A topical microemulsion for the prevention of allergic rhinitis symptoms: results of a randomized, controlled, double-blind, parallel group, multicentre, multinational clinical trial (Nares study)

Pedro Ojeda, Núria Piqué, Alicia Alonso, Julio Delgado, Francisco Feo, Juan Manuel Igea, Ana Navarro, José María Olaguibel, Javier Subiza, Carles Nieto, Morgan Andersson, Pedro Ojeda, Núria Piqué, Alicia Alonso, Julio Delgado, Francisco Feo, Juan Manuel Igea, Ana Navarro, José María Olaguibel, Javier Subiza, Carles Nieto, Morgan Andersson

Abstract

Background: Since barrier protection measures to avoid contact with allergens are being increasingly developed, we assessed the clinical efficacy and tolerability of a topical nasal microemulsion made of glycerol esters in patients with allergic rhinitis.

Methods: Randomized, controlled, double-blind, parallel group, multicentre, multinational clinical trial in which adult patients with allergic rhinitis or rhinoconjunctivitis due to sensitization to birch, grass or olive tree pollens received treatment with topical microemulsion or placebo during the pollen seasons. Efficacy variables included scores in the mini-RQLQ questionnaire, number and severity of nasal, ocular and lung signs and symptoms, need for symptomatic medications and patients' satisfaction with treatment. Adverse events were also recorded.

Results: Demographic characteristics were homogeneous between groups and mini-RQLQ scores did not differ significantly at baseline (visit 1). From symptoms recorded in the diary cards, the ME group showed statistically significant better scores for nasal congestion (0.72 vs. 1.01; p = 0.017) and mean total nasal symptoms (0.7 vs. 0.9; p = 0.045). At visit 2 (pollen season), lower values were observed in the mini-RQLQ in the ME group, although there were no statistically significant differences between groups in both full analysis set (FAS) and patients completing treatment (PPS) populations. The results obtained in the nasal symptoms domain of the mini-RQLQ at visit 2 showed the highest difference (-0.43; 95% CI: -0.88 to 0.02) for the ME group in the FAS population. The topical microemulsion was safe and well tolerated and no major discomforts were observed. Satisfaction rating with the treatment was similar between the groups.

Conclusions: The topical application of the microemulsion is a feasible and safe therapy in the prevention of allergic symptoms, particularly nasal congestion.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01478425.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow diagram of the clinical trial progress. Safety Set (SS): Randomized patients who took at least one dose of the study treatment; Full Analysis Set (FAS): randomized patients who met all selection criteria and had a value of the mini-RQLQ at baseline (visit 1); Per Protocol Set (PPS): FAS patients who completed the study treatment, did not take prohibited medications and who had a value for the primary variable (mini-RQLQ at visit 2).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Allergic symptoms. Allergic symptoms recorded in the patient’s diary as daily means (FAS and PPS populations).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Patient’s quality of life. Results of quality of life, global and in the different dimensions of the mini-RQLQ questionnaire (FAS and PPS population).

References

    1. Mandhane SN, Shah JH, Thennati R. Allergic rhinitis: an update on disease, present treatments and future prospects. Int Immunopharmacol. 2011;11:1646–1662. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2011.07.005.
    1. Willsie SK. Improved strategies and new treatment options for allergic rhinitis. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2002;102:S7–S14.
    1. Brozek JL, Bousquet J, Baena-Cagnani CE, Bonini S, Canonica GW, Casale TB, van Wijk RG, Ohta K, Zuberbier T, Schünemann HJ. Global Allergy and Asthma European Network; Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation Working Group. Allergic Rhinitis and its Impact on Asthma (ARIA) guidelines: 2010 revision. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2010;126:466–476. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2010.06.047.
    1. Åberg N, Dahl Å, Benson M. A nasally applied cellulose powder in seasonal allergic rhinitis (SAR) in children and adolescents; reduction of symptoms and relation to pollen load. Paediatric Allergy Immunol. 2011;22:594–599. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3038.2011.01182.x.
    1. Andersson M, Greiff L, Wollmer P. Nasal treatment with a microemulsion reduces allergen challenge-induced symptoms and signs of allergic rhinitis. Acta Otolaryngol. 2008;128:666–669. doi: 10.1080/00016480701642197.
    1. Andersson M, Greiff L, Wollmer P. Effects of a topical microemulsion in house dust mite allergic rhinitis. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol. 2011;108:146–148. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-7843.2010.00640.x.
    1. Valero A, Alonso J, Antépara I, Baró E, Colás C, del Cuvillo A, Ferrer M, Herdman M, Marti-Guadaño E, Monclús L, Navarro-Pulido AM, Sastre J, Izquierdo I, Mullol J. Health-related quality of life in allergic rhinitis: comparing the short form ESPRINT-15 and MiniRQLQ questionnaires. Allergy. 2007;62:1372–1378. doi: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2007.01552.x.
    1. Juniper EF, Thompson AK, Ferrie PJ, Roberts JN. Development and validation of the mini Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire. Clin Exp Allergy. 2000;30:132–140. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2222.2000.00668.x.
    1. Garavello W, Romagnoli M, Gaini RM. Hypertonic or isotonic saline for allergic rhinitis in children. Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2005;16:91–92. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3038.2005.00215.x.
    1. Nielsen LS, Schubert L, Hansen J. Bioadhesive drug delivery systems. I. Characterisation of mucoadhesive properties of systems based on glyceryl mono-oleate and glyceryl monolinoleate. Eur J Pharm Sci. 1998;6:231–239. doi: 10.1016/S0928-0987(97)10004-5.
    1. Josling P, Steadman S. Use of cellulose powder for the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis. Adv Ther. 2003;20:213–219. doi: 10.1007/BF02850092.
    1. Emberlin JC, Lewis RA. A double blind, placebo controlled trial of inert cellulose powder for the relief of symptoms of hay fever in adults. Curr Med Res Opin. 2006;22:275–285. doi: 10.1185/030079906X80440.
    1. Emberlin JC, Lewis RA. A double blind, placebo-controlled crossover trial cellulose powder by nasal provocation with Der p1 and Der f1. Curr Med Res Opin. 2007;23:2423–31. doi: 10.1185/030079907X231144.

Source: PubMed

3
Subscribe