Exploring the Specific Needs of Persons with Multiple Sclerosis for mHealth Solutions for Physical Activity: Mixed-Methods Study

Guido Giunti, Jan Kool, Octavio Rivera Romero, Enrique Dorronzoro Zubiete, Guido Giunti, Jan Kool, Octavio Rivera Romero, Enrique Dorronzoro Zubiete

Abstract

Background: Multiple sclerosis (MS) is one of the world's most common neurologic disorders, with symptoms such as fatigue, cognitive problems, and issues with mobility. Evidence suggests that physical activity (PA) helps people with MS reduce fatigue and improve quality of life. The use of mobile technologies for health has grown in recent years with little involvement from relevant stakeholders. User-centered design (UCD) is a design philosophy with the goal of creating solutions specific to the needs and tasks of the intended users. UCD involves stakeholders early and often in the design process. In a preliminary study, we assessed the landscape of commercially available MS mobile health (mHealth) apps; to our knowledge, no study has explored what persons with MS and their formal care providers think of mHealth solutions for PA.

Objective: The aim of this study was to (1) explore MS-specific needs for MS mHealth solutions for PA, (2) detect perceived obstacles and facilitators for mHealth solutions from persons with MS and health care professionals, and (3) understand the motivational aspects behind adoption of mHealth solutions for MS.

Methods: A mixed-methods design study was conducted in Kliniken Valens, Switzerland, a clinic specializing in neurological rehabilitation. We explored persons with MS and health care professionals who work with them separately. The study had a qualitative part comprising focus groups and interviews, and a quantitative part with standardized tools such as satisfaction with life scale and electronic health (eHealth) literacy.

Results: A total of 12 persons with relapsing-remitting MS and 12 health care professionals from different backgrounds participated in the study. Participants were well-educated with an even distribution between genders. Themes identified during analysis were MS-related barriers and facilitators, mHealth design considerations, and general motivational aspects. The insights generated were used to create MS personas for design purposes. Desired mHealth features were as follows: (1) activity tracking, (2) incentives for completing tasks and objectives, (3) customizable goal setting, (4) optional sociability, and (5) game-like attitude among others. Potential barriers to mHealth apps adoption were as follows: (1) rough on-boarding experiences, (2) lack of clear use benefits, and (3) disruption of the health care provider-patient relationship. Potential facilitators were identified: (1) endorsements from experts, (2) playfulness, and (3) tailored to specific persons with MS needs. A total of 4 MS personas were developed to provide designers and computer scientists means to help in the creation of future mHealth solutions for MS.

Conclusions: mHealth solutions for increasing PA in persons with MS hold promise. Allowing for realistic goal setting and positive feedback, while minimizing usability burdens, seems to be critical for the adoption of such apps. Fatigue management is especially important in this population; more attention should be brought to this area.

Keywords: chronic disease; exercise; fatigue; mobile applications; multiple sclerosis; qualitative research; telemedicine; video games.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

©Guido Giunti, Jan Kool, Octavio Rivera Romero, Enrique Dorronzoro Zubiete. Originally published in JMIR Mhealth and Uhealth (http://mhealth.jmir.org), 09.02.2018.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Information and communications technologies ownership.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Mobile phone usage. SMS: short message service.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Multiple sclerosis persona with high information and communications technologies and medium physical activity.

References

    1. Browne P, Chandraratna D, Angood C, Tremlett H, Baker C, Taylor BV, Thompson AJ. Atlas of multiple sclerosis 2013: a growing global problem with widespread inequity. Neurology. 2014 Sep 09;83(11):1022–4. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000000768.
    1. Goldenberg MM. Multiple sclerosis review. P T. 2012 Mar;37(3):175–84.
    1. Trisolini M, Honeycutt A, Wiener J, Lesesne S. MSIF. London, United Kingdom: Multiple Sclerosis International Federation; 2010. May, [2018-01-22]. Global Economic Impact of Multiple Sclerosis .
    1. Weinshenker BG. Natural history of multiple sclerosis. Ann Neurol. 1994;36 Suppl:S6–11.
    1. Petajan JH, Gappmaier E, White AT, Spencer MK, Mino L, Hicks RW. Impact of aerobic training on fitness and quality of life in multiple sclerosis. Ann Neurol. 1996 Apr;39(4):432–41. doi: 10.1002/ana.410390405.
    1. Motl RW, Snook EM. Physical activity, self-efficacy, and quality of life in multiple sclerosis. Ann Behav Med. 2008 Feb;35(1):111–5. doi: 10.1007/s12160-007-9006-7.
    1. Klaren RE, Motl RW, Dlugonski D, Sandroff BM, Pilutti LA. Objectively quantified physical activity in persons with multiple sclerosis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013 Dec;94(12):2342–8. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2013.07.011.
    1. Latimer-Cheung AE, Martin GK, Hicks AL, Motl RW, Pilutti LA, Duggan M, Wheeler G, Persad R, Smith KM. Development of evidence-informed physical activity guidelines for adults with multiple sclerosis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013 Sep;94(9):1829–1836.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2013.05.015.
    1. Braley TJ, Chervin RD. Fatigue in multiple sclerosis: mechanisms, evaluation, and treatment. Sleep. 2010 Aug;33(8):1061–7.
    1. Ryan RM, Deci EL. Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. Am Psychol. 2000 Jan;55(1):68–78.
    1. Caulfield BM, Donnelly SC. What is Connected Health and why will it change your practice? QJM. 2013 Aug;106(8):703–7. doi: 10.1093/qjmed/hct114.
    1. World Health Organization. mHealth: New Horizons for Health through Mobile Technologies .
    1. Riley WT, Rivera DE, Atienza AA, Nilsen W, Allison SM, Mermelstein R. Health behavior models in the age of mobile interventions: are our theories up to the task? Transl Behav Med. 2011 Mar;1(1):53–71. doi: 10.1007/s13142-011-0021-7.
    1. Research2guidance. [2018-01-18]. The market for mHealth app services will reach $26 billion by 2017
    1. Fiordelli M, Diviani N, Schulz PJ. Mapping mHealth research: a decade of evolution. J Med Internet Res. 2013;15(5):e95. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2430.
    1. Mechael P. The case for mHealth in developing countries. Innovations. 2009 Jan;4(1):103–118. doi: 10.1162/itgg.2009.4.1.103.
    1. O'Reilly GA, Spruijt-Metz D. Current mHealth technologies for physical activity assessment and promotion. Am J Prev Med. 2013 Oct;45(4):501–7. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2013.05.012.
    1. Robertson MC, Tsai E, Lyons EJ, Srinivasan S, Swartz MC, Baum ML, Basen-Engquist KM. Mobile health physical activity intervention preferences in cancer survivors: a qualitative study. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2017 Jan 24;5(1):e3. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.6970.
    1. Irvine AB, Gelatt VA, Seeley JR, Macfarlane P, Gau JM. Web-based intervention to promote physical activity by sedentary older adults: randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res. 2013;15(2):e19. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2158.
    1. Kreuter M, Wray R. Tailored and targeted health communication: strategies for enhancing information relevance. Am J Health Behav. 2003;27(Suppl 3):S227–32.
    1. Rimer BK, Kreuter MW. Advancing tailored health communication: a persuasion and message effects perspective. J Commun. 2006;56(s1):S184–S201. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00289.x.
    1. Hamilton AD, Brady RR. Medical professional involvement in smartphone 'apps' in dermatology. Br J Dermatol. 2012 Jul;167(1):220–1. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2012.10844.x.
    1. Ventola CL. Mobile devices and apps for health care professionals: uses and benefits. P T. 2014 May;39(5):356–64.
    1. O'Neill S, Brady RR. Colorectal smartphone apps: opportunities and risks. Colorectal Dis. 2012 Sep;14(9):e530–4. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2012.03088.x.
    1. Wong SJ, Robertson GA, Connor KL, Brady RR, Wood AM. Smartphone apps for orthopaedic sports medicine - a smart move? BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil. 2015;7:23. doi: 10.1186/s13102-015-0017-6.
    1. Connor K, Brady RR, De Beaux A, Tulloh B. Contemporary hernia smartphone applications (apps) Hernia. 2014 Aug;18(4):557–61. doi: 10.1007/s10029-013-1130-7.
    1. Giunti G, Guisado-Fernandez E, Caulfield B. Connected Health in Multiple Sclerosis: A Mobile Applications Review. 2017 IEEE 30th International Symposium on Computer-Based Medical Systems (CBMS); 22-24 June 2017; Thessaloniki, Greece. IEEE; 2017. Jun, pp. 660–665.
    1. De Vito Dabbs A, Myers B, Mc Curry KR, Dunbar-Jacob J, Hawkins RP, Begey A, Dew MA. User-centered design and interactive health technologies for patients. Comput Inform Nurs. 2009;27(3):175–83. doi: 10.1097/NCN.0b013e31819f7c7c.
    1. Scaife M, Rogers Y, Aldrich F, Davies M. Designing for or designing with? Informant design for interactive learning environments. ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human factors in computing systems; March 22 - 27, 1997; Atlanta, Georgia, USA. 1997. Mar 22, pp. 343–350.
    1. Pruitt J, Adlin T. The Persona Lifecycle: Keeping People in Mind Throughout Product Design. San Francisco, CA, USA: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc; 2006.
    1. Kayes NM, McPherson KM, Taylor D, Schlüter PJ, Kolt GS. Facilitators and barriers to engagement in physical activity for people with multiple sclerosis: a qualitative investigation. Disabil Rehabil. 2011;33(8):625–42. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2010.505992.
    1. Stuifbergen AK. Health-promoting behaviors and quality of life among individuals with multiple sclerosis. Sch Inq Nurs Pract. 1995;9(1):31–50; discussion 51.
    1. Stuifbergen AK, Roberts GJ. Health promotion practices of women with multiple sclerosis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1997 Dec;78(12 Suppl 5):S3–9.
    1. Stuifbergen AK, Rogers S. Health promotion: an essential component of rehabilitation for persons with chronic disabling conditions. ANS Adv Nurs Sci. 1997 Jun;19(4):1–20.
    1. Plow M, Golding M. A qualitative study of multiple health behaviors in adults with multiple sclerosis. Int J MS Care. 2016;18(5):248–256. doi: 10.7224/1537-2073.2015-065.
    1. Bender JL, Yue RY, To MJ, Deacken L, Jadad AR. A lot of action, but not in the right direction: systematic review and content analysis of smartphone applications for the prevention, detection, and management of cancer. J Med Internet Res. 2013;15(12):e287. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2661.
    1. Chomutare T, Fernandez-Luque L, Årsand E, Hartvigsen G. Features of mobile diabetes applications: review of the literature and analysis of current applications compared against evidence-based guidelines. J Med Internet Res. 2011;13(3):e65. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1874.
    1. Martínez-Pérez B, De La Torre-Diez I, López-Coronado M, Sainz-De-Abajo B. Comparison of mobile apps for the leading causes of death among different income zones: a review of the literature and app stores. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2014;2(1):e1. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.2779.
    1. Sandelowski M. Whatever happened to qualitative description? Res Nurs Health. 2000 Aug;23(4):334–40.
    1. Diener E, Emmons R, Larsen J, Griffin S. The Satisfaction With Life Scale. J Pers Assess. 1985 Feb;49(1):71–5. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13.
    1. Norman CD, Skinner HA. eHEALS: The eHealth Literacy Scale. J Med Internet Res. 2006 Nov;8(4):e27. doi: 10.2196/jmir.8.4.e27.
    1. Farrell S. NNGroup. 2016. Jun 22, [2018-01-18]. Open-ended vs closed-ended questions in user research .
    1. Glaesmer H, Grande G, Braehler E, Roth M. The German version of the Satisfaction With Life Scale (SWLS) psychometric properties, validity, and population-based norms. Eur J Psychol Assess. 2011;27(2):127–132. doi: 10.1027/1015-5759/a000058.
    1. Soellner R, Huber S, Reder M. The Concept of eHealth Literacy and Its Measurement. J Media Psychol. 2014 Jan;26(1):29–38. doi: 10.1027/1864-1105/a000104.
    1. Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006 Jan;3(2):77–101. doi: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
    1. Grudin J, Pruitt J. Personas, participatory design and product development: an infrastructure for engagement. Proceedings of the Participatory Design Conferenc; 23-25 June, 2002; Malmo, Sweden. 2002.
    1. LeRouge C, Ma J, Sneha S, Tolle K. User profiles and personas in the design and development of consumer health technologies. Int J Med Inform. 2013 Nov;82(11):e251–68. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2011.03.006.
    1. Motl RW. Physical activity and its measurement and determinants in multiple sclerosis. Minerva Med. 2008 Apr;99(2):157–65.
    1. Frau J, Coghe G, Lorefice L, Fenu G, Cadeddu B, Marrosu M, Cocco E. Attitude towards physical activity in patients with multiple sclerosis: a cohort study. Neurol Sci. 2015 Jun;36(6):889–93. doi: 10.1007/s10072-015-2100-x.
    1. Motl RW, McAuley E, Snook EM. Physical activity and multiple sclerosis: a meta-analysis. Mult Scler. 2005 Aug;11(4):459–63. doi: 10.1191/1352458505ms1188oa.
    1. Smith RM, Adeney-Steel M, Fulcher G, Longley WA. Symptom change with exercise is a temporary phenomenon for people with multiple sclerosis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2006 May;87(5):723–7. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2006.01.015.
    1. Benito-León J. Physical activity in multiple sclerosis: the missing prescription. Neuroepidemiology. 2011;36(3):192–3. doi: 10.1159/000328276.
    1. Conn VS, Hafdahl AR, Brown SA, Brown LM. Meta-analysis of patient education interventions to increase physical activity among chronically ill adults. Patient Educ Couns. 2008 Feb;70(2):157–72. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2007.10.004.
    1. Learmonth YC, Motl RW. Physical activity and exercise training in multiple sclerosis: a review and content analysis of qualitative research identifying perceived determinants and consequences. Disabil Rehabil. 2016;38(13):1227–42. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2015.1077397.
    1. Jones Rb, Bental D, Cawsey A, Pearson J, Marsden J. Tailoring Health Messages: Customizing Communication with Computer Technology. Hoboken, New Jersey, USA: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 2002. Nov, pp. 542–543.
    1. Glasgow RE, Goldstein MG, Ockene JK, Pronk NP. Translating what we have learned into practice. Principles and hypotheses for interventions addressing multiple behaviors in primary care. Am J Prev Med. 2004 Aug;27(2 Suppl):88–101. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2004.04.019.
    1. Deterding S, Dixon D, Khaled R, Nacke L, Sicart M, O'Hara K. Gamification: using game-design elements in non-gaming contexts. CHI EA '11 CHI '11 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems; May 07 - 12, 2011; Vancouver, BC, Canada. New York, NY, USA: ACM; 2011. May 07, pp. 2425–2428.
    1. Lister C, West JH, Cannon B, Sax T, Brodegard D. Just a fad? Gamification in health and fitness apps. JMIR Serious Games. 2014;2(2):e9. doi: 10.2196/games.3413.
    1. Kluger BM, Krupp LB, Enoka RM. Fatigue and fatigability in neurologic illnesses: proposal for a unified taxonomy. Neurology. 2013 Jan 22;80(4):409–16. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e31827f07be.
    1. Claros-Salinas D, Bratzke D, Greitemann G, Nickisch N, Ochs L, Schröter H. Fatigue-related diurnal variations of cognitive performance in multiple sclerosis and stroke patients. J Neurol Sci. 2010 Aug 15;295(1-2):75–81. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2010.04.018.
    1. Feys P, Gijbels D, Romberg A, Santoyo C, Gebara B, de Noordhout BM, Knuts K, Béthoux F, de Groot V, Vaney C, Dalgas U. Effect of time of day on walking capacity and self-reported fatigue in persons with multiple sclerosis: a multi-center trial. Mult Scler. 2012 Mar;18(3):351–7. doi: 10.1177/1352458511419881.
    1. Stuifbergen A, Rogers S. The experience of fatigue and strategies of self-care among persons with multiple sclerosis. Appl Nurs Res. 1997 Feb;10(1):2–10.
    1. Nutbeam D. The evolving concept of health literacy. Soc Sci Med. 2008 Dec;67(12):2072–8. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.09.050.
    1. Haase R, Schultheiss T, Kempcke R, Thomas K, Ziemssen T. Use and acceptance of electronic communication by patients with multiple sclerosis: a multicenter questionnaire study. J Med Internet Res. 2012;14(5):e135. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2133.
    1. Harland J, Bath P. Assessing the quality of websites providing information on multiple sclerosis: evaluating tools and comparing sites. Health Informatics J. 2007 Sep;13(3):207–21. doi: 10.1177/1460458207079837.
    1. Matti AI, McCarl H, Klaer P, Keane MC, Chen CS. Multiple sclerosis: patients' information sources and needs on disease symptoms and management. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2010;4:157–61.
    1. Nielsen J. Usability Inspection Methods. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons; 1994.
    1. Kostkova P, Brewer H, de Lusignan S, Fottrell E, Goldacre B, Hart G, Koczan P, Knight P, Marsolier C, McKendry RA, Ross E, Sasse A, Sullivan R, Chaytor S, Stevenson O, Velho R, Tooke J. Who owns the data? Open data for healthcare. Front Public Health. 2016;4:7. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2016.00007. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2016.00007.
    1. Brady RR, Hunt AC, Visvanathan A, Rodrigues MA, Graham C, Rae C, Kalima P, Paterson HM, Gibb AP. Mobile phone technology and hospitalized patients: a cross-sectional surveillance study of bacterial colonization, and patient opinions and behaviours. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2011 Jun;17(6):830–5. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2011.03493.x.
    1. Visvanathan A, Gibb AP, Brady RR. Increasing clinical presence of mobile communication technology: avoiding the pitfalls. Telemed J E Health. 2011 Oct;17(8):656–61. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2011.0018.
    1. Rodrigues MA, Visvanathan A, Murchison JT, Brady RR. Radiology smartphone applications; current provision and cautions. Insights Imaging. 2013 Oct;4(5):555–62. doi: 10.1007/s13244-013-0274-4.
    1. Moodley A, Mangino JE, Goff DA. Review of infectious diseases applications for iPhone/iPad and Android: from pocket to patient. Clin Infect Dis. 2013 Oct;57(8):1145–54. doi: 10.1093/cid/cit455.
    1. Misra S, Lewis TL, Aungst TD. Medical application use and the need for further research and assessment for clinical practice: creation and integration of standards for best practice to alleviate poor application design. JAMA Dermatol. 2013 Jun;149(6):661–2. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2013.606.

Source: PubMed

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

3
Subscribe