How Are Information and Communication Technologies Supporting Routine Outcome Monitoring and Measurement-Based Care in Psychotherapy? A Systematic Review

Patricia Gual-Montolio, Verónica Martínez-Borba, Juana María Bretón-López, Jorge Osma, Carlos Suso-Ribera, Patricia Gual-Montolio, Verónica Martínez-Borba, Juana María Bretón-López, Jorge Osma, Carlos Suso-Ribera

Abstract

Psychotherapy has proven to be effective for a wide range of mental health problems. However, not all patients respond to the treatment as expected (not-on-track patients). Routine outcome monitoring (ROM) and measurement-based care (MBC), which consist of monitoring patients between appointments and using this data to guide the intervention, have been shown to be particularly useful for these not-on-track patients. Traditionally, though, ROM and MBC have been challenging, due to the difficulties associated with repeated monitoring of patients and providing real-time feedback to therapists. The use of information and communication technologies (ICTs) might help reduce these challenges. Therefore, we systematically reviewed evidence regarding the use of ICTs for ROM and MBC in face-to-face psychological interventions for mental health problems. The search included published and unpublished studies indexed in the electronic databases PubMed, PsycINFO, and SCOPUS. Main search terms were variations of the terms "psychological treatment", "progress monitoring or measurement-based care", and "technology". Eighteen studies met eligibility criteria. In these, ICTs were frequently handheld technologies, such as smartphone apps, tablets, or laptops, which were involved in the whole process (assessment and feedback). Overall, the use of technology for ROM and MBC during psychological interventions was feasible and acceptable. In addition, the use of ICTs was found to be effective, particularly for not-on-track patients, which is consistent with similar non-ICT research. Given the heterogeneity of reviewed studies, more research and replication is needed to obtain robust findings with different technological solutions and to facilitate the generalization of findings to different mental health populations.

Keywords: information and communication technologies; measurement-based care; mental health; outcome monitoring; therapist feedback.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow diagram of study selection following PRISMA guidelines [26].

References

    1. Shimokawa K., Lambert M.J., Smart D.W. Enhancing treatment outcome of patients at risk of treatment failure: Meta-analytic and mega-analytic review of a psychotherapy quality assurance system. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 2010;78:298–311. doi: 10.1037/a0019247.
    1. Lambert M.J., Hansen N.B., Finch A.E. Patient-focused research: Using patient outcome data to enhance treatment effects. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 2001;69:159–172. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.69.2.159.
    1. Kaplan S.H., Billimek J., Sorkin D.H., Ngo-Metzger Q., Greenfield S. Who can respond to treatment? Med. Care. 2010;48:S9–S16. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3181d99161.
    1. McDevitt-Murphy M.E., Luciano M.T., Zakarian R.J. Use of ecological momentary assessment and intervention in treatment with adults. Focus (Madison) 2018;16:370–375. doi: 10.1176/appi.focus.20180017.
    1. Suso-Ribera C., Mesas Á., Medel J., Server A., Márquez E., Castilla D., Zaragozá I., García-Palacios A., Mesas A., Medel J., et al. Improving pain treatment with a smartphone app: Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2018;19:145. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2539-1.
    1. Colombo D., Fernández-Álvarez J., Suso-Ribera C., Cipresso P., Valev H., Leufkens T., Sas C., Garcia-Palacios A., Riva G., Botella C. The need for change: Understanding emotion regulation antecedents and consequences using ecological momentary assessment. Emotion. 2020;20:30–36. doi: 10.1037/emo0000671.
    1. Beute F., De Kort Y., Ijsselsteijn W. Restoration in its natural context: How ecological momentary assessment can advance restoration research. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2016;13:420. doi: 10.3390/ijerph13040420.
    1. Kendrick T., Moore M., Gilbody S., Churchill R., Stuart B., El-Gohary M. Routine use of patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) for improving treatment of common mental health disorders in adults. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2014;2014 doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011119.pub2.
    1. Canadian Psychological Association . Outcomes and Progress Monitoring in Psychotherapy. Canadian Psychological Association; Ottawa, ON, Canada: 2018. A Report of the Canadian Psychological Association, Prepared by the Task Force on Outcomes and Progress Monitoring in Psychotherapy.
    1. Knaup C., Koesters M., Schoefer D., Becker T., Puschner B. Effect of feedback of treatment outcome in specialist mental healthcare: Meta-analysis. Br. J. Psychiatry. 2009;195:15–22. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.108.053967.
    1. Scott K., Lewis C.C. Using measurement-based care to enhance any treatment. Cogn. Behav. Pract. 2015;22:49–59. doi: 10.1016/j.cbpra.2014.01.010.
    1. Lambert M.J., Whipple J.L., Smart D.W., Vermeersch D.A., Nielsen S.L., Hawkins E.J. The effects of providing therapists with feedback on patient progress during psychotherapy: Are outcomes enhanced? Psychother. Res. 2001;11:49–68. doi: 10.1080/713663852.
    1. Goldberg S.B., Buck B., Raphaely S., Fortney J.C. Measuring psychiatric symptoms remotely: A systematic review of remote measurement-based care. Curr. Psychiatry Rep. 2018;20:81. doi: 10.1007/s11920-018-0958-z.
    1. Reese R.J., Norsworthy L.A., Rowlands S.R. Does a continuous feedback system improve psychotherapy outcome? Psychotherapy. 2009;46:418–431. doi: 10.1037/a0017901.
    1. Lambert M.J., Harmon C., Slade K., Whipple J.L., Hawkins E.J. Providing feedback to psychotherapists on their patients’ progress: Clinical results and practice sugges tions. J. Clin. Psychol. 2005;61:165–174. doi: 10.1002/jclp.20113.
    1. Bickman L., Kelley S.D., Breda C., De Andrade A.R., Riemer M. Effects of routine feedback to clinicians on mental health outcomes of youths: Results of a randomized trial. Psychiatr. Serv. 2011;62:1423–1429. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.002052011.
    1. Carlier I.V.E., Meuldijk D., Van Vliet I.M., Van Fenema E., Van Der Wee N.J.A., Zitman F.G. Routine outcome monitoring and feedback on physical or mental health status: Evidence and theory. J. Eval. Clin. Pract. 2012;18:104–110. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2010.01543.x.
    1. Gondek D., Edbrooke-Childs J., Fink E., Deighton J., Wolpert M. Feedback from outcome measures and treatment effectiveness, treatment efficiency, and collaborative practice: A systematic review. Adm. Policy Ment. Health Ment. Health Serv. Res. 2016;43:325–343. doi: 10.1007/s10488-015-0710-5.
    1. Imel Z.E., Caperton D.D., Tanana M., Atkins D.C. Technology-enhanced human interaction in psychotherapy. J. Couns. Psychol. 2017;64:385–393. doi: 10.1037/cou0000213.
    1. Aboraya A., Nasrallah H.A., Elswick D.E., Elshazly A., Estephan N., Aboraya D., Berzingi S., Chumbers J., Berzingi S., Justice J., et al. Measurement-based care in psychiatry—Past, present, and future. Innov. Clin. Neurosci. 2018;15:13–26.
    1. Hallgren K.A., Bauer A.M., Atkins D.C. Digital technology and clinical decision making in depression treatment: Current findings and future opportunities. Depress. Anxiety. 2017;34:494–501. doi: 10.1002/da.22640.
    1. Bauer S., Moessner M. Technology-enhanced monitoring in psychotherapy and e-mental health. J. Ment. Health. 2012;21:355–363. doi: 10.3109/09638237.2012.667886.
    1. Silk J.S., Forbes E.E., Whalen D.J., Jakubcak J.L., Thompson W.K., Ryan N.D., Axelson D.A., Birmaher B., Dahl R.E. Daily emotional dynamics in depressed youth: A cell phone ecological momentary assessment study. J. Exp. Child Psychol. 2011;110:241–257. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2010.10.007.
    1. Suso-Ribera C., Castilla D., Zaragozá I., Ribera-Canudas M.V., Botella C., García-Palacios A. Validity, reliability, feasibility, and usefulness of Pain Monitor. A multidimensional smartphone app for daily monitoring of adults with heterogeneous chronic pain. Clin. J. Pain. 2018;34:900–908. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000000618.
    1. Hegland P.A., Aasprang A., Hjelle Øygard S., Nordberg S., Kolotkin R., Moltu C., Tell G.S., Andersen J.R. A review of systematic reviews on the effects of patient-reported outcome monitoring with clinical feedback systems on health-related quality of life-implications for a novel technology in obesity treatment. Clin. Obes. 2018;8:452–464. doi: 10.1111/cob.12277.
    1. Moher D., Liberati A., Tetzlaff J., Altman D.G., Altman D.G., Antes G., Atkins D., Barbour V., Barrowman N., Berlin J.A., et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement (Chinese edition) J. Chin. Integr. Med. 2009;7:889–896. doi: 10.3736/jcim20090918.
    1. Falagas M.E., Pitsouni E.I., Malietzis G.A., Pappas G. Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: Strengths and weaknesses. FASEB J. 2008;22:338–342. doi: 10.1096/fj.07-9492LSF.
    1. Eady A.M., Wilczynski N.L., Haynes R.B. PsycINFO search strategies identified methodologically sound therapy studies and review articles for use by clinicians and researchers. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 2008;61:34–40. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.09.016.
    1. National Heart Lung and Blood Institute (NHLBI) Study Quality Assessment Tools. [(accessed on 1 May 2020)]; Available online: .
    1. Smith B., Harms W.D., Burres S., Korda H., Rosen H., Davis J. Enhancing behavioral health treatment and crisis management through mobile ecological momentary assessment and SMS messaging. Health Inform. J. 2012;18:294–308. doi: 10.1177/1460458212445349.
    1. Pramana G., Parmanto B., Kendall P.C., Silk J.S. The SmartCAT: An m-health platform for ecological momentary intervention in child anxiety treatment. Telemed. e-Health. 2014;20:419–427. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2013.0214.
    1. Pinsof W.M., Goldsmith J.Z., Latta T.A. Information technology and feedback research can bridge the scientist–practitioner gap: A couple therapy example. Couple Fam. Psychol. Res. Pract. 2012;1:253–273. doi: 10.1037/a0031023.
    1. Aguilera A., Bruehlman-Senecal E., Demasi O., Avila P. Automated Text messaging as an adjunct to cognitive behavioral therapy for depression: A clinical trial. J. Med. Internet Res. 2017;19:e148. doi: 10.2196/jmir.6914.
    1. Kumar D., Tully L.M., Iosif A.-M., Zakskorn L.N., Nye K.E., Zia A., Niendam T.A. A mobile health platform for clinical monitoring in early psychosis: Implementation in community-based outpatient early psychosis care. JMIR Ment. Health. 2018;5:e15. doi: 10.2196/mental.8551.
    1. Aharonovich E., Sarvet A., Stohl M., DesJarlais D., Tross S., Hurst T., Urbina A., Hasin D. Reducing non-injection drug use in HIV primary care: A randomized trial of brief motivational interviewing, with and without HealthCall, a technology-based enhancement. J. Subst. Abuse Treat. 2017;74:71–79. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2016.12.009.
    1. Niendam T.A., Tully L.M., Iosif A.M., Kumar D., Nye K.E., Denton J.C., Zakskorn L.N., Fedechko T.L., Pierce K.M. Enhancing early psychosis treatment using smartphone technology: A longitudinal feasibility and validity study. J. Psychiatr. Res. 2018;96:239–246. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2017.10.017.
    1. Bauer A.M., Iles-Shih M., Ghomi R.H., Rue T., Grover T., Kincler N., Miller M., Katon W.J. Acceptability of mHealth augmentation of Collaborative Care: A mixed methods pilot study. Gen. Hosp. Psychiatry. 2018;51:22–29. doi: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2017.11.010.
    1. Bell I.H., Rossell S.L., Farhall J., Hayward M., Lim M.H., Fielding-Smith S.F., Thomas N. Pilot randomised controlled trial of a brief coping-focused intervention for hearing voices blended with smartphone-based ecological momentary assessment and intervention (SAVVy): Feasibility, acceptability and preliminary clinical outcomes. Schizophr. Res. 2019 doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2019.10.026.
    1. Bell I.H., Fielding-Smith S.F., Hayward M., Rossell S.L., Lim M.H., Farhall J., Thomas N. Smartphone-based ecological momentary assessment and intervention in a blended coping-focused therapy for distressing voices: Development and case illustration. Internet Interv. 2018;14:18–25. doi: 10.1016/j.invent.2018.11.001.
    1. Newnham E.A., Hooke G.R., Page A.C. Progress monitoring and feedback in psychiatric care reduces depressive symptoms. J. Affect. Disord. 2010;127:139–146. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2010.05.003.
    1. Delgadillo J., Overend K., Lucock M., Groom M., Kirby N., McMillan D., Gilbody S., Lutz W., Rubel J.A., De Jong K. Improving the efficiency of psychological treatment using outcome feedback technology. Behav. Res. Ther. 2017;99:89–97. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2017.09.011.
    1. Delgadillo J., De Jong K., Lucock M., Lutz W., Rubel J., Gilbody S., Ali S., Aguirre E., Appleton M., Nevin J., et al. Feedback-informed treatment versus usual psychological treatment for depression and anxiety: A multisite, open-label, cluster randomised controlled trial. Lancet Psychiatry. 2018;5:564–572. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(18)30162-7.
    1. Miklowitz D.J., Price J., Holmes E.A., Rendell J., Bell S., Budge K., Christensen J., Wallace J., Simon J., Armstrong N.M., et al. Facilitated Integrated Mood Management for adults with bipolar disorder. Bipolar Disord. 2012;14:185–197. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-5618.2012.00998.x.
    1. Schiepek G., Aichhorn W., Gruber M., Strunk G., Bachler E., Aas B. Real-time monitoring of psychotherapeutic processes: Concept and compliance. Front. Psychol. 2016;7:604. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00604.
    1. Kaiser T., Laireiter A.R. DynAMo: A modular platform for monitoring process, outcome, and algorithm-based treatment planning in psychotherapy. JMIR Med. Inform. 2017;5:e20. doi: 10.2196/medinform.6808.
    1. Lazarou I., Karakostas A., Stavropoulos T.G., Tsompanidis T., Meditskos G., Kompatsiaris I., Tsolaki M. A novel and intelligent home monitoring system for care support of elders with cognitive impairment. J. Alzheimer’s Dis. 2016;54:1561–1591. doi: 10.3233/JAD-160348.
    1. De Jong K., Timman R., Hakkaart-Van Roijen L., Vermeulen P., Kooiman K., Passchier J., Van Busschbach J. The effect of outcome monitoring feedback to clinicians and patients in short and long-term psychotherapy: A randomized controlled trial. Psychother. Res. 2014;24:629–639. doi: 10.1080/10503307.2013.871079.
    1. Amble I., Gude T., Stubdal S., Andersen B.J., Wampold B.E. The effect of implementing the Outcome Questionnaire-45.2 feedback system in Norway: A multisite randomized clinical trial in a naturalistic setting. Psychother. Res. 2015;25:669–677. doi: 10.1080/10503307.2014.928756.
    1. Janse P.D., De Jong K., Van Dijk M.K., Hutschemaekers G.J.M., Verbraak M.J.P.M. Improving the efficiency of cognitive-behavioural therapy by using formal client feedback. Psychother. Res. 2017;27:525–538. doi: 10.1080/10503307.2016.1152408.
    1. Lucock M., Halstead J., Leach C., Barkham M., Tucker S., Randal C., Middleton J., Khan W., Catlow H., Waters E., et al. A mixed-method investigation of patient monitoring and enhanced feedback in routine practice: Barriers and facilitators. Psychother. Res. 2015;25:633–646. doi: 10.1080/10503307.2015.1051163.

Source: PubMed

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

3
Subscribe