Three-dimensional (3D)- computed tomography bronchography and angiography combined with 3D-video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) versus conventional 2D-VATS anatomic pulmonary segmentectomy for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer

Xiao-Wei She, Yun-Bin Gu, Chun Xu, Chang Li, Cheng Ding, Jun Chen, Jun Zhao, Xiao-Wei She, Yun-Bin Gu, Chun Xu, Chang Li, Cheng Ding, Jun Chen, Jun Zhao

Abstract

Background: Compared to the pulmonary lobe, the anatomical structure of the pulmonary segment is relatively complex and prone to variation, thus the risk and difficulty of segmentectomy is increased. We compared three-dimensional computed tomography bronchography and angiography (3D-CTBA) combined with 3D video-assisted thoracic surgery (3D-VATS) to perform segmentectomy to conventional two-dimensional (2D)-VATS for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the data of randomly selected patients who underwent 3D-CTBA combined with 3D-VATS (3D-CTBA-VATS) or 2D-VATS at the Department of Thoracic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University Hospital, from January 2014 to May 2017.

Results: The operative duration of 3D group was significantly shorter than the 2D group (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the number of dissected lymph nodes between the two groups (P > 0.05). The extent of intraoperative bleeding and postoperative drainage in the 3D group was significantly lower than in the 2D group (P < 0.05). Chest tube duration in the 3D group was shorter than in the 2D group (P < 0.05). Incidences of pulmonary infection, atelectasis, and arrhythmia were not statistically different between the two groups (P > 0.05). However, hemoptysis and pulmonary air leakage (>3d) occurred significantly less frequently in the 3D than in the 2D group (P < 0.05).

Conclusion: 3D-CTBA-VATS is a more accurate and smooth technique and leads to reduced intraoperative and postoperative complications.

Keywords: 3D; VATS; bronchography and angiography; non-small cell lung cancer; segmentectomy.

© 2018 The Authors. Thoracic Cancer published by China Lung Oncology Group and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.

References

    1. Wu N, Zhao SJ. [Positively and normatively launch screening for low dose spiral CT lung cancer]. Chin J Radiol 2015; 5: 321–2 (In Chinese).
    1. Yang CF, D'Amico TA. Thoracoscopic segmentectomy for lung cancer. Ann Thorac Surg 2012; 94: 668–81.
    1. Takamoto T, Hashimoto T, Ogata S et al Planning of anatomical liver segmentectomy and subsegmentectomy with 3‐dimensional simulation software. Am J Surg 2013; 206: 530–8.
    1. Churchill ED, Belsey R. Segmental pneumonectomy in bronchiectasis. Ann Surg 1939; 109: 481–9.
    1. Ginsberg RJ, Rubenstein LV. Randomized trial of lobectomy versus limited resection for T1N0 non‐small cell lung cancer. Ann Thorac Surg 1995; 60: 615–23.
    1. Smith C, Swanson S, Mhango G, Wisnivesky JP. Survival after segmentectomy and wedge resection in stage I non‐small‐cell lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol 2013; 8: 73–8.
    1. Swanson SJ. Segmentectomy for lung cancer. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2010; 22: 244–9.
    1. Galal G, Kamel M, Nasar A et al Video‐assisted thoracoscopic surgery is a safe and effective alternative to thoracotomy for anatomical segmentectomy in patients with clinical stage I non‐small cell lung cancer. Ann Thorac Surg 2016; 101: 465–72.
    1. Yoshida J, Nagai K, Yokose T et al Limited resection trial for pulmonary ground‐glass opacity nodules: Fifty‐case experience. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2005; 129: 991–6.
    1. Koike T, Togashi K, Shirato T et al Limited resection for noninvasive bronchioloalveolar carcinoma diagnosed by intraoperative pathologic examination. Ann Thorac Surg 2009; 88: 1106–11.
    1. Liu H, Chen L, Zhu Q et al Comparison of the short‐term efficacy of complete thoracoscopic anatomical segmentectomy and lobectomy in the treatment of small pulmonary nodules. Chin J Clinicians (Electronic Edition) 2012; 06: 103–5.
    1. Schuchert MJ, Abbas G, Awais O et al Anatomic segmentectomy for the solitary pulmonary nodule and early‐stage lung cancer. Ann Thorac Surg 2012; 93: 1780–7.
    1. Echavarria MF, Cheng AM, Velez‐Cubian FO et al Comparison of pulmonary function tests and perioperative outcomes after robotic‐assisted pulmonary lobectomy vs segmentectomy. Am J Surg 2016; 212: 1175–82.
    1. Klapper J, D'Amico TA. VATS versus open surgery for lung cancer resection: Moving toward a minimally invasive approach. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2015; 13: 162–4.
    1. Sorensen SM, Savran MM, Konge L, Bjerrum F. Three‐dimensional versus two‐dimensional vision in laparoscopy: A systematic review. Surg Endosc 2016; 30: 11–23.

Source: PubMed

3
Subscribe