Outcome over seven years of healthy adults with and without subjective cognitive impairment

Barry Reisberg, Melanie B Shulman, Carol Torossian, Ling Leng, Wei Zhu, Barry Reisberg, Melanie B Shulman, Carol Torossian, Ling Leng, Wei Zhu

Abstract

Background: Subjective cognitive impairment (SCI) in older persons without manifest symptomatology is a common condition with a largely unclear prognosis. We hypothesized that (1) examining outcome for a sufficient period by using conversion to mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or dementia would clarify SCI prognosis, and (2) with the aforementioned procedures, the prognosis of SCI subjects would differ significantly from that of demographically matched healthy subjects, free of SCI, termed no cognitive impairment (NCI) subjects.

Methods: A consecutive series of healthy subjects, aged > or =40 years, presenting with NCI or SCI to a brain aging and dementia research center during a 14-year interval, were studied and followed up during an 18-year observation window. The study population (60 NCI, 200 SCI, 60% female) had a mean age of 67.2 +/- 9.1 years, was well-educated (mean, 15.5 +/- 2.7 years), and cognitively normal (Mini-Mental State Examination, 29.1 +/- 1.2).

Results: A total of 213 subjects (81.9% of the study population) were followed up. Follow-up occurred during a mean period of 6.8 +/- 3.4 years, and subjects had a mean of 2.9 +/- 1.6 follow-up visits. Seven NCI (14.9%) and 90 SCI (54.2%) subjects declined (P < .0001). Of NCI decliners, five declined to MCI and two to probable Alzheimer's disease. Of SCI decliners, 71 declined to MCI and 19 to dementia diagnoses. Controlling for baseline demographic variables and follow-up time, Weibull proportional hazards model revealed increased decline in SCI subjects (hazard ratio, 4.5; 95% confidence interval, 1.9-10.3), whereas the accelerated failure time model analysis with an underlying Weibull survival function showed that SCI subjects declined more rapidly, at 60% of the rate of NCI subjects (95% confidence interval, 0.45-0.80). Furthermore, mean time to decline was 3.5 years longer for NCI than for SCI subjects (P = .0003).

Conclusions: These results indicate that SCI in subjects with normal cognition is a harbinger of further decline in most subjects during a 7-year mean follow-up interval. Relevance for community populations should be investigated, and prevention studies in this at-risk population should be explored.

2010 The Alzheimer's Association. All rights reserved.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Plot of survival distribution functions for the NCI and SCI baseline groups. The y-axis is the probability of not declining to MCI or dementia. The x-axis is the time (in years) to decline. This survival curve plot extends until observation year 14. There were no SCI subject observations beyond year 14. One NCI subject was followed up beyond year 14. This subject was observed to decline at year 16. There was a significant difference between the NCI and the SCI baseline groups in the survivor function of absence of decline to MCI or dementia in favor of the NCI baseline group (P < .0001, Wilcoxon test and Log-Rank test).

Source: PubMed

3
Subscribe