Maraviroc as intensification strategy in HIV-1 positive patients with deficient immunological response: an Italian randomized clinical trial

Stefano Rusconi, Paola Vitiello, Fulvio Adorni, Elisa Colella, Emanuele Focà, Amedeo Capetti, Paola Meraviglia, Clara Abeli, Stefano Bonora, Marco D'Annunzio, Antonio Di Biagio, Massimo Di Pietro, Luca Butini, Giancarlo Orofino, Manuela Colafigli, Gabriella d'Ettorre, Daniela Francisci, Giustino Parruti, Alessandro Soria, Anna Rita Buonomini, Chiara Tommasi, Silvia Mosti, Francesca Bai, Silvia Di Nardo Stuppino, Manuela Morosi, Marco Montano, Pamela Tau, Esther Merlini, Giulia Marchetti, Stefano Rusconi, Paola Vitiello, Fulvio Adorni, Elisa Colella, Emanuele Focà, Amedeo Capetti, Paola Meraviglia, Clara Abeli, Stefano Bonora, Marco D'Annunzio, Antonio Di Biagio, Massimo Di Pietro, Luca Butini, Giancarlo Orofino, Manuela Colafigli, Gabriella d'Ettorre, Daniela Francisci, Giustino Parruti, Alessandro Soria, Anna Rita Buonomini, Chiara Tommasi, Silvia Mosti, Francesca Bai, Silvia Di Nardo Stuppino, Manuela Morosi, Marco Montano, Pamela Tau, Esther Merlini, Giulia Marchetti

Abstract

Background: Immunological non-responders (INRs) lacked CD4 increase despite HIV-viremia suppression on HAART and had an increased risk of disease progression. We assessed immune reconstitution profile upon intensification with maraviroc in INRs.

Methods: We designed a multi-centric, randomized, parallel, open label, phase 4 superiority trial. We enrolled 97 patients on HAART with CD4+<200/µL and/or CD4+ recovery ≤ 25% and HIV-RNA<50 cp/mL. Patients were randomized 1:1 to HAART+maraviroc or continued HAART. CD4+ and CD8+ CD45+RA/RO, Ki67 expression and plasma IL-7 were quantified at W0, W12 and W48.

Results: By W48 both groups displayed a CD4 increase without a significant inter-group difference. A statistically significant change in CD8 favored patients in arm HAART+maraviroc versus HAART at W12 (p=.009) and W48 (p=.025). The CD4>200/µL and CD4>200/µL + CD4 gain ≥ 25% end-points were not satisfied at W12 (p=.24 and p=.619) nor at W48 (p=.076 and p=.236). Patients continuing HAART displayed no major changes in parameters of T-cell homeostasis and activation. Maraviroc-receiving patients experienced a significant rise in circulating IL-7 by W48 (p=.01), and a trend in temporary reduction in activated HLA-DR+CD38+CD4+ by W12 (p=.06) that was not maintained at W48.

Conclusions: Maraviroc intensification in INRs did not have a significant advantage in reconstituting CD4 T-cell pool, but did substantially expand CD8. It resulted in a low rate of treatment discontinuations.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00884858 https://ichgcp.net/clinical-trials-registry/NCT00884858.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: Stefano Rusconi has been involved with CME activities and speakers bureau fees by GlaxoSmithKline, now ViiV Healthcare and received funding from a commercial source (Pfizer, Inc.). This does not alter the authors' adherence to all the PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials. All other authors have nothing to declare.

Figures

Figure 1. Flow chart illustrating the entire…
Figure 1. Flow chart illustrating the entire study population.
Figure 2. Plasma CD4+/CD8+ count and overtime…
Figure 2. Plasma CD4+/CD8+ count and overtime change at baseline, week 12, and week 48 in the two study arms in the intention to treat analysis.
A CD4+ count at baseline at week 12 and week 48 in arm A and B on the ITT analysis. CD4+ ITT analysis evidenced: in arm A a median count of 192 cell/µL at baseline, 212 cells/µL at week 12 and 223 cells/ µL at week 48; in arm B a median count of 169 cell/µL at baseline, 175 cells/µL at week 12 and 169 cells/µL at week 48. Box-plots (25% and 75% values) are presented. B CD4+ count change from baseline at week 12 and week 48 in the two study arms in the intention to treat analysis. The vertical lines represent the standard deviation. C CD8+ count at baseline at week 12 and week 48 in arm A and B on the ITT analysis. CD8+ ITT analysis evidenced: in arm A a median count of 580 cells/µL at baseline, 634 cells/µL at week 12 and 585 cells/µL at week 48; in arm B a median count of 725 cells/µL at baseline, 681 cells/µL at week 12 and 687 cells/µL at week 48. Box-plots (25% and 75% values) are presented. D CD8+ count change from baseline at week 12 and week 48 in the two study arms in the intention to treat analysis. The vertical lines represent the standard deviation.
Figure 3. Naive and memory T-cell phenotypes…
Figure 3. Naive and memory T-cell phenotypes in Immunological Non Responders with and without HAART intensification with MVC.
A. Percentage of naive CD45RA+CD62L+CD4+ T-cells. B. Percentage of naïve CD45RA+CD62L+CD8+ T-cells. C. Percentage of memory CD45RA-CD4+ T-cells. D. Percentage of memory CD45RA-CD8+ T-cells. The vertical lines represent median and interquartile ranges (25th and 75th percentiles).
Figure 4. T-cells activation and proliferation in…
Figure 4. T-cells activation and proliferation in Immunological Non Responders with and without HAART intensification with MVC.
A-B. T-cell activation defined as the co-expression of HLA-DR and CD38 on CD4+ and CD8+. C-D. T-cell proliferation defined as the expression of Ki67 on CD4+ and CD8+. The vertical lines represent median and interquartile ranges (25th and 75th percentiles).
Figure 5. IL-7/IL-7R system in Immunological Non…
Figure 5. IL-7/IL-7R system in Immunological Non Responders with and without HAART intensification with MVC.
A. Percentage of CD127+CD4+ T-cells. B. Percentage of CD127+CD8+ T-cells. C. Plasma levels of IL-7. The vertical lines represent median and interquartile ranges (25th and 75th percentiles).

References

    1. Street E, Curtis H, Sabin CA, Monteiro EF, Johnson MA (2009) British HIV Association (BHIVA) national cohort outcomes audit of patients commencing antiretrovirals from naive. HIV Med; 10: 337–342. doi:10.1111/j.1468-1293.2009.00692.x. PubMed: .
    1. Tan R, Westfall AO, Willig JH, Mugavero MJ, Saag MS et al. (2008) Clinical outcome of HIV-infected antiretroviral-naive patients with discordant immunologic virologic responses to highly active antiretroviral therapy. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr; 47: 553–558. doi:10.1097/QAI.0b013e31816856c5. PubMed: .
    1. Robbins GK, Spritzler JG, Chan ES, Asmuth DM, Gandhi RT et al. (2009) Incomplete reconstitution of T cell subsets on combination antiretroviral therapy in the AIDS Clinical Trials Group protocol 384. Clin Infect Dis; 48: 350–361. doi:10.1086/595888. PubMed: .
    1. Renaud M, Katlama C, Mallet A, Calvez V, Carcelain G et al. (1999) Determinants of paradoxical CD4 cell reconstitution after protease inhibitor-containing antiretroviral regimen. AIDS; 13: 669–676. doi:10.1097/00002030-199904160-00007. PubMed: .
    1. HIV Surrogate Marker Collaborative Group (2000) Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 RNA level and CD4 count as prognostic markers and surrogate end points: a meta-analysis. HIV Surrogate Marker Collaborative Group. AIDS Res Hum Retrovir; 16: 1123–1133. doi:10.1089/088922200414965. PubMed: .
    1. d’Arminio Monforte A, Testori V, Adorni F, Castelnuovo B, Bini T et al. (1999) CD4+ cell counts at the third month of HAART may predict clinical failure. AIDS; 13: 1669–1676. doi:10.1097/00002030-199909100-00010. PubMed: .
    1. Zoufaly A, An der Heiden M, Kollan C, Bogner JR, Fätkenheuer G et al. (2010) Clinical Outcome of HIV-Infected Patients with Discordant Virological and Immunological Response to Antiretroviral Therapy. J Infect Dis; 203: 364-371. PubMed: .
    1. Lapadula G, Cozzi-Lepri A, Gori A, Antinori A, Marchetti G et al. (2012) Risk of AIDS and non AIDS-related events among patients with conserved CD4+ T-cell counts at baseline but blunted immune-response despite virological suppression after antiretroviral treatment [abstract 641]. In Program and abstracts of the 19th Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections (Seattle, WA), Alexandria, VA.:page 314.
    1. Giorgi JV, Hultin LE, McKeating JA, Johnson TD, Owens B et al. (1999) Shorter survival in advanced human immunodeficiency type 1 infection is more closely associated with T lymphocyte activation than with plasma virus burden or virus chemokine coreceptor usage. J Infect Dis; 179: 859–870. doi:10.1086/314660. PubMed: .
    1. Deeks SG, Kitchen CM, Liu L, Guo H, Gascon R et al. (2004) Immune activation set point during early HIV infection predicts subsequent CD4 + T-cell changes independent of viral load. Blood; 104: 942–947. doi:10.1182/blood-2003-09-3333. PubMed: .
    1. Hunt PW, Martin JN, Sinclair E, Bredt B, Hagos E et al. (2003) T cell activation is associated with lower CD4 T cell gains in human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients with sustained viral suppression during antiretroviral therapy. J Infect Dis;187: 1534–1543. doi:10.1086/374786. PubMed: .
    1. Marchetti G, Gori A, Casabianca A, Magnani M, Franzetti F et al. (2006) Comparative analysis of T-cell turnover and homeostatic parameters in HIV-infected patients with discordant immune-virological responses to HAART. AIDS;20: 1727-1736. doi:10.1097/01.aids.0000242819.72839.db. PubMed: .
    1. Abrams D, Lévy Y, Losso MH, Babiker A, Collins G et al. (2009) Retrieved onpublished at whilst December year 1111. from Interleukin-2 therapy in patients with HIV infection. INSIGHT-ESPRIT Study Group; SILCAAT Scientific; Committee. N Engl J Med;361 (1548-59)
    1. Hammer SM, Ribaudo H, Bassett R, Mellors JW, Demeter LM et al. (2010) A randomized Retrieved onpublished at whilst December year 1111 from placebo-controlled trial of abacavir intensification in HIV-1-infected adults with virologic suppression on a protease inhibitor-containing regimen.; AIDS Clinical Trials Group; (ACTG; ) 372A Study Team. HIV. Clin Trials;11: 312-324
    1. Gulick RM, Lalama CM, Ribaudo HJ, Shikuma CM, Schackman BR et al. (2007) Intensification of a triple-nucleoside regimen with tenofovir or efavirenz in HIV-1-infected patients with virological suppression . AIDS;21: 813-823. doi:10.1097/QAD.0b013e32805e8753. PubMed: .
    1. Gandhi RT, Zheng L, Bosch RJ, Chan ES, Margolis DM et al. (2010) The effect of raltegravir intensification on low-level residual viremia in HIV-infected patients on antiretroviral therapy: a randomized controlled trial. PLOS Med;7(8):e1000321 PubMed: .
    1. Rossi R, Lichtner M, De Rosa A, Sauzullo I, Mengoni F et al. (2011) In vitro effect of anti-human immunodeficiency virus CCR5 antagonist MVC on chemotactic activity of monocytes, macrophages and dendritic cells . Clin Exp Immunol;166: 184-190. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2249.2011.04409.x. PubMed: .
    1. Stepanyuk O, Chiang TS, Dever LL, Paez SL, Smith SM et al. (2009) Impact of adding maraviroc to antiretroviral regimens in patients with full viral suppression but impaired CD4 recovery. AIDS; 23: 1911-1913. doi:10.1097/QAD.0b013e32832f3c65. PubMed: .
    1. Svicher V, Alteri C, Montano M, D’Arrigo R, Andreoni M et al. (2012) Performance of genotypic tropism testing on proviral DNA in clinical practice: results from the DIVA Study Group. New Microbiol.;35: 17-25. PubMed: .
    1. Amorosi EL, Ultmann JE (1966) Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura: Report of 16 cases and review of the literature. Medicine (Baltimore);45: 139–159.
    1. Massanella M, Llibre J, Puertas M, Pérez-Alvarez N, Miro J et al. Immunological Effects of Treatment Intensification with MVC in Recently Infected HIV-1-naive Subjects Starting RAL + TDF/FTC: The Maraviboost Study [abstract 547]. In Program and abstracts of the 18th Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections (Boston, MA), Alexandria, VA.. p. 2011. p. 277.
    1. Cossarini F, Galli A, Galli L, Bigoloni A, Salpietro S et al. (2012) Immune recovery and T cell subset analysis during effective treatment with maraviroc. J Antimicrob Chemother;67: 2474-2478. doi:10.1093/jac/dks216. PubMed: .
    1. Wilkin TJ, Lalama CM, McKinnon J, Gandhi RT, Lin N et al. (2012) A pilot trial of adding maraviroc to suppressive antiretroviral therapy for suboptimal Retrieved onpublished at whilst December year 1111 from CD4⁺ T-cell recovery despite sustained virologic suppression: ACTG A5256. J Infect Dis;206:534-42
    1. Hunt PW, Shulman NS, Hayes TL, Dahl V, Somsouk M et al. (2013) The immunologic effects of maraviroc intensification in treated HIV-infected individuals with incomplete CD4+ T-cell recovery: a randomized trial. Blood;121: 4635-4646. doi:10.1182/blood-2012-06-436345. PubMed: .
    1. Shalekoff S, Pendle S, Johnson D, Martin DJ, Tiemessen CT et al. (2001) Distribution of the Human Immunodeficiency Virus Coreceptors CXCR4 and CCR5 on Leukocytes of Persons with Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Infection and Pulmonary Tuberculosis: Implications for Pathogenesis. J Clin Immunol;21: 390-401. doi:10.1023/A:1013121625962. PubMed: .
    1. Ndhlovu L, Chew G, Agsalda M, Hanks N, Shiramizu B et al. (2012) Maraviroc Intensification in Virally Suppressed HIV Subjects Leads to Decreases in CD8+ T Cell Activation and Loss of Activated Monocytes from the Blood [abstract 377]. In Program and abstracts of the 19th Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections (Seattle, WA), Alexandria, VA.:page 210.
    1. Wilkin TJ, Lalama CM, McKinnon J, Gandhi RT, Lin N et al. (2012) A pilot trial of adding maraviroc to suppressive antiretroviral therapy for suboptimal CD4⁺ T-cell recovery despite sustained virologic suppression: ACTG A5256. J Infect Dis.;206:534-542
    1. Sieg SF (2012) Interleukin-7 biology in HIV disease and the path to immune reconstitution. Curr HIV Res;10: 341-347. doi:10.2174/157016212800792432. PubMed: .
    1. Lévy Y, Sereti I, Tambussi G, Routy JP, Lelièvre JD et al. (2012) Effects of recombinant human interleukin 7 on T-cell recovery and thymic output in HIV-infected patients receiving antiretroviral therapy: results of a phase I/IIa randomized, placebo-controlled, multicenter study. Clin Infect Dis;55: 291-300. doi:10.1093/cid/cis383. PubMed: .
    1. Mazzucchelli R, Durum SK (2007) Interleukin-7 receptor expression: intelligent design. Nat Rev Immunol;7: 144-154. doi:10.1038/nri2023. PubMed: .
    1. Cuzin L, Trabelsi S, Delobel P, Barbuat C, Reynes J et al. (2012) Maraviroc intensification of stable antiviral therapy in HIV-1-infected patients with poor immune restoration: MARIMUNO-ANRS 145 study. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr;6: 557-564. PubMed: .

Source: PubMed

3
Subscribe