Short-term plasticity following motor sequence learning revealed by diffusion magnetic resonance imaging

Ido Tavor, Rotem Botvinik-Nezer, Michal Bernstein-Eliav, Galia Tsarfaty, Yaniv Assaf, Ido Tavor, Rotem Botvinik-Nezer, Michal Bernstein-Eliav, Galia Tsarfaty, Yaniv Assaf

Abstract

Current noninvasive methods to detect structural plasticity in humans are mainly used to study long-term changes. Diffusion magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was recently proposed as a novel approach to reveal gray matter changes following spatial navigation learning and object-location memory tasks. In the present work, we used diffusion MRI to investigate the short-term neuroplasticity that accompanies motor sequence learning. Following a 45-min training session in which participants learned to accurately play a short sequence on a piano keyboard, changes in diffusion properties were revealed mainly in motor system regions such as the premotor cortex and cerebellum. In a second learning session taking place immediately afterward, feedback was given on the timing of key pressing instead of accuracy, while participants continued to learn. This second session induced a different plasticity pattern, demonstrating the dynamic nature of learning-induced plasticity, formerly thought to require months of training in order to be detectable. These results provide us with an important reminder that the brain is an extremely dynamic structure. Furthermore, diffusion MRI offers a novel measure to follow tissue plasticity particularly over short timescales, allowing new insights into the dynamics of structural brain plasticity.

Keywords: diffusion MRI; learning; motor; neuroplasticity; piano.

© 2019 The Authors. Human Brain Mapping published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Performance in piano training (Session 1). Accuracy of key pressing during the first learning session is shown by the absolute number of correct notes (a) and the normalized accuracy levels (b). Blue circles represent the average number of correct notes played by participants in each trial. The number of notes that were presented to participants in each trial is shown in red. On average, the best performance participants achieved was 46.6 correct notes out of 51. Error bars depict SEM [Color figure can be viewed at http://wileyonlinelibrary.com]
Figure 2
Figure 2
Performance in piano training (Session 2). Accuracy in the timing of key pressing during the first (a) and second (b) learning sessions is shown. Blue circles represent the average error in time per note for each trial. (a) During the first learning session, subjects did not show a decrease in their error rate. Red arrows indicate trials in which the number of notes increased. (b) During the second learning session, subjects' error rate decreased dramatically as they reached to an average error per note shorter than 20 ms. Error bars depict SEM [Color figure can be viewed at http://wileyonlinelibrary.com]
Figure 3
Figure 3
Reduction in mean diffusivity after piano training (Session 1). Structural remodeling of brain tissue, measured by DTI as a reduction in mean diffusivity (MD) after 45 min of training on a motor sequence learning task. A paired t test between the MD maps before and after the learning task (first session) was performed. The statistical parametric map is presented superimposed on coronal (upper row) and axial (lower row) slices of a single‐subject T1 map. Significant clusters of MD decrease were found in the left premotor cortex, left middle temporal gyrus and the cerebellum (p < .005, cluster size >37, equivalent to p < .05, corrected for multiple comparisons). L indicates the left side of the brain; color bar represents the T value [Color figure can be viewed at http://wileyonlinelibrary.com]
Figure 4
Figure 4
Reduction in mean diffusivity (a) after piano training (Session 2) and (b) after professional pianists' exposure to the task. Structural remodeling of brain tissue, measured by DTI as a reduction in mean diffusivity (MD) after 45 min of training on a motor sequence learning task. (a) In a second training session in the naïve participants feedback was given on the timing of key pressing. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) of the MD maps before and after each learning task was performed, and post hoc analysis revealed a significant cluster in the left lingual gyrus (p < .005, cluster size >37, equivalent to p < .05, corrected for multiple comparisons) in which the effect was a result of a reduction in MD after the second learning session. (b) Professional pianists experienced a piano‐playing session similar to the first session in the naïve participants. A paired t test between the MD maps before and after the session was performed. Significant clusters of MD decrease were found in the primary motor cortex bilaterally and in the ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC). p < .005, cluster size >37, equivalent to p < .05, corrected for multiple comparisons. The statistical parametric maps are presented superimposed on coronal (upper row) and axial (lower row) slices of a single‐subject T1 map. L indicates the left side of the brain; color bar represents the statistic (F or T) value [Color figure can be viewed at http://wileyonlinelibrary.com]
Figure 5
Figure 5
Specificity of brain networks plasticity to the learning procedure. Significant reduction in mean diffusivity was found in different brain regions for different stages of learning. Regions that underwent significant change after the first training session, in which feedback was given on accuracy, are presented on the left; regions of significant change after the second training session, in which feedback was given on timing, are presented in the middle; regions that were found in professional pianists are presented on the right. For each of these regions, the percentage reduction in mean diffusivity ([MD after–MD before]/MD before) is shown for three conditions: accuracy and timing training of naïve subjects (blue and red bars, respectively) and training of the professional pianists (green bar). The first scan was used as baseline for all conditions. The values presented refer to the MD decrease within the significant clusters. Error bars depict the SEM [Color figure can be viewed at http://wileyonlinelibrary.com]

References

    1. Ashby, F. G. , Turner, B. O. , & Horvitz, J. C. (2010). Cortical and basal ganglia contributions to habit learning and automaticity. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 14, 208–215. 10.1016/j.tics.2010.02.001
    1. Assaf, Y. (2018). New dimensions for brain mapping. Science, 362, 994–995. 10.1126/science.aav7357
    1. Bangert, M. , Peschel, T. , Schlaug, G. , Rotte, M. , Drescher, D. , Hinrichs, H. , … Altenmüller, E. (2006). Shared networks for auditory and motor processing in professional pianists: Evidence from fMRI conjunction. NeuroImage, 30, 917–926. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.10.044
    1. Bengtsson, S. L. , Ullén, F. , Ehrsson, H. H. , Hashimoto, T. , Kito, T. , Naito, E. , … Sadato, N. (2009). Listening to rhythms activates motor and premotor cortices. Cortex, 45, 62–71. 10.1016/j.cortex.2008.07.002
    1. Bennett, C. M. , Wolford, G. L. , & Miller, M. B. (2009). The principled control of false positives in neuroimaging. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 4, 417–422. 10.1093/scan/nsp053
    1. Bezzola, L. , Mérillat, S. , Gaser, C. , & Jäncke, L. (2011). Training‐induced neural plasticity in golf novices. The Journal of Neuroscience, 31, 12444–12448. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1996-11.2011
    1. Blumenfeld‐Katzir, T. , Pasternak, O. , Dagan, M. , & Assaf, Y. (2011). Diffusion MRI of structural brain plasticity induced by a learning and memory task. PLoS One, 6, e20678. 10.1371/journal.pone.0020678
    1. Brodt, S. , Gais, S. , Beck, J. , Erb, M. , & Scheffler, K. (2018). Fast track to the neocortex: A memory engram in the posterior parietal cortex. Science, 362(6418), 1045–1048.
    1. Chen, J. L. , Rae, C. , & Watkins, K. E. (2012). Learning to play a melody: An fMRI study examining the formation of auditory‐motor associations. NeuroImage, 59, 1200–1208. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.08.012
    1. Corbetta, M. , Miezin, F. M. , Dobmeyer, S. , Shulman, G. L. , & Petersen, S. E. (1990). Attentional modulation of neural processing of shape, color, and velocity in humans. Science, 248, 1556–1559.
    1. Coutureau, E. , & Killcross, S. (2003). Inactivation of the infralimbic prefrontal cortex reinstates goal‐directed responding in overtrained rats. Behavioural Brain Research, 146, 167–174.
    1. Coynel, D. , Marrelec, G. , Perlbarg, V. , Pélégrini‐Issac, M. , Van de Moortele, P. F. , Ugurbil, K. , … Lehéricy, S. (2010). Dynamics of motor‐related functional integration during motor sequence learning. NeuroImage, 49, 759–766. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.08.048
    1. Dayan, E. , & Cohen, L. G. (2011). Neuroplasticity subserving motor skill learning. Neuron, 72(3), 443‐454. 10.1016/j.neuron.2011.10.008
    1. de Wit, S. , Corlett, P. R. , Aitken, M. R. , Dickinson, A. , & Fletcher, P. C. (2009). Differential engagement of the ventromedial prefrontal cortex by goal‐directed and habitual behavior toward food pictures in humans. The Journal of Neuroscience, 29, 11330–11338. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1639-09.2009
    1. Diedrichsen, J. , & Kornysheva, K. (2015). Motor skill learning between selection and execution. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 19(4), 227‐233. 10.1016/j.tics.2015.02.003
    1. Doya, K. (2000). Complementary roles of basal ganglia and cerebellum in learning and motor control. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 10, 732–739. 10.1016/S0959-4388(00)00153-7
    1. Doyon, J. , Bellec, P. , Amsel, R. , Penhune, V. , Monchi, O. , Carrier, J. , … Benali, H. (2009). Contributions of the basal ganglia and functionally related brain structures to motor learning. Behavioural Brain Research, 199(1), 61‐75. 10.1016/j.bbr.2008.11.012
    1. Doyon, J. , & Benali, H. (2005). Reorganization and plasticity in the adult brain during learning of motor skills. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 15(2), 161‐167. 10.1016/j.conb.2005.03.004
    1. Doyon, J. , Gabitov, E. , Vahdat, S. , Lungu, O. , & Boutin, A. (2018). Current issues related to motor sequence learning in humans. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 20, 89‐97. 10.1016/j.cobeha.2017.11.012
    1. Doyon, J. , Penhune, V. , & Ungerleider, L. G. (2003). Distinct contribution of the cortico‐striatal and cortico‐cerebellar systems to motor skill learning. Neuropsychologia, 41, 252–262.
    1. Draganski, B. , Gaser, C. , Busch, V. , Schuierer, G. , Bogdahn, U. , & May, A. (2004). Neuroplasticity: Changes in grey matter induced by training. Nature, 427, 311–312. 10.1038/427311a
    1. Eklund, A. , Nichols, T. E. , & Knutsson, H. (2016). Cluster failure: Why fMRI inferences for spatial extent have inflated false‐positive rates. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 113(28), 7900–7905. 10.1073/pnas.1602413113
    1. Fedorenko, E. , McDermott, J. H. , Norman‐Haignere, S. , & Kanwisher, N. (2012). Sensitivity to musical structure in the human brain. Journal of Neurophysiology, 108, 3289–3300. 10.1152/jn.00209.2012
    1. Floyer‐Lea, A. , & Matthews, P. M. (2005). Distinguishable brain activation networks for short‐ and Long‐term motor skill learning. Journal of Neurophysiology, 94, 512–518. 10.1152/jn.00717.2004
    1. Gaser, C. , & Schlaug, G. (2003). Brain structures differ between musicians and non‐musicians. The Journal of Neuroscience, 23, 9240–9245.
    1. Herholz, S. C. , Coffey, E. B. J. , Pantev, C. , & Zatorre, R. J. (2016). Dissociation of neural networks for predisposition and for training‐related plasticity in auditory‐motor learning. Cerebral Cortex, 26, 3125–3134. 10.1093/cercor/bhv138
    1. Herholz, S. C. , & Zatorre, R. J. (2012). Musical training as a framework for brain plasticity: Behavior, function, and structure. Neuron, 76, 486–502. 10.1016/j.neuron.2012.10.011
    1. Hikosaka, O. , Nakamura, K. , Sakai, K. , & Nakahara, H. (2002). Central mechanisms of motor skill learning. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 12, 217–222.
    1. Hofstetter, S. , & Assaf, Y. (2017). The rapid development of structural plasticity through short water maze training: A DTI study. NeuroImage, 155, 202‐208. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.04.056
    1. Hofstetter, S. , Tavor, I. , Tzur Moryosef, S. , & Assaf, Y. (2013). Short‐term learning induces white matter plasticity in the fornix. The Journal of Neuroscience, 33, 12844–12850. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4520-12.2013
    1. Janata, P. , Birk, J. L. , Van Horn, J. D. , Leman, M. , Tillmann, B. , & Bharucha, J. J. (2002). The cortical topography of tonal structures underlying Western music. Science, 298, 2167–2170. 10.1126/science.1076262
    1. Jiang, C. , Zhang, L. , Zou, C. , Long, X. , Liu, X. , Zheng, H. , … Diao, Y. (2014). Diurnal microstructural variations in healthy adult brain revealed by diffusion tensor imaging. PLoS One, 9(1), e84822. 10.1371/journal.pone.0084822
    1. Johansen‐Berg, H. , Baptista, C. S. , & Thomas, A. G. (2012). Human structural plasticity at record speed. Neuron, 73, 1058–1060. 10.1016/j.neuron.2012.03.001
    1. Lahav, A. , Saltzman, E. , & Schlaug, G. (2007). Action representation of sound: Audiomotor recognition network while listening to newly acquired actions. The Journal of Neuroscience, 27, 308–314. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4822-06.2007
    1. Lehéricy, S. , Benali, H. , Van de Moortele, P.‐F. , Pélégrini‐Issac, M. , Waechter, T. , Ugurbil, K. , & Doyon, J. (2005). Distinct basal ganglia territories are engaged in early and advanced motor sequence learning. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102, 12566–12571. 10.1073/pnas.0502762102
    1. Lohse, K. R. , Wadden, K. , Boyd, L. A. , & Hodges, N. J. (2014). Motor skill acquisition across short and long time scales: A meta‐analysis of neuroimaging data. Neuropsychologia, 59, 130‐141. 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.05.001
    1. Mayka, M. A. , Corcos, D. M. , Leurgans, S. E. , & Vaillancourt, D. E. (2006). Three‐dimensional locations and boundaries of motor and premotor cortices as defined by functional brain imaging: A meta‐analysis. NeuroImage, 31, 1453–1474. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.02.004
    1. Muellbacher, W. , Ziemann, U. , Boroojerdi, B. , Cohen, L. G. , & Hallett, M. (2001). Role of the human motor cortex in rapid motor learning. Experimental Brain Research, 136, 431–438. 10.1007/s002210000614
    1. Müller, R. A. , Kleinhans, N. , Pierce, K. , Kemmotsu, N. , & Courchesne, E. (2002). Functional MRI of motor sequence acquisition: Effects of learning stage and performance. Brain Research. Cognitive Brain Research, 14, 277–293.
    1. Parsons, L. M. , Sergent, J. , Hodges, D. A. , & Fox, P. T. (2005). The brain basis of piano performance. Neuropsychologia, 43, 199–215. 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2004.11.007
    1. Penhune, V. B. , & Steele, C. J. (2012). Parallel contributions of cerebellar, striatal and M1 mechanisms to motor sequence learning. Behavioural Brain Research, 226(2), 579‐591. 10.1016/j.bbr.2011.09.044
    1. Poldrack, R. A. (2000). Imaging brain plasticity: Conceptual and methodological issues—a theoretical review. NeuroImage, 12, 1–13. 10.1006/nimg.2000.0596
    1. Reithler, J. , van Mier, H. I. , & Goebel, R. (2010). Continuous motor sequence learning: Cortical efficiency gains accompanied by striatal functional reorganization. NeuroImage, 52, 263–276. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.03.073
    1. Rudebeck, S. R. , Scholz, J. , Millington, R. , Rohenkohl, G. , Johansen‐Berg, H. , & Lee, A. C. H. (2009). Fornix microstructure correlates with recollection but not familiarity memory. The Journal of Neuroscience, 29, 14987–14992. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4707-09.2009
    1. Sagi, Y. , Tavor, I. , Hofstetter, S. , Tzur‐Moryosef, S. , Blumenfeld‐Katzir, T. , & Assaf, Y. (2012). Learning in the fast lane: New insights into neuroplasticity. Neuron, 73, 1195–1203. 10.1016/j.neuron.2012.01.025
    1. Sale, M. V. , Reid, L. B. , Cocchi, L. , Pagnozzi, A. M. , Rose, S. E. , & Mattingley, J. B. (2017). Brain changes following four weeks of unimanual motor training: Evidence from behavior, neural stimulation, cortical thickness, and functional MRI. Human Brain Mapping, 38, 4773–4787. 10.1002/hbm.23710
    1. Sanes, J. N. , & Donoghue, J. P. (2000). Plasticity and primary motor cortex. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 23, 393–415. 10.1146/annurev.neuro.23.1.393
    1. Schmithorst, V. J. , & Holland, S. K. (2003). The effect of musical training on music processing: A functional magnetic resonance imaging study in humans. Neuroscience Letters, 348, 65–68. 10.1016/S0304-3940(03)00714-6
    1. Scholz, J. , Klein, M. C. , Behrens, T. E. J. , & Johansen‐Berg, H. (2009). Training induces changes in white‐matter architecture. Nature Neuroscience, 12, 1370–1371. 10.1038/nn.2412
    1. Tavor, I. , Hofstetter, S. , & Assaf, Y. (2013). Micro‐structural assessment of short term plasticity dynamics. NeuroImage, 81, 1–7. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.05.050
    1. Thomas, A. G. , Marrett, S. , Saad, Z. S. , Ruff, D. a. , Martin, A. , & Bandettini, P. a. (2009). Functional but not structural changes associated with learning: An exploration of longitudinal voxel‐based morphometry (VBM). NeuroImage, 48, 117–125. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.05.097
    1. Thomas, C. , & Baker, C. I. (2013). Teaching an adult brain new tricks: A critical review of evidence for training‐dependent structural plasticity in humans. NeuroImage, 73, 225–236. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.03.069
    1. Tillmann, B. , Janata, P. , & Bharucha, J. J. (2003). Activation of the inferior frontal cortex in musical priming. Cognitive Brain Research, 16, 145–161. 10.1016/S0926-6410(02)00245-8
    1. Tricomi, E. M. , Delgado, M. R. , & Fiez, J. A. (2004). Modulation of caudate activity by action contingency. Neuron, 41, 281–292.
    1. Tzourio‐Mazoyer, N. , Landeau, B. , Papathanassiou, D. , Crivello, F. , Etard, O. , Delcroix, N. , … Joliot, M. (2002). Automated anatomical labeling of activations in SPM using a macroscopic anatomical parcellation of the MNI MRI single‐subject brain. NeuroImage, 15, 273–289. 10.1006/nimg.2001.0978
    1. Ungerleider, L. G. , Doyon, J. , & Karni, A. (2002). Imaging brain plasticity during motor skill learning. Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, 78, 553–564. 10.1006/nlme.2002.4091
    1. Verwey, W. B. , Shea, C. H. , & Wright, D. L. (2014). A cognitive framework for explaining serial processing and sequence execution strategies. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 22(1), 54‐77. 10.3758/s13423-014-0773-4
    1. Watanabe, T. , Yagishita, S. , & Kikyo, H. (2008). Memory of music: Roles of right hippocampus and left inferior frontal gyrus. NeuroImage, 39, 483–491. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.08.024
    1. Zatorre, R. J. , Carpentier, T. , Segado, M. , Wollman, I. , & Penhune, V. (2018). Neural network retuning and neural predictors of learning success associated with cello training. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115, E6056–E6064. 10.1073/pnas.1721414115
    1. Zatorre, R. J. , Fields, R. D. , & Johansen‐Berg, H. (2012). Plasticity in gray and white: Neuroimaging changes in brain structure during learning. Nature Neuroscience, 15, 528–536. 10.1038/nn.3045
    1. Zimmerman, E. , & Lahav, A. (2012). The multisensory brain and its ability to learn music. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1252, 179–184. 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2012.06455.x

Source: PubMed

3
Subscribe