Three week versus six week immobilisation for stable Weber B type ankle fractures: randomised, multicentre, non-inferiority clinical trial

Tero Kortekangas, Heidi Haapasalo, Tapio Flinkkilä, Pasi Ohtonen, Simo Nortunen, Heikki-Jussi Laine, Teppo Ln Järvinen, Harri Pakarinen, Tero Kortekangas, Heidi Haapasalo, Tapio Flinkkilä, Pasi Ohtonen, Simo Nortunen, Heikki-Jussi Laine, Teppo Ln Järvinen, Harri Pakarinen

Abstract

Objective: To determine whether treatment of isolated stable Weber B type ankle fractures with a cast or a simple orthotic device for three weeks produces non-inferior outcomes compared with conventional immobilisation in a cast for six weeks.

Design: Randomised, pragmatic, non-inferiority, clinical trial with blinded outcome assessment.

Setting: Two major trauma centres in Finland, 22 December 2012 to 6 June 2016.

Participants: 247 skeletally mature patients aged 16 years or older with an isolated Weber B type fibula fracture and congruent ankle mortise in static ankle radiographs.

Interventions: Participants were randomly allocated to conventional six week cast immobilisation (n=84) or three week treatment either in a cast (n=83) or in a simple orthosis (n=80).

Main outcome measures: The primary, non-inferiority, intention-to-treat outcome was the Olerud-Molander Ankle Score at 12 months (OMAS; range 0-100; higher scores indicate better outcomes and fewer symptoms). The predefined non-inferiority margin for the primary outcome was -8.8 points. Secondary outcomes were ankle function, pain, quality of life, ankle motion, and radiographic outcome. Follow-up assessments were performed at 6, 12, and 52 weeks.

Results: 212 of 247 randomised participants (86%) completed the study. At 52 weeks, the mean OMAS was 87.6 (SD 18.3) in the six week cast group, 91.7 (SD 12.9) in the three week cast group, and 89.8 (SD 18.4) in the three week orthosis group. The between group difference at 52 weeks for the three week cast versus six week cast was 3.6 points (95% confidence interval -1.9 to 9.1, P=0.20), and for the three week orthosis versus six week cast was 1.7 points (-4.0 to 7.3, P=0.56). In both comparisons, the confidence intervals did not include the predefined inferiority margin of -8.8 points. The only statistically significant between group differences observed in the secondary outcomes and harms in the two primary comparisons were slight improvement in ankle plantar flexion and incidence of deep vein thrombosis, both in the three week orthosis group versus six week cast group.

Conclusion: Immobilisation for three weeks with a cast or orthosis was non-inferior to conventional cast immobilisation for six weeks in the treatment of an isolated stable Weber B type fracture.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01758835.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form at www.icmje.org/coi_disclosure.pdf and declare: TJ reports an honorarium for a lecture on osteoporosis from AMGEN (donated to AllTrials campaign). Other authors declare no support from any organisation for the submitted work; no financial relationships with any organisations that might have an interest in the submitted work in the previous three years; no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.

Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1
Weber classification for lateral malleolar (fibula) fractures. Type A: Fracture below level of ankle joint. Type B: Fracture starts distally at level of ankle joint (syndesmosis) and extends proximally. Type C: Fracture proximal to syndesmosis (level of ankle joint)
Fig 2
Fig 2
Trial profile
Fig 3
Fig 3
Presentation and interpretation of primary outcome Olerud-Molander Ankle Score (OMAS) at 52 weeks using confidence intervals in relation to non-inferiority margin. Given that confidence intervals for both comparisons (three week orthosis versus six week cast and three week cast versus six week cast) lie to the right of the non-inferiority margin (∆, −8.8 points) and also include zero, the interpretation is: new treatments (three week orthosis and cast) are non-inferior to the control (six week cast) but not shown to be superior. Error bars indicate two sided 95% confidence intervals. Dashed line indicates non-inferiority margin; shaded region indicates zone of non-inferiority
Fig 4
Fig 4
Trajectories of treatment responses for primary outcome in three study groups over course of trial. Circles represent mean values of each group at each follow-up point. Bars indicate standard deviations. OMAS=Olerud-Molander Ankle Score
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/instance/6342249/bin/kort043141.va.jpg

References

    1. Court-Brown CM, McBirnie J, Wilson G. Adult ankle fractures--an increasing problem? Acta Orthop Scand 1998;69:43-7. 10.3109/17453679809002355
    1. Melton LJ, 3rd, Crowson CS, O’Fallon WM. Fracture incidence in Olmsted County, Minnesota: comparison of urban with rural rates and changes in urban rates over time. Osteoporos Int 1999;9:29-37. 10.1007/s001980050113
    1. Pakarinen HJ, Flinkkil TE, Ohtonen PP, Ristiniemi JY. Stability criteria for nonoperative ankle fracture management. Foot Ankle Int 2011;32:141-7. 10.3113/FAI.2011.0141.
    1. Weber BG. Die Verletzungen des oberen Sprunggelenkes. Aktuelle Probleme in der Chirurgie. 2nd ed Verlag Hans Ruber, 1972..
    1. Lindsjö U. Operative treatment of ankle fracture-dislocations. A follow-up study of 306/321 consecutive cases. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1985;(199):28-38.
    1. Michelson JD. Fractures about the ankle. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1995;77:142-52. 10.2106/00004623-199501000-00020
    1. Tile M. Fractures of the ankle. In: Schatzker J, Tile M, eds. The Rationale of Operative Fracture Management. 3rd ed Springer, 2005: 551-90 10.1007/3-540-27708-0_22.
    1. Davidovitch RI, Egol KA. Ankle fractures. In: Bucholz RW, Heckman JD, Court-Brown CM, eds. Rockwood and Green’s Fractures in Adults. 7th ed Wolters Kluwer Health/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2010: 1975-2021.
    1. Nortunen S, Lepojärvi S, Savola O, et al. Stability assessment of the ankle mortise in supination-external rotation-type ankle fractures: lack of additional diagnostic value of MRI. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2014;96:1855-62. 10.2106/JBJS.M.01533.
    1. Michelson JD, Varner KE, Checcone M. Diagnosing deltoid injury in ankle fractures: the gravity stress view. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2001;(387):178-82. 10.1097/00003086-200106000-00024
    1. McConnell T, Creevy W, Tornetta P., 3rd Stress examination of supination external rotation-type fibular fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2004;86-A:2171-8. 10.2106/00004623-200410000-00007
    1. Park SS, Kubiak EN, Egol KA, Kummer F, Koval KJ. Stress radiographs after ankle fracture: the effect of ankle position and deltoid ligament status on medial clear space measurements. J Orthop Trauma 2006;20:11-8. 10.1097/01.bot.0000189591.40267.09
    1. Gill JB, Risko T, Raducan V, Grimes JS, Schutt RC., Jr Comparison of manual and gravity stress radiographs for the evaluation of supination-external rotation fibular fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007;89:994-9. 10.2106/JBJS.F.01002.
    1. Gougoulias N, Khanna A, Sakellariou A, Maffulli N. Supination-external rotation ankle fractures: stability a key issue. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2010;468:243-51. 10.1007/s11999-009-0988-2.
    1. Sanders DW, Manjoo A. Malleolar fractures. In: Bhandari M, ed. Evidence-Based Orthopedics. 1st ed Blackwell Publishing, 2012: 561-6.
    1. Yde J, Kristensen KD. Ankle fractures. Supination-eversion fractures stage II. Primary and late results of operative and non-operative treatment. Acta Orthop Scand 1980;51:695-702. 10.3109/17453678008990863
    1. Bauer M, Jonsson K, Nilsson B. Thirty-year follow-up of ankle fractures. Acta Orthop Scand 1985;56:103-6. 10.3109/17453678508994329
    1. Kristensen KD, Hansen T. Closed treatment of ankle fractures. Stage II supination-eversion fractures followed for 20 years. Acta Orthop Scand 1985;56:107-9. 10.3109/17453678508994330
    1. Donken CC, Al-Khateeb H, Verhofstad MH, van Laarhoven CJ. Surgical versus conservative interventions for treating ankle fractures in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012;(8):CD008470. 10.1002/14651858.CD008470.pub2.
    1. Van Schie-Van der Weert EM, Van Lieshout EM, De Vries MR, Van der Elst M, Schepers T. Determinants of outcome in operatively and non-operatively treated Weber-B ankle fractures. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2012;132:257-63. 10.1007/s00402-011-1397-z.
    1. Patil S, Gandhi J, Curzon I, Hui AC. Incidence of deep-vein thrombosis in patients with fractures of the ankle treated in a plaster cast. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2007;89:1340-3. 10.1302/0301-620X.89B10.19241.
    1. Donken CC, Verhofstad MH, Edwards MJ, van Laarhoven CJ. Twenty-one-year follow-up of supination-external rotation type II-IV (OTA type B) ankle fractures: a retrospective cohort study. J Orthop Trauma 2012;26:e108-14. 10.1097/BOT.0b013e31822c4ea5.
    1. Drakos MC, Murphy CI. Bracing versus casting in ankle fractures. Phys Sportsmed 2014;42:60-70. 10.3810/psm.2014.11.2092.
    1. Stuart PR, Brumby C, Smith SR. Comparative study of functional bracing and plaster cast treatment of stable lateral malleolar fractures. Injury 1989;20:323-6. 10.1016/0020-1383(89)90003-X
    1. Lin CW, Donkers NA, Refshauge KM, Beckenkamp PR, Khera K, Moseley AM. Rehabilitation for ankle fractures in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012;11:CD005595. 10.1002/14651858.CD005595.pub3.
    1. Moseley AM, Beckenkamp PR, Haas M, Herbert RD, Lin CW, EXACT Team Rehabilitation After Immobilization for Ankle Fracture: The EXACT Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA 2015;314:1376-85. 10.1001/jama.2015.12180.
    1. Zeegers AV, Van Raay JJ, van der Werken C. Ankle fractures treated with a stabilizing shoe. Acta Orthop Scand 1989;60:597-9. 10.3109/17453678909150130
    1. Ryd L, Bengtsson S. Isolated fracture of the lateral malleolus requires no treatment. 49 prospective cases of supination-eversion type II ankle fractures. Acta Orthop Scand 1992;63:443-6. 10.3109/17453679209154764
    1. Port AM, McVie JL, Naylor G, Kreibich DN. Comparison of two conservative methods of treating an isolated fracture of the lateral malleolus. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1996;78:568-72. 10.1302/0301-620X.78B4.0780568
    1. Brink O, Staunstrup H, Sommer J. Stable lateral malleolar fractures treated with aircast ankle brace and DonJoy R.O.M.-Walker brace: a prospective randomized study. Foot Ankle Int 1996;17:679-84. 10.1177/107110079601701106.
    1. Goodship AE, Kenwright J. The influence of induced micromovement upon the healing of experimental tibial fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1985;67:650-5. 10.1302/0301-620X.67B4.4030869
    1. Kenwright J, Richardson JB, Cunningham JL, et al. Axial movement and tibial fractures. A controlled randomised trial of treatment. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1991;73:654-9. 10.1302/0301-620X.73B4.2071654
    1. Hente R, Füchtmeier B, Schlegel U, Ernstberger A, Perren SM. The influence of cyclic compression and distraction on the healing of experimental tibial fractures. J Orthop Res 2004;22:709-15. 10.1016/j.orthres.2003.11.007.
    1. Lapidus PW, Guidotti FP. Letter to the editor. Immediate mobilization and swimming pool exercises in some fractures of foot and ankle bones. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1968;56:197-206.
    1. Piaggio G, Elbourne DR, Pocock SJ, Evans SJ, Altman DG, CONSORT Group Reporting of noninferiority and equivalence randomized trials: extension of the CONSORT 2010 statement. JAMA 2012;308:2594-604. 10.1001/jama.2012.87802.
    1. Olerud C, Molander H. A scoring scale for symptom evaluation after ankle fracture. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 1984;103:190-4. 10.1007/BF00435553
    1. Nilsson GM, Eneroth M, Ekdahl CS. The Swedish version of OMAS is a reliable and valid outcome measure for patients with ankle fractures. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2013;14:109. 10.1186/1471-2474-14-109.
    1. Roos EM, Brandsson S, Karlsson J. Validation of the foot and ankle outcome score for ankle ligament reconstruction. Foot Ankle Int 2001;22:788-94. 10.1177/107110070102201004.
    1. Chapman CR, Casey KL, Dubner R, Foley KM, Gracely RH, Reading AE. Pain measurement: an overview. Pain 1985;22:1-31. 10.1016/0304-3959(85)90145-9
    1. Aalto A, Aro A, Teperi J. RAND 36 terveyteen liittyvän elämänlaadun mittarina (RAND 36 as a measure of quality of life. [In Finnish]). Saarijärvi, Finland: Gummerus Kirjapaino Oy 1999.
    1. Lindsjö U, Danckwardt-Lillieström G, Sahlstedt B. Measurement of the motion range in the loaded ankle. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1985;(199):68-71.
    1. Norkin CC, White DJ. Measurement of Joint Motion: A Guide to Goniometry. 3rd ed FA Davis, 2003.
    1. Jones B, Jarvis P, Lewis JA, Ebbutt AF. Trials to assess equivalence: the importance of rigorous methods. BMJ 1996;313:36-9. 10.1136/bmj.313.7048.36
    1. Brown H, Prescott R. Applied Mixed Models in Medicine. 2nd ed John Wiley, 2006. 10.1002/0470023589.
    1. Hartrick CT, Kovan JP, Shapiro S. The numeric rating scale for clinical pain measurement: a ratio measure? Pain Pract 2003;3:310-6. 10.1111/j.1530-7085.2003.03034.x.
    1. Hutchinson RH, Barrie JL. The effects of shared decision making in the conservative management of stable ankle fractures. Injury 2015;46:1116-8. 10.1016/j.injury.2015.01.013.
    1. Wykes PR, Eccles K, Thennavan B, Barrie JL. Improvement in the treatment of stable ankle fractures: an audit based approach. Injury 2004;35:799-804. 10.1016/S0020-1383(03)00207-9.
    1. Kosuge DD, Mahadevan D, Chandrasenan J, Pugh H. Managing type II and type IV Lauge-Hansen supination external rotation ankle fractures: current orthopaedic practice. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2010;92:689-92.
    1. McKibbin B. The biology of fracture healing in long bones. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1978;60-B:150-62. 10.1302/0301-620X.60B2.350882
    1. Michelson JD, Ahn U, Magid D. Economic analysis of roentgenogram use in the closed treatment of stable ankle fractures. J Trauma 1995;39:1119-22. 10.1097/00005373-199512000-00019
    1. Martin AG. Weber B ankle fracture: an unnecessary fracture clinic burden. Injury 2004;35:805-8. 10.1016/j.injury.2003.12.013.
    1. Willett K, Keene DJ, Mistry D, et al. Ankle Injury Management (AIM) Trial Collaborators Close Contact Casting vs Surgery for Initial Treatment of Unstable Ankle Fractures in Older Adults: A Randomized Clinical Trial [published Online First: 2016/10/12]. JAMA 2016;316:1455-63. 10.1001/jama.2016.14719.
    1. Freidlin B, Korn EL, Gray R, Martin A. Multi-arm clinical trials of new agents: some design considerations. Clin Cancer Res 2008;14:4368-71. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-08-0325
    1. Wason JM, Stecher L, Mander AP. Correcting for multiple-testing in multi-arm trials: is it necessary and is it done? Trials 2014;15:364. 10.1186/1745-6215-15-364.
    1. Julious SA. Sample Size Calculations for Non-inferiority Clinical Trials with Normal Data. Sample Sizes for Clinical Trials. 1st ed. Chapman and Hall/CRC, 2010: 95-106.
    1. Vioreanu M, Dudeney S, Hurson B, Kelly E, O’Rourke K, Quinlan W. Early mobilization in a removable cast compared with immobilization in a cast after operative treatment of ankle fractures: a prospective randomized study. Foot Ankle Int 2007;28:13-9. 10.3113/FAI.2007.0003.
    1. Lehtonen H, Järvinen TL, Honkonen S, Nyman M, Vihtonen K, Järvinen M. Use of a cast compared with a functional ankle brace after operative treatment of an ankle fracture. A prospective, randomized study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2003;85-A:205-11. 10.2106/00004623-200302000-00004
    1. Selby R, Geerts WH, Kreder HJ, Crowther MA, Kaus L, Sealey F. Symptomatic venous thromboembolism uncommon without thromboprophylaxis after isolated lower-limb fracture: the knee-to-ankle fracture (KAF) cohort study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2014;96:e83. 10.2106/JBJS.M.00236.
    1. Selby R, Geerts WH, Kreder HJ, Crowther MA, Kaus L, Sealey F, D-KAF (Dalteparin in Knee-to-Ankle Fracture) Investigators A double-blind, randomized controlled trial of the prevention of clinically important venous thromboembolism after isolated lower leg fractures. J Orthop Trauma 2015;29:224-30. 10.1097/BOT.0000000000000250.
    1. van Adrichem RA, Nemeth B, Algra A, et al. POT-KAST and POT-CAST Group Thromboprophylaxis after Knee Arthroscopy and Lower-Leg Casting. N Engl J Med 2017;376:515-25. 10.1056/NEJMoa1613303.

Source: PubMed

3
Subscribe