Development of mWellcare: an mHealth intervention for integrated management of hypertension and diabetes in low-resource settings

Devraj Jindal, Priti Gupta, Dilip Jha, Vamadevan S Ajay, Shifalika Goenka, Pramod Jacob, Kriti Mehrotra, Pablo Perel, Jonathan Nyong, Ambuj Roy, Nikhil Tandon, Dorairaj Prabhakaran, Vikram Patel, Devraj Jindal, Priti Gupta, Dilip Jha, Vamadevan S Ajay, Shifalika Goenka, Pramod Jacob, Kriti Mehrotra, Pablo Perel, Jonathan Nyong, Ambuj Roy, Nikhil Tandon, Dorairaj Prabhakaran, Vikram Patel

Abstract

Background: Cardiovascular diseases and diabetes are among the leading causes of premature adult deaths in India. Innovative approaches such as clinical decision support (CDS) software could play a major role in improving the quality of hypertension/diabetes care in primary care settings.

Objective: To describe the steps and processes in the development of mWellcare, a complex intervention based on mobile health (mHealth) technology.

Methods: The Medical Research Council framework was used to develop mWellcare in four steps: (1) identify gaps in usual care through literature review and health facility assessments; (2) identify the components of the intervention through discussions and consultations with experts; (3) develop intervention (clinical algorithms and mHealth system); and (4) evaluate acceptability and feasibility through pilot testing in five community health centers.

Results: Lack of evidence-based, integrated, and systematic management of chronic conditions were major gaps identified. Experts in information technology, clinical fields, and public health professionals identified intervention components to address these gaps. Thereafter, clinical algorithm contextualized to primary care settings were prepared and the mWellcare intervention was developed. During the 2-month pilot, 631 patients diagnosed with hypertension and/or diabetes were registered, with a follow-up rate of 36.2%. The major barrier was resistance to follow mWellcare recommended patient workflow, and to overcome it, we emphasized onsite training and orientation program to cover all health care team member in each CHC.

Conclusion: A pilot-tested mWellcare intervention is an mHealth system with important components, i.e. integrated management of chronic conditions, evidence-based CDS, longitudinal health data and automated short-messaging service to reinforce compliance to drug intake and follow-up visit, which will be used by nurses at primary health care settings in India. The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the intervention will be tested through a cluster randomized trial (trial registration number NCT02480062).

Keywords: Clinical decision support system; complex intervention; evidence-based management; longitudinal patient monitoring; noncommunicable diseases; primary care.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Architecture of mWellcare.
Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Architecture of mWellcare.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
mWellcare workflow.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
mWellcare workflow.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
mWellcare decision-support output.

References

    1. Wang H, Naghavi M, Allen C, et al. Global, regional, and national life expectancy, all-cause mortality, and cause-specific mortality for 249 causes of death, 1980–2015: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2015. Lancet. 2016;388:1459–10.
    1. World Health Organization Global status report on noncommunicable diseases 2014. Geneva: WHO; 2014.
    1. International Diabetes Federation Diabetes In India- 2015 [Internet]. Int. Diabetes Fed. 2016 [cited 2018 July24]. Available from: .
    1. Thankappan KR, Sivasankaran S, Sarma PS, et al. Prevalence-correlates-awareness-treatment and control of hypertension in kumarakom, kerala: baseline results of a community-based intervention program. Indian Heart J. 2006;58:28–33.
    1. Venkataraman K, Kannan AT, Mohan V.. Challenges in diabetes management with particular reference to India. Int J Diabetes Dev Ctries. 2009;29:103–109.
    1. Jonas JB, Nangia V, Matin A, et al. Prevalence, awareness, control, and associations of arterial hypertension in a rural central India population: the Central India eye and medical study. Am J Hypertens. 2010;23:347–350.
    1. Joshi R, Chow CK, Raju PK, et al. Fatal and nonfatal cardiovascular disease and the use of therapies for secondary prevention in a rural region of India. Circulation. 2009;119:1950–1955.
    1. Garg AX, Adhikari NKJ, McDonald H, et al. Effects of computerized clinical decision support systems on practitioner performance and patient outcomes: a systematic review. JAMA. 2005;293:1223–1238.
    1. Berntson J, Stewart KR, Vrany E, et al. Depressive symptoms and self-reported adherence to medical recommendations to prevent cardiovascular disease: NHANES 2005-2010. Soc Sci Med. 2015;138:74–81.
    1. Arshad AR, Alvi KY. Frequency of depression in type 2 diabetes mellitus and an analysis of predictive factors. J Pak Med Assoc. 2016;66:425–429.
    1. Timko C, Kong C, Vittorio L, et al. Screening and brief intervention for unhealthy substance use in patients with chronic medical conditions: a systematic review. J Clin Nurs. 2016;25:3131–3143.
    1. Anchala R, Pinto MP, Shroufi A, et al. The role of decision support system (DSS) in prevention of cardiovascular disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gong Y, editor Plos ONE. 2012;7:e47064.
    1. Ministry of Health and Family Welfare Indian public health standards [Internet]. 2012 [cited 2018 July24]. Available from: .
    1. Ministry of Health & Family Welfare National programme for prevention and control of cancer, diabetes, cardiovascular diseases and stroke (NPCDCS): operation guidelines. New Delhi, India: Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India; 2010.
    1. Craig P, Dieppe P, Macintyre S, et al. Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new medical research council guidance. BMJ. 2008;337:a1655.
    1. Ajay VS, Jindal D, Roy A, et al. Development of a smartphone-enabled hypertension and diabetes mellitus management package to facilitate evidence-based care delivery in primary healthcare facilities in India: the mPower heart project. J Am Heart Assoc. 2016;5:e004343.
    1. Tian M, Ajay VS, Dunzhu D, et al. A cluster-randomized, controlled trial of a simplified multifaceted management program for individuals at high cardiovascular risk (simcard trial) in rural Tibet, China, and Haryana, India. Circulation. 2015;132:815–824.
    1. Anchala R, Di Angelantonio E, Prabhakaran D, et al. Development and validation of a clinical and computerised decision support system for management of hypertension (DSS-HTN) at a primary health care (PHC) setting. Plos ONE. 2013;8:e79638.
    1. Ali MK, Singh K, Kondal D, et al. Effectiveness of a multicomponent quality improvement strategy to improve achievement of diabetes care goals: a randomized, controlled trial. Ann Intern Med. 2016;165:399–408.
    1. James PA, Oparil S, Carter BL, et al. 2014 evidence-based guideline for the management of high blood pressure in adults. JAMA. 2014;311:507.
    1. Members AF, Mancia G, Fagard R, et al. 2013 ESH/ESC guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension. Eur Heart J. 2013;34:2159–2219.
    1. World Health Organization Prevention of cardiovascular disease guidelines for assessment and management of cardiovascular risk. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2007.
    1. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) Hypertension in adults: diagnosis and management [Internet]. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence; 2011. Available from: .
    1. Ministry of Health and Family Welfare National Programme for Prevention and Control of Cancer, Diabetes, Cardiovascular Disease and Stroke (NPCDCS): A Manual for Medical Officer. New Delhi, India: Ministry of health and family welfare, Government of India; 2008.
    1. World Health Organization mhGAP Intervention Guide for mental, neurological and substance use disorders in non-specialized health settings. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2010.
    1. CommCare | Dimagi [Internet] CommCare. [cited 2018. July 24]. Available from: .
    1. Flaming A, Canty M, Javetski G, et al. The commcare evidence base for frontline workers [Internet]. 2015 [cited 2018 July24]. Available from: .
    1. Crosson JC, Heisler M, Subramanian U, et al. Physicians’ perceptions of barriers to cardiovascular disease risk factor control among patients with diabetes: results from the translating research into action for diabetes (TRIAD) study. J Am Board Fam Med. 2010;23:171–178.
    1. Düsing R. Overcoming barriers to effective blood pressure control in patients with hypertension. Curr Med Res Opin. 2006;22:1545–1553.
    1. Menon VU, Guruprasad U, Sundaram KR, et al. Glycaemic status and prevalence of comorbid conditions among people with diabetes in Kerala. Natl Med J India. 2008;21:112–115.
    1. Pakhare A, Kumar S, Goyal S, et al. Assessment of primary care facilities for cardiovascular disease preparedness in Madhya Pradesh, India. BMC Health Serv Res. 2015;15:408.
    1. Mendis S, Al Bashir I, Dissanayake L, et al. Gaps in capacity in primary care in low-resource settings for implementation of essential noncommunicable disease interventions. Int J Hypertens. 2012;2012:584041.
    1. Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JBW. The PHQ-9. J Gen Intern Med. 2001;16:606–613.
    1. Babor TF, Higgins-Biddle Ohn C, Saunders JB, et al. AUDIT, The alcohol use disorders identification test. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2001.
    1. D’Agostino RB, Vasan RS, Pencina MJ, et al. General cardiovascular risk profile for use in primary care: the Framingham heart study. Circulation. 2008;117:743–753.
    1. Ministry of Health and Family Welfare Electronic health record (EHR) standards for India. New Delhi, India: Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India; 2016.

Source: PubMed

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

3
Subscribe