Multicenter data acquisition made easy

Jacob Rosenberg, Nadia Abdelaal Henriksen, Lars Nannestad Jørgensen, Jacob Rosenberg, Nadia Abdelaal Henriksen, Lars Nannestad Jørgensen

Abstract

Background: The process for data collection in multicenter trials may be troublesome and expensive. We report our experience with the spreadsheet function in Googledocs for this purpose.

Methods: In Googledocs the data manager creates a form similar to the paper case record form, which will function as a decentral data entry module. When the forms are submitted, they are presented in a spreadsheet in Googledocs, which can be exported to different standard spreadsheet formats.

Results: For a multicenter randomized clinical trial with five different participating hospitals we created a decentral data entry module using the spreadsheet function in Googledocs. The study comprised 332 patients (clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT00815698) with five visits per patient. One person at each study site entered data from the original paper based case report forms which were kept at the study sites as originals. We did not experience any technical problems using the system.

Conclusions: The system allowed for decentral data entry, and it was easy to use, safe, and free of charge. The spreadsheet function in Googledocs may potentially replace current expensive solutions for data acquisition in multicenter trials.

Trial registration: clinicaltrials.gov NCT00815698.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Case record form as presented for the decentral data entry person when entering data.

References

    1. Angelow A, Schmidt M, Weitmann K, Schwedler S, Vogt H, Havemann C, Hoffmann W. Methods and implementation of a central biosample and data management in a three-centre clinical study. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2008;91:82–90. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2008.02.002.
    1. Manion FJ, Robbins RJ, Weems WA, Crowley RS. Security and privacy requirements for a multi-institutional cancer research data grid: an interview-based study. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2009;9:31. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-9-31.
    1. The Googledocs website.
    1. Eapen BJ. Collaborative writing: Tools and tips. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol. 2007;73:439–441. doi: 10.4103/0378-6323.37078.
    1. Wink DM. Web-based collaboration tools. Nurse Educ. 2009;34:235–237. doi: 10.1097/NNE.0b013e3181bc7348.
    1. Zapletal E, Le Bozec C, Degoulet P, Jaulent MC. A collaborative platform for consensus sessions in pathology over Internet. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2003;95:224–229.
    1. Williams AJ. Internet-based tools for communication and collaboration in chemistry. Drug Discov Today. 2008;13:502–6. doi: 10.1016/j.drudis.2008.03.015.
    1. Hu PJ, Zeng D, Chen H, Larson C, Chang W, Tseng C, Ma J. System for infectious disease information sharing and analysis: Design and evaluation. IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed. 2007;11:483–492. doi: 10.1109/TITB.2007.893286.
    1. Björling E, Uhlén M. Antibodypedia, a portal for sharing antibody and antigen validation data. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2008;7:2028–37. doi: 10.1074/mcp.M800264-MCP200.
    1. Butler D. Data sharing threatens privacy. Nature. 2007;449:644–5. doi: 10.1038/449644a.

Source: PubMed

3
Subscribe