Association between maternal satisfaction and other indicators of quality of care at childbirth: a cross-sectional study based on the WHO standards

Marzia Lazzerini, Ilaria Mariani, Chiara Semenzato, Emanuelle Pessa Valente, Marzia Lazzerini, Ilaria Mariani, Chiara Semenzato, Emanuelle Pessa Valente

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to explore the association between maternal satisfaction and other indicators of quality of care (QoC) at childbirth, as defined by WHO standards.

Design: Cross-sectional study.

Setting: Referral hospital in Northeast Italy.

Participants: 1244 consecutive mothers giving birth in the hospital participated in a survey.

Data collection and analysis: Univariate analyses were performed to evaluate the association between maternal satisfaction and 61 variables, including measures of 'provision of care', 'experience of care', 'availability of resources' and other maternal characteristics. Exploratory factor analysis was performed to create groups of correlated variables, which were used in multivariate analysis.

Results: Overall, 509 (40.9%) of women were >35 years of age, about half (52.7%) were highly educated, most (95.2%) were married/living with partner and employed (79.3%) and about half (52.9%) were primiparous. Overall, 189 (15.2%) were not born in Italy and 111 (8.9%) did not have Italian citizenship. Most women (84.2%) were highly satisfied (score ≥7/10) with the care received. Among the 61 variables explored, 46 (75.4%) were significantly associated with women's satisfaction, 33 with higher satisfaction and 13 with lower satisfaction. Multivariate analysis largely confirmed univariate findings, with six out of eight groups of correlated variables being statistically significantly associated with women's satisfaction. Factors most strongly associated with women's satisfaction were 'effective communication, involvement, listening to women's needs, respectful and timely care' (OR 16.84, 95% CI 9.90 to 28.61, p<0.001) and 'physical structure' (OR 6.51, 95% CI 4.08 to 10.40, p<0.001). Additionally, 'victim of abuse, discrimination, aggressiveness' was inversely associated with the wish to return to the facility or to recommend it to a friend (OR 0.35, 95% CI 0.17 to 0.70, p<0.003).

Conclusion: This study suggested that many variables are strongly associated with women's satisfaction with care during childbirth and support the use of multiple measures to monitor the QoC at childbirth.

Keywords: maternal medicine; quality in health care; reproductive medicine.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Association between ‘women’s overall satisfaction’ and sociodemographic and clinical characteristics. RMC, respectful maternity care.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Association between ‘women’s overall satisfaction’ and indicators of provision of care. CTG, cardiotocography. All variables were WHO quality measures, except for ‘induction of labour’ and ‘private assistance’, which resulted significantly associated with a low maternal satisfaction.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Association between ‘women’s overall satisfaction’ and indicators of experience of care. HWs, health workers.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Association between ‘women’s overall satisfaction’ and indicators of availability ofresources. HWs, health workers. All variables were WHO quality measures, except for ‘organisation of hospital routine’ (timings of follow-up visits, medications, etc) and ‘areas for visitors and timing’, which resulted significantly associated with a high maternal satisfaction.

References

    1. UNFPA, World Health Organization, UNICEF, World Bank Group, The United Nations Population Division . Trends in maternal mortality: 2000 to 2017. estimates by WHO, UNICEF, UNFPA, world bank group and the United nations population division. Available: [Accessed 16 Jan 2020].
    1. Kruk ME, Gage AD, Joseph NT, et al. . Mortality due to low-quality health systems in the universal health coverage era: a systematic analysis of amenable deaths in 137 countries. Lancet 2018;392:2203–12. 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31668-4
    1. World Health Organization Health 2020 a European policy framework and strategy for the 21st century. World Health organization, Copenhagen, 2013. Available: [Accessed 16 Jan 2020].
    1. World Health Organization Beyond the numbers: reviewing maternal deaths and complications to make pregnancy safer. World Health organization, Geneva, 2004. Available: [Accessed 16 Jan 2020].
    1. World Health Organization Global strategy for women's, children's and adolescent's health 2016-2030. Available: [Accessed 16 Jan 2020].
    1. Tunçalp Ӧ, Were WM, MacLennan C, et al. . Quality of care for pregnant women and newborns-the WHO vision. BJOG 2015;122:1045–9. 10.1111/1471-0528.13451
    1. World Health Organization Standards for improving quality of maternal and newborn care in health facilities. Geneva: World Health organization, 2016. Available: [Accessed 16 Jan 2020].
    1. World Health Organization The prevention and elimination of disrespect and abuse during facility-based childbirth. Geneva: World Health organization, 2014. Available: [Accessed 16 Jan 2020].
    1. Oladapo OT, Tunçalp Ö, Bonet M, et al. . WHO model of intrapartum care for a positive childbirth experience: transforming care of women and babies for improved health and wellbeing. BJOG 2018;125:918–22. 10.1111/1471-0528.15237
    1. Conesa Ferrer MB, Canteras Jordana M, Ballesteros Meseguer C, et al. . Comparative study analysing women's childbirth satisfaction and obstetric outcomes across two different models of maternity care. BMJ Open 2016;6:e011362. 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011362
    1. Alfaro Blazquez R, Corchon S, Ferrer Ferrandiz E. Validity of instruments for measuring the satisfaction of a woman and her partner with care received during labour and childbirth: systematic review. Midwifery 2017;55:103–12. 10.1016/j.midw.2017.09.014
    1. Manu A, Arifeen S, Williams J, et al. . Assessment of facility readiness for implementing the WHO/UNICEF standards for improving quality of maternal and newborn care in health facilities - experiences from UNICEF's implementation in three countries of South Asia and sub-Saharan Africa. BMC Health Serv Res 2018;18:531. 10.1186/s12913-018-3334-0
    1. Bohren MA, Mehrtash H, Fawole B, et al. . How women are treated during facility-based childbirth in four countries: a cross-sectional study with labour observations and community-based surveys. Lancet 2019;394:1750–63. 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31992-0
    1. Carquillat P, Boulvain M, Guittier M-J. How does delivery method influence factors that contribute to women's childbirth experiences? Midwifery 2016;43:21–8. 10.1016/j.midw.2016.10.002
    1. Smarandache A, Kim THM, Bohr Y, et al. . Predictors of a negative labour and birth experience based on a national survey of Canadian women. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2016;16:114. 10.1186/s12884-016-0903-2
    1. STROBE Statement Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology, 2009. Available: [Accessed 16 Jan 2020].
    1. Lazzerini M, Valente EP, Covi B, et al. . Use of WHO standards to improve quality of maternal and newborn hospital care: a study collecting both mothers' and staff perspective in a tertiary care hospital in Italy. BMJ Open Qual 2019;8:e000525. 10.1136/bmjoq-2018-000525
    1. Cohen J. Chi-Square Tests for Goodness of Fit and Contingency : Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2nd edn Routledge, 1988.
    1. Blalock HM. Correlated independent variables: the problem of Multicollinearity. Social Forces 1963;42:233–7. 10.2307/2575696
    1. Kleinbaum DG, Klein M. Additional Modeling Strategy Issues : Logistic regression, statistics for biology and health. Atlanta, GA: Springer Science+Business Media, 2010: 241–300.
    1. Dormann CF, Elith J, Bacher S, et al. . Collinearity: a review of methods to deal with it and a simulation study evaluating their performance. Ecography 2013;36:27–46. 10.1111/j.1600-0587.2012.07348.x
    1. Hair JF, Black WC, Babin BJ, et al. . Exploratory Factor Analysis : Multivariate data analysis. 7th edn London: Pearson Education Limited, 2014.
    1. Williams B, Onsman A, Brown T. Exploratory factor analysis: a five-step guide for novices. Australasian Journal of Paramedicine 2010;8 10.33151/ajp.8.3.93
    1. Keller AC, Bergman MM, Heinzmann C, et al. . The relationship between hospital patients' ratings of quality of care and communication. Int J Qual Health Care 2014;26:26–33. 10.1093/intqhc/mzt083
    1. Nestler S. A Monte Carlo study comparing Piv, ULS and DWLS in the estimation of dichotomous confirmatory factor analysis. Br J Math Stat Psychol 2013;66:127–43. 10.1111/j.2044-8317.2012.02044.x
    1. Bossano CM, Townsend KM, Walton AC, et al. . The maternal childbirth experience more than a decade after delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2017;217:342.e1–342.e8. 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.04.027
    1. Nilsson C, Bondas T, Lundgren I. Previous birth experience in women with intense fear of childbirth. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs 2010;39:298–309. 10.1111/j.1552-6909.2010.01139.x
    1. Elmir R, Schmied V, Wilkes L, et al. . Women's perceptions and experiences of a traumatic birth: a meta-ethnography. J Adv Nurs 2010;66:2142–53. 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2010.05391.x
    1. Stankovic B. Women's experiences of childbirth in Serbian public healthcare institutions: a qualitative study. Int J Behav Med 2017;24:803–14. 10.1007/s12529-017-9672-1
    1. Larkin P, Begley CM, Devane D. 'Not enough people to look after you': an exploration of women's experiences of childbirth in the Republic of Ireland. Midwifery 2012;28:98–105. 10.1016/j.midw.2010.11.007
    1. Macpherson I, Roqué-Sánchez MV, Legget Bn FO, et al. . A systematic review of the relationship factor between women and health professionals within the multivariant analysis of maternal satisfaction. Midwifery 2016;41:68–78. 10.1016/j.midw.2016.08.003
    1. Gürber S, Bielinski-Blattmann D, Lemola S, et al. . Maternal mental health in the first 3-week postpartum: the impact of caregiver support and the subjective experience of childbirth - a longitudinal path model. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol 2012;33:176–84. 10.3109/0167482X.2012.730584
    1. Bohren MA, Berger BO, Munthe-Kaas H, et al. . Perceptions and experiences of labour companionship: a qualitative evidence synthesis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2019;3:CD012449. 10.1002/14651858.CD012449.pub2
    1. Mohamed R, Fahmy FF, Senanayake H, et al. . Correlation among experience of person-centered maternity care, provision of care and women’s satisfaction: cross sectional study in Colombo, Sri Lanka. BMJ Open. In Press
    1. Srivastava A, Avan BI, Rajbangshi P, et al. . Determinants of women's satisfaction with maternal health care: a review of literature from developing countries. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2015;15:97. 10.1186/s12884-015-0525-0
    1. Wilde-Larsson B, Sandin-Bojö A-K, Starrin B, et al. . Birthgiving women's feelings and perceptions of quality of intrapartal care: a nationwide Swedish cross-sectional study. J Clin Nurs 2011;20:1168–77. 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03393.x
    1. Henriksen L, Grimsrud E, Schei B, et al. . Factors related to a negative birth experience - A mixed methods study. Midwifery 2017;51:33–9. 10.1016/j.midw.2017.05.004
    1. Hodnett ED. Pain and women's satisfaction with the experience of childbirth: a systematic review. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002;186:S160–72. 10.1067/mob.2002.121141
    1. Palmer JK, Gore JS. A theory of contrast effects in performance appraisal and social cognitive judgments. Psychol Stud 2014;59:323–36. 10.1007/s12646-014-0282-6
    1. Javidmehr M, Ebrahimpour M. Performance appraisal bias and errors: the influences and consequences. IJOL 2015;4:286–302. 10.33844/ijol.2015.60464
    1. Coast E, Jones E, Lattof SR, et al. . Effectiveness of interventions to provide culturally appropriate maternity care in increasing uptake of skilled maternity care: a systematic review. Health Policy Plan 2016;31:1479–91. 10.1093/heapol/czw065
    1. Akileswaran CP, Hutchison MS. Making room at the table for obstetrics, midwifery, and a culture of Normalcy within maternity care. Obstet Gynecol 2016;128:176–80. 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001493
    1. Lazzerini M, Richardson S, Ciardelli V, et al. . Effectiveness of the facility-based maternal near-miss case reviews in improving maternal and newborn quality of care in low-income and middle-income countries: a systematic review. BMJ Open 2018;8:e019787. 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019787
    1. nascita E, CeDAP ilR. Direzione Generale DELLA Digitalizzazione, del Sistema Informativo Sanitario E DELLA Statistica – Ufficio di statistica Rome, Italy, 2015, 2015. Available: [Accessed 16 Jan 2020].

Source: PubMed

3
Subscribe