Prevalence of phenotypes of acute respiratory distress syndrome in critically ill patients with COVID-19: a prospective observational study

Pratik Sinha, Carolyn S Calfee, Shiney Cherian, David Brealey, Sean Cutler, Charles King, Charlotte Killick, Owen Richards, Yusuf Cheema, Catherine Bailey, Kiran Reddy, Kevin L Delucchi, Manu Shankar-Hari, Anthony C Gordon, Murali Shyamsundar, Cecilia M O'Kane, Daniel F McAuley, Tamas Szakmany, Pratik Sinha, Carolyn S Calfee, Shiney Cherian, David Brealey, Sean Cutler, Charles King, Charlotte Killick, Owen Richards, Yusuf Cheema, Catherine Bailey, Kiran Reddy, Kevin L Delucchi, Manu Shankar-Hari, Anthony C Gordon, Murali Shyamsundar, Cecilia M O'Kane, Daniel F McAuley, Tamas Szakmany

Abstract

Background: In acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) unrelated to COVID-19, two phenotypes, based on the severity of systemic inflammation (hyperinflammatory and hypoinflammatory), have been described. The hyperinflammatory phenotype is known to be associated with increased multiorgan failure and mortality. In this study, we aimed to identify these phenotypes in COVID-19-related ARDS.

Methods: In this prospective observational study done at two UK intensive care units, we recruited patients with ARDS due to COVID-19. Demographic, clinical, and laboratory data were collected at baseline. Plasma samples were analysed for interleukin-6 (IL-6) and soluble tumour necrosis factor receptor superfamily member 1A (TNFR1) using a novel point-of-care assay. A parsimonious regression classifier model was used to calculate the probability for the hyperinflammatory phenotype in COVID-19 using IL-6, soluble TNFR1, and bicarbonate levels. Data from this cohort was compared with patients with ARDS due to causes other than COVID-19 recruited to a previous UK multicentre, randomised controlled trial of simvastatin (HARP-2).

Findings: Between March 17 and April 25, 2020, 39 patients were recruited to the study. Median ratio of partial pressure of arterial oxygen to fractional concentration of oxygen in inspired air (PaO2/FiO2) was 18 kpa (IQR 15-21) and acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II score was 12 (10-16). 17 (44%) of 39 patients had died by day 28 of the study. Compared with survivors, patients who died were older and had lower PaO2/FiO2. The median probability for the hyperinflammatory phenotype was 0·03 (IQR 0·01-0·2). Depending on the probability cutoff used to assign class, the prevalence of the hyperinflammatory phenotype was between four (10%) and eight (21%) of 39, which is lower than the proportion of patients with the hyperinflammatory phenotype in HARP-2 (186 [35%] of 539). Using the Youden index cutoff (0·274) to classify phenotype, five (63%) of eight patients with the hyperinflammatory phenotype and 12 (39%) of 31 with the hypoinflammatory phenotype died. Compared with matched patients recruited to HARP-2, levels of IL-6 were similar in our cohort, whereas soluble TNFR1 was significantly lower in patients with COVID-19-associated ARDS.

Interpretation: In this exploratory analysis of 39 patients, ARDS due to COVID-19 was not associated with higher systemic inflammation and was associated with a lower prevalence of the hyperinflammatory phenotype than that observed in historical ARDS data. This finding suggests that the excess mortality observed in COVID-19-related ARDS is unlikely to be due to the upregulation of inflammatory pathways described by the parsimonious model.

Funding: US National Institutes of Health, Innovate UK, and Randox.

Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Correlation matrix of the biomarkers measured at baseline in our cohort Increased size of the circles shows stronger correlation. Coefficients are derived using the Spearman's rank correlation coefficient. IL-6=interleukin 6. LDH=lactate dehydrogenase. TNFR1=tumour necrosis factor receptor superfamily member 1A.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Comparison of measures of creatinine, lactate dehydrogenase, and lymphocytes in the hyperinflammatory and hypoinflammatory phenotypes of COVID-19-associated ARDS Comparisons of creatinine (A), lactate dehydrogenase (B), and lymphocytes (C) between the hyperinflammatory and hypoinflammatory subgroups of the COVID-19 subset of the PHIND cohort. Phenotypes were assigned using the Youden index as the cutoff (≥0·274). Boxes show medians and IQRs; whiskers show the full range; and dots show individual observations. p values were calculated by Wilcoxon signed-rank test. ARDS=acute respiratory distress syndrome. PHIND=clinical evaluation of a point of care assay to identify PHenotypes IN the acute respiratory Distress syndrome.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Comparison of patient characteristics in the COVID-19-related ARDS cohort and the HARP-2 matched cohort Comparisons of APACHE II score (A) and measures of soluble TNFR1 (B), IL-6 (C), creatinine (D), and platelets (E) between the COVID-19 subset of the PHIND cohort and HARP-2 matched cohort. Boxes show medians and IQRs; whiskers show the full range; and dots show individual observations. p values were calculated by Wilcoxon signed-rank test. APACHE II=acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II. ARDS=acute respiratory distress syndrome. IL-6=interleukin 6. HARP-2=Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA reductase inhibition with simvastatin in Acute lung injury to Reduce Pulmonary dysfunction. PHIND=clinical evaluation of a point of care assay to identify PHenotypes IN the acute respiratory Distress syndrome. TNFR1=tumour necrosis factor receptor superfamily member 1A.

References

    1. Huang C, Wang Y, Li X. Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China. Lancet. 2020;395:497–506.
    1. Bhatraju PK, Ghassemieh BJ, Nichols M. Covid-19 in critically ill patients in the Seattle region—case series. N Engl J Med. 2020;382:2012–2022.
    1. Grasselli G, Zangrillo A, Zanella A. Baseline characteristics and outcomes of 1591 patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 admitted to ICUs of the Lombardy region, Italy. JAMA. 2020;323:1574–1581.
    1. Wright DJM. Prevention of the cytokine storm in COVID-19. Lancet Infect Dis. 2020 doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30376-5. published online May 7.
    1. Zhang X, Tan Y, Ling Y. Viral and host factors related to the clinical outcome of COVID-19. Nature. 2020;583:437–440.
    1. Mehta P, McAuley DF, Brown M, Sanchez E, Tattersall RS, Manson JJ. COVID-19: consider cytokine storm syndromes and immunosuppression. Lancet. 2020;395:1033–1034.
    1. Sinha P, Matthay MA, Calfee CS. Is a “cytokine storm” relevant to COVID-19? JAMA Intern Med. 2020 doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.3313. published online June 20.
    1. Calfee CS, Delucchi K, Parsons PE, Thompson BT, Ware LB, Matthay MA. Subphenotypes in acute respiratory distress syndrome: latent class analysis of data from two randomised controlled trials. Lancet Respir Med. 2014;2:611–620.
    1. Calfee CS, Delucchi KL, Sinha P. Acute respiratory distress syndrome subphenotypes and differential response to simvastatin: secondary analysis of a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Respir Med. 2018;6:691–698.
    1. Famous KR, Delucchi K, Ware LB. Acute respiratory distress syndrome subphenotypes respond differently to randomized fluid management strategy. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2017;195:331–338.
    1. Sinha P, Delucchi KL, Thompson BT, McAuley DF, Matthay MA, Calfee CS. Latent class analysis of ARDS subphenotypes: a secondary analysis of the statins for acutely injured lungs from sepsis (SAILS) study. Intensive Care Med. 2018;44:1859–1869.
    1. Sinha P, Delucchi KL, McAuley DF, O'Kane CM, Matthay MA, Calfee CS. Development and validation of parsimonious algorithms to classify acute respiratory distress syndrome phenotypes: a secondary analysis of randomised controlled trials. Lancet Respir Med. 2020;8:247–257.
    1. Parker JC, Higgins M, Torrisi M, et al. Development of a point-of-care (POC) theranostic assay to stratify patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). European Respiratory Society research seminar: personalised medicine in acute respiratory distress syndrome. Barcelona, Spain; Jan 30–31, 2020 (poster).
    1. McAuley DF, Laffey JG, O'Kane CM. Simvastatin in the acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2014;371:1695–1703.
    1. Ranieri VM, Rubenfeld GD, Thompson BT. Acute respiratory distress syndrome: the Berlin definition. JAMA. 2012;307:2526–2533.
    1. Ruan Q, Yang K, Wang W, Jiang L, Song J. Clinical predictors of mortality due to COVID-19 based on an analysis of data of 150 patients from Wuhan, China. Intensive Care Med. 2020;46:846–848.
    1. Stapleton RD, Wang BM, Hudson LD, Rubenfeld GD, Caldwell ES, Steinberg KP. Causes and timing of death in patients with ARDS. Chest. 2005;128:525–532.
    1. Shime N, Bunya N, Endo T. Save the ICU and save lives during the COVID-19 pandemic. J Intensive Care. 2020;8:40.
    1. Vanderburg S, Alipanah N, Crowder R. Management and outcomes of critically-ill patients with COVID-19 pneumonia at a safety-net hospital in San Francisco, a region with early public health interventions: a case series. medRxiv. 2020 doi: 10.1101/2020.05.27.20114090. published online May 29.
    1. Intensive Care National Audit And Research Centre . Intensive Care National Audit and Research Centre; London: 2020. ICNARC report on COVID-19 in critical care 12 June 2020.
    1. Guo T, Fan Y, Chen M. Cardiovascular implications of fatal outcomes of patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) JAMA Cardiol. 2020;5:811.
    1. Sinha P, Calfee CS. Phenotypes in acute respiratory distress syndrome: moving towards precision medicine. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2019;25:12–20.
    1. Calfee CS, Janz DR, Bernard GR. Distinct molecular phenotypes of direct vs indirect ARDS in single-center and multicenter studies. Chest. 2015;147:1539–1548.
    1. Ackermann M, Verleden SE, Kuehnel M. Pulmonary vascular endothelialitis, thrombosis, and angiogenesis in Covid-19. N Engl J Med. 2020;383:120–128.
    1. Schaller T, Hirschbühl K, Burkhardt K. Postmortem examination of patients with COVID-19. JAMA. 2020;323
    1. Jabaudon M, Blondonnet R, Audard J. Recent directions in personalised acute respiratory distress syndrome medicine. Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med. 2018;37:251–258.

Source: PubMed

3
Subscribe