Oxaliplatin plus Capecitabine in the Perioperative Treatment of Locally Advanced Gastric Adenocarcinoma in Combination with D2 Gastrectomy: NEO-CLASSIC Study

Yiyi Yu, Yong Fang, Zhenbin Shen, Yan Wang, Min Yan, Hui Cao, Yingbin Liu, Xuefei Wang, Yuehong Cui, Fenglin Liu, Weidong Chen, Wei Li, Qian Li, Huiqin Jiang, Yihong Sun, Tianshu Liu, Yiyi Yu, Yong Fang, Zhenbin Shen, Yan Wang, Min Yan, Hui Cao, Yingbin Liu, Xuefei Wang, Yuehong Cui, Fenglin Liu, Weidong Chen, Wei Li, Qian Li, Huiqin Jiang, Yihong Sun, Tianshu Liu

Abstract

Lessons learned: The NEO-CLASSIC study provided valuable insight for the clinical efficacy and tolerability profiles of perioperative chemotherapy with oxaliplatin and capecitabine, plus gastrectomy, in patients with localized resectable gastric cancer.The study was designed to explore the potential survival benefits of an eight-cycle, perioperative oxaliplatin and capecitabine (XELOX) schedule in the above-mentioned setting and to explore the feasibility of prolonging the cycles of preoperative chemotherapy. The projected endpoint was not met.

Background: This multicenter, open-label study (NEO-CLASSIC) evaluated the efficacy and safety of oxaliplatin and capecitabine (XELOX), plus D2 gastrectomy, in localized resectable gastric cancer.

Methods: Patients aged 18-75 years with histologically-confirmed gastric adenocarcinoma (stage T2-4a/N+M0) were given eight cycles of XELOX (four preoperatively, four postoperatively). Each 3-week cycle comprised capecitabine 1,000 mg/m2 twice daily on days 1-14 and oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 on day 1. Curative D2 gastrectomy was scheduled 2-4 weeks after the last preoperative cycle. The primary objective of the study was to determine the objective response rate (ORR) of XELOX in the preoperative setting. Sample size was calculated by assuming that a minimum of 47 cases would be required to increase the ORR by 15% (from 40% to 55%). With an estimated 10% dropout rate, 55 patients would have to be recruited.

Results: Fifty-five patients were enrolled, and one was excluded because of screening failure. R0 resections were achieved in 45 of 54 intent-to-treat patients (83.3%), and four patients received R1 resections (Fig. 1). There were no complete responses, 27 (50.0%) partial responses, 22 cases (40.7%) of stable disease, and 4 (7.4%) of progressive disease. The objective response rate was 50.0%. Median follow-up was 52.97 months; 30 patients (55.6%) had disease progression (Table 1), and median progression-free survival was 20.10 (95% confidence interval: 4.31-35.89) months; median overall survival was 30.77 months (95% confidence interval was not yet available) (Fig. 2). Fifty-four patients completed 209 cycles of preoperative chemotherapy; 42 patients received 133 cycles of postoperative chemotherapy (Table 3). The rate of grade 3-4 adverse events was 8.5% (29/342 cycles); the most frequent events were neutropenia (9/342 cycles) and leukopenia (4/342 cycles).

Conclusion: These findings suggest that combination therapy with capecitabine and oxaliplatin as perioperative chemotherapy, followed by D2 gastrectomy, is effective and safe in late-stage, locally advanced gastric cancer. Although enrollment exceeded the 47 patients required to identify an increase in the ORR by 15% (from 40% to 55%), results did not meet the primary endpoint.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01880632.

© AlphaMed Press; the data published online to support this summary are the property of the authors.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Study flowchart. Abbreviation: XELOX, oxaliplatin and capecitabine.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Kaplan‐Meier plots of progression‐free survival and overall survival. Abbreviations: OS, overall survival; PFS, progression‐free survival.

References

    1. Smyth EC, Verheij M, Allum W et al. Gastric cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow‐up. Ann Oncol 2016;27:v38–v49.
    1. Schulz C, Kullmann F, Kunzmann V et al. NeoFLOT: Multicenter phase II study of perioperative chemotherapy in resectable adenocarcinoma of the gastroesophageal junction or gastric adenocarcinoma ‐ Very good response predominantly in patients with intestinal type tumors. Int J Cancer 2015;137:678–685.
    1. Cunningham D, Allum WH, Stenning SP et al. Perioperative chemotherapy versus surgery alone for resectable gastroesophageal cancer. N Engl J Med 2006;355:11–20.
    1. Ychou M, Boige V, Pignon JP et al. Perioperative chemotherapy compared with surgery alone for resectable gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma: An FNCLCC and FFCD multicenter phase III trial. J Clin Oncol 2011;29:1715–1721.
    1. Al‐Batran SE, Pauligk C, Homann N et al. LBA‐008Docetaxel, oxaliplatin, and fluorouracil/leucovorin (FLOT) versus epirubicin, cisplatin, and fluorouracil or capecitabine (ECF/ECX) as perioperative treatment of resectable gastric or gastro‐esophageal junction adenocarcinoma: The multicenter, randomized phase 3 FLOT4 trial (German Gastric Group at AIO). Ann Oncol 2017;28(suppl 3):152–153.
    1. Al‐Batran SE, Hofheinz RD, Pauligk C et al. Histopathological regression after neoadjuvant docetaxel, oxaliplatin, fluorouracil, and leucovorin versus epirubicin, cisplatin, and fluorouracil or capecitabine in patients with resectable gastric or gastro‐oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (FLOT4‐AIO): Results from the phase 2 part of a multicentre, open‐label, randomised phase 2/3 trial. Lancet Oncol 2016;17:1697–1708.
    1. Ostwal V, Sahu A, Ramaswamy A et al. Perioperative epirubicin, oxaliplatin, and capecitabine chemotherapy in locally advanced gastric cancer: Safety and feasibility in an interim survival analysis. J Gastric Cancer 2017;17:21–32.
    1. Yoshikawa T, Sasako M, Yamamoto S et al. Phase II study of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and extended surgery for locally advanced gastric cancer. Br J Surg 2009;96:1015–1022.
    1. Japanese Gastric Cancer Association . Japanese classification of gastric carcinoma: 3rd English edition. Gastric Cancer 2011;14:101–112.
    1. Schuhmacher C, Gretschel S, Lordick F et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy compared with surgery alone for locally advanced cancer of the stomach and cardia: European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer randomized trial 40954. J Clin Oncol 2010;28:5210–5218.
    1. Xiong BH, Cheng Y, Ma L et al. An updated meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trial assessing the effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in advanced gastric cancer. Cancer Invest 2014;32:272–284.
    1. Blackham AU, Greenleaf E, Yamamoto M et al. Tumor regression grade in gastric cancer: Predictors and impact on outcome. J Surg Oncol 2016;114:434–439.
    1. Mansour JC, Tang L, Shah M et al. Does graded histologic response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy predict survival for completely resected gastric cancer? Ann Surg Oncol 2007;14:3412–3418.
    1. MacGregor TP, Maughan TS, Sharma RA. Pathological grading of regression following neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy: The clinical need is now. J Clin Pathol 2012;65:867–871.
    1. Bang YJ, Kim YW, Yang HK et al. Adjuvant capecitabine and oxaliplatin for gastric cancer after D2 gastrectomy (CLASSIC): A phase 3 open‐label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2012;379:315–321.
    1. Edge SB, Byrd DR, Compton CC et al. American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) Cancer Staging Manual, 7th edition New York, NY: Springer, 2010.
    1. National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN). NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology: Gastric Cancer. 2017, Version 5. October 13, 2017. Available from . Accessed March 21, 2018.

Source: PubMed

3
Subscribe