Evidence of Benefit of Telerehabitation After Orthopedic Surgery: A Systematic Review

Jose Manuel Pastora-Bernal, Rocio Martín-Valero, Francisco Javier Barón-López, María José Estebanez-Pérez, Jose Manuel Pastora-Bernal, Rocio Martín-Valero, Francisco Javier Barón-López, María José Estebanez-Pérez

Abstract

Background: In addition to traditional physiotherapy, studies based on telerehabilitation programs have published the results of effectiveness, validity, noninferiority, and important advantages in some neurological, cognitive, and musculoskeletal disorders, providing an opportunity to define new social policies and interventions.

Objectives: The aim of this systematic review is to investigate the effects of telerehabilitation after surgical procedures on orthopedic conditions as well as to describe how interventions are designed and to determine whether telerehabilitation is comparable with conventional methods of delivery. This systematic review summarizes the levels of evidence and grades of recommendation regarding telerehabilitation intervention (synchronous or asynchronous provided via the telerehabilitation medium, either in conjunction with, or in isolation of, other treatment interventions) after surgical procedures on orthopedic conditions.

Methods: Study quality was assessed using the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) scores and grade of recommendation following the recommendation of the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine.

Results: We found 3 studies with PEDro scores between 6 and 8, which is considered as level 1 evidence (good; 20% [3/15]), 4 studies with a score of 5, which is considered as level 2 evidence (acceptable; 27% [4/15]), and the remaining 8 studies had scores of 4 or less, which is considered (poor; 53% [8/15]). A total of 1316 participants received telerehabilitation intervention in the selected studies, where knee and hip replacement were 75% of all the studies. Strong and moderate grades of evidence (grade of recommendation A-B) were found in knee and hip replacement interventions. Studies on the upper limb were 25% of the studies, but only 1 study presented a moderate grade of evidence (grade of recommendation B) and the rest were of poor methodological quality with weak evidence (grade of recommendation C).

Conclusions: Conclusive evidence on the efficacy of telerehabilitation for treatment after an orthopedic surgery, regardless of pathology, was not obtained. We found strong evidence in favor of telerehabilitation in patients following total knee and hip arthroplasty and limited evidence in the upper limb interventions (moderate and weak evidence). Future research needs to be more extensive and conclusive. To the best of the authors' knowledge, this is the first attempt at evaluating the quality of telerehabilitation intervention research after surgical procedures on orthopedic conditions in a systematic review. Clinical messages and future research recommendations are included in the review.

Keywords: mHealth; mobile health; musculoskeletal disorders; orthopedic surgery; physiotherapy; systematic review; telehealth; telemedicine; telerehabilitation.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

©Jose Manuel Pastora-Bernal, Rocio Martín-Valero, Francisco Javier Barón-López, María José Estebanez-Pérez. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 28.04.2017.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flowchart.

References

    1. Agostini M, Moja L, Banzi R, Pistotti V, Tonin P, Venneri A, Turolla A. Telerehabilitation and recovery of motor function: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Telemed Telecare. 2015 Jun;21(4):202–13. doi: 10.1177/1357633X15572201.
    1. Rogante M, Grigioni M, Cordella DG, Giacomozzi Claudia. Ten years of telerehabilitation: a literature overview of technologies and clinical applications. NeuroRehabilitation. 2010;27(4):287–304. doi: 10.3233/NRE-2010-0612.
    1. Zampolini M, Todeschini E, Bernabeu GM, Hermens H, Ilsbroukx S, Macellari V, Magni R, Rogante M, Scattareggia MS, Vollenbroek M, Giacomozzi C. Tele-rehabilitation: present and future. Ann Ist Super Sanita. 2008;44(2):125–34.
    1. Rogante M, Kairy D, Giacomozzi C, Grigioni M. A quality assessment of systematic reviews on telerehabilitation: what does the evidence tell us? Ann Ist Super Sanita. 2015;51(1):11–8. doi: 10.4415/ANN_15_01_04. doi: 10.4415/ANN_15_01_04.
    1. Dinesen B, Nonnecke B, Lindeman D, Toft E, Kidholm K, Jethwani K, Young HM, Spindler H, Oestergaard CU, Southard JA, Gutierrez M, Anderson N, Albert NM, Han JJ, Nesbitt T. Personalized telehealth in the future: a global research agenda. J Med Internet Res. 2016 Mar 01;18(3):e53. doi: 10.2196/jmir.5257.
    1. Ruiz-Fernandez D, Marín-Alonso O, Soriano-Paya A, García-Pérez JD. eFisioTrack: a telerehabilitation environment based on motion recognition using accelerometry. ScientificWorldJournal. 2014;2014:495391. doi: 10.1155/2014/495391. doi: 10.1155/2014/495391.
    1. Houlihan BV, Jette A, Friedman RH, Paasche-Orlow M, Ni P, Wierbicky J, Williams K, Ducharme S, Zazula J, Cuevas P, Rosenblum D, Williams S. A pilot study of a telehealth intervention for persons with spinal cord dysfunction. Spinal Cord. 2013 Sep;51(9):715–20. doi: 10.1038/sc.2013.45.
    1. Jelcic N, Agostini M, Meneghello F, Bussè C, Parise S, Galano A, Tonin P, Dam M, Cagnin A. Feasibility and efficacy of cognitive telerehabilitation in early Alzheimer's disease: a pilot study. Clin Interv Aging. 2014;9:1605–11. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S68145. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S68145.
    1. Paul L, Coulter EH, Miller L, McFadyen A, Dorfman J, Mattison PG. Web-based physiotherapy for people moderately affected with Multiple Sclerosis; quantitative and qualitative data from a randomized, controlled pilot study. Clin Rehabil. 2014 Sep;28(9):924–35. doi: 10.1177/0269215514527995.
    1. Hoffmann T, Russell T, Thompson L, Vincent A, Nelson M. Using the internet to assess activities of daily living and hand function in people with Parkinson's disease. NeuroRehabilitation. 2008;23(3):253–61.
    1. Lin K, Chen C, Chen Y, Huang W, Lai J, Yu S, Chang Y. Bidirectional and multi-user telerehabilitation system: clinical effect on balance, functional activity, and satisfaction in patients with chronic stroke living in long-term care facilities. Sensors (Basel) 2014 Jul 11;14(7):12451–66. doi: 10.3390/s140712451.
    1. Langan J, Delave K, Phillips L, Pangilinan P, Brown SH. Home-based telerehabilitation shows improved upper limb function in adults with chronic stroke: a pilot study. J Rehabil Med. 2013 Feb;45(2):217–20. doi: 10.2340/16501977-1115.
    1. Deng H, Durfee WK, Nuckley DJ, Rheude BS, Severson AE, Skluzacek KM, Spindler KK, Davey CS, Carey JR. Complex versus simple ankle movement training in stroke using telerehabilitation: a randomized controlled trial. Phys Ther. 2012 Feb;92(2):197–209. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20110018.
    1. Jackson JC, Ely EW, Morey MC, Anderson VM, Denne LB, Clune J, Siebert CS, Archer KR, Torres R, Janz D, Schiro E, Jones J, Shintani AK, Levine B, Pun BT, Thompson J, Brummel NE, Hoenig H. Cognitive and physical rehabilitation of intensive care unit survivors: results of the RETURN randomized controlled pilot investigation. Crit Care Med. 2012 Apr;40(4):1088–97. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3182373115.
    1. Galiano-Castillo N, Ariza-García A, Cantarero-Villanueva I, Fernández-Lao C, Díaz-Rodríguez L, Legerén-Alvarez M, Sánchez-Salado C, Del-Moral-Avila R, Arroyo-Morales M. Telehealth system (e-CUIDATE) to improve quality of life in breast cancer survivors: rationale and study protocol for a randomized clinical trial. Trials. 2013 Jun 22;14:187. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-14-187.
    1. Bedra M, McNabney M, Stiassny D, Nicholas J, Finkelstein J. Defining patient-centered characteristics of a telerehabilitation system for patients with COPD. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2013;190:24–6.
    1. Bennell KL, Rini C, Keefe F, French S, Nelligan R, Kasza J, Forbes A, Dobson F, Abbott JH, Dalwood A, Vicenzino B, Harris A, Hinman RS. Effects of adding an internet-based pain coping skills training protocol to a standardized education and exercise program for people with persistent hip pain (HOPE trial): randomized controlled trial protocol. Phys Ther. 2015 Oct;95(10):1408–22. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20150119.
    1. Truter P, Russell T, Fary R. The validity of physical therapy assessment of low back pain via telerehabilitation in a clinical setting. Telemed J E Health. 2014 Feb;20(2):161–7. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2013.0088.
    1. Piqueras M, Marco E, Coll M, Escalada F, Ballester A, Cinca C, Belmonte R, Muniesa JM. Effectiveness of an interactive virtual telerehabilitation system in patients after total knee arthoplasty: a randomized controlled trial. J Rehabil Med. 2013 Apr;45(4):392–6. doi: 10.2340/16501977-1119.
    1. Moffet H, Tousignant M, Nadeau S, Mérette C, Boissy P, Corriveau H, Marquis F, Cabana F, Ranger P, Belzile ÉL, Dimentberg R. In-Home telerehabilitation compared with face-to-face rehabilitation after total knee arthroplasty: a noninferiority randomized controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015 Jul 15;97(14):1129–41. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.N.01066.
    1. Tousignant M, Giguère A-M, Morin M, Pelletier J, Sheehy A, Cabana F. In-home telerehabilitation for proximal humerus fractures: a pilot study. Int J Telerehabil. 2014;6(2):31–7. doi: 10.5195/ijt.2014.6158.
    1. Bedra M, Finkelstein J. Feasibility of post-acute hip fracture telerehabilitation in older adults. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2015;210:469–73.
    1. Shulver W, Killington M, Morris C, Crotty M. 'Well, if the kids can do it, I can do it': older rehabilitation patients' experiences of telerehabilitation. Health Expect. 2017 Feb;20(1):120–9. doi: 10.1111/hex.12443.
    1. Theodoros D, Russell T. Telerehabilitation: current perspectives. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2008;131:191–209.
    1. Kairy D, Lehoux P, Vincent C, Visintin M. A systematic review of clinical outcomes, clinical process, healthcare utilization and costs associated with telerehabilitation. Disabil Rehabil. 2009;31(6):427–47. doi: 10.1080/09638280802062553.
    1. Hailey D, Roine R, Ohinmaa A, Dennett L. Evidence of benefit from telerehabilitation in routine care: a systematic review. J Telemed Telecare. 2011;17(6):281–7. doi: 10.1258/jtt.2011.101208.
    1. Laver KE, Schoene D, Crotty M, George S, Lannin NA, Sherrington C. Telerehabilitation services for stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;(12):CD010255. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010255.pub2.
    1. Pietrzak E, Cotea C, Pullman S, Nasveld P. Self-management and rehabilitation in osteoarthritis: is there a place for internet-based interventions? Telemed J E Health. 2013 Oct;19(10):800–5. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2012.0288.
    1. Russell TG, Blumke R, Richardson B, Truter P. Telerehabilitation mediated physiotherapy assessment of ankle disorders. Physiother Res Int. 2010 Sep;15(3):167–75. doi: 10.1002/pri.471.
    1. Fingar K, Stocks C, Weiss A, Steiner C. HCUP Statistical Brief # 186 Internet. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2014. [2017-04-18]. Most frequent operating room procedures performed in U.S. hospitals, 2003-2012 .
    1. Eriksson L, Lindström B, Ekenberg L. Patients' experiences of telerehabilitation at home after shoulder joint replacement. J Telemed Telecare. 2011;17(1):25–30. doi: 10.1258/jtt.2010.100317.
    1. Saunders DG. Therapeutic exercise. Clin Tech Small Anim Pract. 2007 Nov;22(4):155–9.
    1. Cottrell MA, Galea OA, O'Leary SP, Hill AJ, Russell TG. Real-time telerehabilitation for the treatment of musculoskeletal conditions is effective and comparable to standard practice: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Rehabil. 2016 May 2;:-. doi: 10.1177/0269215516645148. Epub ahead of print.
    1. Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gøtzsche PC, Ioannidis JP, Clarke M, Devereaux PJ, Kleijnen J, Moher D. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration. BMJ. 2009;339:b2700.
    1. Hailey D, Roine R, Ohinmaa A, Dennett L. The status of telerehabilitation in neurological applications. J Telemed Telecare. 2013 Sep;19(6):307–10. doi: 10.1177/1357633X13501775.
    1. Shamseer L, Moher D, Clarke M, Ghersi D, Liberati A, Petticrew M, Shekelle P, Stewart LA, PRISMA-P Group Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation. BMJ. 2015 Jan 02;349:g7647.
    1. Systematic Reviews: CRD's Guidance for Undertaking Reviews in Healthcare. Layerthorpe, York: CRD, University of York; 2009. Jan, pp. 1–281.
    1. de Morton Na. The PEDro scale is a valid measure of the methodological quality of clinical trials: a demographic study. Aust J Physiother. 2009;55(2):129–33. doi: 10.1016/S0004-9514(09)70043-1.
    1. Maher CG, Sherrington C, Herbert RD, Moseley AM, Elkins M. Reliability of the PEDro scale for rating quality of randomized controlled trials. Phys Ther. 2003 Aug;83(8):713–21.
    1. Verhagen A, de Vet HC, de Bie RA, Kessels A, Boers M, Bouter L, Knipschild P G. The Delphi list: a criteria list for quality assessment of randomized clinical trials for conducting systematic reviews developed by Delphi consensus. J Clin Epidemiol. 1998 Dec;51(12):1235–41.
    1. Moseley A, Herbert R, Sherrington C, Maher C. Evidence for physiotherapy practice: a survey of the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) Aust J Physiother. 2002;48(1):43–9. doi: 10.1016/S0004-9514(14)60281-6.
    1. Foley NC, Teasell RW, Bhogal SK, Speechley MR. Stroke rehabilitation evidence-based review: methodology. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2003;10(1):1–7.
    1. CEBM. 2011. [2017-04-18]. Levels of evidence: introductory document
    1. Guyatt GH, Sackett DL, Sinclair JC, Hayward R, Cook DJ, Cook RJ. Users' guides to the medical literature. IX. A method for grading health care recommendations. Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. JAMA. 1995 Dec 13;274(22):1800–4.
    1. Martin-Valero R, De La Casa AM, Casuso-Holgado M, Heredia-Madrazo A. Systematic review of inspiratory muscle training after cerebrovascular accident. Respir Care. 2015;60(11):1652–9. doi: 10.4187/respcare.03981.
    1. Russell T, Buttrum P, Wootton R, Jull G. Internet-based outpatient telerehabilitation for patients following total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011 Jan 19;93(2):113–20. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.I.01375.
    1. Bini SA, Mahajan J. Clinical outcomes of remote asynchronous telerehabilitation are equivalent to traditional therapy following total knee arthroplasty: A randomized control study. J Telemed Telecare. 2017 Feb;23(2):239–47. doi: 10.1177/1357633X16634518.
    1. Fung V, Ho A, Shaffer J, Chung E, Gomez M. Use of Nintendo Wii Fit™ in the rehabilitation of outpatients following total knee replacement: a preliminary randomised controlled trial. Physiotherapy. 2012 Sep;98(3):183–8. doi: 10.1016/j.physio.2012.04.001.
    1. Hørdam B, Sabroe S, Pedersen PU, Mejdahl S, Søballe K. Nursing intervention by telephone interviews of patients aged over 65 years after total hip replacement improves health status: a randomised clinical trial. Scand J Caring Sci. 2010 Mar;24(1):94–100. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6712.2009.00691.x.
    1. Tousignant M, Moffet H, Boissy P, Corriveau H, Cabana F, Marquis F. A randomized controlled trial of home telerehabilitation for post-knee arthroplasty. J Telemed Telecare. 2011;17(4):195–8. doi: 10.1258/jtt.2010.100602.
    1. Piqueras M, Marco E, Coll M, Escalada F, Ballester A, Cinca C, Belmonte R, Muniesa JM. Effectiveness of an interactive virtual telerehabilitation system in patients after total knee arthoplasty: a randomized controlled trial. J Rehabil Med. 2013 Apr;45(4):392–6. doi: 10.2340/16501977-1119.
    1. Eisermann U, Haase I, Kladny B. Computer-aided multimedia training in orthopedic rehabilitation. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2004 Sep;83(9):670–80.
    1. Li L, Gan Y, Zhang L, Wang Y, Zhang F, Qi J. The effect of post-discharge telephone intervention on rehabilitation following total hip replacement surgery. Int J Nurs Sci. 2014 Jun;1(2):207–11. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnss.2014.05.005.
    1. Russell TG, Buttrum P, Wootton R, Jull GA. Low-bandwidth telerehabilitation for patients who have undergone total knee replacement: preliminary results. J Telemed Telecare. 2003;9 Suppl 2:S44–7. doi: 10.1258/135763303322596246.
    1. Eriksson L, Lindström B, Gard G, Lysholm J. Physiotherapy at a distance: a controlled study of rehabilitation at home after a shoulder joint operation. J Telemed Telecare. 2009;15(5):215–20. doi: 10.1258/jtt.2009.081003.
    1. Heuser A, Kourtev H, Winter S, Fensterheim D, Burdea G, Hentz V, Forducey P. Telerehabilitation using the Rutgers Master II glove following carpal tunnel release surgery: proof-of-concept. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2007 Mar;15(1):43–9. doi: 10.1109/TNSRE.2007.891393.
    1. Macías-Hernández SI, Vásquez-Sotelo DS, Ferruzca-Navarro MV, Badillo SS, Gutiérrez-Martínez J, Núñez-Gaona MA, Meneses HA, Velez-Gutiérrez OB, Tapia-Ferrusco I, Soria-Bastida M, Coronado-Zarco R, Morones-Alba JD. Proposal and evaluation of a telerehabilitation platform designed for patients with partial rotator cuff tears: a preliminary study. Ann Rehabil Med. 2016 Aug;40(4):710–7. doi: 10.5535/arm.2016.40.4.710.
    1. Antón D, Nelson M, Russell T, Goñi A, Illarramendi A. Validation of a Kinect-based telerehabilitation system with total hip replacement patients. J Telemed Telecare. 2016 Apr;22(3):192–7. doi: 10.1177/1357633X15590019.
    1. Giansanti D, Morelli S, Maccioni G, Lanzetta M, Macellari V. Health technology assessment of a homecare device for telemonitoring and telerehabilitation for patients after hand transplantation. Telemed J E Health. 2008;14(1):69–75. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2007.0023.
    1. Placidi G. A smart virtual glove for the hand telerehabilitation. Comput Biol Med. 2007;37(8):1100–7. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2006.09.011.
    1. Burdea G, Popescu V, Hentz V, Colbert K. Virtual reality-based orthopedic telerehabilitation. IEEE Trans Rehabil Eng. 2000 Sep;8(3):430–2.
    1. Antón D, Nelson M, Russell T, Goñi A, Illarramendi A. Validation of a Kinect-based telerehabilitation system with total hip replacement patients. J Telemed Telecare. 2016 Apr;22(3):192–7. doi: 10.1177/1357633X15590019.
    1. Antón D, Nelson M, Russell T, Goñi A, Illarramendi A. Validation of a Kinect-based telerehabilitation system with total hip replacement patients. J Telemed Telecare. 2016 Apr;22(3):192–7. doi: 10.1177/1357633X15590019.
    1. Tousignant M, Giguère A, Morin M, Pelletier J, Sheehy A, Cabana F. In-home telerehabilitation for proximal humerus fractures: a pilot study. Int J Telerehabil. 2014;6(2):31–7. doi: 10.5195/ijt.2014.6158.
    1. Egger M, Juni P, Bartlett C, Holenstein F, Sterne J. How important are comprehensive literature searches and the assessment of trial quality in systematic reviews? Empirical study. Health Technol Assess. 2003;7(1):1–76.
    1. Levy CE, Silverman E, Jia H, Geiss M, Omura D. Effects of physical therapy delivery via home video telerehabilitation on functional and health-related quality of life outcomes. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2015;52(3):361–70. doi: 10.1682/JRRD.2014.10.0239.
    1. Spangehl M. Is it time for telerehabilitation to go mainstream? J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015 Jul 15;97(14):e55. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.O.00540.
    1. Peterson C, Watzlaf V. Telerehabilitation store and forward applications: a review of applications and privacy considerations in physical and occupational therapy practice. Int J Telerehabil. 2014;6(2):75–84. doi: 10.5195/ijt.2014.6161.
    1. Sharareh B, Schwarzkopf R. Effectiveness of telemedical applications in postoperative follow-up after total joint arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2014 May;29(5):918–922.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2013.09.019.
    1. Bendixen RM, Levy C, Lutz BJ, Horn KR, Chronister K, Mann WC. A telerehabilitation model for victims of polytrauma. Rehabil Nurs. 2008;33(5):215–20.
    1. Burdea G, Popescu V, Hentz V, Colbert K. Virtual reality-based orthopedic telerehabilitation. IEEE Trans Rehabil Eng. 2000 Sep;8(3):430–2.
    1. Vuorenmaa M, Ylinen J, Piitulainen K, Salo P, Kautiainen H, Pesola M, Häkkinen A. Efficacy of a 12-month, monitored home exercise programme compared with normal care commencing 2 months after total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial. J Rehabil Med. 2014 Feb;46(2):166–72. doi: 10.2340/16501977-1242.
    1. Girone M, Burdea G, Bouzit M, Popescu V, Deutsch JE. Orthopedic rehabilitation using the “Rutgers ankle” interface. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2000;70:89–95.

Source: PubMed

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

3
Subscribe