Mind your step: Target walking task reveals gait disturbance in individuals with incomplete spinal cord injury

Freschta Mohammadzada, Carl Moritz Zipser, Chris A Easthope, David M Halliday, Bernard A Conway, Armin Curt, Martin Schubert, Freschta Mohammadzada, Carl Moritz Zipser, Chris A Easthope, David M Halliday, Bernard A Conway, Armin Curt, Martin Schubert

Abstract

Background: Walking over obstacles requires precise foot placement while maintaining balance control of the center of mass (CoM) and the flexibility to adapt the gait patterns. Most individuals with incomplete spinal cord injury (iSCI) are capable of overground walking on level ground; however, gait stability and adaptation may be compromised. CoM control was investigated during a challenging target walking (TW) task in individuals with iSCI compared to healthy controls. The hypothesis was that individuals with iSCI, when challenged with TW, show a lack of gait pattern adaptability which is reflected by an impaired adaptation of CoM movement compared to healthy controls.

Methods: A single-center controlled diagnostic clinical trial with thirteen participants with iSCI (0.3-24 years post injury; one subacute and twelve chronic) and twelve healthy controls was conducted where foot and pelvis kinematics were acquired during two conditions: normal treadmill walking (NW) and visually guided target walking (TW) with handrail support, during which participants stepped onto projected virtual targets synchronized with the moving treadmill surface. Approximated CoM was calculated from pelvis markers and used to calculate CoM trajectory length and mean CoM Euclidean distance TW-NW (primary outcome). Nonparametric statistics, including spearman rank correlations, were performed to evaluate the relationship between clinical parameter, outdoor mobility score, performance, and CoM parameters (secondary outcome).

Results: Healthy controls adapted to TW by decreasing anterior-posterior and vertical CoM trajectory length (p < 0.001), whereas participants with iSCI reduced CoM trajectory length only in the vertical direction (p = 0.002). Mean CoM Euclidean distance TW-NW correlated with participants' neurological level of injury (R = 0.76, p = 0.002) and CoM trajectory length (during TW) correlated with outdoor mobility score (R = - 0.64, p = 0.026).

Conclusions: This study demonstrated that reduction of CoM movement is a common strategy to cope with TW challenge in controls, but it is impaired in individuals with iSCI. In the iSCI group, the ability to cope with gait challenges worsened the more rostral the level of injury. Thus, the TW task could be used as a gait challenge paradigm in ambulatory iSCI individuals. Trial registration Registry number/ ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03343132, date of registration 2017/11/17.

Keywords: Balance control; Center of mass; Gait; Locomotion; Motor control; Spinal cord injury; Visually guided walking.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interest.

© 2022. The Author(s).

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Target walking task. Schematic view of Motek GRAIL system. A Participants were asked to step onto moving white circular targets (10 cm diameter, here pink) projected on the black treadmill with their self-selected walking speed. B Aerial view of treadmill: participants had to change step length and width based on a variability of 40–80% of 0.8 m and 40–80% of 0.25 m, respectively, in order to step onto the targets. Accuracy was assessed in the anterior–posterior (AP) and medio-lateral (ML) direction monitored by a reflective marker placed on the second toe, the metatarsal 2 (MT2). Handrails and harness that were worn for safety are not shown in this schematic figure. This figure shows whole-body kinematics but for this study foot and pelvis markers were used
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Center of Mass trajectories. A CoM 3-D and 2-D trajectories in TW are reduced in participants with iSCI (top, right) and controls (top, left); however, the reduction is more pronounced in controls (top, left). Arrows indicate movement direction. B Reductions may be caused primarily by TW CoM trajectories in AP and V directions (middle) in participants with iSCI (middle, right) and controls (middle, left). Differences between NW and TW are significant at, and following HS and TO for participants and for controls throughout almost the entire CoM trajectory. TW induced alterations of CoM trajectory are assumed to subserve an increase of inertial stability of CoM and further to optimize CoM movement for accurate foot placement. For redundancy reasons, only differences in CoM trajectory lengths are shown and omitted for CoM 3-D and 2-D trajectories. Gray dashed lines depict time of TO. C CoM trajectory length is reduced most consistently in the V direction in controls and participants with iSCI. Participants with iSCI show on average less reduction of CoM trajectory length and more variability in AP, ML, and V when performing TW. Dots and triangles represent single participants. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001. CoM center of mass, TW target walking, NW normal walking, AP anterior–posterior, ML medio-lateral, V vertical, iSCI incomplete spinal cord injury, HS heel strike, TO toe off
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Relationship between CoM and clinical parameter and outdoor mobility score. A Ability of participants with iSCI to reduce 3-D CoM movement during TW is related to their lesion level (as well as 1-D AP trajectory and 2-D trajectories, see “Results”), as depicted by the mean Euclidean distance between TW and NW. B Mean SCIM outdoor mobility score is inversely correlated to the length of 3-D CoM trajectory length (also AP 1-D trajectory, and ML-AP 2-D trajectory, see “Results”) when participants with iSCI perform TW suggesting a relation with their lack of adaptability to adjust to the task. Dots represent single participants and their ID. CoM center of mass, TW target walking, NW normal walking, AP anterior–posterior, ML medio-lateral, V vertical, SCIM outdoor spinal cord independence measure outdoor mobility, iSCI incomplete spinal cord injury
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
CoM trajectory length is related to preferred walking speed in controls and participants with iSCI. The relationship between preferred walking speed and CoM 3-D trajectory length is changed during TW (red dots) in participants with iSCI (A) and controls (gray triangles) (B) while the latter shows more decline and greater reduction than the former. In participants with iSCI, more variation of walking speed is obtained. Some participants, e.g., P01, P02, P07, and P15 prefer lower walking speeds during both NW and TW (A). The clear separation of TW and NW CoM 3-D trajectory length found in both participants and controls at similar walking speeds may be seen as an indication that reduction of CoM 3-D trajectory length is a common strategy to cope with TW independent of pathology and independent of preferred walking speed. Gray colored dotted lines connect NW and TW for each participant. Dots and triangles represent single participants and their ID. AP anterior–posterior, ML medio-lateral, V vertical, TW target walking, NW normal walking

References

    1. Zörner B, Blanckenhorn WU, Dietz V, Curt A. Clinical algorithm for improved prediction of ambulation and patient stratification after incomplete spinal cord injury. J Neurotrauma. 2010;27(1):241–252.
    1. Awai L, Curt A. Intralimb coordination as a sensitive indicator of motor-control impairment after spinal cord injury. Front Hum Neurosci. 2014;8:148.
    1. Malik RN, Eginyan G, Lynn AK, Lam T. Improvements in skilled walking associated with kinematic adaptations in people with spinal cord injury. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2019;16(1):107.
    1. Leroux A, Fung J, Barbeau H. Postural adaptation to walking on inclined surfaces: II. Strategies following spinal cord injury. Clin Neurophysiol. 2006;117(6):1273–1282.
    1. Day KV, Kautz SA, Wu SS, Suter SP, Behrman AL. Foot placement variability as a walking balance mechanism post-spinal cord injury. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2012;27(2):145–150.
    1. Horak FB. Postural orientation and equilibrium: what do we need to know about neural control of balance to prevent falls? Age Ageing. 2006;35(Suppl 2):ii7–ii11.
    1. Ladouceur M, Barbeau H, McFadyen BJ. Kinematic adaptations of spinal cord-injured subjects during obstructed walking. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2003;17(1):25–31.
    1. Leroux A, Fung J, Barbeau H. Adaptation of the walking pattern to uphill walking in normal and spinal-cord injured subjects. Exp Brain Res. 1999;126(3):359–368.
    1. Easthope CS, Traini LR, Awai L, Franz M, Rauter G, Curt A, et al. Overground walking patterns after chronic incomplete spinal cord injury show distinct response patterns to unloading. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2018;15(1):102.
    1. Awai L, Curt A. Locomotor recovery in spinal cord injury: insights beyond walking speed and distance. J Neurotrauma. 2016;33(15):1428–1435.
    1. Krawetz P, Nance P. Gait analysis of spinal cord injured subjects: effects of injury level and spasticity. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1996;77(7):635–638.
    1. Tesio L, Rota V. The motion of body center of mass during walking: a review oriented to clinical applications. Front Neurol. 2019;10:999.
    1. Lugade V, Lin V, Chou LS. Center of mass and base of support interaction during gait. Gait Posture. 2011;33(3):406–411.
    1. Mansfield A, Wong JS, Bryce J, Knorr S, Patterson KK. Does perturbation-based balance training prevent falls? Systematic review and meta-analysis of preliminary randomized controlled trials. Phys Ther. 2015;95(5):700–709.
    1. Buurke TJW, Lamoth CJC, Vervoort D, van der Woude LHV, den Otter R. Adaptive control of dynamic balance in human gait on a split-belt treadmill. J Exp Biol. 2018;221(Pt 13).
    1. Itzkovich M, Gelernter I, Biering-Sorensen F, Weeks C, Laramee MT, Craven BC, et al. The Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM) version III: reliability and validity in a multi-center international study. Disabil Rehabil. 2007;29(24):1926–1933.
    1. Kirshblum SC, O'Connor KC. Predicting neurologic recovery in traumatic cervical spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1998;79(11):1456–1466.
    1. Aimetti AA, Kirshblum S, Curt A, Mobley J, Grossman RG, Guest JD. Natural history of neurological improvement following complete (AIS A) thoracic spinal cord injury across three registries to guide acute clinical trial design and interpretation. Spinal Cord. 2019;57(9):753–762.
    1. Kirshblum S, Snider B, Eren F, Guest J. Characterizing natural recovery after traumatic spinal cord injury. J Neurotrauma. 2021;38(9):1267–1284.
    1. Desroches G, Gagnon D, Nadeau S, Popovic MR. Effects of sensorimotor trunk impairments on trunk and upper limb joint kinematics and kinetics during sitting pivot transfers in individuals with a spinal cord injury. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2013;28(1):1–9.
    1. Nas K, Yazmalar L, Şah V, Aydın A, Öneş K. Rehabilitation of spinal cord injuries. World J Orthop. 2015;6(1):8–16.
    1. Killeen T, Easthope CS, Filli L, Linnebank M, Curt A, Bolliger M, et al. Modulating arm swing symmetry with cognitive load: a window on rhythmic spinal locomotor networks in humans? J Neurotrauma. 2017;34(10):1897–1902.
    1. Wirz M, van Hedel HJA. Balance, gait, and falls in spinal cord injury. Handb Clin Neurol. 2018;159:367–384.
    1. Kirshblum SC, Burns SP, Biering-Sorensen F, Donovan W, Graves DE, Jha A, et al. International standards for neurological classification of spinal cord injury (revised 2011) J Spinal Cord Med. 2011;34(6):535–546.
    1. Matthis JS, Barton SL, Fajen BR. The critical phase for visual control of human walking over complex terrain. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017;114(32):E6720–E6729.
    1. Zeni JA, Jr, Richards JG, Higginson JS. Two simple methods for determining gait events during treadmill and overground walking using kinematic data. Gait Posture. 2008;27(4):710–714.
    1. Havens KL, Mukherjee T, Finley JM. Analysis of biases in dynamic margins of stability introduced by the use of simplified center of mass estimates during walking and turning. Gait Posture. 2018;59:162–167.
    1. Bannwart M, Bayer SL, König Ignasiak N, Bolliger M, Rauter G, Easthope CA. Mediolateral damping of an overhead body weight support system assists stability during treadmill walking. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2020;17(1):108.
    1. Gard SA, Miff SC, Kuo AD. Comparison of kinematic and kinetic methods for computing the vertical motion of the body center of mass during walking. Hum Mov Sci. 2004;22(6):597–610.
    1. Süptitz F, Moreno Catalá M, Brüggemann GP, Karamanidis K. Dynamic stability control during perturbed walking can be assessed by a reduced kinematic model across the adult female lifespan. Hum Mov Sci. 2013;32(6):1404–1414.
    1. Robinson MA, Vanrenterghem J, Pataky TC. Statistical Parametric Mapping (SPM) for alpha-based statistical analyses of multi-muscle EMG time-series. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2015;25(1):14–19.
    1. Pataky TC. Generalized n-dimensional biomechanical field analysis using statistical parametric mapping. J Biomech. 2010;43(10):1976–1982.
    1. van Silfhout L, Hosman AJF, Bartels R, Edwards MJR, Abel R, Curt A, et al. Ten meters walking speed in spinal cord-injured patients: does speed predict who walks and who rolls? Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2017;31(9):842–850.
    1. van Hedel HJ, Dietz V, Curt A. Assessment of walking speed and distance in subjects with an incomplete spinal cord injury. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2007;21(4):295–301.
    1. Hornby TG, Reisman DS, Ward IG, Scheets PL, Miller A, Haddad D, et al. Clinical practice guideline to improve locomotor function following chronic stroke, incomplete spinal cord injury, and brain injury. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2020;44(1):49–100.
    1. Tesio L, Rota V, Chessa C, Perucca L. The 3D path of body centre of mass during adult human walking on force treadmill. J Biomech. 2010;43(5):938–944.
    1. Orendurff MS, Segal AD, Klute GK, Berge JS, Rohr ES, Kadel NJ. The effect of walking speed on center of mass displacement. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2004;41(6a):829–834.
    1. Bhatt T, Wening JD, Pai YC. Influence of gait speed on stability: recovery from anterior slips and compensatory stepping. Gait Posture. 2005;21(2):146–156.
    1. Dingwell JB, Marin LC. Kinematic variability and local dynamic stability of upper body motions when walking at different speeds. J Biomech. 2006;39(3):444–452.
    1. Desrosiers E, Duclos C, Nadeau S. Gait adaptation during walking on an inclined pathway following spinal cord injury. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2014;29(5):500–505.
    1. Espy DD, Yang F, Bhatt T, Pai YC. Independent influence of gait speed and step length on stability and fall risk. Gait Posture. 2010;32(3):378–382.
    1. Lemay JF, Duclos C, Nadeau S, Gagnon D, Desrosiers É. Postural and dynamic balance while walking in adults with incomplete spinal cord injury. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2014;24(5):739–746.
    1. Ortega JD, Fehlman LA, Farley CT. Effects of aging and arm swing on the metabolic cost of stability in human walking. J Biomech. 2008;41(16):3303–3308.
    1. Awai L, Bolliger M, Ferguson AR, Courtine G, Curt A. Influence of spinal cord integrity on gait control in human spinal cord injury. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2016;30(6):562–572.
    1. Bierbaum S, Peper A, Karamanidis K, Arampatzis A. Adaptive feedback potential in dynamic stability during disturbed walking in the elderly. J Biomech. 2011;44(10):1921–1926.
    1. Hernández A, Silder A, Heiderscheit BC, Thelen DG. Effect of age on center of mass motion during human walking. Gait Posture. 2009;30(2):217–222.
    1. Schrager MA, Kelly VE, Price R, Ferrucci L, Shumway-Cook A. The effects of age on medio-lateral stability during normal and narrow base walking. Gait Posture. 2008;28(3):466–471.
    1. Komisar V, Nirmalanathan K, Novak AC. Influence of handrail height and fall direction on center of mass control and the physical demands of reach-to-grasp balance recovery reactions. Gait Posture. 2018;60:209–216.
    1. Powell LE, Myers AM. The activities-specific balance confidence (ABC) scale. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 1995;50a(1):M28–34.

Source: PubMed

3
Subscribe