The long-term effect of vagus nerve stimulation on quality of life in patients with pharmacoresistant focal epilepsy: the PuLsE (Open Prospective Randomized Long-term Effectiveness) trial

Philippe Ryvlin, Frank G Gilliam, Dang K Nguyen, Gabriella Colicchio, Alfonso Iudice, Paolo Tinuper, Nelia Zamponi, Umberto Aguglia, Louis Wagner, Lorella Minotti, Hermann Stefan, Paul Boon, Mark Sadler, Paolo Benna, Pradheep Raman, Emilio Perucca, Philippe Ryvlin, Frank G Gilliam, Dang K Nguyen, Gabriella Colicchio, Alfonso Iudice, Paolo Tinuper, Nelia Zamponi, Umberto Aguglia, Louis Wagner, Lorella Minotti, Hermann Stefan, Paul Boon, Mark Sadler, Paolo Benna, Pradheep Raman, Emilio Perucca

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate whether vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) as adjunct to best medical practice (VNS + BMP) is superior to BMP alone in improving long-term health-related quality of life (HRQoL).

Methods: PuLsE (Open Prospective Randomized Long-term Effectiveness) was a prospective, randomized, parallel-group, open-label, and long-term effectiveness study (conducted at 28 sites in Europe and Canada). Adults with pharmacoresistant focal seizures (n = 112) received VNS + BMP or BMP (1:1 ratio). Medications and VNS parameters could be adjusted as clinically indicated for optimal seizure control while minimizing adverse effects. Primary endpoint was mean change from baseline HRQoL (using Quality of Life in Epilepsy Inventory-89 total score; QOLIE-89). Secondary endpoints included changes in seizure frequency, responder rate (≥50% decrease in seizure frequency), Centre for Epidemiologic Studies Depression scale (CES-D), Neurological Disorders Depression Inventory-Epilepsy scale (NDDI-E), Clinical Global Impression-Improvement scale (CGI-I), Adverse Event Profile (AEP), and antiepileptic drug (AED) load. The study was prematurely terminated due to recruitment difficulties prior to completing the planned enrollment of n = 362. Results for n = 96 who had baseline and at least one follow-up QOLIE-89 assessment (from months 3-12) were included in this analysis. Mixed model repeated measures (MMRM) analysis of variance was performed on change from baseline for the primary and secondary endpoints.

Results: Significant between-group differences in favor of VNS + BMP were observed regarding improvement in HRQoL, seizure frequency, and CGI-I score (respective p-values < 0.05, 0.03, and 0.01). More patients in the VNS + BMP group (43%) reported adverse events (AEs) versus BMP group (21%) (p = 0.01), a difference reflecting primarily mostly transient AEs related to VNS implantation or stimulation. No significant difference between treatment groups was observed for changes in CES-D, NDDI-E, AEP, and AED load.

Significance: VNS therapy as a treatment adjunct to BMP in patients with pharmacoresistant focal seizures was associated with a significant improvement in HRQoL compared with BMP alone. A PowerPoint slide summarizing this article is available for download in the Supporting Information section here.

Keywords: Epilepsy; Health-related quality of life; QOLIE-89; Seizures; Vagus nerve stimulation.

© 2014 The Authors Epilepsia published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of International League Against Epilepsy.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study time line showing the timing of the various study visits and efficacy assessments.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Primary outcome measure: Mean change in QOLIE-89 overall score from baseline (Month 0; n = 96) to Months 3 (n = 94), 6 (n = 83), 9 (n = 68), and 12 (n = 60).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Median percent change in total seizure frequency from baseline (Month 0; n = 95) to Months 3 (n = 93), 6 (n = 80), 9 (n = 67), and 12 (n = 60). p-Values at baseline, and 3, 6, 9, and 12 months were 0.94, 0.77, 0.35, 0.12, and 0.13, respectively.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Mean change in CGI-I score from baseline (Month 0; n = 96) to Months 3 (n = 94), 6 (n = 83), 9 (n = 68), and 12 (n = 60).
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/instance/4283995/bin/epi0055-0893-f5.jpg

References

    1. Elliott RE, Morsi A, Kalhorn SP, et al. Vagus nerve stimulation in 436 consecutive patients with treatment-resistant epilepsy: long-term outcomes and predictors of response. Epilepsy Behav. 2011;20:57–63.
    1. Kwan P, Brodie MJ. Definition of refractory epilepsy: defining the indefinable? Lancet Neurol. 2010;9:27–29.
    1. Kwan P, Schachter SC, Brodie MJ. Drug-resistant epilepsy. N Engl J Med. 2011;365:919–926.
    1. Elliott RE, Morsi A, Tanweer O, et al. Efficacy of vagus nerve stimulation over time: review of 65 consecutive patients with treatment-resistant epilepsy treated with VNS > 10 years. Epilepsy Behav. 2011;20:478–483.
    1. Cersosimo RO, Bartuluchi M, Fortini S, et al. Vagus nerve stimulation: effectiveness and tolerability in 64 paediatric patients with refractory epilepsies. Epileptic Disord. 2011;13:382–388.
    1. Shahwan A, Bailey C, Maxiner W, et al. Vagus nerve stimulation for refractory epilepsy in children: more to VNS than seizure frequency reduction. Epilepsia. 2009;50:1220–1228.
    1. Renfroe JB, Wheless JW. Earlier use of adjunctive vagus nerve stimulation therapy for refractory epilepsy. Neurology. 2002;59:S26–S30.
    1. Alonso-Vanegas MA, Austria-Velásquez J, López-Gómez M, et al. Chronic intermittent vagal nerve stimulation in the treatment of refractory epilepsy: experience in Mexico with 35 cases. Cir Cir. 2010;78:15–23, 24.
    1. Cersosimo RO, Bartuluchi M, De Los Santos C, et al. Vagus nerve stimulation: effectiveness and tolerability in patients with epileptic encephalopathies. Childs Nerv Syst. 2011;27:787–792.
    1. Klinkenberg S, Majoie HJ, van der Heijden MM, et al. Vagus nerve stimulation has a positive effect on mood in patients with refractory epilepsy. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2012;114:336–340.
    1. Devinsky O, Vickrey BG, Cramer J, et al. Development of the quality of life in epilepsy inventory. Epilepsia. 1995;36:1089–1104.
    1. Radloff LS. The CES-D Scale. A self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Appl Psychol Meas. 1977;1:385–401.
    1. Gilliam FG, Barry JJ, Hermann BP, et al. Rapid detection of major depression in epilepsy: a multicentre study. Lancet Neurol. 2006;5:399–405.
    1. Guy W. ECDEU assessment manual for psychopharmacology. Rockville, MD: US Department of Health, Education, and Welfare; 1976.
    1. Gilliam FG, Fessler AJ, Baker G, et al. Systematic screening allows reduction of adverse antiepileptic drug effects: a randomized trial. Neurology. 2004;62:23–27.
    1. Perucca P, Jacoby A, Marson AG, et al. Adverse antiepileptic drug effects in new-onset seizures: a case–control study. Neurology. 2011;76:273–279.
    1. Canevini MP, De Sarro G, Galimberti CA, et al. Relationship between adverse effects of antiepileptic drugs, number of coprescribed drugs, and drug load in a large cohort of consecutive patients with drug-refractory epilepsy. Epilepsia. 2010;51:797–804.
    1. Langfitt JT, Vickrey BG, McDermott MP, et al. Validity and responsiveness of generic preference-based HRQOL instruments in chronic epilepsy. Qual Life Res. 2006;15:899–914.
    1. Luoni C, Bisulli F, Canevini MP, et al. Determinants of health-related quality of life in pharmacoresistant epilepsy: results from a large multicenter study of consecutively enrolled patients using validated quantitative assessments. Epilepsia. 2011;52:2181–2191.
    1. Birbeck GL, Hays RD, Cui X, et al. Seizure reduction and quality of life improvements in people with epilepsy. Epilepsia. 2002;43:535–538.
    1. McLachlan RS, Sadler M, Pillay N, et al. Quality of life after vagus nerve stimulation for intractable epilepsy: is seizure control the only contributing factor? Eur Neurol. 2003;50:16–19.
    1. Morris GL, 3rd, Mueller WM. Long-term treatment with vagus nerve stimulation in patients with refractory epilepsy. The Vagus Nerve Stimulation Study Group E01-E05. Neurology. 1999;53:1731–1735.

Source: PubMed

3
Subscribe