The cost of a primary care-based childhood obesity prevention intervention

Davene R Wright, Elsie M Taveras, Matthew W Gillman, Christine M Horan, Katherine H Hohman, Steven L Gortmaker, Lisa A Prosser, Davene R Wright, Elsie M Taveras, Matthew W Gillman, Christine M Horan, Katherine H Hohman, Steven L Gortmaker, Lisa A Prosser

Abstract

Background: United States pediatric guidelines recommend that childhood obesity counseling be conducted in the primary care setting. Primary care-based interventions can be effective in improving health behaviors, but also costly. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the cost of a primary care-based obesity prevention intervention targeting children between the ages of two and six years who are at elevated risk for obesity, measured against usual care.

Methods: High Five for Kids was a cluster-randomized controlled clinical trial that aimed to modify children's nutrition and TV viewing habits through a motivational interviewing intervention. We assessed visit-related costs from a societal perspective, including provider-incurred direct medical costs, provider-incurred equipment costs, parent time costs and parent out-of-pocket costs, in 2011 dollars for the intervention (n = 253) and usual care (n =192) groups. We conducted a net cost analysis using both societal and health plan costing perspectives and conducted one-way sensitivity and uncertainty analyses on results.

Results: The total costs for the intervention group and usual care groups in the first year of the intervention were $65,643 (95% CI [$64,522, $66,842]) and $12,192 (95% CI [$11,393, $13,174]). The mean costs for the intervention and usual care groups were $259 (95% CI [$255, $264]) and $63 (95% CI [$59, $69]) per child, respectively, for a incremental difference of $196 (95% CI [$191, $202]) per child. Children in the intervention group attended a mean of 2.4 of a possible 4 in-person visits and received 0.45 of a possible 2 counseling phone calls. Provider-incurred costs were the primary driver of cost estimates in sensitivity analyses.

Conclusions: High Five for Kids was a resource-intensive intervention. Further studies are needed to assess the cost-effectiveness of the intervention relative to other pediatric obesity interventions.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00377767.

References

    1. Public Law 111-148, The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. Bill number H.R. 3590. United States: 111th United States Congress; 2010.
    1. Barlow SE. Expert committee recommendations regarding the prevention, assessment, and treatment of child and adolescent overweight and obesity: summary report. Pediatrics. 2007;14(Suppl 4):S164–S192.
    1. Schwartz RP, Hamre R, Dietz WH, Wasserman RC, Slora EJ, Myers EF, Sullivan S, Rockett H, Thoma KA, Dumitru G. et al.Office-based motivational interviewing to prevent childhood obesity: a feasibility study. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2007;14(5):495–501. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.161.5.495.
    1. Taveras EM, Gortmaker SL, Hohman KH, Horan CM, Kleinman KP, Mitchell K, Price S, Prosser LA, Rifas-Shiman SL, Gillman MW. Randomized controlled trial to improve primary care to prevent and manage childhood obesity: the high five for kids study. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2011;14(8):714–722. doi: 10.1001/archpediatrics.2011.44.
    1. Brown HS 3rd, Perez A, Li YP, Hoelscher DM, Kelder SH, Rivera R. The cost-effectiveness of a school-based overweight program. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2007;14:47. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-4-47.
    1. Goldfield GS, Epstein LH, Kilanowski CK, Paluch RA, Kogut-Bossler B. Cost-effectiveness of group and mixed family-based treatment for childhood obesity. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2001;14(12):1843–1849. doi: 10.1038/sj.ijo.0801838.
    1. McAuley KA, Taylor RW, Farmer VL, Hansen P, Williams SM, Booker CS, Mann JI. Economic evaluation of a community-based obesity prevention program in children: the APPLE project. Obesity (Silver Spring) 2010;14:131–136. doi: 10.1038/oby.2009.148.
    1. Moodie M, Haby M, Swinburn B, Carter R. Cost-effectiveness of active transport for primary school children - Walking School Bus program. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2009;14(1):63. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-6-63.
    1. Moodie M, Haby M, Wake M, Gold L, Carter R. Cost-effectiveness of a family-based GP-mediated intervention targeting overweight and moderately obese children. Econ Hum Biol. 2008;14(3):363–376. doi: 10.1016/j.ehb.2008.06.001.
    1. Wake M, Baur LA, Gerner B, Gibbons K, Gold L, Gunn J, Levickis P, McCallum Z, Naughton G, Sanci L. et al.Outcomes and costs of primary care surveillance and intervention for overweight or obese children: the LEAP 2 randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2009;14:b3308. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b3308.
    1. Wake M, Gold L, McCallum Z, Gerner B, Waters E. Economic evaluation of a primary care trial to reduce weight gain in overweight/obese children: the LEAP trial. Ambul Pediatr. 2008;14(5):336–341. doi: 10.1016/j.ambp.2008.06.006.
    1. Wang LY, Gutin B, Barbeau P, Moore JB, Hanes J Jr, Johnson MH, Cavnar M, Thornburg J, Yin Z. Cost-effectiveness of a school-based obesity prevention program. J Sch Health. 2008;14(12):619–624. doi: 10.1111/j.1746-1561.2008.00357.x.
    1. Wang LY, Yang Q, Lowry R, Wechsler H. Economic analysis of a school-based obesity prevention program. Obes Res. 2003;14(11):1313–1324. doi: 10.1038/oby.2003.178.
    1. Janicke DM, Sallinen BJ, Perri MG, Lutes LD, Silverstein JH, Brumback B. Comparison of program costs for parent-only and family-based interventions for pediatric obesity in medically underserved rural settings. J Rural Health. 2009;14(3):326–330. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-0361.2009.00238.x.
    1. Moodie M, Haby MM, Swinburn B, Carter R. Assessing cost-effectiveness in obesity: active transport program for primary school children–TravelSMART Schools Curriculum program. J Phys Act Health. 2011;14(4):503–515.
    1. Moodie ML, Carter RC, Swinburn BA, Haby MM. The cost-effectiveness of Australia's active after-school communities program. Obesity (Silver Spring) 2010;14(8):1585–1592. doi: 10.1038/oby.2009.401.
    1. Wagner E. Chronic disease management: what will it take to improve care for chronic illness? Eff Clin Pract. 1998;14:2–4.
    1. Taveras EM, Gortmaker SL, Hohman KH, Horan CM, Kleinman KP, Mitchell K, Price S, Prosser L, Rifas-Shiman SL, Gillman MW. Randomized controlled trial to improve primary care to prevent and manage childhood obesity: the high five for kids study. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2010. p. c. In Press.
    1. Gold M, Siegel J, Russell L, Weinstein MC. Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine. New York: Oxford University Press; 1996.
    1. Consumer Price Index. .
    1. Yoo BK, Szilagyi PG, Schaffer SJ, Humiston SG, Rand CM, Albertin CS, Vincelli P, Blumkin AK, Shone LP, Coleman MS. Cost of universal influenza vaccination of children in pediatric practices. Pediatrics. 2009;14(Suppl 5):S499–S506.
    1. National Compensation Survey. Occupational Earnings in the United States. 2007. . Accessed February 6, 2013.
    1. Russell LB. Completing costs: patients’ time. Med Care. 2009;14(7 Suppl 1):S89–93.
    1. Grosse SD, Krueger KV, Mvundura M. Economic productivity by age and sex: 2007 estimates for the United States. Med Care. 2009;14(7 Suppl 1):S94–103.
    1. Heyse JF, Cook JR, Carides GW. In: Economic Evaluation in Health Care. Drummond MF, McGuire A, editor. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2001. Statistical considerations in analysing health care resource utilization and cost data.
    1. Kalavainen M, Karjalainen S, Martikainen J, Korppi M, Linnosmaa I, Nuutinen O. Cost-effectiveness of routine and group programs for treatment of obese children. Pediatr Int. 2009;14(5):606–611. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-200X.2009.02810.x.
    1. Magnus A, Haby MM, Carter R, Swinburn B. The cost-effectiveness of removing television advertising of high-fat and/or high-sugar food and beverages to Australian children. Int J Obes (Lond) 2009;14(10):1094–1102. doi: 10.1038/ijo.2009.156.
    1. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. Purchasing Power Parities for GDP and related indicators. Available at . Accessed February 6, 2013.
    1. US Department of the Treasury. Treasury Reporting Rates of Exchange. Washington, DC: Service FM; 2010.
    1. Cutler DM, Ly DP. The (paper) work of medicine: understanding international medical costs. J Econ Perspect. 2011;14(2):3–25. doi: 10.1257/jep.25.2.3.
    1. Thorpe KE. Inside the black box of administrative costs. Health Aff (Millwood) 1992;14(2):41–55. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.11.2.41.
    1. Drummond MF, Sculpher MJ, Torrance GW. O'Briend BJ, Stodart GL: Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programmes. 3. New York: Oxford University Press; 2005.

Source: PubMed

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

3
Subscribe