QUALITY OF LIFE AFTER LAPAROSCOPIC SLEEVE GASTRECTOMY USİNG BAROS SYSTEM

Cüneyt Kirkil, Erhan Aygen, Mehmet Fatih Korkmaz, Mehmet Buğra Bozan, Cüneyt Kirkil, Erhan Aygen, Mehmet Fatih Korkmaz, Mehmet Buğra Bozan

Abstract

Background: Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is currently the most frequently performed bariatric procedure in Turkey. The goal of weight reduction surgery is not only to decrease excess weight, but also to improve obesity related comorbidities and quality of life (QoL).

Aim: To evaluate the impact of LSG on patient quality of life, weight loss, and comorbidities associated with morbid obesity according to the updated BAROS criteria.

Methods: Eleven hundred thirty-eight adult patients were undergone to LSG by our bariatric surgery team between January 2013 and January 2016. A questionnaire (The Bariatric Analysis and Reporting Outcome System - BAROS) was published on social media. The data on postoperative complications were collected from hospital database.

Results: Number of respondants was 562 (49.4%). Six of 1138 patients(0.5%) had leakage. All patients who had leakage were respondants. The overall complication rate was 7.7%. After a mean period of 7.4±5.3 months(1-30), mean excess weight loss was 71.3±27.1% (10.2-155.4). The respondants reported 772 comorbidities. Of these, 162 (30%) were improved, and 420 (54.4%) were resolved. The mean scores for QoL were significantly increased after LSG (range, p<0.05 to <0.001). Of the 562 patients, 26 (4.6%) were classified as failures; 86 (15.3%) fair; 196 (34.9%) good; 144 (25.6%) very good, and 110 (19.6%) excellent results according to the updated BAROS scoring system.

Conclusion: LSG is a highly effective bariatric procedure in the manner of weight control, improvement in comorbidities and increasing of QoL in short- and mid-term.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest: none

Figures

FIGURE 1. Bariatric analysis and reporting outcome…
FIGURE 1. Bariatric analysis and reporting outcome system (BAROS) with Moorehead-Ardelt Quality of Life Questionnaire II scoring key
FIGURE 2. The mean EWL rates of…
FIGURE 2. The mean EWL rates of the groups
FIGURE 3. The distribution of EWL% of…
FIGURE 3. The distribution of EWL% of the patients
FIGURE 4. The distribution of the updated…
FIGURE 4. The distribution of the updated Bariatric Analysis and Reporting Outcome System - BAROS - results

References

    1. Angrisani L, Santonicola A, Iovino P, Formisano G, Buchwald H, Scopinaro N. Bariatric surgery worldwide 2013. Obes Surg. 2015;25(10):1822–1832.
    1. Berger ER, Clements RH, Morton JM, Huffman KM, Wolfe BM, Nguyen NT, Ko CY, Hutter MM. The Impact of Different Surgical Techniques on Outcomes in Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomies The First Report from the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program (MBSAQIP) Ann Surg. 2016;264:764–773.
    1. Bobowicz M, Lehmann A, Orlowski M, Lech P, Michalik M. Preliminary outcomes 1 year after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy based on Bariatric Analysis and Reporting Outcome System (BAROS) Obes Surg. 2011;21:1843–1848.
    1. De Palma GD, Forestieri P. Role of endoscopy in the bariatric surgery of patients. World J Gastroenterol. 2014;20(4):7777–7784.
    1. D'Hondt M, Vanneste S, Pottel H, Devriendt D, Van Rooy F, Vansteenkiste F. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy as a single-stage procedure for the treatment of morbid obesity and the resulting quality of life, resolution of comorbidities, food tolerance, and 6-year weight loss. Surg Endosc. 2011;25:2498–2504.
    1. Felsenreich DM, Langer FB, Kefurt R, Panhofer P, Schermann M, et al. Weight loss, weight regain, and conversions to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: 10-year results of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2016
    1. Gadiot RPM, Biter LU, Zengerink HJF, de Vos tot Nederveen Cappel RJ, Elte JW, Castro Cabezas M, Mannaerts GH. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy with an extensive posterior mobilization technique and preliminary results. Obes Surg. 2012;22:320–329.
    1. Janik MR, Rogula T, Bielecka I, Kwiatkowski A, Pasnik K. Quality of life and bariatric surgery cross-sectional study and analysis of factors influencing outcome. Obes Surg. 2016;26:2849–2855.
    1. Keren D, Matter I, Lavy A. Lifestyle modification parallels to sleeve success. Obes Surg. 2014;24:735–740.
    1. Lemanu DP, Singh PP, Rahman H, Hill AG, Babor R, MacCormick AD. Five-year results after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy a prospective study. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2015;11:518–524.
    1. Myers JA, Clifford JC, Sarker S, Primeau M, Doninger GL, Shayani V. Quality of life after laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding using the Baros and Moorehead-Ardelt quality of life questionnaire II. JSLS. 2006;10:414–420.
    1. Oria HE, Moorehead MK. Updated Bariatric Analysis and Reporting Outcome System. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2009;5:60–66.
    1. Starr K, McPherson G, Forrest M, Cotton SC. SMS text pre-notification and delivery of reminder e-mails to increase response rates to postal questionnaires in the SUSPEND trial a factorial design, randomised controlled trial. Trials. 2015;16:295–295.
    1. Mendes GA, Vargas GP. Quality of life after vertical gastrectomy evaluated by the baros questionnaire. Arq Bras Cir Dig. 2017;30(1):14–17.
    1. Costa AJ, Pinto SL. Binge eating disorder and quality of life of candidates to bariatric surgery. Arq Bras Cir Dig. 2015;28(1):52–55.
    1. Nicareta JR, de Freitas AC, Nicareta SM, Nicareta C, Campos AC, Nassif PA, jb marchesini. Baros method critical analysis(bariatric analysis and reporting system) Arq Bras Cir Dig. 2015;28(1):73–78.

Source: PubMed

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

3
Subscribe