, IgM, IgA, and IgG. Statistics are for the proportion that are IgG+. (I) Number of RBD-specific IgG+ MBCs. (J) Representative gating of RBD-specific MBCs for T-bet expression and number of RBD-specific T-bet+ MBCs. Statistics for unpaired data determined by 2-tailed Mann-Whitney tests and, for paired data, by 2-tailed Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. Multiple testing correction significance cutoff at FDR = 0.05 is p value 

Figure 3

SARS-CoV-2 Infection Induces Durable, Functional…

Figure 3

SARS-CoV-2 Infection Induces Durable, Functional Spike-Reactive CD4 + T Cells (A) Representative flow…

Figure 3
SARS-CoV-2 Infection Induces Durable, Functional Spike-Reactive CD4+ T Cells (A) Representative flow cytometry plots of ICOS and CD40L expression on antigen-experienced (non-CD45RA+CCR7+) CD4+ T cells 20 h after incubation of PBMCs from HC and CoV2+ individuals at V1 and V2 with vehicle or SARS-CoV-2 spike. (B) Number of antigen-experienced ICOS+CD40L+CD4+ T cells per 1x106 CD4+ T cells from HC and CoV2+ samples after incubation with vehicle (Veh.) or spike (S) at both time points (right) and calculated number of spike-responsive CD4+ T cells (number after incubation with spike minus number after incubation with vehicle) compared across time points (left). (C) Number of antigen-experienced CXCR5+ICOS+CD40L+CD4+ T cells (cTfh) per 1 × 106 CD4+ T cells from HC and CoV2+ samples after incubation with Veh. or S at both time points (right) and calculated number of spike-responsive cTfh cells (number after incubation with spike minus number after incubation with vehicle) compared across time points (left). (D) Representative flow cytometry plots of sorted CD4+ naive (CD45RA+CCR7+), TCM (CD45RA−CCR7+), or TEM (CD45RA−CCR7−) T cells from HC and CoV2+ PBMCs after 5–6 days of co-culture with SARS-CoV-2 spike-protein-pulsed autologous monocytes and measuring proliferation by CPD dilution. (E) SARS-CoV-2 spike-specific expansion of sorted CD4+ naive T, TCM, and TEM cells from V1 (circles) and V2 (squares) reported as frequency of CXCR3+CPDlo cells after incubation with spike minus frequency after incubation with vehicle. (F) Number of cytokine-producing, antigen-experienced CD69+CD4+ T cells per 1 × 106 CD4+ T cells after incubation with Veh. or S (right) and calculated number of spike-responsive, cytokine-producing CD4+ T cells (number after incubation with spike minus number after incubation with vehicle) (left). (G) Frequency of antigen-experienced CD69+CD4+ T cell subsets, CCR6+/− Teff (CXCR5−), and CCR6+/− cTfh (CXCR5+) producing IL-2, IFN-γ, and IL-17A effector cytokines after incubation with spike for 20 h. (H) Representative flow cytometry plots of CD69 and IFN-γ expression on antigen-experienced CD8+ T cells from HC and CoV2+ PBMCs at V2 after 20 h of incubation with vehicle or SARS-CoV-2 spike. (I) Number of antigen-experienced IFN-γ+CD69+CD8+ T cells per 1 × 106 CD8+ T cells after 20 h of incubation with Veh. or S (right) and calculated number of spike-responsive CD8+ T cells (number after incubation with spike minus number after incubation with vehicle) (left). Statistics for unpaired data determined by 2-tailed Mann-Whitney tests and, for paired data, by 2-tailed Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. Multiple testing correction significance cutoff at FDR = 0.05 is p value 

Figure S6

SARS-CoV-2 Infection Induces Durable, Functional…

Figure S6

SARS-CoV-2 Infection Induces Durable, Functional Spike-Reactive CD4 + T Cells, Related to Figure…

Figure S6
SARS-CoV-2 Infection Induces Durable, Functional Spike-Reactive CD4+ T Cells, Related to Figure 3 (A) Flow cytometry sorting strategy for naive, T central memory (TCM), and T effector memory (TEM) cells from HC and CoV2+ PBMCs at Visit 1 and Visit 2 before 5-6 days of culture with autologous monocytes and SARS-CoV-2 spike protein or vehicle. (B) Representative flow cytometry gating on PMA/Ionomycin-activated PBMCs for cytokine expression by antigen experienced (non-CD45RA+CCR7+) CD4+ T cells subset into CCR6+/− T effector cells (Teff, CXCR5-) and circulating T follicular helper cells (cTfh, CXCR5+). (C) Representative flow cytometry gating on antigen-experienced (non-CD45RA+CCR7+) CD4+ T cells from HC and CoV2+ V2 PBMCs following incubation with SARS-CoV-2 spike for 20 h. Gating on CD69+ CCR6+/− T effector cells (Teff, CXCR5-) and CCR6+/− circulating T follicular helper cells (cTfh, CXCR5+) for IL-2, IFN-γ and IL-17A effector cytokines expression. (D) Number of IL-4-producing, antigen-experienced CD69+CD4+ T cells per 1x106 CD4+ T cells after incubation with vehicle (Veh.) or SARS-CoV2 spike (S) (left) and calculated number of spike-responsive, cytokine-producing CD4+ T cells (number after incubation with spike minus number after incubation with vehicle)(right). Statistics determined by two-tailed Mann-Whitney tests. Multiple testing correction significance cutoff at FDR = 0.05 is p value 

Figure S7

SARS-CoV-2-Specific MBCs Can Express Neutralizing…

Figure S7

SARS-CoV-2-Specific MBCs Can Express Neutralizing Antibodies, Related to Figure 4 and Table S1…

Figure S7
SARS-CoV-2-Specific MBCs Can Express Neutralizing Antibodies, Related to Figure 4 and Table S1 (A) Gating strategy for sorting RBD-specific B cells. (B) IgG ELISA to confirm expression of Visit 1 antibodies in transfected cell culture supernatants. Positive control is the kit standard (std) and negative control is supernatant from untransfected cells (no trans, green). (C) RBD ELISA of purified Visit 1 monoclonal antibodies. Negative control (green) is an irrelevant Plasmodium-specific antibody. (D) IgG ELISA to confirm expression of Visit 2 antibodies in transfected cell culture supernatants. (E) RBD ELISA of purified Visit 2 monoclonal antibodies. (F) Number of mutations in variable regions of RBD-specific monoclonal antibodies. (G) Mutation frequency of variable regions of RBD-specific monoclonal antibodies. Statistics determined by two-tailed Mann-Whitney tests. Multiple testing correction significance cutoff at FDR = 0.05 is p value 

Figure 4

SARS-CoV-2-Specific MBCs Can Express Neutralizing…

Figure 4

SARS-CoV-2-Specific MBCs Can Express Neutralizing Antibodies (A) Representative flow plots of index-sorted RBD-tetramer…

Figure 4
SARS-CoV-2-Specific MBCs Can Express Neutralizing Antibodies (A) Representative flow plots of index-sorted RBD-tetramer specific B cells (gating scheme in Figure S7A). BCRs cloned from cells are shown in red. (B) Anti-RBD ELISA of culture supernatants from cells transfected to express one of the Visit 1 monoclonal antibodies or supernatant from untransfected cells (no trans). Antibodies that did not bind RBD are shown in orange. (C) Inhibition of RBD binding to ACE2 by Visit 1 monoclonal antibody supernatants measured by sVNT assay, compared to a known RBD-specific neutralizing antibody (Ty1). Red indicates strong inhibitors, blue moderate inhibitors and black non-inhibitors. (D) Anti-RBD ELISA of culture supernatants from cells transfected to express one of the Visit 2 monoclonal antibodies. Antibodies that did not bind RBD are shown in orange. (E) Inhibition of RBD binding to ACE2 by Visit 2 monoclonal antibodies measured by sVNT assay. Red indicates strong inhibitors and black non-inhibitors. (F) Neutralization capacity of purified monoclonal antibodies as measured by PRNT. 2B04 and 2C02 are previously identified strong and weak neutralizing murine antibodies, respectively, and MSP-003 is an irrelevant Plasmodium-specific antibody. (G) IC50 values calculated from PRNT. Dotted line represents the limit of detection. See also Figure S7.

Figure 5

Recovered Individuals Formed Multifaceted SARS-CoV-2-Specific…

Figure 5

Recovered Individuals Formed Multifaceted SARS-CoV-2-Specific Immune Memory Heatmap of values for independent SARS-CoV2…

Figure 5
Recovered Individuals Formed Multifaceted SARS-CoV-2-Specific Immune Memory Heatmap of values for independent SARS-CoV2 RBD- or spike-specific immune memory components from each HC and CoV2+ individual at Visit 2. RBD-specific IgG measured by ELISA (AUC). Percent inhibition by sVNT calculated at 1:2 plasma dilution. Number of RBD-specific IgG+ MBCs per 1 × 106 PBMCs. Number of spike-responsive (CD69+), cytokine-producing (IL-2/IFN-γ/IL-17A), antigen-experienced CD4+ T cells calculated by number after 20 h incubation with spike minus number after incubation with vehicle. Number of spike-responsive (CD69+IFN-γ+), antigen-experienced CD8+ T cells calculated by number after 20 h incubation with spike minus number after incubation with vehicle. The color scales are set for each metric (row) with the mean + 1 SD of the HC set to white.
All figures (13)
Update of
  • Functional SARS-CoV-2-specific immune memory persists after mild COVID-19.
    Rodda LB, Netland J, Shehata L, Pruner KB, Morawski PM, Thouvenel C, Takehara KK, Eggenberger J, Hemann EA, Waterman HR, Fahning ML, Chen Y, Rathe J, Stokes C, Wrenn S, Fiala B, Carter LP, Hamerman JA, King NP, Gale M, Campbell DJ, Rawlings D, Pepper M. Rodda LB, et al. medRxiv. 2020 Aug 15:2020.08.11.20171843. doi: 10.1101/2020.08.11.20171843. Preprint. medRxiv. 2020. PMID: 32817957 Free PMC article. Updated.
  • Functional SARS-CoV-2-specific immune memory persists after mild COVID-19.
    Rodda LB, Netland J, Shehata L, Pruner KB, Morawski PA, Thouvenel C, Takehara KK, Eggenberger J, Hemann E, Waterman HR, Fahning ML, Chen Y, Rathe J, Stokes C, Wrenn S, Fiala B, Carter L, Hamerman JA, King NP, Gale M Jr, Campbell DJ, Rawlings D, Pepper M. Rodda LB, et al. Res Sq. 2020 Aug 13:rs.3.rs-57112. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-57112/v1. Preprint. Res Sq. 2020. PMID: 32818218 Free PMC article. Updated.
Similar articles
Cited by
References
    1. Addetia A., Crawford K.H.D., Dingens A., Zhu H., Roychoudhury P., Huang M.-L., Jerome K.R., Bloom J.D., Greninger A.L. Neutralizing Antibodies Correlate with Protection from SARS-CoV-2 in Humans during a Fishery Vessel Outbreak with a High Attack Rate. J. Clin. Microbiology. 2020;58 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ahmed R., Gray D. Immunological memory and protective immunity: understanding their relation. Science. 1996;272:54–60. - PubMed
    1. Alamyar E., et al. IMGT(®) tools for the nucleotide analysis of immunoglobulin (IG) and T cell receptor (TR) V-(D)-J repertoires, polymorphisms, and IG mutations: IMGT/V-QUEST and IMGT/HighV-QUEST for NGS. Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) 882(Chapter. 2012;32:569–604. - PubMed
    1. Alsoussi W.B., Turner J.S., Case J.B., Zhao H., Schmitz A.J., Zhou J.Q., Chen R.E., Lei T., Rizk A.A., McIntire K.M., et al. A Potently Neutralizing Antibody Protects Mice against SARS-CoV-2 Infection. J. Immunol. 2020;205:915–922. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Amanat F., Stadlbauer D., Strohmeier S., Nguyen T.H.O., Chromikova V., McMahon M., Jiang K., Arunkumar G.A., Jurczyszak D., Polanco J., et al. A serological assay to detect SARS-CoV-2 seroconversion in humans. Nat. Med. 2020;26:1033–1036. - PMC - PubMed
Show all 63 references
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
[x]
Cite
Copy Download .nbib
Format: AMA APA MLA NLM

NCBI Literature Resources

MeSH PMC Bookshelf Disclaimer

The PubMed wordmark and PubMed logo are registered trademarks of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). Unauthorized use of these marks is strictly prohibited.

Follow NCBI
Figure S2
Figure S2
PBMC Innate Populations in CoV2+ Individuals Return to Immune Quiescence by Visit 1, Related to Figure 1 (A) Flow cytometry gating for CD15-CD3-CD19-CD56-HLADR+CD14+ monocytes (purple gate), which were further divided into CD14loCD16+ (red gate), CD14+CD16+ (blue gate), and CD14+CD16- monocytes (green gate), and CD15-CD3-CD19-CD56-CD14-CD304+CD123+ plasmacytoid dendritic cells (pDCs) (pink gate). (B) Percent monocytes and pDCs of live PBMCs from healthy controls (HC) and previously SARS-CoV-2 infected (CoV2+) individuals. (C) Percent subsets of monocytes from PBMCs. Statistics determined by two-tailed Mann-Whitney tests. Multiple testing correction significance cutoff at FDR = 0.05 is p value 

Figure S3

Bulk PBMCs Return to Immune…

Figure S3

Bulk PBMCs Return to Immune Quiescence by Visit 1, Related to Figure 1…

Figure S3
Bulk PBMCs Return to Immune Quiescence by Visit 1, Related to Figure 1 (A and B) Representative flow cytometry plots and frequencies of αβ and γδ T cell subsets at Visit 1 (V1) in PBMCs from healthy control (HC) and SARS-CoV-2-recovered (CoV2+) individuals. (C and D) Representative flow cytometry plots and frequencies of CD4+ and CD8+ T cell effector/activation states (Ki67+, T-bet+, HLA-DR+CD38+) of total non-naive, memory CD45RA+CCR7+/− CD4+ or CD8+ T cells at V1 in HC and CoV2+ PBMCs. (E and F) Representative flow cytometry plots and frequencies of CD4+ memory and T-helper subsets at V1 in HC and CoV2+ PBMCs. (G and H) Representative flow cytometry plots and frequencies of cTfh (CXCR5+CD45RA-) and cTfh activation (ICOS+PD-1+) and helper (CXCR3+/−CCR6+/−) subsets at V1 in HC and CoV2+ PBMCs. (I) Frequency of B cells (CD19+CD3-) at V1 in HC and CoV2+ PBMCs. Statistics determined by two-tailed Mann-Whitney tests. Multiple testing correction significance cutoff at FDR = 0.05 is p value 

Figure S4

Mild COVID-19 Induces Persistent, Neutralizing…

Figure S4

Mild COVID-19 Induces Persistent, Neutralizing Anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG Antibody, Related to Figure 1 (A)…

Figure S4
Mild COVID-19 Induces Persistent, Neutralizing Anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG Antibody, Related to Figure 1 (A) ELISA dilution curves and area under the curve (AUC) for anti-spike IgG (left), IgM (center), and IgA (right) from healthy control (HC) and SARS-CoV-2-recovered (CoV2+) individuals plasma at Visit 1 (V1). Dashed line indicates mean + 3 SD of the HC AUC values. (B) Spearman correlation of V1 anti-RBD and anti-spike IgG (left), IgM (center), and IgA (right) AUC. Statistics determined by two-tailed Mann-Whitney tests. Multiple testing correction significance cutoff at FDR = 0.05 is p value 

Figure S5

Mild COVID-19 Induces a Sustained…

Figure S5

Mild COVID-19 Induces a Sustained Enrichment of RBD-Specific IgG + Memory B Cells,…

Figure S5
Mild COVID-19 Induces a Sustained Enrichment of RBD-Specific IgG+ Memory B Cells, Related to Figure 2 (A) Representative flow cytometry gates for phenotyping RBD-specific B cells from PBMCs in Figure 2 set on total B cells from a healthy control (HC) (surface stain, top; intracellular stain, bottom). (B) Number of RBD-specific IgD+, IgM+ and IgA+ MBCs (CD20+RBD tetramer+decoy tetramer- CD27+CD21+/CD27+CD21-/CD27-CD21-) from healthy control (HC) and SARS-CoV-2-recovered (CoV2+) PBMCs at Visit 1 (V1) and Visit 2 (V2). Statistics for unpaired data determined by two-tailed Mann-Whitney tests and, for paired data, by two-tailed Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. Multiple testing correction significance cutoff at FDR = 0.05 is p value 

Figure 2

Mild COVID-19 Induces a Sustained…

Figure 2

Mild COVID-19 Induces a Sustained Enrichment of RBD-Specific IgG + Memory B Cells…

Figure 2
Mild COVID-19 Induces a Sustained Enrichment of RBD-Specific IgG+ Memory B Cells (A) Representative gating of live CD3–CD14–CD16– cells for SARS-CoV-2 RBD-specific cells (RBD tetramer+decoy tetramer–) from CoV2+ and HC PBMCs at V1 and V2. (B) Number of RBD-specific B cells (RBD tetramer+decoy tetramer–CD20+) per 1 × 106 PBMCs. (C) Representative flow cytometry plots and number of RBD-specific PBs (RBD tetramer+decoy tetramer−CD20−CD138hi) (na = could not be calculated because all values 0). (D) Representative gating of RBD-specific B cells for naive B cells (CD21+CD27−) and MBCs (CD21+CD27+/CD21–CD27+/CD21–CD27– populations outlined in green). (E) Proportion of RBD-specific B cells that are naive (CD21+CD27−), classical MBCs (CD21+CD27+), or activated MBCs (CD21−CD27+/−), statistics for the proportion that are MBCs. (F) Number of RBD-specific MBCs (classical and activated). (G) Representative gating of RBD-specific MBCs for BCR isotype (IgD, IgM, IgA, and IgG) expression. (H) Proportion of RBD-specific MBCs expressing the BCR isotypes IgD, IgM, IgA, and IgG. Statistics are for the proportion that are IgG+. (I) Number of RBD-specific IgG+ MBCs. (J) Representative gating of RBD-specific MBCs for T-bet expression and number of RBD-specific T-bet+ MBCs. Statistics for unpaired data determined by 2-tailed Mann-Whitney tests and, for paired data, by 2-tailed Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. Multiple testing correction significance cutoff at FDR = 0.05 is p value 

Figure 3

SARS-CoV-2 Infection Induces Durable, Functional…

Figure 3

SARS-CoV-2 Infection Induces Durable, Functional Spike-Reactive CD4 + T Cells (A) Representative flow…

Figure 3
SARS-CoV-2 Infection Induces Durable, Functional Spike-Reactive CD4+ T Cells (A) Representative flow cytometry plots of ICOS and CD40L expression on antigen-experienced (non-CD45RA+CCR7+) CD4+ T cells 20 h after incubation of PBMCs from HC and CoV2+ individuals at V1 and V2 with vehicle or SARS-CoV-2 spike. (B) Number of antigen-experienced ICOS+CD40L+CD4+ T cells per 1x106 CD4+ T cells from HC and CoV2+ samples after incubation with vehicle (Veh.) or spike (S) at both time points (right) and calculated number of spike-responsive CD4+ T cells (number after incubation with spike minus number after incubation with vehicle) compared across time points (left). (C) Number of antigen-experienced CXCR5+ICOS+CD40L+CD4+ T cells (cTfh) per 1 × 106 CD4+ T cells from HC and CoV2+ samples after incubation with Veh. or S at both time points (right) and calculated number of spike-responsive cTfh cells (number after incubation with spike minus number after incubation with vehicle) compared across time points (left). (D) Representative flow cytometry plots of sorted CD4+ naive (CD45RA+CCR7+), TCM (CD45RA−CCR7+), or TEM (CD45RA−CCR7−) T cells from HC and CoV2+ PBMCs after 5–6 days of co-culture with SARS-CoV-2 spike-protein-pulsed autologous monocytes and measuring proliferation by CPD dilution. (E) SARS-CoV-2 spike-specific expansion of sorted CD4+ naive T, TCM, and TEM cells from V1 (circles) and V2 (squares) reported as frequency of CXCR3+CPDlo cells after incubation with spike minus frequency after incubation with vehicle. (F) Number of cytokine-producing, antigen-experienced CD69+CD4+ T cells per 1 × 106 CD4+ T cells after incubation with Veh. or S (right) and calculated number of spike-responsive, cytokine-producing CD4+ T cells (number after incubation with spike minus number after incubation with vehicle) (left). (G) Frequency of antigen-experienced CD69+CD4+ T cell subsets, CCR6+/− Teff (CXCR5−), and CCR6+/− cTfh (CXCR5+) producing IL-2, IFN-γ, and IL-17A effector cytokines after incubation with spike for 20 h. (H) Representative flow cytometry plots of CD69 and IFN-γ expression on antigen-experienced CD8+ T cells from HC and CoV2+ PBMCs at V2 after 20 h of incubation with vehicle or SARS-CoV-2 spike. (I) Number of antigen-experienced IFN-γ+CD69+CD8+ T cells per 1 × 106 CD8+ T cells after 20 h of incubation with Veh. or S (right) and calculated number of spike-responsive CD8+ T cells (number after incubation with spike minus number after incubation with vehicle) (left). Statistics for unpaired data determined by 2-tailed Mann-Whitney tests and, for paired data, by 2-tailed Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. Multiple testing correction significance cutoff at FDR = 0.05 is p value 

Figure S6

SARS-CoV-2 Infection Induces Durable, Functional…

Figure S6

SARS-CoV-2 Infection Induces Durable, Functional Spike-Reactive CD4 + T Cells, Related to Figure…

Figure S6
SARS-CoV-2 Infection Induces Durable, Functional Spike-Reactive CD4+ T Cells, Related to Figure 3 (A) Flow cytometry sorting strategy for naive, T central memory (TCM), and T effector memory (TEM) cells from HC and CoV2+ PBMCs at Visit 1 and Visit 2 before 5-6 days of culture with autologous monocytes and SARS-CoV-2 spike protein or vehicle. (B) Representative flow cytometry gating on PMA/Ionomycin-activated PBMCs for cytokine expression by antigen experienced (non-CD45RA+CCR7+) CD4+ T cells subset into CCR6+/− T effector cells (Teff, CXCR5-) and circulating T follicular helper cells (cTfh, CXCR5+). (C) Representative flow cytometry gating on antigen-experienced (non-CD45RA+CCR7+) CD4+ T cells from HC and CoV2+ V2 PBMCs following incubation with SARS-CoV-2 spike for 20 h. Gating on CD69+ CCR6+/− T effector cells (Teff, CXCR5-) and CCR6+/− circulating T follicular helper cells (cTfh, CXCR5+) for IL-2, IFN-γ and IL-17A effector cytokines expression. (D) Number of IL-4-producing, antigen-experienced CD69+CD4+ T cells per 1x106 CD4+ T cells after incubation with vehicle (Veh.) or SARS-CoV2 spike (S) (left) and calculated number of spike-responsive, cytokine-producing CD4+ T cells (number after incubation with spike minus number after incubation with vehicle)(right). Statistics determined by two-tailed Mann-Whitney tests. Multiple testing correction significance cutoff at FDR = 0.05 is p value 

Figure S7

SARS-CoV-2-Specific MBCs Can Express Neutralizing…

Figure S7

SARS-CoV-2-Specific MBCs Can Express Neutralizing Antibodies, Related to Figure 4 and Table S1…

Figure S7
SARS-CoV-2-Specific MBCs Can Express Neutralizing Antibodies, Related to Figure 4 and Table S1 (A) Gating strategy for sorting RBD-specific B cells. (B) IgG ELISA to confirm expression of Visit 1 antibodies in transfected cell culture supernatants. Positive control is the kit standard (std) and negative control is supernatant from untransfected cells (no trans, green). (C) RBD ELISA of purified Visit 1 monoclonal antibodies. Negative control (green) is an irrelevant Plasmodium-specific antibody. (D) IgG ELISA to confirm expression of Visit 2 antibodies in transfected cell culture supernatants. (E) RBD ELISA of purified Visit 2 monoclonal antibodies. (F) Number of mutations in variable regions of RBD-specific monoclonal antibodies. (G) Mutation frequency of variable regions of RBD-specific monoclonal antibodies. Statistics determined by two-tailed Mann-Whitney tests. Multiple testing correction significance cutoff at FDR = 0.05 is p value 

Figure 4

SARS-CoV-2-Specific MBCs Can Express Neutralizing…

Figure 4

SARS-CoV-2-Specific MBCs Can Express Neutralizing Antibodies (A) Representative flow plots of index-sorted RBD-tetramer…

Figure 4
SARS-CoV-2-Specific MBCs Can Express Neutralizing Antibodies (A) Representative flow plots of index-sorted RBD-tetramer specific B cells (gating scheme in Figure S7A). BCRs cloned from cells are shown in red. (B) Anti-RBD ELISA of culture supernatants from cells transfected to express one of the Visit 1 monoclonal antibodies or supernatant from untransfected cells (no trans). Antibodies that did not bind RBD are shown in orange. (C) Inhibition of RBD binding to ACE2 by Visit 1 monoclonal antibody supernatants measured by sVNT assay, compared to a known RBD-specific neutralizing antibody (Ty1). Red indicates strong inhibitors, blue moderate inhibitors and black non-inhibitors. (D) Anti-RBD ELISA of culture supernatants from cells transfected to express one of the Visit 2 monoclonal antibodies. Antibodies that did not bind RBD are shown in orange. (E) Inhibition of RBD binding to ACE2 by Visit 2 monoclonal antibodies measured by sVNT assay. Red indicates strong inhibitors and black non-inhibitors. (F) Neutralization capacity of purified monoclonal antibodies as measured by PRNT. 2B04 and 2C02 are previously identified strong and weak neutralizing murine antibodies, respectively, and MSP-003 is an irrelevant Plasmodium-specific antibody. (G) IC50 values calculated from PRNT. Dotted line represents the limit of detection. See also Figure S7.

Figure 5

Recovered Individuals Formed Multifaceted SARS-CoV-2-Specific…

Figure 5

Recovered Individuals Formed Multifaceted SARS-CoV-2-Specific Immune Memory Heatmap of values for independent SARS-CoV2…

Figure 5
Recovered Individuals Formed Multifaceted SARS-CoV-2-Specific Immune Memory Heatmap of values for independent SARS-CoV2 RBD- or spike-specific immune memory components from each HC and CoV2+ individual at Visit 2. RBD-specific IgG measured by ELISA (AUC). Percent inhibition by sVNT calculated at 1:2 plasma dilution. Number of RBD-specific IgG+ MBCs per 1 × 106 PBMCs. Number of spike-responsive (CD69+), cytokine-producing (IL-2/IFN-γ/IL-17A), antigen-experienced CD4+ T cells calculated by number after 20 h incubation with spike minus number after incubation with vehicle. Number of spike-responsive (CD69+IFN-γ+), antigen-experienced CD8+ T cells calculated by number after 20 h incubation with spike minus number after incubation with vehicle. The color scales are set for each metric (row) with the mean + 1 SD of the HC set to white.
All figures (13)
Update of
  • Functional SARS-CoV-2-specific immune memory persists after mild COVID-19.
    Rodda LB, Netland J, Shehata L, Pruner KB, Morawski PM, Thouvenel C, Takehara KK, Eggenberger J, Hemann EA, Waterman HR, Fahning ML, Chen Y, Rathe J, Stokes C, Wrenn S, Fiala B, Carter LP, Hamerman JA, King NP, Gale M, Campbell DJ, Rawlings D, Pepper M. Rodda LB, et al. medRxiv. 2020 Aug 15:2020.08.11.20171843. doi: 10.1101/2020.08.11.20171843. Preprint. medRxiv. 2020. PMID: 32817957 Free PMC article. Updated.
  • Functional SARS-CoV-2-specific immune memory persists after mild COVID-19.
    Rodda LB, Netland J, Shehata L, Pruner KB, Morawski PA, Thouvenel C, Takehara KK, Eggenberger J, Hemann E, Waterman HR, Fahning ML, Chen Y, Rathe J, Stokes C, Wrenn S, Fiala B, Carter L, Hamerman JA, King NP, Gale M Jr, Campbell DJ, Rawlings D, Pepper M. Rodda LB, et al. Res Sq. 2020 Aug 13:rs.3.rs-57112. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-57112/v1. Preprint. Res Sq. 2020. PMID: 32818218 Free PMC article. Updated.
Similar articles
Cited by
References
    1. Addetia A., Crawford K.H.D., Dingens A., Zhu H., Roychoudhury P., Huang M.-L., Jerome K.R., Bloom J.D., Greninger A.L. Neutralizing Antibodies Correlate with Protection from SARS-CoV-2 in Humans during a Fishery Vessel Outbreak with a High Attack Rate. J. Clin. Microbiology. 2020;58 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ahmed R., Gray D. Immunological memory and protective immunity: understanding their relation. Science. 1996;272:54–60. - PubMed
    1. Alamyar E., et al. IMGT(®) tools for the nucleotide analysis of immunoglobulin (IG) and T cell receptor (TR) V-(D)-J repertoires, polymorphisms, and IG mutations: IMGT/V-QUEST and IMGT/HighV-QUEST for NGS. Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) 882(Chapter. 2012;32:569–604. - PubMed
    1. Alsoussi W.B., Turner J.S., Case J.B., Zhao H., Schmitz A.J., Zhou J.Q., Chen R.E., Lei T., Rizk A.A., McIntire K.M., et al. A Potently Neutralizing Antibody Protects Mice against SARS-CoV-2 Infection. J. Immunol. 2020;205:915–922. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Amanat F., Stadlbauer D., Strohmeier S., Nguyen T.H.O., Chromikova V., McMahon M., Jiang K., Arunkumar G.A., Jurczyszak D., Polanco J., et al. A serological assay to detect SARS-CoV-2 seroconversion in humans. Nat. Med. 2020;26:1033–1036. - PMC - PubMed
Show all 63 references
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
[x]
Cite
Copy Download .nbib
Format: AMA APA MLA NLM

NCBI Literature Resources

MeSH PMC Bookshelf Disclaimer

The PubMed wordmark and PubMed logo are registered trademarks of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). Unauthorized use of these marks is strictly prohibited.

Follow NCBI
Figure S3
Figure S3
Bulk PBMCs Return to Immune Quiescence by Visit 1, Related to Figure 1 (A and B) Representative flow cytometry plots and frequencies of αβ and γδ T cell subsets at Visit 1 (V1) in PBMCs from healthy control (HC) and SARS-CoV-2-recovered (CoV2+) individuals. (C and D) Representative flow cytometry plots and frequencies of CD4+ and CD8+ T cell effector/activation states (Ki67+, T-bet+, HLA-DR+CD38+) of total non-naive, memory CD45RA+CCR7+/− CD4+ or CD8+ T cells at V1 in HC and CoV2+ PBMCs. (E and F) Representative flow cytometry plots and frequencies of CD4+ memory and T-helper subsets at V1 in HC and CoV2+ PBMCs. (G and H) Representative flow cytometry plots and frequencies of cTfh (CXCR5+CD45RA-) and cTfh activation (ICOS+PD-1+) and helper (CXCR3+/−CCR6+/−) subsets at V1 in HC and CoV2+ PBMCs. (I) Frequency of B cells (CD19+CD3-) at V1 in HC and CoV2+ PBMCs. Statistics determined by two-tailed Mann-Whitney tests. Multiple testing correction significance cutoff at FDR = 0.05 is p value 

Figure S4

Mild COVID-19 Induces Persistent, Neutralizing…

Figure S4

Mild COVID-19 Induces Persistent, Neutralizing Anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG Antibody, Related to Figure 1 (A)…

Figure S4
Mild COVID-19 Induces Persistent, Neutralizing Anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG Antibody, Related to Figure 1 (A) ELISA dilution curves and area under the curve (AUC) for anti-spike IgG (left), IgM (center), and IgA (right) from healthy control (HC) and SARS-CoV-2-recovered (CoV2+) individuals plasma at Visit 1 (V1). Dashed line indicates mean + 3 SD of the HC AUC values. (B) Spearman correlation of V1 anti-RBD and anti-spike IgG (left), IgM (center), and IgA (right) AUC. Statistics determined by two-tailed Mann-Whitney tests. Multiple testing correction significance cutoff at FDR = 0.05 is p value 

Figure S5

Mild COVID-19 Induces a Sustained…

Figure S5

Mild COVID-19 Induces a Sustained Enrichment of RBD-Specific IgG + Memory B Cells,…

Figure S5
Mild COVID-19 Induces a Sustained Enrichment of RBD-Specific IgG+ Memory B Cells, Related to Figure 2 (A) Representative flow cytometry gates for phenotyping RBD-specific B cells from PBMCs in Figure 2 set on total B cells from a healthy control (HC) (surface stain, top; intracellular stain, bottom). (B) Number of RBD-specific IgD+, IgM+ and IgA+ MBCs (CD20+RBD tetramer+decoy tetramer- CD27+CD21+/CD27+CD21-/CD27-CD21-) from healthy control (HC) and SARS-CoV-2-recovered (CoV2+) PBMCs at Visit 1 (V1) and Visit 2 (V2). Statistics for unpaired data determined by two-tailed Mann-Whitney tests and, for paired data, by two-tailed Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. Multiple testing correction significance cutoff at FDR = 0.05 is p value 

Figure 2

Mild COVID-19 Induces a Sustained…

Figure 2

Mild COVID-19 Induces a Sustained Enrichment of RBD-Specific IgG + Memory B Cells…

Figure 2
Mild COVID-19 Induces a Sustained Enrichment of RBD-Specific IgG+ Memory B Cells (A) Representative gating of live CD3–CD14–CD16– cells for SARS-CoV-2 RBD-specific cells (RBD tetramer+decoy tetramer–) from CoV2+ and HC PBMCs at V1 and V2. (B) Number of RBD-specific B cells (RBD tetramer+decoy tetramer–CD20+) per 1 × 106 PBMCs. (C) Representative flow cytometry plots and number of RBD-specific PBs (RBD tetramer+decoy tetramer−CD20−CD138hi) (na = could not be calculated because all values 0). (D) Representative gating of RBD-specific B cells for naive B cells (CD21+CD27−) and MBCs (CD21+CD27+/CD21–CD27+/CD21–CD27– populations outlined in green). (E) Proportion of RBD-specific B cells that are naive (CD21+CD27−), classical MBCs (CD21+CD27+), or activated MBCs (CD21−CD27+/−), statistics for the proportion that are MBCs. (F) Number of RBD-specific MBCs (classical and activated). (G) Representative gating of RBD-specific MBCs for BCR isotype (IgD, IgM, IgA, and IgG) expression. (H) Proportion of RBD-specific MBCs expressing the BCR isotypes IgD, IgM, IgA, and IgG. Statistics are for the proportion that are IgG+. (I) Number of RBD-specific IgG+ MBCs. (J) Representative gating of RBD-specific MBCs for T-bet expression and number of RBD-specific T-bet+ MBCs. Statistics for unpaired data determined by 2-tailed Mann-Whitney tests and, for paired data, by 2-tailed Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. Multiple testing correction significance cutoff at FDR = 0.05 is p value 

Figure 3

SARS-CoV-2 Infection Induces Durable, Functional…

Figure 3

SARS-CoV-2 Infection Induces Durable, Functional Spike-Reactive CD4 + T Cells (A) Representative flow…

Figure 3
SARS-CoV-2 Infection Induces Durable, Functional Spike-Reactive CD4+ T Cells (A) Representative flow cytometry plots of ICOS and CD40L expression on antigen-experienced (non-CD45RA+CCR7+) CD4+ T cells 20 h after incubation of PBMCs from HC and CoV2+ individuals at V1 and V2 with vehicle or SARS-CoV-2 spike. (B) Number of antigen-experienced ICOS+CD40L+CD4+ T cells per 1x106 CD4+ T cells from HC and CoV2+ samples after incubation with vehicle (Veh.) or spike (S) at both time points (right) and calculated number of spike-responsive CD4+ T cells (number after incubation with spike minus number after incubation with vehicle) compared across time points (left). (C) Number of antigen-experienced CXCR5+ICOS+CD40L+CD4+ T cells (cTfh) per 1 × 106 CD4+ T cells from HC and CoV2+ samples after incubation with Veh. or S at both time points (right) and calculated number of spike-responsive cTfh cells (number after incubation with spike minus number after incubation with vehicle) compared across time points (left). (D) Representative flow cytometry plots of sorted CD4+ naive (CD45RA+CCR7+), TCM (CD45RA−CCR7+), or TEM (CD45RA−CCR7−) T cells from HC and CoV2+ PBMCs after 5–6 days of co-culture with SARS-CoV-2 spike-protein-pulsed autologous monocytes and measuring proliferation by CPD dilution. (E) SARS-CoV-2 spike-specific expansion of sorted CD4+ naive T, TCM, and TEM cells from V1 (circles) and V2 (squares) reported as frequency of CXCR3+CPDlo cells after incubation with spike minus frequency after incubation with vehicle. (F) Number of cytokine-producing, antigen-experienced CD69+CD4+ T cells per 1 × 106 CD4+ T cells after incubation with Veh. or S (right) and calculated number of spike-responsive, cytokine-producing CD4+ T cells (number after incubation with spike minus number after incubation with vehicle) (left). (G) Frequency of antigen-experienced CD69+CD4+ T cell subsets, CCR6+/− Teff (CXCR5−), and CCR6+/− cTfh (CXCR5+) producing IL-2, IFN-γ, and IL-17A effector cytokines after incubation with spike for 20 h. (H) Representative flow cytometry plots of CD69 and IFN-γ expression on antigen-experienced CD8+ T cells from HC and CoV2+ PBMCs at V2 after 20 h of incubation with vehicle or SARS-CoV-2 spike. (I) Number of antigen-experienced IFN-γ+CD69+CD8+ T cells per 1 × 106 CD8+ T cells after 20 h of incubation with Veh. or S (right) and calculated number of spike-responsive CD8+ T cells (number after incubation with spike minus number after incubation with vehicle) (left). Statistics for unpaired data determined by 2-tailed Mann-Whitney tests and, for paired data, by 2-tailed Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. Multiple testing correction significance cutoff at FDR = 0.05 is p value 

Figure S6

SARS-CoV-2 Infection Induces Durable, Functional…

Figure S6

SARS-CoV-2 Infection Induces Durable, Functional Spike-Reactive CD4 + T Cells, Related to Figure…

Figure S6
SARS-CoV-2 Infection Induces Durable, Functional Spike-Reactive CD4+ T Cells, Related to Figure 3 (A) Flow cytometry sorting strategy for naive, T central memory (TCM), and T effector memory (TEM) cells from HC and CoV2+ PBMCs at Visit 1 and Visit 2 before 5-6 days of culture with autologous monocytes and SARS-CoV-2 spike protein or vehicle. (B) Representative flow cytometry gating on PMA/Ionomycin-activated PBMCs for cytokine expression by antigen experienced (non-CD45RA+CCR7+) CD4+ T cells subset into CCR6+/− T effector cells (Teff, CXCR5-) and circulating T follicular helper cells (cTfh, CXCR5+). (C) Representative flow cytometry gating on antigen-experienced (non-CD45RA+CCR7+) CD4+ T cells from HC and CoV2+ V2 PBMCs following incubation with SARS-CoV-2 spike for 20 h. Gating on CD69+ CCR6+/− T effector cells (Teff, CXCR5-) and CCR6+/− circulating T follicular helper cells (cTfh, CXCR5+) for IL-2, IFN-γ and IL-17A effector cytokines expression. (D) Number of IL-4-producing, antigen-experienced CD69+CD4+ T cells per 1x106 CD4+ T cells after incubation with vehicle (Veh.) or SARS-CoV2 spike (S) (left) and calculated number of spike-responsive, cytokine-producing CD4+ T cells (number after incubation with spike minus number after incubation with vehicle)(right). Statistics determined by two-tailed Mann-Whitney tests. Multiple testing correction significance cutoff at FDR = 0.05 is p value 

Figure S7

SARS-CoV-2-Specific MBCs Can Express Neutralizing…

Figure S7

SARS-CoV-2-Specific MBCs Can Express Neutralizing Antibodies, Related to Figure 4 and Table S1…

Figure S7
SARS-CoV-2-Specific MBCs Can Express Neutralizing Antibodies, Related to Figure 4 and Table S1 (A) Gating strategy for sorting RBD-specific B cells. (B) IgG ELISA to confirm expression of Visit 1 antibodies in transfected cell culture supernatants. Positive control is the kit standard (std) and negative control is supernatant from untransfected cells (no trans, green). (C) RBD ELISA of purified Visit 1 monoclonal antibodies. Negative control (green) is an irrelevant Plasmodium-specific antibody. (D) IgG ELISA to confirm expression of Visit 2 antibodies in transfected cell culture supernatants. (E) RBD ELISA of purified Visit 2 monoclonal antibodies. (F) Number of mutations in variable regions of RBD-specific monoclonal antibodies. (G) Mutation frequency of variable regions of RBD-specific monoclonal antibodies. Statistics determined by two-tailed Mann-Whitney tests. Multiple testing correction significance cutoff at FDR = 0.05 is p value 

Figure 4

SARS-CoV-2-Specific MBCs Can Express Neutralizing…

Figure 4

SARS-CoV-2-Specific MBCs Can Express Neutralizing Antibodies (A) Representative flow plots of index-sorted RBD-tetramer…

Figure 4
SARS-CoV-2-Specific MBCs Can Express Neutralizing Antibodies (A) Representative flow plots of index-sorted RBD-tetramer specific B cells (gating scheme in Figure S7A). BCRs cloned from cells are shown in red. (B) Anti-RBD ELISA of culture supernatants from cells transfected to express one of the Visit 1 monoclonal antibodies or supernatant from untransfected cells (no trans). Antibodies that did not bind RBD are shown in orange. (C) Inhibition of RBD binding to ACE2 by Visit 1 monoclonal antibody supernatants measured by sVNT assay, compared to a known RBD-specific neutralizing antibody (Ty1). Red indicates strong inhibitors, blue moderate inhibitors and black non-inhibitors. (D) Anti-RBD ELISA of culture supernatants from cells transfected to express one of the Visit 2 monoclonal antibodies. Antibodies that did not bind RBD are shown in orange. (E) Inhibition of RBD binding to ACE2 by Visit 2 monoclonal antibodies measured by sVNT assay. Red indicates strong inhibitors and black non-inhibitors. (F) Neutralization capacity of purified monoclonal antibodies as measured by PRNT. 2B04 and 2C02 are previously identified strong and weak neutralizing murine antibodies, respectively, and MSP-003 is an irrelevant Plasmodium-specific antibody. (G) IC50 values calculated from PRNT. Dotted line represents the limit of detection. See also Figure S7.

Figure 5

Recovered Individuals Formed Multifaceted SARS-CoV-2-Specific…

Figure 5

Recovered Individuals Formed Multifaceted SARS-CoV-2-Specific Immune Memory Heatmap of values for independent SARS-CoV2…

Figure 5
Recovered Individuals Formed Multifaceted SARS-CoV-2-Specific Immune Memory Heatmap of values for independent SARS-CoV2 RBD- or spike-specific immune memory components from each HC and CoV2+ individual at Visit 2. RBD-specific IgG measured by ELISA (AUC). Percent inhibition by sVNT calculated at 1:2 plasma dilution. Number of RBD-specific IgG+ MBCs per 1 × 106 PBMCs. Number of spike-responsive (CD69+), cytokine-producing (IL-2/IFN-γ/IL-17A), antigen-experienced CD4+ T cells calculated by number after 20 h incubation with spike minus number after incubation with vehicle. Number of spike-responsive (CD69+IFN-γ+), antigen-experienced CD8+ T cells calculated by number after 20 h incubation with spike minus number after incubation with vehicle. The color scales are set for each metric (row) with the mean + 1 SD of the HC set to white.
All figures (13)
Update of
  • Functional SARS-CoV-2-specific immune memory persists after mild COVID-19.
    Rodda LB, Netland J, Shehata L, Pruner KB, Morawski PM, Thouvenel C, Takehara KK, Eggenberger J, Hemann EA, Waterman HR, Fahning ML, Chen Y, Rathe J, Stokes C, Wrenn S, Fiala B, Carter LP, Hamerman JA, King NP, Gale M, Campbell DJ, Rawlings D, Pepper M. Rodda LB, et al. medRxiv. 2020 Aug 15:2020.08.11.20171843. doi: 10.1101/2020.08.11.20171843. Preprint. medRxiv. 2020. PMID: 32817957 Free PMC article. Updated.
  • Functional SARS-CoV-2-specific immune memory persists after mild COVID-19.
    Rodda LB, Netland J, Shehata L, Pruner KB, Morawski PA, Thouvenel C, Takehara KK, Eggenberger J, Hemann E, Waterman HR, Fahning ML, Chen Y, Rathe J, Stokes C, Wrenn S, Fiala B, Carter L, Hamerman JA, King NP, Gale M Jr, Campbell DJ, Rawlings D, Pepper M. Rodda LB, et al. Res Sq. 2020 Aug 13:rs.3.rs-57112. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-57112/v1. Preprint. Res Sq. 2020. PMID: 32818218 Free PMC article. Updated.
Similar articles
Cited by
References
    1. Addetia A., Crawford K.H.D., Dingens A., Zhu H., Roychoudhury P., Huang M.-L., Jerome K.R., Bloom J.D., Greninger A.L. Neutralizing Antibodies Correlate with Protection from SARS-CoV-2 in Humans during a Fishery Vessel Outbreak with a High Attack Rate. J. Clin. Microbiology. 2020;58 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ahmed R., Gray D. Immunological memory and protective immunity: understanding their relation. Science. 1996;272:54–60. - PubMed
    1. Alamyar E., et al. IMGT(®) tools for the nucleotide analysis of immunoglobulin (IG) and T cell receptor (TR) V-(D)-J repertoires, polymorphisms, and IG mutations: IMGT/V-QUEST and IMGT/HighV-QUEST for NGS. Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) 882(Chapter. 2012;32:569–604. - PubMed
    1. Alsoussi W.B., Turner J.S., Case J.B., Zhao H., Schmitz A.J., Zhou J.Q., Chen R.E., Lei T., Rizk A.A., McIntire K.M., et al. A Potently Neutralizing Antibody Protects Mice against SARS-CoV-2 Infection. J. Immunol. 2020;205:915–922. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Amanat F., Stadlbauer D., Strohmeier S., Nguyen T.H.O., Chromikova V., McMahon M., Jiang K., Arunkumar G.A., Jurczyszak D., Polanco J., et al. A serological assay to detect SARS-CoV-2 seroconversion in humans. Nat. Med. 2020;26:1033–1036. - PMC - PubMed
Show all 63 references
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
[x]
Cite
Copy Download .nbib
Format: AMA APA MLA NLM

NCBI Literature Resources

MeSH PMC Bookshelf Disclaimer

The PubMed wordmark and PubMed logo are registered trademarks of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). Unauthorized use of these marks is strictly prohibited.

Follow NCBI
Figure S4
Figure S4
Mild COVID-19 Induces Persistent, Neutralizing Anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG Antibody, Related to Figure 1 (A) ELISA dilution curves and area under the curve (AUC) for anti-spike IgG (left), IgM (center), and IgA (right) from healthy control (HC) and SARS-CoV-2-recovered (CoV2+) individuals plasma at Visit 1 (V1). Dashed line indicates mean + 3 SD of the HC AUC values. (B) Spearman correlation of V1 anti-RBD and anti-spike IgG (left), IgM (center), and IgA (right) AUC. Statistics determined by two-tailed Mann-Whitney tests. Multiple testing correction significance cutoff at FDR = 0.05 is p value 

Figure S5

Mild COVID-19 Induces a Sustained…

Figure S5

Mild COVID-19 Induces a Sustained Enrichment of RBD-Specific IgG + Memory B Cells,…

Figure S5
Mild COVID-19 Induces a Sustained Enrichment of RBD-Specific IgG+ Memory B Cells, Related to Figure 2 (A) Representative flow cytometry gates for phenotyping RBD-specific B cells from PBMCs in Figure 2 set on total B cells from a healthy control (HC) (surface stain, top; intracellular stain, bottom). (B) Number of RBD-specific IgD+, IgM+ and IgA+ MBCs (CD20+RBD tetramer+decoy tetramer- CD27+CD21+/CD27+CD21-/CD27-CD21-) from healthy control (HC) and SARS-CoV-2-recovered (CoV2+) PBMCs at Visit 1 (V1) and Visit 2 (V2). Statistics for unpaired data determined by two-tailed Mann-Whitney tests and, for paired data, by two-tailed Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. Multiple testing correction significance cutoff at FDR = 0.05 is p value 

Figure 2

Mild COVID-19 Induces a Sustained…

Figure 2

Mild COVID-19 Induces a Sustained Enrichment of RBD-Specific IgG + Memory B Cells…

Figure 2
Mild COVID-19 Induces a Sustained Enrichment of RBD-Specific IgG+ Memory B Cells (A) Representative gating of live CD3–CD14–CD16– cells for SARS-CoV-2 RBD-specific cells (RBD tetramer+decoy tetramer–) from CoV2+ and HC PBMCs at V1 and V2. (B) Number of RBD-specific B cells (RBD tetramer+decoy tetramer–CD20+) per 1 × 106 PBMCs. (C) Representative flow cytometry plots and number of RBD-specific PBs (RBD tetramer+decoy tetramer−CD20−CD138hi) (na = could not be calculated because all values 0). (D) Representative gating of RBD-specific B cells for naive B cells (CD21+CD27−) and MBCs (CD21+CD27+/CD21–CD27+/CD21–CD27– populations outlined in green). (E) Proportion of RBD-specific B cells that are naive (CD21+CD27−), classical MBCs (CD21+CD27+), or activated MBCs (CD21−CD27+/−), statistics for the proportion that are MBCs. (F) Number of RBD-specific MBCs (classical and activated). (G) Representative gating of RBD-specific MBCs for BCR isotype (IgD, IgM, IgA, and IgG) expression. (H) Proportion of RBD-specific MBCs expressing the BCR isotypes IgD, IgM, IgA, and IgG. Statistics are for the proportion that are IgG+. (I) Number of RBD-specific IgG+ MBCs. (J) Representative gating of RBD-specific MBCs for T-bet expression and number of RBD-specific T-bet+ MBCs. Statistics for unpaired data determined by 2-tailed Mann-Whitney tests and, for paired data, by 2-tailed Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. Multiple testing correction significance cutoff at FDR = 0.05 is p value 

Figure 3

SARS-CoV-2 Infection Induces Durable, Functional…

Figure 3

SARS-CoV-2 Infection Induces Durable, Functional Spike-Reactive CD4 + T Cells (A) Representative flow…

Figure 3
SARS-CoV-2 Infection Induces Durable, Functional Spike-Reactive CD4+ T Cells (A) Representative flow cytometry plots of ICOS and CD40L expression on antigen-experienced (non-CD45RA+CCR7+) CD4+ T cells 20 h after incubation of PBMCs from HC and CoV2+ individuals at V1 and V2 with vehicle or SARS-CoV-2 spike. (B) Number of antigen-experienced ICOS+CD40L+CD4+ T cells per 1x106 CD4+ T cells from HC and CoV2+ samples after incubation with vehicle (Veh.) or spike (S) at both time points (right) and calculated number of spike-responsive CD4+ T cells (number after incubation with spike minus number after incubation with vehicle) compared across time points (left). (C) Number of antigen-experienced CXCR5+ICOS+CD40L+CD4+ T cells (cTfh) per 1 × 106 CD4+ T cells from HC and CoV2+ samples after incubation with Veh. or S at both time points (right) and calculated number of spike-responsive cTfh cells (number after incubation with spike minus number after incubation with vehicle) compared across time points (left). (D) Representative flow cytometry plots of sorted CD4+ naive (CD45RA+CCR7+), TCM (CD45RA−CCR7+), or TEM (CD45RA−CCR7−) T cells from HC and CoV2+ PBMCs after 5–6 days of co-culture with SARS-CoV-2 spike-protein-pulsed autologous monocytes and measuring proliferation by CPD dilution. (E) SARS-CoV-2 spike-specific expansion of sorted CD4+ naive T, TCM, and TEM cells from V1 (circles) and V2 (squares) reported as frequency of CXCR3+CPDlo cells after incubation with spike minus frequency after incubation with vehicle. (F) Number of cytokine-producing, antigen-experienced CD69+CD4+ T cells per 1 × 106 CD4+ T cells after incubation with Veh. or S (right) and calculated number of spike-responsive, cytokine-producing CD4+ T cells (number after incubation with spike minus number after incubation with vehicle) (left). (G) Frequency of antigen-experienced CD69+CD4+ T cell subsets, CCR6+/− Teff (CXCR5−), and CCR6+/− cTfh (CXCR5+) producing IL-2, IFN-γ, and IL-17A effector cytokines after incubation with spike for 20 h. (H) Representative flow cytometry plots of CD69 and IFN-γ expression on antigen-experienced CD8+ T cells from HC and CoV2+ PBMCs at V2 after 20 h of incubation with vehicle or SARS-CoV-2 spike. (I) Number of antigen-experienced IFN-γ+CD69+CD8+ T cells per 1 × 106 CD8+ T cells after 20 h of incubation with Veh. or S (right) and calculated number of spike-responsive CD8+ T cells (number after incubation with spike minus number after incubation with vehicle) (left). Statistics for unpaired data determined by 2-tailed Mann-Whitney tests and, for paired data, by 2-tailed Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. Multiple testing correction significance cutoff at FDR = 0.05 is p value 

Figure S6

SARS-CoV-2 Infection Induces Durable, Functional…

Figure S6

SARS-CoV-2 Infection Induces Durable, Functional Spike-Reactive CD4 + T Cells, Related to Figure…

Figure S6
SARS-CoV-2 Infection Induces Durable, Functional Spike-Reactive CD4+ T Cells, Related to Figure 3 (A) Flow cytometry sorting strategy for naive, T central memory (TCM), and T effector memory (TEM) cells from HC and CoV2+ PBMCs at Visit 1 and Visit 2 before 5-6 days of culture with autologous monocytes and SARS-CoV-2 spike protein or vehicle. (B) Representative flow cytometry gating on PMA/Ionomycin-activated PBMCs for cytokine expression by antigen experienced (non-CD45RA+CCR7+) CD4+ T cells subset into CCR6+/− T effector cells (Teff, CXCR5-) and circulating T follicular helper cells (cTfh, CXCR5+). (C) Representative flow cytometry gating on antigen-experienced (non-CD45RA+CCR7+) CD4+ T cells from HC and CoV2+ V2 PBMCs following incubation with SARS-CoV-2 spike for 20 h. Gating on CD69+ CCR6+/− T effector cells (Teff, CXCR5-) and CCR6+/− circulating T follicular helper cells (cTfh, CXCR5+) for IL-2, IFN-γ and IL-17A effector cytokines expression. (D) Number of IL-4-producing, antigen-experienced CD69+CD4+ T cells per 1x106 CD4+ T cells after incubation with vehicle (Veh.) or SARS-CoV2 spike (S) (left) and calculated number of spike-responsive, cytokine-producing CD4+ T cells (number after incubation with spike minus number after incubation with vehicle)(right). Statistics determined by two-tailed Mann-Whitney tests. Multiple testing correction significance cutoff at FDR = 0.05 is p value 

Figure S7

SARS-CoV-2-Specific MBCs Can Express Neutralizing…

Figure S7

SARS-CoV-2-Specific MBCs Can Express Neutralizing Antibodies, Related to Figure 4 and Table S1…

Figure S7
SARS-CoV-2-Specific MBCs Can Express Neutralizing Antibodies, Related to Figure 4 and Table S1 (A) Gating strategy for sorting RBD-specific B cells. (B) IgG ELISA to confirm expression of Visit 1 antibodies in transfected cell culture supernatants. Positive control is the kit standard (std) and negative control is supernatant from untransfected cells (no trans, green). (C) RBD ELISA of purified Visit 1 monoclonal antibodies. Negative control (green) is an irrelevant Plasmodium-specific antibody. (D) IgG ELISA to confirm expression of Visit 2 antibodies in transfected cell culture supernatants. (E) RBD ELISA of purified Visit 2 monoclonal antibodies. (F) Number of mutations in variable regions of RBD-specific monoclonal antibodies. (G) Mutation frequency of variable regions of RBD-specific monoclonal antibodies. Statistics determined by two-tailed Mann-Whitney tests. Multiple testing correction significance cutoff at FDR = 0.05 is p value 

Figure 4

SARS-CoV-2-Specific MBCs Can Express Neutralizing…

Figure 4

SARS-CoV-2-Specific MBCs Can Express Neutralizing Antibodies (A) Representative flow plots of index-sorted RBD-tetramer…

Figure 4
SARS-CoV-2-Specific MBCs Can Express Neutralizing Antibodies (A) Representative flow plots of index-sorted RBD-tetramer specific B cells (gating scheme in Figure S7A). BCRs cloned from cells are shown in red. (B) Anti-RBD ELISA of culture supernatants from cells transfected to express one of the Visit 1 monoclonal antibodies or supernatant from untransfected cells (no trans). Antibodies that did not bind RBD are shown in orange. (C) Inhibition of RBD binding to ACE2 by Visit 1 monoclonal antibody supernatants measured by sVNT assay, compared to a known RBD-specific neutralizing antibody (Ty1). Red indicates strong inhibitors, blue moderate inhibitors and black non-inhibitors. (D) Anti-RBD ELISA of culture supernatants from cells transfected to express one of the Visit 2 monoclonal antibodies. Antibodies that did not bind RBD are shown in orange. (E) Inhibition of RBD binding to ACE2 by Visit 2 monoclonal antibodies measured by sVNT assay. Red indicates strong inhibitors and black non-inhibitors. (F) Neutralization capacity of purified monoclonal antibodies as measured by PRNT. 2B04 and 2C02 are previously identified strong and weak neutralizing murine antibodies, respectively, and MSP-003 is an irrelevant Plasmodium-specific antibody. (G) IC50 values calculated from PRNT. Dotted line represents the limit of detection. See also Figure S7.

Figure 5

Recovered Individuals Formed Multifaceted SARS-CoV-2-Specific…

Figure 5

Recovered Individuals Formed Multifaceted SARS-CoV-2-Specific Immune Memory Heatmap of values for independent SARS-CoV2…

Figure 5
Recovered Individuals Formed Multifaceted SARS-CoV-2-Specific Immune Memory Heatmap of values for independent SARS-CoV2 RBD- or spike-specific immune memory components from each HC and CoV2+ individual at Visit 2. RBD-specific IgG measured by ELISA (AUC). Percent inhibition by sVNT calculated at 1:2 plasma dilution. Number of RBD-specific IgG+ MBCs per 1 × 106 PBMCs. Number of spike-responsive (CD69+), cytokine-producing (IL-2/IFN-γ/IL-17A), antigen-experienced CD4+ T cells calculated by number after 20 h incubation with spike minus number after incubation with vehicle. Number of spike-responsive (CD69+IFN-γ+), antigen-experienced CD8+ T cells calculated by number after 20 h incubation with spike minus number after incubation with vehicle. The color scales are set for each metric (row) with the mean + 1 SD of the HC set to white.
All figures (13)
Update of
  • Functional SARS-CoV-2-specific immune memory persists after mild COVID-19.
    Rodda LB, Netland J, Shehata L, Pruner KB, Morawski PM, Thouvenel C, Takehara KK, Eggenberger J, Hemann EA, Waterman HR, Fahning ML, Chen Y, Rathe J, Stokes C, Wrenn S, Fiala B, Carter LP, Hamerman JA, King NP, Gale M, Campbell DJ, Rawlings D, Pepper M. Rodda LB, et al. medRxiv. 2020 Aug 15:2020.08.11.20171843. doi: 10.1101/2020.08.11.20171843. Preprint. medRxiv. 2020. PMID: 32817957 Free PMC article. Updated.
  • Functional SARS-CoV-2-specific immune memory persists after mild COVID-19.
    Rodda LB, Netland J, Shehata L, Pruner KB, Morawski PA, Thouvenel C, Takehara KK, Eggenberger J, Hemann E, Waterman HR, Fahning ML, Chen Y, Rathe J, Stokes C, Wrenn S, Fiala B, Carter L, Hamerman JA, King NP, Gale M Jr, Campbell DJ, Rawlings D, Pepper M. Rodda LB, et al. Res Sq. 2020 Aug 13:rs.3.rs-57112. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-57112/v1. Preprint. Res Sq. 2020. PMID: 32818218 Free PMC article. Updated.
Similar articles
Cited by
References
    1. Addetia A., Crawford K.H.D., Dingens A., Zhu H., Roychoudhury P., Huang M.-L., Jerome K.R., Bloom J.D., Greninger A.L. Neutralizing Antibodies Correlate with Protection from SARS-CoV-2 in Humans during a Fishery Vessel Outbreak with a High Attack Rate. J. Clin. Microbiology. 2020;58 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ahmed R., Gray D. Immunological memory and protective immunity: understanding their relation. Science. 1996;272:54–60. - PubMed
    1. Alamyar E., et al. IMGT(®) tools for the nucleotide analysis of immunoglobulin (IG) and T cell receptor (TR) V-(D)-J repertoires, polymorphisms, and IG mutations: IMGT/V-QUEST and IMGT/HighV-QUEST for NGS. Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) 882(Chapter. 2012;32:569–604. - PubMed
    1. Alsoussi W.B., Turner J.S., Case J.B., Zhao H., Schmitz A.J., Zhou J.Q., Chen R.E., Lei T., Rizk A.A., McIntire K.M., et al. A Potently Neutralizing Antibody Protects Mice against SARS-CoV-2 Infection. J. Immunol. 2020;205:915–922. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Amanat F., Stadlbauer D., Strohmeier S., Nguyen T.H.O., Chromikova V., McMahon M., Jiang K., Arunkumar G.A., Jurczyszak D., Polanco J., et al. A serological assay to detect SARS-CoV-2 seroconversion in humans. Nat. Med. 2020;26:1033–1036. - PMC - PubMed
Show all 63 references
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
[x]
Cite
Copy Download .nbib
Format: AMA APA MLA NLM

NCBI Literature Resources

MeSH PMC Bookshelf Disclaimer

The PubMed wordmark and PubMed logo are registered trademarks of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). Unauthorized use of these marks is strictly prohibited.

Follow NCBI
Figure S5
Figure S5
Mild COVID-19 Induces a Sustained Enrichment of RBD-Specific IgG+ Memory B Cells, Related to Figure 2 (A) Representative flow cytometry gates for phenotyping RBD-specific B cells from PBMCs in Figure 2 set on total B cells from a healthy control (HC) (surface stain, top; intracellular stain, bottom). (B) Number of RBD-specific IgD+, IgM+ and IgA+ MBCs (CD20+RBD tetramer+decoy tetramer- CD27+CD21+/CD27+CD21-/CD27-CD21-) from healthy control (HC) and SARS-CoV-2-recovered (CoV2+) PBMCs at Visit 1 (V1) and Visit 2 (V2). Statistics for unpaired data determined by two-tailed Mann-Whitney tests and, for paired data, by two-tailed Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. Multiple testing correction significance cutoff at FDR = 0.05 is p value 

Figure 2

Mild COVID-19 Induces a Sustained…

Figure 2

Mild COVID-19 Induces a Sustained Enrichment of RBD-Specific IgG + Memory B Cells…

Figure 2
Mild COVID-19 Induces a Sustained Enrichment of RBD-Specific IgG+ Memory B Cells (A) Representative gating of live CD3–CD14–CD16– cells for SARS-CoV-2 RBD-specific cells (RBD tetramer+decoy tetramer–) from CoV2+ and HC PBMCs at V1 and V2. (B) Number of RBD-specific B cells (RBD tetramer+decoy tetramer–CD20+) per 1 × 106 PBMCs. (C) Representative flow cytometry plots and number of RBD-specific PBs (RBD tetramer+decoy tetramer−CD20−CD138hi) (na = could not be calculated because all values 0). (D) Representative gating of RBD-specific B cells for naive B cells (CD21+CD27−) and MBCs (CD21+CD27+/CD21–CD27+/CD21–CD27– populations outlined in green). (E) Proportion of RBD-specific B cells that are naive (CD21+CD27−), classical MBCs (CD21+CD27+), or activated MBCs (CD21−CD27+/−), statistics for the proportion that are MBCs. (F) Number of RBD-specific MBCs (classical and activated). (G) Representative gating of RBD-specific MBCs for BCR isotype (IgD, IgM, IgA, and IgG) expression. (H) Proportion of RBD-specific MBCs expressing the BCR isotypes IgD, IgM, IgA, and IgG. Statistics are for the proportion that are IgG+. (I) Number of RBD-specific IgG+ MBCs. (J) Representative gating of RBD-specific MBCs for T-bet expression and number of RBD-specific T-bet+ MBCs. Statistics for unpaired data determined by 2-tailed Mann-Whitney tests and, for paired data, by 2-tailed Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. Multiple testing correction significance cutoff at FDR = 0.05 is p value 

Figure 3

SARS-CoV-2 Infection Induces Durable, Functional…

Figure 3

SARS-CoV-2 Infection Induces Durable, Functional Spike-Reactive CD4 + T Cells (A) Representative flow…

Figure 3
SARS-CoV-2 Infection Induces Durable, Functional Spike-Reactive CD4+ T Cells (A) Representative flow cytometry plots of ICOS and CD40L expression on antigen-experienced (non-CD45RA+CCR7+) CD4+ T cells 20 h after incubation of PBMCs from HC and CoV2+ individuals at V1 and V2 with vehicle or SARS-CoV-2 spike. (B) Number of antigen-experienced ICOS+CD40L+CD4+ T cells per 1x106 CD4+ T cells from HC and CoV2+ samples after incubation with vehicle (Veh.) or spike (S) at both time points (right) and calculated number of spike-responsive CD4+ T cells (number after incubation with spike minus number after incubation with vehicle) compared across time points (left). (C) Number of antigen-experienced CXCR5+ICOS+CD40L+CD4+ T cells (cTfh) per 1 × 106 CD4+ T cells from HC and CoV2+ samples after incubation with Veh. or S at both time points (right) and calculated number of spike-responsive cTfh cells (number after incubation with spike minus number after incubation with vehicle) compared across time points (left). (D) Representative flow cytometry plots of sorted CD4+ naive (CD45RA+CCR7+), TCM (CD45RA−CCR7+), or TEM (CD45RA−CCR7−) T cells from HC and CoV2+ PBMCs after 5–6 days of co-culture with SARS-CoV-2 spike-protein-pulsed autologous monocytes and measuring proliferation by CPD dilution. (E) SARS-CoV-2 spike-specific expansion of sorted CD4+ naive T, TCM, and TEM cells from V1 (circles) and V2 (squares) reported as frequency of CXCR3+CPDlo cells after incubation with spike minus frequency after incubation with vehicle. (F) Number of cytokine-producing, antigen-experienced CD69+CD4+ T cells per 1 × 106 CD4+ T cells after incubation with Veh. or S (right) and calculated number of spike-responsive, cytokine-producing CD4+ T cells (number after incubation with spike minus number after incubation with vehicle) (left). (G) Frequency of antigen-experienced CD69+CD4+ T cell subsets, CCR6+/− Teff (CXCR5−), and CCR6+/− cTfh (CXCR5+) producing IL-2, IFN-γ, and IL-17A effector cytokines after incubation with spike for 20 h. (H) Representative flow cytometry plots of CD69 and IFN-γ expression on antigen-experienced CD8+ T cells from HC and CoV2+ PBMCs at V2 after 20 h of incubation with vehicle or SARS-CoV-2 spike. (I) Number of antigen-experienced IFN-γ+CD69+CD8+ T cells per 1 × 106 CD8+ T cells after 20 h of incubation with Veh. or S (right) and calculated number of spike-responsive CD8+ T cells (number after incubation with spike minus number after incubation with vehicle) (left). Statistics for unpaired data determined by 2-tailed Mann-Whitney tests and, for paired data, by 2-tailed Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. Multiple testing correction significance cutoff at FDR = 0.05 is p value 

Figure S6

SARS-CoV-2 Infection Induces Durable, Functional…

Figure S6

SARS-CoV-2 Infection Induces Durable, Functional Spike-Reactive CD4 + T Cells, Related to Figure…

Figure S6
SARS-CoV-2 Infection Induces Durable, Functional Spike-Reactive CD4+ T Cells, Related to Figure 3 (A) Flow cytometry sorting strategy for naive, T central memory (TCM), and T effector memory (TEM) cells from HC and CoV2+ PBMCs at Visit 1 and Visit 2 before 5-6 days of culture with autologous monocytes and SARS-CoV-2 spike protein or vehicle. (B) Representative flow cytometry gating on PMA/Ionomycin-activated PBMCs for cytokine expression by antigen experienced (non-CD45RA+CCR7+) CD4+ T cells subset into CCR6+/− T effector cells (Teff, CXCR5-) and circulating T follicular helper cells (cTfh, CXCR5+). (C) Representative flow cytometry gating on antigen-experienced (non-CD45RA+CCR7+) CD4+ T cells from HC and CoV2+ V2 PBMCs following incubation with SARS-CoV-2 spike for 20 h. Gating on CD69+ CCR6+/− T effector cells (Teff, CXCR5-) and CCR6+/− circulating T follicular helper cells (cTfh, CXCR5+) for IL-2, IFN-γ and IL-17A effector cytokines expression. (D) Number of IL-4-producing, antigen-experienced CD69+CD4+ T cells per 1x106 CD4+ T cells after incubation with vehicle (Veh.) or SARS-CoV2 spike (S) (left) and calculated number of spike-responsive, cytokine-producing CD4+ T cells (number after incubation with spike minus number after incubation with vehicle)(right). Statistics determined by two-tailed Mann-Whitney tests. Multiple testing correction significance cutoff at FDR = 0.05 is p value 

Figure S7

SARS-CoV-2-Specific MBCs Can Express Neutralizing…

Figure S7

SARS-CoV-2-Specific MBCs Can Express Neutralizing Antibodies, Related to Figure 4 and Table S1…

Figure S7
SARS-CoV-2-Specific MBCs Can Express Neutralizing Antibodies, Related to Figure 4 and Table S1 (A) Gating strategy for sorting RBD-specific B cells. (B) IgG ELISA to confirm expression of Visit 1 antibodies in transfected cell culture supernatants. Positive control is the kit standard (std) and negative control is supernatant from untransfected cells (no trans, green). (C) RBD ELISA of purified Visit 1 monoclonal antibodies. Negative control (green) is an irrelevant Plasmodium-specific antibody. (D) IgG ELISA to confirm expression of Visit 2 antibodies in transfected cell culture supernatants. (E) RBD ELISA of purified Visit 2 monoclonal antibodies. (F) Number of mutations in variable regions of RBD-specific monoclonal antibodies. (G) Mutation frequency of variable regions of RBD-specific monoclonal antibodies. Statistics determined by two-tailed Mann-Whitney tests. Multiple testing correction significance cutoff at FDR = 0.05 is p value 

Figure 4

SARS-CoV-2-Specific MBCs Can Express Neutralizing…

Figure 4

SARS-CoV-2-Specific MBCs Can Express Neutralizing Antibodies (A) Representative flow plots of index-sorted RBD-tetramer…

Figure 4
SARS-CoV-2-Specific MBCs Can Express Neutralizing Antibodies (A) Representative flow plots of index-sorted RBD-tetramer specific B cells (gating scheme in Figure S7A). BCRs cloned from cells are shown in red. (B) Anti-RBD ELISA of culture supernatants from cells transfected to express one of the Visit 1 monoclonal antibodies or supernatant from untransfected cells (no trans). Antibodies that did not bind RBD are shown in orange. (C) Inhibition of RBD binding to ACE2 by Visit 1 monoclonal antibody supernatants measured by sVNT assay, compared to a known RBD-specific neutralizing antibody (Ty1). Red indicates strong inhibitors, blue moderate inhibitors and black non-inhibitors. (D) Anti-RBD ELISA of culture supernatants from cells transfected to express one of the Visit 2 monoclonal antibodies. Antibodies that did not bind RBD are shown in orange. (E) Inhibition of RBD binding to ACE2 by Visit 2 monoclonal antibodies measured by sVNT assay. Red indicates strong inhibitors and black non-inhibitors. (F) Neutralization capacity of purified monoclonal antibodies as measured by PRNT. 2B04 and 2C02 are previously identified strong and weak neutralizing murine antibodies, respectively, and MSP-003 is an irrelevant Plasmodium-specific antibody. (G) IC50 values calculated from PRNT. Dotted line represents the limit of detection. See also Figure S7.

Figure 5

Recovered Individuals Formed Multifaceted SARS-CoV-2-Specific…

Figure 5

Recovered Individuals Formed Multifaceted SARS-CoV-2-Specific Immune Memory Heatmap of values for independent SARS-CoV2…

Figure 5
Recovered Individuals Formed Multifaceted SARS-CoV-2-Specific Immune Memory Heatmap of values for independent SARS-CoV2 RBD- or spike-specific immune memory components from each HC and CoV2+ individual at Visit 2. RBD-specific IgG measured by ELISA (AUC). Percent inhibition by sVNT calculated at 1:2 plasma dilution. Number of RBD-specific IgG+ MBCs per 1 × 106 PBMCs. Number of spike-responsive (CD69+), cytokine-producing (IL-2/IFN-γ/IL-17A), antigen-experienced CD4+ T cells calculated by number after 20 h incubation with spike minus number after incubation with vehicle. Number of spike-responsive (CD69+IFN-γ+), antigen-experienced CD8+ T cells calculated by number after 20 h incubation with spike minus number after incubation with vehicle. The color scales are set for each metric (row) with the mean + 1 SD of the HC set to white.
All figures (13)
Update of
  • Functional SARS-CoV-2-specific immune memory persists after mild COVID-19.
    Rodda LB, Netland J, Shehata L, Pruner KB, Morawski PM, Thouvenel C, Takehara KK, Eggenberger J, Hemann EA, Waterman HR, Fahning ML, Chen Y, Rathe J, Stokes C, Wrenn S, Fiala B, Carter LP, Hamerman JA, King NP, Gale M, Campbell DJ, Rawlings D, Pepper M. Rodda LB, et al. medRxiv. 2020 Aug 15:2020.08.11.20171843. doi: 10.1101/2020.08.11.20171843. Preprint. medRxiv. 2020. PMID: 32817957 Free PMC article. Updated.
  • Functional SARS-CoV-2-specific immune memory persists after mild COVID-19.
    Rodda LB, Netland J, Shehata L, Pruner KB, Morawski PA, Thouvenel C, Takehara KK, Eggenberger J, Hemann E, Waterman HR, Fahning ML, Chen Y, Rathe J, Stokes C, Wrenn S, Fiala B, Carter L, Hamerman JA, King NP, Gale M Jr, Campbell DJ, Rawlings D, Pepper M. Rodda LB, et al. Res Sq. 2020 Aug 13:rs.3.rs-57112. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-57112/v1. Preprint. Res Sq. 2020. PMID: 32818218 Free PMC article. Updated.
Similar articles
Cited by
References
    1. Addetia A., Crawford K.H.D., Dingens A., Zhu H., Roychoudhury P., Huang M.-L., Jerome K.R., Bloom J.D., Greninger A.L. Neutralizing Antibodies Correlate with Protection from SARS-CoV-2 in Humans during a Fishery Vessel Outbreak with a High Attack Rate. J. Clin. Microbiology. 2020;58 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ahmed R., Gray D. Immunological memory and protective immunity: understanding their relation. Science. 1996;272:54–60. - PubMed
    1. Alamyar E., et al. IMGT(®) tools for the nucleotide analysis of immunoglobulin (IG) and T cell receptor (TR) V-(D)-J repertoires, polymorphisms, and IG mutations: IMGT/V-QUEST and IMGT/HighV-QUEST for NGS. Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) 882(Chapter. 2012;32:569–604. - PubMed
    1. Alsoussi W.B., Turner J.S., Case J.B., Zhao H., Schmitz A.J., Zhou J.Q., Chen R.E., Lei T., Rizk A.A., McIntire K.M., et al. A Potently Neutralizing Antibody Protects Mice against SARS-CoV-2 Infection. J. Immunol. 2020;205:915–922. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Amanat F., Stadlbauer D., Strohmeier S., Nguyen T.H.O., Chromikova V., McMahon M., Jiang K., Arunkumar G.A., Jurczyszak D., Polanco J., et al. A serological assay to detect SARS-CoV-2 seroconversion in humans. Nat. Med. 2020;26:1033–1036. - PMC - PubMed
Show all 63 references
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
[x]
Cite
Copy Download .nbib
Format: AMA APA MLA NLM

NCBI Literature Resources

MeSH PMC Bookshelf Disclaimer

The PubMed wordmark and PubMed logo are registered trademarks of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). Unauthorized use of these marks is strictly prohibited.

Follow NCBI
Figure 2
Figure 2
Mild COVID-19 Induces a Sustained Enrichment of RBD-Specific IgG+ Memory B Cells (A) Representative gating of live CD3–CD14–CD16– cells for SARS-CoV-2 RBD-specific cells (RBD tetramer+decoy tetramer–) from CoV2+ and HC PBMCs at V1 and V2. (B) Number of RBD-specific B cells (RBD tetramer+decoy tetramer–CD20+) per 1 × 106 PBMCs. (C) Representative flow cytometry plots and number of RBD-specific PBs (RBD tetramer+decoy tetramer−CD20−CD138hi) (na = could not be calculated because all values 0). (D) Representative gating of RBD-specific B cells for naive B cells (CD21+CD27−) and MBCs (CD21+CD27+/CD21–CD27+/CD21–CD27– populations outlined in green). (E) Proportion of RBD-specific B cells that are naive (CD21+CD27−), classical MBCs (CD21+CD27+), or activated MBCs (CD21−CD27+/−), statistics for the proportion that are MBCs. (F) Number of RBD-specific MBCs (classical and activated). (G) Representative gating of RBD-specific MBCs for BCR isotype (IgD, IgM, IgA, and IgG) expression. (H) Proportion of RBD-specific MBCs expressing the BCR isotypes IgD, IgM, IgA, and IgG. Statistics are for the proportion that are IgG+. (I) Number of RBD-specific IgG+ MBCs. (J) Representative gating of RBD-specific MBCs for T-bet expression and number of RBD-specific T-bet+ MBCs. Statistics for unpaired data determined by 2-tailed Mann-Whitney tests and, for paired data, by 2-tailed Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. Multiple testing correction significance cutoff at FDR = 0.05 is p value 

Figure 3

SARS-CoV-2 Infection Induces Durable, Functional…

Figure 3

SARS-CoV-2 Infection Induces Durable, Functional Spike-Reactive CD4 + T Cells (A) Representative flow…

Figure 3
SARS-CoV-2 Infection Induces Durable, Functional Spike-Reactive CD4+ T Cells (A) Representative flow cytometry plots of ICOS and CD40L expression on antigen-experienced (non-CD45RA+CCR7+) CD4+ T cells 20 h after incubation of PBMCs from HC and CoV2+ individuals at V1 and V2 with vehicle or SARS-CoV-2 spike. (B) Number of antigen-experienced ICOS+CD40L+CD4+ T cells per 1x106 CD4+ T cells from HC and CoV2+ samples after incubation with vehicle (Veh.) or spike (S) at both time points (right) and calculated number of spike-responsive CD4+ T cells (number after incubation with spike minus number after incubation with vehicle) compared across time points (left). (C) Number of antigen-experienced CXCR5+ICOS+CD40L+CD4+ T cells (cTfh) per 1 × 106 CD4+ T cells from HC and CoV2+ samples after incubation with Veh. or S at both time points (right) and calculated number of spike-responsive cTfh cells (number after incubation with spike minus number after incubation with vehicle) compared across time points (left). (D) Representative flow cytometry plots of sorted CD4+ naive (CD45RA+CCR7+), TCM (CD45RA−CCR7+), or TEM (CD45RA−CCR7−) T cells from HC and CoV2+ PBMCs after 5–6 days of co-culture with SARS-CoV-2 spike-protein-pulsed autologous monocytes and measuring proliferation by CPD dilution. (E) SARS-CoV-2 spike-specific expansion of sorted CD4+ naive T, TCM, and TEM cells from V1 (circles) and V2 (squares) reported as frequency of CXCR3+CPDlo cells after incubation with spike minus frequency after incubation with vehicle. (F) Number of cytokine-producing, antigen-experienced CD69+CD4+ T cells per 1 × 106 CD4+ T cells after incubation with Veh. or S (right) and calculated number of spike-responsive, cytokine-producing CD4+ T cells (number after incubation with spike minus number after incubation with vehicle) (left). (G) Frequency of antigen-experienced CD69+CD4+ T cell subsets, CCR6+/− Teff (CXCR5−), and CCR6+/− cTfh (CXCR5+) producing IL-2, IFN-γ, and IL-17A effector cytokines after incubation with spike for 20 h. (H) Representative flow cytometry plots of CD69 and IFN-γ expression on antigen-experienced CD8+ T cells from HC and CoV2+ PBMCs at V2 after 20 h of incubation with vehicle or SARS-CoV-2 spike. (I) Number of antigen-experienced IFN-γ+CD69+CD8+ T cells per 1 × 106 CD8+ T cells after 20 h of incubation with Veh. or S (right) and calculated number of spike-responsive CD8+ T cells (number after incubation with spike minus number after incubation with vehicle) (left). Statistics for unpaired data determined by 2-tailed Mann-Whitney tests and, for paired data, by 2-tailed Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. Multiple testing correction significance cutoff at FDR = 0.05 is p value 

Figure S6

SARS-CoV-2 Infection Induces Durable, Functional…

Figure S6

SARS-CoV-2 Infection Induces Durable, Functional Spike-Reactive CD4 + T Cells, Related to Figure…

Figure S6
SARS-CoV-2 Infection Induces Durable, Functional Spike-Reactive CD4+ T Cells, Related to Figure 3 (A) Flow cytometry sorting strategy for naive, T central memory (TCM), and T effector memory (TEM) cells from HC and CoV2+ PBMCs at Visit 1 and Visit 2 before 5-6 days of culture with autologous monocytes and SARS-CoV-2 spike protein or vehicle. (B) Representative flow cytometry gating on PMA/Ionomycin-activated PBMCs for cytokine expression by antigen experienced (non-CD45RA+CCR7+) CD4+ T cells subset into CCR6+/− T effector cells (Teff, CXCR5-) and circulating T follicular helper cells (cTfh, CXCR5+). (C) Representative flow cytometry gating on antigen-experienced (non-CD45RA+CCR7+) CD4+ T cells from HC and CoV2+ V2 PBMCs following incubation with SARS-CoV-2 spike for 20 h. Gating on CD69+ CCR6+/− T effector cells (Teff, CXCR5-) and CCR6+/− circulating T follicular helper cells (cTfh, CXCR5+) for IL-2, IFN-γ and IL-17A effector cytokines expression. (D) Number of IL-4-producing, antigen-experienced CD69+CD4+ T cells per 1x106 CD4+ T cells after incubation with vehicle (Veh.) or SARS-CoV2 spike (S) (left) and calculated number of spike-responsive, cytokine-producing CD4+ T cells (number after incubation with spike minus number after incubation with vehicle)(right). Statistics determined by two-tailed Mann-Whitney tests. Multiple testing correction significance cutoff at FDR = 0.05 is p value 

Figure S7

SARS-CoV-2-Specific MBCs Can Express Neutralizing…

Figure S7

SARS-CoV-2-Specific MBCs Can Express Neutralizing Antibodies, Related to Figure 4 and Table S1…

Figure S7
SARS-CoV-2-Specific MBCs Can Express Neutralizing Antibodies, Related to Figure 4 and Table S1 (A) Gating strategy for sorting RBD-specific B cells. (B) IgG ELISA to confirm expression of Visit 1 antibodies in transfected cell culture supernatants. Positive control is the kit standard (std) and negative control is supernatant from untransfected cells (no trans, green). (C) RBD ELISA of purified Visit 1 monoclonal antibodies. Negative control (green) is an irrelevant Plasmodium-specific antibody. (D) IgG ELISA to confirm expression of Visit 2 antibodies in transfected cell culture supernatants. (E) RBD ELISA of purified Visit 2 monoclonal antibodies. (F) Number of mutations in variable regions of RBD-specific monoclonal antibodies. (G) Mutation frequency of variable regions of RBD-specific monoclonal antibodies. Statistics determined by two-tailed Mann-Whitney tests. Multiple testing correction significance cutoff at FDR = 0.05 is p value 

Figure 4

SARS-CoV-2-Specific MBCs Can Express Neutralizing…

Figure 4

SARS-CoV-2-Specific MBCs Can Express Neutralizing Antibodies (A) Representative flow plots of index-sorted RBD-tetramer…

Figure 4
SARS-CoV-2-Specific MBCs Can Express Neutralizing Antibodies (A) Representative flow plots of index-sorted RBD-tetramer specific B cells (gating scheme in Figure S7A). BCRs cloned from cells are shown in red. (B) Anti-RBD ELISA of culture supernatants from cells transfected to express one of the Visit 1 monoclonal antibodies or supernatant from untransfected cells (no trans). Antibodies that did not bind RBD are shown in orange. (C) Inhibition of RBD binding to ACE2 by Visit 1 monoclonal antibody supernatants measured by sVNT assay, compared to a known RBD-specific neutralizing antibody (Ty1). Red indicates strong inhibitors, blue moderate inhibitors and black non-inhibitors. (D) Anti-RBD ELISA of culture supernatants from cells transfected to express one of the Visit 2 monoclonal antibodies. Antibodies that did not bind RBD are shown in orange. (E) Inhibition of RBD binding to ACE2 by Visit 2 monoclonal antibodies measured by sVNT assay. Red indicates strong inhibitors and black non-inhibitors. (F) Neutralization capacity of purified monoclonal antibodies as measured by PRNT. 2B04 and 2C02 are previously identified strong and weak neutralizing murine antibodies, respectively, and MSP-003 is an irrelevant Plasmodium-specific antibody. (G) IC50 values calculated from PRNT. Dotted line represents the limit of detection. See also Figure S7.

Figure 5

Recovered Individuals Formed Multifaceted SARS-CoV-2-Specific…

Figure 5

Recovered Individuals Formed Multifaceted SARS-CoV-2-Specific Immune Memory Heatmap of values for independent SARS-CoV2…

Figure 5
Recovered Individuals Formed Multifaceted SARS-CoV-2-Specific Immune Memory Heatmap of values for independent SARS-CoV2 RBD- or spike-specific immune memory components from each HC and CoV2+ individual at Visit 2. RBD-specific IgG measured by ELISA (AUC). Percent inhibition by sVNT calculated at 1:2 plasma dilution. Number of RBD-specific IgG+ MBCs per 1 × 106 PBMCs. Number of spike-responsive (CD69+), cytokine-producing (IL-2/IFN-γ/IL-17A), antigen-experienced CD4+ T cells calculated by number after 20 h incubation with spike minus number after incubation with vehicle. Number of spike-responsive (CD69+IFN-γ+), antigen-experienced CD8+ T cells calculated by number after 20 h incubation with spike minus number after incubation with vehicle. The color scales are set for each metric (row) with the mean + 1 SD of the HC set to white.
All figures (13)
Update of
  • Functional SARS-CoV-2-specific immune memory persists after mild COVID-19.
    Rodda LB, Netland J, Shehata L, Pruner KB, Morawski PM, Thouvenel C, Takehara KK, Eggenberger J, Hemann EA, Waterman HR, Fahning ML, Chen Y, Rathe J, Stokes C, Wrenn S, Fiala B, Carter LP, Hamerman JA, King NP, Gale M, Campbell DJ, Rawlings D, Pepper M. Rodda LB, et al. medRxiv. 2020 Aug 15:2020.08.11.20171843. doi: 10.1101/2020.08.11.20171843. Preprint. medRxiv. 2020. PMID: 32817957 Free PMC article. Updated.
  • Functional SARS-CoV-2-specific immune memory persists after mild COVID-19.
    Rodda LB, Netland J, Shehata L, Pruner KB, Morawski PA, Thouvenel C, Takehara KK, Eggenberger J, Hemann E, Waterman HR, Fahning ML, Chen Y, Rathe J, Stokes C, Wrenn S, Fiala B, Carter L, Hamerman JA, King NP, Gale M Jr, Campbell DJ, Rawlings D, Pepper M. Rodda LB, et al. Res Sq. 2020 Aug 13:rs.3.rs-57112. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-57112/v1. Preprint. Res Sq. 2020. PMID: 32818218 Free PMC article. Updated.
Similar articles
Cited by
References
    1. Addetia A., Crawford K.H.D., Dingens A., Zhu H., Roychoudhury P., Huang M.-L., Jerome K.R., Bloom J.D., Greninger A.L. Neutralizing Antibodies Correlate with Protection from SARS-CoV-2 in Humans during a Fishery Vessel Outbreak with a High Attack Rate. J. Clin. Microbiology. 2020;58 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ahmed R., Gray D. Immunological memory and protective immunity: understanding their relation. Science. 1996;272:54–60. - PubMed
    1. Alamyar E., et al. IMGT(®) tools for the nucleotide analysis of immunoglobulin (IG) and T cell receptor (TR) V-(D)-J repertoires, polymorphisms, and IG mutations: IMGT/V-QUEST and IMGT/HighV-QUEST for NGS. Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) 882(Chapter. 2012;32:569–604. - PubMed
    1. Alsoussi W.B., Turner J.S., Case J.B., Zhao H., Schmitz A.J., Zhou J.Q., Chen R.E., Lei T., Rizk A.A., McIntire K.M., et al. A Potently Neutralizing Antibody Protects Mice against SARS-CoV-2 Infection. J. Immunol. 2020;205:915–922. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Amanat F., Stadlbauer D., Strohmeier S., Nguyen T.H.O., Chromikova V., McMahon M., Jiang K., Arunkumar G.A., Jurczyszak D., Polanco J., et al. A serological assay to detect SARS-CoV-2 seroconversion in humans. Nat. Med. 2020;26:1033–1036. - PMC - PubMed
Show all 63 references
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
[x]
Cite
Copy Download .nbib
Format: AMA APA MLA NLM

NCBI Literature Resources

MeSH PMC Bookshelf Disclaimer

The PubMed wordmark and PubMed logo are registered trademarks of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). Unauthorized use of these marks is strictly prohibited.

Follow NCBI
Figure 3
Figure 3
SARS-CoV-2 Infection Induces Durable, Functional Spike-Reactive CD4+ T Cells (A) Representative flow cytometry plots of ICOS and CD40L expression on antigen-experienced (non-CD45RA+CCR7+) CD4+ T cells 20 h after incubation of PBMCs from HC and CoV2+ individuals at V1 and V2 with vehicle or SARS-CoV-2 spike. (B) Number of antigen-experienced ICOS+CD40L+CD4+ T cells per 1x106 CD4+ T cells from HC and CoV2+ samples after incubation with vehicle (Veh.) or spike (S) at both time points (right) and calculated number of spike-responsive CD4+ T cells (number after incubation with spike minus number after incubation with vehicle) compared across time points (left). (C) Number of antigen-experienced CXCR5+ICOS+CD40L+CD4+ T cells (cTfh) per 1 × 106 CD4+ T cells from HC and CoV2+ samples after incubation with Veh. or S at both time points (right) and calculated number of spike-responsive cTfh cells (number after incubation with spike minus number after incubation with vehicle) compared across time points (left). (D) Representative flow cytometry plots of sorted CD4+ naive (CD45RA+CCR7+), TCM (CD45RA−CCR7+), or TEM (CD45RA−CCR7−) T cells from HC and CoV2+ PBMCs after 5–6 days of co-culture with SARS-CoV-2 spike-protein-pulsed autologous monocytes and measuring proliferation by CPD dilution. (E) SARS-CoV-2 spike-specific expansion of sorted CD4+ naive T, TCM, and TEM cells from V1 (circles) and V2 (squares) reported as frequency of CXCR3+CPDlo cells after incubation with spike minus frequency after incubation with vehicle. (F) Number of cytokine-producing, antigen-experienced CD69+CD4+ T cells per 1 × 106 CD4+ T cells after incubation with Veh. or S (right) and calculated number of spike-responsive, cytokine-producing CD4+ T cells (number after incubation with spike minus number after incubation with vehicle) (left). (G) Frequency of antigen-experienced CD69+CD4+ T cell subsets, CCR6+/− Teff (CXCR5−), and CCR6+/− cTfh (CXCR5+) producing IL-2, IFN-γ, and IL-17A effector cytokines after incubation with spike for 20 h. (H) Representative flow cytometry plots of CD69 and IFN-γ expression on antigen-experienced CD8+ T cells from HC and CoV2+ PBMCs at V2 after 20 h of incubation with vehicle or SARS-CoV-2 spike. (I) Number of antigen-experienced IFN-γ+CD69+CD8+ T cells per 1 × 106 CD8+ T cells after 20 h of incubation with Veh. or S (right) and calculated number of spike-responsive CD8+ T cells (number after incubation with spike minus number after incubation with vehicle) (left). Statistics for unpaired data determined by 2-tailed Mann-Whitney tests and, for paired data, by 2-tailed Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. Multiple testing correction significance cutoff at FDR = 0.05 is p value 

Figure S6

SARS-CoV-2 Infection Induces Durable, Functional…

Figure S6

SARS-CoV-2 Infection Induces Durable, Functional Spike-Reactive CD4 + T Cells, Related to Figure…

Figure S6
SARS-CoV-2 Infection Induces Durable, Functional Spike-Reactive CD4+ T Cells, Related to Figure 3 (A) Flow cytometry sorting strategy for naive, T central memory (TCM), and T effector memory (TEM) cells from HC and CoV2+ PBMCs at Visit 1 and Visit 2 before 5-6 days of culture with autologous monocytes and SARS-CoV-2 spike protein or vehicle. (B) Representative flow cytometry gating on PMA/Ionomycin-activated PBMCs for cytokine expression by antigen experienced (non-CD45RA+CCR7+) CD4+ T cells subset into CCR6+/− T effector cells (Teff, CXCR5-) and circulating T follicular helper cells (cTfh, CXCR5+). (C) Representative flow cytometry gating on antigen-experienced (non-CD45RA+CCR7+) CD4+ T cells from HC and CoV2+ V2 PBMCs following incubation with SARS-CoV-2 spike for 20 h. Gating on CD69+ CCR6+/− T effector cells (Teff, CXCR5-) and CCR6+/− circulating T follicular helper cells (cTfh, CXCR5+) for IL-2, IFN-γ and IL-17A effector cytokines expression. (D) Number of IL-4-producing, antigen-experienced CD69+CD4+ T cells per 1x106 CD4+ T cells after incubation with vehicle (Veh.) or SARS-CoV2 spike (S) (left) and calculated number of spike-responsive, cytokine-producing CD4+ T cells (number after incubation with spike minus number after incubation with vehicle)(right). Statistics determined by two-tailed Mann-Whitney tests. Multiple testing correction significance cutoff at FDR = 0.05 is p value 

Figure S7

SARS-CoV-2-Specific MBCs Can Express Neutralizing…

Figure S7

SARS-CoV-2-Specific MBCs Can Express Neutralizing Antibodies, Related to Figure 4 and Table S1…

Figure S7
SARS-CoV-2-Specific MBCs Can Express Neutralizing Antibodies, Related to Figure 4 and Table S1 (A) Gating strategy for sorting RBD-specific B cells. (B) IgG ELISA to confirm expression of Visit 1 antibodies in transfected cell culture supernatants. Positive control is the kit standard (std) and negative control is supernatant from untransfected cells (no trans, green). (C) RBD ELISA of purified Visit 1 monoclonal antibodies. Negative control (green) is an irrelevant Plasmodium-specific antibody. (D) IgG ELISA to confirm expression of Visit 2 antibodies in transfected cell culture supernatants. (E) RBD ELISA of purified Visit 2 monoclonal antibodies. (F) Number of mutations in variable regions of RBD-specific monoclonal antibodies. (G) Mutation frequency of variable regions of RBD-specific monoclonal antibodies. Statistics determined by two-tailed Mann-Whitney tests. Multiple testing correction significance cutoff at FDR = 0.05 is p value 

Figure 4

SARS-CoV-2-Specific MBCs Can Express Neutralizing…

Figure 4

SARS-CoV-2-Specific MBCs Can Express Neutralizing Antibodies (A) Representative flow plots of index-sorted RBD-tetramer…

Figure 4
SARS-CoV-2-Specific MBCs Can Express Neutralizing Antibodies (A) Representative flow plots of index-sorted RBD-tetramer specific B cells (gating scheme in Figure S7A). BCRs cloned from cells are shown in red. (B) Anti-RBD ELISA of culture supernatants from cells transfected to express one of the Visit 1 monoclonal antibodies or supernatant from untransfected cells (no trans). Antibodies that did not bind RBD are shown in orange. (C) Inhibition of RBD binding to ACE2 by Visit 1 monoclonal antibody supernatants measured by sVNT assay, compared to a known RBD-specific neutralizing antibody (Ty1). Red indicates strong inhibitors, blue moderate inhibitors and black non-inhibitors. (D) Anti-RBD ELISA of culture supernatants from cells transfected to express one of the Visit 2 monoclonal antibodies. Antibodies that did not bind RBD are shown in orange. (E) Inhibition of RBD binding to ACE2 by Visit 2 monoclonal antibodies measured by sVNT assay. Red indicates strong inhibitors and black non-inhibitors. (F) Neutralization capacity of purified monoclonal antibodies as measured by PRNT. 2B04 and 2C02 are previously identified strong and weak neutralizing murine antibodies, respectively, and MSP-003 is an irrelevant Plasmodium-specific antibody. (G) IC50 values calculated from PRNT. Dotted line represents the limit of detection. See also Figure S7.

Figure 5

Recovered Individuals Formed Multifaceted SARS-CoV-2-Specific…

Figure 5

Recovered Individuals Formed Multifaceted SARS-CoV-2-Specific Immune Memory Heatmap of values for independent SARS-CoV2…

Figure 5
Recovered Individuals Formed Multifaceted SARS-CoV-2-Specific Immune Memory Heatmap of values for independent SARS-CoV2 RBD- or spike-specific immune memory components from each HC and CoV2+ individual at Visit 2. RBD-specific IgG measured by ELISA (AUC). Percent inhibition by sVNT calculated at 1:2 plasma dilution. Number of RBD-specific IgG+ MBCs per 1 × 106 PBMCs. Number of spike-responsive (CD69+), cytokine-producing (IL-2/IFN-γ/IL-17A), antigen-experienced CD4+ T cells calculated by number after 20 h incubation with spike minus number after incubation with vehicle. Number of spike-responsive (CD69+IFN-γ+), antigen-experienced CD8+ T cells calculated by number after 20 h incubation with spike minus number after incubation with vehicle. The color scales are set for each metric (row) with the mean + 1 SD of the HC set to white.
All figures (13)
Update of
  • Functional SARS-CoV-2-specific immune memory persists after mild COVID-19.
    Rodda LB, Netland J, Shehata L, Pruner KB, Morawski PM, Thouvenel C, Takehara KK, Eggenberger J, Hemann EA, Waterman HR, Fahning ML, Chen Y, Rathe J, Stokes C, Wrenn S, Fiala B, Carter LP, Hamerman JA, King NP, Gale M, Campbell DJ, Rawlings D, Pepper M. Rodda LB, et al. medRxiv. 2020 Aug 15:2020.08.11.20171843. doi: 10.1101/2020.08.11.20171843. Preprint. medRxiv. 2020. PMID: 32817957 Free PMC article. Updated.
  • Functional SARS-CoV-2-specific immune memory persists after mild COVID-19.
    Rodda LB, Netland J, Shehata L, Pruner KB, Morawski PA, Thouvenel C, Takehara KK, Eggenberger J, Hemann E, Waterman HR, Fahning ML, Chen Y, Rathe J, Stokes C, Wrenn S, Fiala B, Carter L, Hamerman JA, King NP, Gale M Jr, Campbell DJ, Rawlings D, Pepper M. Rodda LB, et al. Res Sq. 2020 Aug 13:rs.3.rs-57112. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-57112/v1. Preprint. Res Sq. 2020. PMID: 32818218 Free PMC article. Updated.
Similar articles
Cited by
References
    1. Addetia A., Crawford K.H.D., Dingens A., Zhu H., Roychoudhury P., Huang M.-L., Jerome K.R., Bloom J.D., Greninger A.L. Neutralizing Antibodies Correlate with Protection from SARS-CoV-2 in Humans during a Fishery Vessel Outbreak with a High Attack Rate. J. Clin. Microbiology. 2020;58 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ahmed R., Gray D. Immunological memory and protective immunity: understanding their relation. Science. 1996;272:54–60. - PubMed
    1. Alamyar E., et al. IMGT(®) tools for the nucleotide analysis of immunoglobulin (IG) and T cell receptor (TR) V-(D)-J repertoires, polymorphisms, and IG mutations: IMGT/V-QUEST and IMGT/HighV-QUEST for NGS. Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) 882(Chapter. 2012;32:569–604. - PubMed
    1. Alsoussi W.B., Turner J.S., Case J.B., Zhao H., Schmitz A.J., Zhou J.Q., Chen R.E., Lei T., Rizk A.A., McIntire K.M., et al. A Potently Neutralizing Antibody Protects Mice against SARS-CoV-2 Infection. J. Immunol. 2020;205:915–922. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Amanat F., Stadlbauer D., Strohmeier S., Nguyen T.H.O., Chromikova V., McMahon M., Jiang K., Arunkumar G.A., Jurczyszak D., Polanco J., et al. A serological assay to detect SARS-CoV-2 seroconversion in humans. Nat. Med. 2020;26:1033–1036. - PMC - PubMed
Show all 63 references
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
[x]
Cite
Copy Download .nbib
Format: AMA APA MLA NLM

NCBI Literature Resources

MeSH PMC Bookshelf Disclaimer

The PubMed wordmark and PubMed logo are registered trademarks of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). Unauthorized use of these marks is strictly prohibited.

Follow NCBI
Figure S6
Figure S6
SARS-CoV-2 Infection Induces Durable, Functional Spike-Reactive CD4+ T Cells, Related to Figure 3 (A) Flow cytometry sorting strategy for naive, T central memory (TCM), and T effector memory (TEM) cells from HC and CoV2+ PBMCs at Visit 1 and Visit 2 before 5-6 days of culture with autologous monocytes and SARS-CoV-2 spike protein or vehicle. (B) Representative flow cytometry gating on PMA/Ionomycin-activated PBMCs for cytokine expression by antigen experienced (non-CD45RA+CCR7+) CD4+ T cells subset into CCR6+/− T effector cells (Teff, CXCR5-) and circulating T follicular helper cells (cTfh, CXCR5+). (C) Representative flow cytometry gating on antigen-experienced (non-CD45RA+CCR7+) CD4+ T cells from HC and CoV2+ V2 PBMCs following incubation with SARS-CoV-2 spike for 20 h. Gating on CD69+ CCR6+/− T effector cells (Teff, CXCR5-) and CCR6+/− circulating T follicular helper cells (cTfh, CXCR5+) for IL-2, IFN-γ and IL-17A effector cytokines expression. (D) Number of IL-4-producing, antigen-experienced CD69+CD4+ T cells per 1x106 CD4+ T cells after incubation with vehicle (Veh.) or SARS-CoV2 spike (S) (left) and calculated number of spike-responsive, cytokine-producing CD4+ T cells (number after incubation with spike minus number after incubation with vehicle)(right). Statistics determined by two-tailed Mann-Whitney tests. Multiple testing correction significance cutoff at FDR = 0.05 is p value 

Figure S7

SARS-CoV-2-Specific MBCs Can Express Neutralizing…

Figure S7

SARS-CoV-2-Specific MBCs Can Express Neutralizing Antibodies, Related to Figure 4 and Table S1…

Figure S7
SARS-CoV-2-Specific MBCs Can Express Neutralizing Antibodies, Related to Figure 4 and Table S1 (A) Gating strategy for sorting RBD-specific B cells. (B) IgG ELISA to confirm expression of Visit 1 antibodies in transfected cell culture supernatants. Positive control is the kit standard (std) and negative control is supernatant from untransfected cells (no trans, green). (C) RBD ELISA of purified Visit 1 monoclonal antibodies. Negative control (green) is an irrelevant Plasmodium-specific antibody. (D) IgG ELISA to confirm expression of Visit 2 antibodies in transfected cell culture supernatants. (E) RBD ELISA of purified Visit 2 monoclonal antibodies. (F) Number of mutations in variable regions of RBD-specific monoclonal antibodies. (G) Mutation frequency of variable regions of RBD-specific monoclonal antibodies. Statistics determined by two-tailed Mann-Whitney tests. Multiple testing correction significance cutoff at FDR = 0.05 is p value 

Figure 4

SARS-CoV-2-Specific MBCs Can Express Neutralizing…

Figure 4

SARS-CoV-2-Specific MBCs Can Express Neutralizing Antibodies (A) Representative flow plots of index-sorted RBD-tetramer…

Figure 4
SARS-CoV-2-Specific MBCs Can Express Neutralizing Antibodies (A) Representative flow plots of index-sorted RBD-tetramer specific B cells (gating scheme in Figure S7A). BCRs cloned from cells are shown in red. (B) Anti-RBD ELISA of culture supernatants from cells transfected to express one of the Visit 1 monoclonal antibodies or supernatant from untransfected cells (no trans). Antibodies that did not bind RBD are shown in orange. (C) Inhibition of RBD binding to ACE2 by Visit 1 monoclonal antibody supernatants measured by sVNT assay, compared to a known RBD-specific neutralizing antibody (Ty1). Red indicates strong inhibitors, blue moderate inhibitors and black non-inhibitors. (D) Anti-RBD ELISA of culture supernatants from cells transfected to express one of the Visit 2 monoclonal antibodies. Antibodies that did not bind RBD are shown in orange. (E) Inhibition of RBD binding to ACE2 by Visit 2 monoclonal antibodies measured by sVNT assay. Red indicates strong inhibitors and black non-inhibitors. (F) Neutralization capacity of purified monoclonal antibodies as measured by PRNT. 2B04 and 2C02 are previously identified strong and weak neutralizing murine antibodies, respectively, and MSP-003 is an irrelevant Plasmodium-specific antibody. (G) IC50 values calculated from PRNT. Dotted line represents the limit of detection. See also Figure S7.

Figure 5

Recovered Individuals Formed Multifaceted SARS-CoV-2-Specific…

Figure 5

Recovered Individuals Formed Multifaceted SARS-CoV-2-Specific Immune Memory Heatmap of values for independent SARS-CoV2…

Figure 5
Recovered Individuals Formed Multifaceted SARS-CoV-2-Specific Immune Memory Heatmap of values for independent SARS-CoV2 RBD- or spike-specific immune memory components from each HC and CoV2+ individual at Visit 2. RBD-specific IgG measured by ELISA (AUC). Percent inhibition by sVNT calculated at 1:2 plasma dilution. Number of RBD-specific IgG+ MBCs per 1 × 106 PBMCs. Number of spike-responsive (CD69+), cytokine-producing (IL-2/IFN-γ/IL-17A), antigen-experienced CD4+ T cells calculated by number after 20 h incubation with spike minus number after incubation with vehicle. Number of spike-responsive (CD69+IFN-γ+), antigen-experienced CD8+ T cells calculated by number after 20 h incubation with spike minus number after incubation with vehicle. The color scales are set for each metric (row) with the mean + 1 SD of the HC set to white.
All figures (13)
Update of
  • Functional SARS-CoV-2-specific immune memory persists after mild COVID-19.
    Rodda LB, Netland J, Shehata L, Pruner KB, Morawski PM, Thouvenel C, Takehara KK, Eggenberger J, Hemann EA, Waterman HR, Fahning ML, Chen Y, Rathe J, Stokes C, Wrenn S, Fiala B, Carter LP, Hamerman JA, King NP, Gale M, Campbell DJ, Rawlings D, Pepper M. Rodda LB, et al. medRxiv. 2020 Aug 15:2020.08.11.20171843. doi: 10.1101/2020.08.11.20171843. Preprint. medRxiv. 2020. PMID: 32817957 Free PMC article. Updated.
  • Functional SARS-CoV-2-specific immune memory persists after mild COVID-19.
    Rodda LB, Netland J, Shehata L, Pruner KB, Morawski PA, Thouvenel C, Takehara KK, Eggenberger J, Hemann E, Waterman HR, Fahning ML, Chen Y, Rathe J, Stokes C, Wrenn S, Fiala B, Carter L, Hamerman JA, King NP, Gale M Jr, Campbell DJ, Rawlings D, Pepper M. Rodda LB, et al. Res Sq. 2020 Aug 13:rs.3.rs-57112. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-57112/v1. Preprint. Res Sq. 2020. PMID: 32818218 Free PMC article. Updated.
Similar articles
Cited by
References
    1. Addetia A., Crawford K.H.D., Dingens A., Zhu H., Roychoudhury P., Huang M.-L., Jerome K.R., Bloom J.D., Greninger A.L. Neutralizing Antibodies Correlate with Protection from SARS-CoV-2 in Humans during a Fishery Vessel Outbreak with a High Attack Rate. J. Clin. Microbiology. 2020;58 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ahmed R., Gray D. Immunological memory and protective immunity: understanding their relation. Science. 1996;272:54–60. - PubMed
    1. Alamyar E., et al. IMGT(®) tools for the nucleotide analysis of immunoglobulin (IG) and T cell receptor (TR) V-(D)-J repertoires, polymorphisms, and IG mutations: IMGT/V-QUEST and IMGT/HighV-QUEST for NGS. Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) 882(Chapter. 2012;32:569–604. - PubMed
    1. Alsoussi W.B., Turner J.S., Case J.B., Zhao H., Schmitz A.J., Zhou J.Q., Chen R.E., Lei T., Rizk A.A., McIntire K.M., et al. A Potently Neutralizing Antibody Protects Mice against SARS-CoV-2 Infection. J. Immunol. 2020;205:915–922. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Amanat F., Stadlbauer D., Strohmeier S., Nguyen T.H.O., Chromikova V., McMahon M., Jiang K., Arunkumar G.A., Jurczyszak D., Polanco J., et al. A serological assay to detect SARS-CoV-2 seroconversion in humans. Nat. Med. 2020;26:1033–1036. - PMC - PubMed
Show all 63 references
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
[x]
Cite
Copy Download .nbib
Format: AMA APA MLA NLM
Figure S7
Figure S7
SARS-CoV-2-Specific MBCs Can Express Neutralizing Antibodies, Related to Figure 4 and Table S1 (A) Gating strategy for sorting RBD-specific B cells. (B) IgG ELISA to confirm expression of Visit 1 antibodies in transfected cell culture supernatants. Positive control is the kit standard (std) and negative control is supernatant from untransfected cells (no trans, green). (C) RBD ELISA of purified Visit 1 monoclonal antibodies. Negative control (green) is an irrelevant Plasmodium-specific antibody. (D) IgG ELISA to confirm expression of Visit 2 antibodies in transfected cell culture supernatants. (E) RBD ELISA of purified Visit 2 monoclonal antibodies. (F) Number of mutations in variable regions of RBD-specific monoclonal antibodies. (G) Mutation frequency of variable regions of RBD-specific monoclonal antibodies. Statistics determined by two-tailed Mann-Whitney tests. Multiple testing correction significance cutoff at FDR = 0.05 is p value 

Figure 4

SARS-CoV-2-Specific MBCs Can Express Neutralizing…

Figure 4

SARS-CoV-2-Specific MBCs Can Express Neutralizing Antibodies (A) Representative flow plots of index-sorted RBD-tetramer…

Figure 4
SARS-CoV-2-Specific MBCs Can Express Neutralizing Antibodies (A) Representative flow plots of index-sorted RBD-tetramer specific B cells (gating scheme in Figure S7A). BCRs cloned from cells are shown in red. (B) Anti-RBD ELISA of culture supernatants from cells transfected to express one of the Visit 1 monoclonal antibodies or supernatant from untransfected cells (no trans). Antibodies that did not bind RBD are shown in orange. (C) Inhibition of RBD binding to ACE2 by Visit 1 monoclonal antibody supernatants measured by sVNT assay, compared to a known RBD-specific neutralizing antibody (Ty1). Red indicates strong inhibitors, blue moderate inhibitors and black non-inhibitors. (D) Anti-RBD ELISA of culture supernatants from cells transfected to express one of the Visit 2 monoclonal antibodies. Antibodies that did not bind RBD are shown in orange. (E) Inhibition of RBD binding to ACE2 by Visit 2 monoclonal antibodies measured by sVNT assay. Red indicates strong inhibitors and black non-inhibitors. (F) Neutralization capacity of purified monoclonal antibodies as measured by PRNT. 2B04 and 2C02 are previously identified strong and weak neutralizing murine antibodies, respectively, and MSP-003 is an irrelevant Plasmodium-specific antibody. (G) IC50 values calculated from PRNT. Dotted line represents the limit of detection. See also Figure S7.

Figure 5

Recovered Individuals Formed Multifaceted SARS-CoV-2-Specific…

Figure 5

Recovered Individuals Formed Multifaceted SARS-CoV-2-Specific Immune Memory Heatmap of values for independent SARS-CoV2…

Figure 5
Recovered Individuals Formed Multifaceted SARS-CoV-2-Specific Immune Memory Heatmap of values for independent SARS-CoV2 RBD- or spike-specific immune memory components from each HC and CoV2+ individual at Visit 2. RBD-specific IgG measured by ELISA (AUC). Percent inhibition by sVNT calculated at 1:2 plasma dilution. Number of RBD-specific IgG+ MBCs per 1 × 106 PBMCs. Number of spike-responsive (CD69+), cytokine-producing (IL-2/IFN-γ/IL-17A), antigen-experienced CD4+ T cells calculated by number after 20 h incubation with spike minus number after incubation with vehicle. Number of spike-responsive (CD69+IFN-γ+), antigen-experienced CD8+ T cells calculated by number after 20 h incubation with spike minus number after incubation with vehicle. The color scales are set for each metric (row) with the mean + 1 SD of the HC set to white.
All figures (13)
Figure 4
Figure 4
SARS-CoV-2-Specific MBCs Can Express Neutralizing Antibodies (A) Representative flow plots of index-sorted RBD-tetramer specific B cells (gating scheme in Figure S7A). BCRs cloned from cells are shown in red. (B) Anti-RBD ELISA of culture supernatants from cells transfected to express one of the Visit 1 monoclonal antibodies or supernatant from untransfected cells (no trans). Antibodies that did not bind RBD are shown in orange. (C) Inhibition of RBD binding to ACE2 by Visit 1 monoclonal antibody supernatants measured by sVNT assay, compared to a known RBD-specific neutralizing antibody (Ty1). Red indicates strong inhibitors, blue moderate inhibitors and black non-inhibitors. (D) Anti-RBD ELISA of culture supernatants from cells transfected to express one of the Visit 2 monoclonal antibodies. Antibodies that did not bind RBD are shown in orange. (E) Inhibition of RBD binding to ACE2 by Visit 2 monoclonal antibodies measured by sVNT assay. Red indicates strong inhibitors and black non-inhibitors. (F) Neutralization capacity of purified monoclonal antibodies as measured by PRNT. 2B04 and 2C02 are previously identified strong and weak neutralizing murine antibodies, respectively, and MSP-003 is an irrelevant Plasmodium-specific antibody. (G) IC50 values calculated from PRNT. Dotted line represents the limit of detection. See also Figure S7.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Recovered Individuals Formed Multifaceted SARS-CoV-2-Specific Immune Memory Heatmap of values for independent SARS-CoV2 RBD- or spike-specific immune memory components from each HC and CoV2+ individual at Visit 2. RBD-specific IgG measured by ELISA (AUC). Percent inhibition by sVNT calculated at 1:2 plasma dilution. Number of RBD-specific IgG+ MBCs per 1 × 106 PBMCs. Number of spike-responsive (CD69+), cytokine-producing (IL-2/IFN-γ/IL-17A), antigen-experienced CD4+ T cells calculated by number after 20 h incubation with spike minus number after incubation with vehicle. Number of spike-responsive (CD69+IFN-γ+), antigen-experienced CD8+ T cells calculated by number after 20 h incubation with spike minus number after incubation with vehicle. The color scales are set for each metric (row) with the mean + 1 SD of the HC set to white.

References

    1. Addetia A., Crawford K.H.D., Dingens A., Zhu H., Roychoudhury P., Huang M.-L., Jerome K.R., Bloom J.D., Greninger A.L. Neutralizing Antibodies Correlate with Protection from SARS-CoV-2 in Humans during a Fishery Vessel Outbreak with a High Attack Rate. J. Clin. Microbiology. 2020;58
    1. Ahmed R., Gray D. Immunological memory and protective immunity: understanding their relation. Science. 1996;272:54–60.
    1. Alamyar E., et al. IMGT(®) tools for the nucleotide analysis of immunoglobulin (IG) and T cell receptor (TR) V-(D)-J repertoires, polymorphisms, and IG mutations: IMGT/V-QUEST and IMGT/HighV-QUEST for NGS. Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) 882(Chapter. 2012;32:569–604.
    1. Alsoussi W.B., Turner J.S., Case J.B., Zhao H., Schmitz A.J., Zhou J.Q., Chen R.E., Lei T., Rizk A.A., McIntire K.M., et al. A Potently Neutralizing Antibody Protects Mice against SARS-CoV-2 Infection. J. Immunol. 2020;205:915–922.
    1. Amanat F., Stadlbauer D., Strohmeier S., Nguyen T.H.O., Chromikova V., McMahon M., Jiang K., Arunkumar G.A., Jurczyszak D., Polanco J., et al. A serological assay to detect SARS-CoV-2 seroconversion in humans. Nat. Med. 2020;26:1033–1036.
    1. Amanna I.J., Carlson N.E., Slifka M.K. Duration of humoral immunity to common viral and vaccine antigens. N. Engl. J. Med. 2007;357:1903–1915.
    1. Bentebibel S.E., Lopez S., Obermoser G., Schmitt N., Mueller C., Harrod C., Flano E., Mejias A., Albrecht R.A., Blankenship D., et al. Induction of ICOS+CXCR3+CXCR5+ TH cells correlates with antibody responses to influenza vaccination. Sci. Transl. Med. 2013;5:176ra32.
    1. Braun J., Loyal L., Frentsch M., Wendisch D., Georg P., Kurth F., Hippenstiel S., Dingeldey M., Kruse B., Fauchere F., et al. SARS-CoV-2-reactive T cells in healthy donors and patients with COVID-19. Nature. 2020;587:270–274.
    1. Callow K.A., Parry H.F., Sergeant M., Tyrrell D.A. The time course of the immune response to experimental coronavirus infection of man. Epidemiol. Infect. 1990;105:435–446.
    1. Chandrashekar A., et al. SARS-CoV-2 infection protects against rechallenge in rhesus macaques. Science. 2020;369:812–817.
    1. Cohen S., Freeman T. Metabolic heterogeneity of human gamma-globulin. Biochem. J. 1960;76:475–487.
    1. Erasmus J.H., Khandhar A.P., Walls A.C., Hemann E.A., O’Connor M.A., Murapa P., Archer J., Leventhal S., Fuller J., Lewis T., et al. Single-dose replicating RNA vaccine induces neutralizing antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 in nonhuman primates. bioRxiv. 2020 2020.05.28.121640.
    1. Grifoni A., Weiskopf D., Ramirez S.I., Mateus J., Dan J.M., Moderbacher C.R., Rawlings S.A., Sutherland A., Premkumar L., Jadi R.S., et al. Targets of T Cell Responses to SARS-CoV-2 Coronavirus in Humans with COVID-19 Disease and Unexposed Individuals. Cell. 2020;181:1489–1501.e15, e1415.
    1. Hanke L., Vidakovics Perez L., Sheward D.J., Das H., Schulte T., Moliner-Morro A., Corcoran M., Achour A., Karlsson Hedestam G.B., Hällberg B.M., et al. An alpaca nanobody neutralizes SARS-CoV-2 by blocking receptor interaction. Nat. Commun. 2020;11:4420.
    1. Hirota K., Turner J.E., Villa M., Duarte J.H., Demengeot J., Steinmetz O.M., Stockinger B. Plasticity of Th17 cells in Peyer’s patches is responsible for the induction of T cell-dependent IgA responses. Nat. Immunol. 2013;14:372–379.
    1. Hoffmann M., Kleine-Weber H., Schroeder S., Krüger N., Herrler T., Erichsen S., Schiergens T.S., Herrler G., Wu N.H., Nitsche A., et al. SARS-CoV-2 Cell Entry Depends on ACE2 and TMPRSS2 and Is Blocked by a Clinically Proven Protease Inhibitor. Cell. 2020;181:271–280.e8, e278.
    1. Isho B., Abe K.T., Zuo M., Jamal A.J., Rathod B., Wang J.H., Li Z., Chao G., Rojas O.L., Bang Y.M., et al. Evidence for sustained mucosal and systemic antibody responses to SARS-CoV-2 antigens in COVID-19 patients. medRxiv. 2020 2020.2008.2001.20166553.
    1. Juno J.A., Tan H.X., Lee W.S., Reynaldi A., Kelly H.G., Wragg K., Esterbauer R., Kent H.E., Batten C.J., Mordant F.L., et al. Humoral and circulating follicular helper T cell responses in recovered patients with COVID-19. Nat. Med. 2020;26:1428–1434.
    1. Kaneko N., Kuo H.H., Boucau J., Farmer J.R., Allard-Chamard H., Mahajan V.S., Piechocka-Trocha A., Lefteri K., Osborn M., Bals J., et al. Massachusetts Consortium on Pathogen Readiness Specimen Working Group Loss of Bcl-6-Expressing T Follicular Helper Cells and Germinal Centers in COVID-19. Cell. 2020;183:143–157.e13, e113.
    1. Keitany G.J., et al. Blood Stage Malaria Disrupts Humoral Immunity to the Pre- erythrocytic Stage Circumsporozoite Protein. Cell Reports. 2016;17:3193–3205.
    1. Kim C.C., Baccarella A.M., Bayat A., Pepper M., Fontana M.F. FCRL5+ Memory B Cells Exhibit Robust Recall Responses. Cell Rep. 2019;27:1446–1460.e4, e1444.
    1. Knox J.J., Buggert M., Kardava L., Seaton K.E., Eller M.A., Canaday D.H., Robb M.L., Ostrowski M.A., Deeks S.G., Slifka M.K., et al. T-bet+ B cells are induced by human viral infections and dominate the HIV gp140 response. JCI Insight. 2017;2:92943.
    1. Knox J.J., Kaplan D.E., Betts M.R. T-bet-expressing B cells during HIV and HCV infections. Cell. Immunol. 2017;321:26–34.
    1. Knox J.J., Myles A., Cancro M.P. T-bet+ memory B cells: Generation, function, and fate. Immunol. Rev. 2019;288:149–160.
    1. Krishnamurty A.T., Thouvenel C.D., Portugal S., Keitany G.J., Kim K.S., Holder A., Crompton P.D., Rawlings D.J., Pepper M. Somatically Hypermutated Plasmodium-Specific IgM(+) Memory B Cells Are Rapid, Plastic, Early Responders upon Malaria Rechallenge. Immunity. 2016;45:402–414.
    1. Lee Y.K., Turner H., Maynard C.L., Oliver J.R., Chen D., Elson C.O., Weaver C.T. Late developmental plasticity in the T helper 17 lineage. Immunity. 2009;30:92–107.
    1. Long Q.-X., Liu B.-Z., Deng H.-J., Wu G.-C., Deng K., Chen Y.-K., Liao P., Qiu J.-F., Lin Y., Cai X.-F., et al. Antibody responses to SARS-CoV-2 in patients with COVID-19. Nat. Med. 2020;26:845–848.
    1. Ma H., Zeng W., He H., Zhao D., Jiang D., Zhou P., Cheng L., Li Y., Ma X., Jin T. Serum IgA, IgM, and IgG responses in COVID-19. Cell. Mol. Immunol. 2020;17:773–775.
    1. Mathew D., Giles J.R., Baxter A.E., Oldridge D.A., Greenplate A.R., Wu J.E., Alanio C., Kuri-Cervantes L., Pampena M.B., D’Andrea K., et al. UPenn COVID Processing Unit Deep immune profiling of COVID-19 patients reveals distinct immunotypes with therapeutic implications. Science. 2020;369:eabc8511.
    1. Morita R., Schmitt N., Bentebibel S.E., Ranganathan R., Bourdery L., Zurawski G., Foucat E., Dullaers M., Oh S., Sabzghabaei N., et al. Human blood CXCR5(+)CD4(+) T cells are counterparts of T follicular cells and contain specific subsets that differentially support antibody secretion. Immunity. 2011;34:108–121.
    1. Nellore A., Scharer C.D., King R.G., Tipton C.M., Zumaquero E., Fucile C., Mousseau B., Bradley J.E., Macon K., Mi T., et al. Fcrl5 and T-bet define influenza-specific memory B cells that predict long-lived antibody responses. bioRxiv. 2019 doi: 10.1101/643973.
    1. Peng S.L., Szabo S.J., Glimcher L.H. T-bet regulates IgG class switching and pathogenic autoantibody production. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2002;99:5545–5550.
    1. Perreault J., Tremblay T., Fournier M.-J., Drouin M., Beaudoin-Bussières G., Prévost J., Lewin A., Bégin P., Finzi A., Bazin R. Longitudinal analysis of the humoral response to SARS-CoV-2 spike RBD in convalescent plasma donors. bioRxiv. 2020 2020.2007.2016.206847.
    1. Plotkin S.A. Correlates of protection induced by vaccination. Clin. Vaccine Immunol. 2010;17:1055–1065.
    1. Pray I.W., et al. COVID-19 Outbreak at an Overnight Summer School Retreat Wisconsin, July-August 2020. MMWR. Morbidity and mortality weekly. report. 2020;69:1600–1604.
    1. Reiss S., Baxter A.E., Cirelli K.M., Dan J.M., Morou A., Daigneault A., Brassard N., Silvestri G., Routy J.P., Havenar-Daughton C., et al. Comparative analysis of activation induced marker (AIM) assays for sensitive identification of antigen-specific CD4 T cells. PLoS ONE. 2017;12:e0186998.
    1. Ripperger T.J., Uhrlaub J.L., Watanabe M., Wong R., Castaneda Y., Pizzato H.A., Thompson M.R., Bradshaw C., Weinkauf C.C., Bime C., et al. Detection, prevalence, and duration of humoral responses to SARS-CoV-2 under conditions of limited population exposure. medRxiv. 2020 2020.08.14.20174490.
    1. Robbiani D.F., Gaebler C., Muecksch F., Lorenzi J.C.C., Wang Z., Cho A., Agudelo M., Barnes C.O., Gazumyan A., Finkin S., et al. Convergent antibody responses to SARS-CoV-2 in convalescent individuals. Nature. 2020;584:437–442.
    1. Rubtsova K., Rubtsov A.V., van Dyk L.F., Kappler J.W., Marrack P. T-box transcription factor T-bet, a key player in a unique type of B-cell activation essential for effective viral clearance. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2013;110:E3216–E3224.
    1. Ruterbusch M., Pruner K.B., Shehata L., Pepper M. In Vivo CD4+ T Cell Differentiation and Function: Revisiting the Th1/Th2 Paradigm. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 2020;38:705–725.
    1. Sallusto F. Heterogeneity of Human CD4(+) T Cells Against Microbes. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 2016;34:317–334.
    1. Sallusto F., Lenig D., Förster R., Lipp M., Lanzavecchia A. Two subsets of memory T lymphocytes with distinct homing potentials and effector functions. Nature. 1999;401:708–712.
    1. Schmidt M.E., Varga S.M. The CD8 T Cell Response to Respiratory Virus Infections. Front. Immunol. 2018;9:678.
    1. Sekine T., Perez-Potti A., Rivera-Ballesteros O., Strålin K., Gorin J.B., Olsson A., Llewellyn-Lacey S., Kamal H., Bogdanovic G., Muschiol S., et al. Karolinska COVID-19 Study Group Robust T Cell Immunity in Convalescent Individuals with Asymptomatic or Mild COVID-19. Cell. 2020;183:158–168.e14, e114.
    1. Seow J., Graham C., Merrick B., Acors S., Steel K.J.A., Hemmings O., O’Bryne A., Kouphou N., Pickering S., Galao R., et al. Longitudinal evaluation and decline of antibody responses in SARS-CoV-2 infection. medRxiv. 2020 2020.2007.2009.20148429.
    1. Sette A., Crotty S. Pre-existing immunity to SARS-CoV-2: the knowns and unknowns. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2020;20:457–458.
    1. Shi R., Shan C., Duan X., Chen Z., Liu P., Song J., Song T., Bi X., Han C., Wu L., et al. A human neutralizing antibody targets the receptor-binding site of SARS-CoV-2. Nature. 2020;584:120–124.
    1. Slifka M.K., Ahmed R. Long-term antibody production is sustained by antibody-secreting cells in the bone marrow following acute viral infection. Ann. N Y Acad. Sci. 1996;797:166–176.
    1. Smith K., et al. Rapid generation of fully human monoclonal antibodies specific to a vaccinating antigen. Nature protocols. 2009;4:372–384.
    1. Song G., He W.T., Callaghan S., Anzanello F., Huang D., Ricketts J., Torres J.L., Beutler N., Peng L., Vargas S., et al. Cross-reactive serum and memory B cell responses to spike protein in SARS-CoV-2 and endemic coronavirus infection. bioRxiv. 2020 2020.09.22.308965.
    1. Tan C.W., Chia W.N., Qin X., Liu P., Chen M.I.C., Tiu C., Hu Z., Chen V.C.-W., Young B.E., Sia W.R., et al. A SARS-CoV-2 surrogate virus neutralization test based on antibody-mediated blockage of ACE2-spike protein-protein interaction. Nat. Biotechnol. 2020;38:1073–1078.
    1. Tang F., Quan Y., Xin Z.-T., Wrammert J., Ma M.-J., Lv H., Wang T.-B., Yang H., Richardus J.H., Liu W., Cao W.C. Lack of peripheral memory B cell responses in recovered patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome: a six-year follow-up study. J. Immunol. 2011;186:7264–7268.
    1. To K., Hung I., Ip J.D., Infectious A.C.C. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) reinfectionby a phylogenetically distinct severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 strainconfirmed by whole genome sequencing. Clin. Inf. Dis. 2020 doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa1275.
    1. Vinuesa C.G., Linterman M.A., Yu D., MacLennan I.C. Follicular Helper T Cells. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 2016;34:335–368.
    1. Wajnberg A., Amanat F., Firpo A., Altman D., Bailey M., Mansour M., McMahon M., Meade P., Mendu D.R., Muellers K., et al. SARS-CoV-2 infection induces robust, neutralizing antibody responses that are stable for at least three months. medRxiv. 2020 2020.2007.2014.20151126.
    1. Walls A.C., Fiala B., Schäfer A., Wrenn S., Pham M.N., Murphy M., Tse L.V., Shehata L., O’Connor M.A., Chen C., et al. Elicitation of Potent Neutralizing Antibody Responses by Designed Protein Nanoparticle Vaccines for SARS-CoV-2. Cell. 2020 S0092-8674(20)31450-1.
    1. Weisel F., Shlomchik M. Memory B Cells of Mice and Humans. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 2017;35:255–284.
    1. Wilson P., Stamper C., Dugan H., Li L., Asby N., Halfmann P., Guthmiller J., Zheng N.Y., Huang M., Stovicek O., et al. Distinct B cell subsets give rise to antigen-specific antibody responses against SARS-CoV-2. Res Sq. 2020 -80476.
    1. Wölfel R., Corman V.M., Guggemos W., Seilmaier M., Zange S., Müller M.A., Niemeyer D., Jones T.C., Vollmar P., Rothe C., et al. Virological assessment of hospitalized patients with COVID-2019. Nature. 2020;581:465–469.
    1. Wu Z., McGoogan J.M. Characteristics of and Important Lessons From the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Outbreak in China: Summary of a Report of 72 314 Cases From the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention. JAMA. 2020;323:1239–1242.
    1. Wu L.P., Wang N.C., Chang Y.H., Tian X.Y., Na D.Y., Zhang L.Y., Zheng L., Lan T., Wang L.F., Liang G.D. Duration of antibody responses after severe acute respiratory syndrome. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2007;13:1562–1564.
    1. Abu-Raddad L.J., et al. Assessment of the risk of SARS-CoV-2 reinfection in an intense reexposure setting. medRxiv. 2020 doi: 10.1101/2020.08.24.20179457.
    1. Wardemann H., Busse C.E. (2019) Expression Cloning of Antibodies from Single Human B Cells. In: Küppers R. (eds) Lymphoma. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 1956. Humana Press, New York, NY. 10.1007/978-1-4939-9151-8_5

Source: PubMed

3
Subscribe