Real-World Analysis of Remote Electrical Neuromodulation (REN) for the Acute Treatment of Migraine

Jessica Ailani, Liron Rabany, Shira Tamir, Alon Ironi, Amaal Starling, Jessica Ailani, Liron Rabany, Shira Tamir, Alon Ironi, Amaal Starling

Abstract

Introduction: Migraine is a chronic neurological disease that is the primary cause of years lived with disability in people under the age of 50. Remote electrical neuromodulation (REN) is a novel drug-free acute treatment of migraine, that is FDA cleared for episodic and chronic migraine. As a prescribed digital therapeutic, REN enables large-scale post-marketing research, thus providing real-world information on the use of the intervention in a wide range of populations, environments, and situations. Methods: The REN device (®Nerivio) includes a secured, personal migraine diary, which patients can use to record their symptoms before treatment and 2 h post-treatment. Real-world data on REN treatments were collected via the app from patients across the United States who used Nerivio between October 1st, 2019, and May 24th, 2021. Data analysis focused on four metrics: 1. Per-treatment patterns of REN use as a standalone treatment vs. in combination with medications. 2. Per-user intra-individual efficacy across multiple treatments. 3. Distribution of treatment intensity among users (the electroceutical equivalent to treatment dose). 4. Prevalence and severity of adverse events. Results: 1. Out of 23,151 treatments, in 66.5% of treatments REN was used as a standalone treatment, in 12.9% it was followed by over-the-counter medications, and in 20.6% followed by prescription medications. 2. Out of 2,514 patients, response in at least 50% of treatments was achieved in 66.5% of cases for pain relief, and in 22.6% for pain freedom. 3. Out of 117,583 treatments, in 80% of cases intensity levels were between 18 and 55% of the stimulator's range. The mean intensity was 34.3% of the stimulator's output (±16.6%). 4. Out of 12,368 users (121,947 treatments), there were 59 users (0.48%) who reported device related adverse events, 56 (0.45%) of which were mild, three (0.03%) were moderate, and none were severe. Conclusions: The current analysis of real-world clinical data indicates that REN provides an efficacious, stable, and safe treatment option for acute treatment of migraine in real-world settings, both as a standalone replacement of pharmaceuticals, as well as an adjunct to medications.

Keywords: REN; headache; medication; migraine; neuromodulation; real world; remote electric neuromodulation; treatment.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that this study received funding from Theranica Bio-Electronics Ltd. The funder had the following involvement in the study: the funder designed and performed the analysis together with the other authors, and took part in the writing of the manuscript. AI, LR, and ST are employees of Theranica Bio-Electronics Ltd and hold stocks.

Copyright © 2022 Ailani, Rabany, Tamir, Ironi and Starling.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Distribution of mean treatment intensity.

References

    1. Stovner LJ, Nichols E, Steiner TJ, Abd-Allah F, Abdelalim A, Al-Raddadi RM, et al. . Global, regional, and national burden of migraine and tension-type headache, 1990–2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet Neurol. (2018) 17:954–76. 10.1016/S1474-4422(18)30322-3
    1. Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society (IHS) . The international classification of headache disorders, 3rd edition. Cephalalgia. (2018) 38:1–211. 10.1177/0333102417738202
    1. Silva A, Tepper SJ. Acute treatment of migraines. CNS Drugs. (2012) 26:823–39. 10.2165/11635440-000000000-00000
    1. Goadsby PJ, Sprenger T. Current practice and future directions in the prevention and acute management of migraine. Lancet Neurol. (2010) 9:285–98. 10.1016/S1474-4422(10)70005-3
    1. Diener HC, Limmroth V. Medication-overuse headache: a worldwide problem. Lancet Neurol. (2004) 3:475–83. 10.1016/S1474-4422(04)00824-5
    1. Bigal ME, Lipton RB. Overuse of acute migraine medications and migraine chronification. Curr Sci Inc. (2009) 13:301–7. 10.1007/s11916-009-0048-3
    1. Lipton RB, Fanning KM, Serrano D, Reed ML, Cady R, Buse DC. Ineffective acute treatment of episodic migraine is associated with new-onset chronic migraine. Neurology. (2015) 84:688–95. 10.1212/WNL.0000000000001256
    1. Yarnitsky D, Volokh L, Ironi A, Weller B, Shor M, Shifrin A, et al. . Nonpainful remote electrical stimulation alleviates episodic migraine pain. Neurology. (2017) 88:1250–5. 10.1212/WNL.0000000000003760
    1. Yarnitsky D, Dodick DW, Grosberg BM, Burstein R, Ironi A, Harris D, et al. . Remote Electrical Neuromodulation (REN) relieves acute migraine: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial. Headache. (2019) 59:1240–52. 10.1111/head.13551
    1. Rapoport AM, Bonner JH, Lin T, Harris D, Gruper Y, Ironi A, et al. . Remote electrical neuromodulation (REN) in the acute treatment of migraine: a comparison with usual care and acute migraine medications. J Headache Pain. (2019) 20:83. 10.1186/s10194-019-1033-9
    1. Nir RR, Yarnitsky D. Conditioned pain modulation. Curr Opin Support Palliat Care. (2015) 9:131–7. 10.1097/SPC.0000000000000126
    1. Rapoport AM, Lin T. Device profile of the NerivioTM for acute migraine treatment: overview of its efficacy and safety. Expert Rev Med Devices. (2019) 16:1017–23. 10.1080/17434440.2019.1695599
    1. Marmura MJ, Lin T, Harris D, Ironi A, Rosen NL. Incorporating Remote Electrical Neuromodulation (REN) into usual care reduces acute migraine medication use: an open-label extension study. Front Neurol. (2020) 11:226. 10.3389/fneur.2020.00226
    1. Tepper SJ, Lin T, Montal T, Ironi A, Dougherty C. Real-world Experience with remote electrical neuromodulation in the acute treatment of migraine. Pain Med. (2020) 21:3522–9. 10.1093/pm/pnaa299
    1. Nierenburg H, Vieira JR, Lev N, Lin T, Harris D, Vizel M, et al. . Remote electrical neuromodulation for the acute treatment of migraine in patients with chronic migraine: an open-label pilot study. Pain Ther. (2020) 9:531–43. 10.1007/s40122-020-00185-1
    1. Hershey AD, Lin T, Gruper Y, Harris D, Ironi A, Berk T, et al. . Remote electrical neuromodulation for acute treatment of migraine in adolescents. Headache. (2021) 61:310–17. 10.1111/head.14042
    1. Chou DE, Shnayderman Yugrakh M, Winegarner D, Rowe V, Kuruvilla D, Schoenen J. Acute migraine therapy with external trigeminal neurostimulation (ACME): a randomized controlled trial. Cephalalgia. (2019) 39:3–14. 10.1177/0333102418811573
    1. Stilling JM, Monchi O, Amoozegar F, Debert CT. Transcranial Magnetic and Direct Current Stimulation (TMS/tDCS) for the treatment of headache: a systematic review. Headache. (2019) 59:339–57. 10.1111/head.13479
    1. Cai G, Xia Z, Charvet L, Xiao F, Datta A, Androulakis XM. A systematic review and meta-analysis on the efficacy of repeated transcranial direct current stimulation for migraine. J Pain Res. (2021) 14:1171–83. 10.2147/JPR.S295704
    1. Moisset X, Pereira B, Ciampi de Andrade D, Fontaine D, Lantéri-Minet M, Mawet J. Neuromodulation techniques for acute and preventive migraine treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Headache Pain. (2020) 21:142. 10.1186/s10194-020-01204-4
    1. Ailani J, Burch RC, Robbins MS, on behalf of the Board of Directors of the American Headache Society . The American Headache Society Consensus Q18 Statement: update on integrating new migraine treatments into clinical practice. In press.
    1. Tassorelli C, Diener H-C, Silberstein SD, Dodick DW, Goadsby PJ, Jensen RH, et al. . Guidelines of the International Headache Society for clinical trials with neuromodulation devices for the treatment of migraine. Cephalalgia. (2021) 41:1135–51. 10.1177/03331024211010413
    1. Waning B, Montagne M, McCloskey WW. Pharmacoepidemiology: Principles and Practice. J Neurosci. (2001).
    1. Dowson AJ. Analysis of the patients attending a specialist UK headache clinic over a 3-year period. Headache. (2003) 43:14–8. 10.1046/j.1526-4610.2003.03003.x
    1. Nirl R-R, Granovskyl Y, Yarnitskyl D, Sprecherl E, Granotl M. A psychophysical study of endogenous analgesia: the role of the conditioning pain in the induction and magnitude of conditioned pain modulation. Eur J Pain. (2011) 15:491–7. 10.1016/j.ejpain.2010.10.001
    1. Yarnitsky D, Granot M, Nahman-Averbuch H, Khamaisi M, Granovsky Y. Conditioned pain modulation predicts duloxetine efficacy in painful diabetic neuropathy. Pain. (2012) 153:1193–8. 10.1016/j.pain.2012.02.021
    1. Youssef AM, Macefield VG, Henderson LA. Pain inhibits pain; human brainstem mechanisms. Neuroimage. (2016) 124:54–62. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.08.060
    1. Harper DE, Ichesco E, Schrepf A, Hampson JP, Clauw DJ, Schmidt-Wilcke T, et al. . Resting functional connectivity of the periaqueductal gray is associated with normal inhibition and pathological facilitation in conditioned pain modulation. J Pain. (2018) 19:635.e1–15. 10.1016/j.jpain.2018.01.001
    1. Marciszewski KK, Meylakh N, Di Pietro F, Mills EP, Macefield VG, Macey PM, et al. . Changes in brainstem pain modulation circuitry function over the migraine cycle. J Neurosci. (2018) 38:10479–88. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1088-18.2018
    1. Andreou AP, Holland PR, Akerman S, Summ O, Fredrick J, Goadsby PJ. Transcranial magnetic stimulation and potential cortical and trigeminothalamic mechanisms in migraine. Brain. (2016) 139:2002–14. 10.1093/brain/aww118
    1. DaSilva AF, Truong DQ, DosSantos MF, Toback RL, Datta A, Bikson M. State-of-art neuroanatomical target analysis of high-definition and conventional tDCS montages used for migraine and pain control. Front Neuroanat. (2015) 9:89. 10.3389/fnana.2015.00089

Source: PubMed

3
Subscribe