Split rejection in vascularized composite allotransplantation

Indranil Sinha, Bohdan Pomahac, Indranil Sinha, Bohdan Pomahac

Abstract

Introduction: Graft monitoring following vascularized composite allotransplantation (VCA) relies primarily on serial skin biopsy. However, given that VCA comprised multiple tissue types, skin biopsy may not accurately reflect rejection in other transplanted tissue.

Methods: A review of the literature on episodes of both acute and chronic rejection following VCA was completed. Special attention was given to how these patients were monitored for rejection and whether skin biopsy accurately reflected the state of other tissue types within VCA.

Results: Following VCA, skin biopsies accurately reflected episodes of acute rejection, but chronic rejection, resulting in both muscle fibrosis and graft vasculopathy, did not present with any ostensible skin changes.

Conclusion: Various tissue types within VCA can reject at different times and rates. We define this phenomenon as "split rejection." Split rejection has significant implications on flap monitoring, as it suggests that skin biopsy alone may not be sufficient in monitoring long-term graft rejection.

Keywords: acute rejection; chronic rejection; immunosuppression; split rejection; vascularized composite allotransplantation.

References

    1. Kaufman CL, Breidenbach W. World experience after more than a decade of clinical hand transplantation: update from the Louisville hand transplant program. Hand Clin. 2011;27:417–21.
    1. Siemionow M, Ozturk C. An update on facial transplantation cases performed between 2005 and 2010. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;128:707–20e.
    1. Chang J, Davis CL, Mathes DW. The impact of current immunosuppression strategies in renal transplantation on the field of reconstructive transplantation. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2011;28:7–20.
    1. Schuind F, Abramowicz D, Schneeberger S. Hand transplantation: the state-of-the-art. J Hand Surg. 2007;32:2–17.
    1. Petruzzo P, Lanzetta M, Dubernard JM, et al. The international registry on hand and composite tissue transplantation. Transplantation. 2010;90:1590–4.
    1. Starzl R, Brandacher G, Lee WPA, et al. Review of the early diagnoses and assessment of rejection in vascularized composite allotransplantation. Clin Dev Immunol. 2013;2013:402980.
    1. Schneeberger S, Ninkovic M, Piza-Katzer H, et al. Status 5 years after bilateral hand transplantation. Am J Transplant. 2006;6:834–41.
    1. Cendales LC, Kirk AD, Moresi JM, et al. Composite tissue allotransplantation: classification of clinical acute skin rejection. Transplantation. 2006;81:418–22.
    1. Schneeberger S, Lucchina S, Lanzetta M, et al. Cytomegalovirus-related complications in human hand transplantation. Transplantation. 2005;80:441–7.
    1. Cendales LC, Kanitakis J, Schneeberger S, et al. The Banff 2007 working classification of skin-containing composite tissue allograft pathology. Am J Transplant. 2008;8:1396–400.
    1. Morelon E, Kanitakis J, Petruzzo P. Immunological issues in clinical composite tissue allotransplantation: where do we stand today? Transplant J. 2012;93:855–9.
    1. Landin L, Cavadas P, Nthumba P, et al. Preliminary results of bilateral arm transplantation. Transplantation. 2009;88:749–51.
    1. Kanitakis J, Petruzzo P, Jullien D, et al. Pathological score for the evaluation of allograft rejection in human hand (composite tissue) allotransplantation. Eur J Dermatol. 2005;15:235–8.
    1. Bingaman AW, Farber DL. Memory T cells in transplantation: generation, function, and potential role in rejection. Am J Transplant. 2004;4:846–52.
    1. Kupiec-Weglinski JW. Graft rejection in sensitized recipients. Ann Transplant. 1996;1:34–40.
    1. Kanitakis J. The challenge of dermatopathological diagnosis of composite tissue allograft rejection: a review. J Cutan Pathol. 2008;35:738–44.
    1. Singhal D, Pribaz JJ, Pomahac B. The Brigham and women's hospital face transplant program: a look back. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012;129:81–8e.
    1. Lee WP, Yaremchuk MJ, Pan YC, et al. Relative antigenicity of components of a vascularized limb allograft. Plast Reconstr Surgery. 1991;87:401–11.
    1. Zamfirescu DG, Owen I, Lascar M, et al. Sentinel skin allograft—a reliable marker for monitoring of composite tissue transplant rejection. Transplantation Proc. 2009;41:503–8.
    1. Unadkat JV, Schneeberger S, Horibe EH, et al. Composite tissue vasculopathy and degeneration following multiple episodes of acute rejection in reconstructive transplantation. Am J Transplant. 2010;10:251–61.
    1. Press BHJ, Sibley RK, Shons AR. Limb allotransplantation in the rat: extended survival and return of nerve function with continuous cyclosporin/prednisone immunosuppression. Ann Plast Surg. 1986;16:313–21.
    1. Benhaim P, Anthony JP, Lin LY-T, et al. A long-term study of allogeneic rat hindlimb transplants immunosuppressed with RS-61443. Transplantation. 1993;56:911–7.
    1. Tan CM, Yaremchuk MJ, Randolph MA, et al. Vascularized muscle allografts and the role of cyclosporine. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1991;87:412–8.
    1. Shirbacheh MV, Jones JW, Breidenbach WC, et al. The case for local immunosuppression in composite tissue allotransplantation. Transplant Proc. 1998;30:2739–42.
    1. Petruzzo P, Kanitakis J, Badet L, et al. Long-term follow-up in composite tissue allotransplantation: in-depth study of five (hand and face) recipients. Am J Transplant. 2011;11:808–16.
    1. Schmauss D, Weis M. Cardiac allograft vasculopathy: recent developments. Circulation. 2008;117:2131–41.
    1. Billingham ME. Pathology and etiology of chronic rejection of the heart. Clin Transplant. 1994;8:289–92.
    1. Kaufmana CL, Ousephc R, Blaira B, et al. Graft vasculopathy in clinical hand transplantation. Am J Transplant. 2012;12:1004–16.
    1. Johnson P, Carpenter M, Hirsch G, Lee T. Recipient cells form the intimal proliferative lesion in the rat aortic model of allograft arteriosclerosis. Am J Transplant. 2002;2:207–14.
    1. Sindhi R, Higgs BW, Weeks DE, et al. Genetic variants in major histocompatibility complex-linked genes associate with pediatric liver transplant rejection. Gastroenterology. 2008;135:830–9.
    1. Kotb M, Russell WC, Hathaway DK, et al. The use of positive B cell flow cytometry crossmatch in predicting rejection among renal transplant recipients. Clinical Transplant. 1999;13:83–9.
    1. Pomahac B, Becker YT, Cendales L, et al. Vascularized composite allotransplantation research: the emerging field. Am J Transplant. 2012;12:1062–3.

Source: PubMed

3
Subscribe