Thoracic Epidural analgesia versus Rectus Sheath Catheters for open midline incisions in major abdominal surgery within an enhanced recovery programme (TERSC): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

Kate M Wilkinson, Anton Krige, Sarah G Brearley, Steven Lane, Michael Scott, Anthony C Gordon, Gordon L Carlson, Kate M Wilkinson, Anton Krige, Sarah G Brearley, Steven Lane, Michael Scott, Anthony C Gordon, Gordon L Carlson

Abstract

Background: Thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) is recommended for post-operative pain relief in patients undergoing major abdominal surgery via a midline incision. However, the effectiveness of TEA is variable with high failure rates reported post-operatively. Common side effects such as low blood pressure and motor block can reduce mobility and hinder recovery, and a number of rare but serious complications can also occur following their use.Rectus sheath catheters (RSC) may provide a novel alternative approach to somatic analgesia without the associated adverse effects of TEA. The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy of both techniques in terms of pain relief, patient experience, post-operative functional recovery, safety and cost-effectiveness.

Methods/design: This is a single-centre randomised controlled non-blinded trial, which also includes a nested qualitative study. Over a two-year period, 132 patients undergoing major abdominal surgery via a midline incision will be randomised to receive either TEA or RSC for post-operative analgesia. The primary outcome measures pain scores on moving from a supine to a sitting position at 24 hours post wound closure, and the patient experience between groups evaluated through in-depth interviews. Secondary outcomes include pain scores at rest and on movement at other time points, opiate consumption, functional recovery, morbidity and cost-effectiveness.

Discussion: This will be the first randomised controlled trial comparing thoracic epidurals to ultrasound-guided rectus sheath catheters in adults undergoing elective midline laparotomy. The standardised care provided by an Enhanced Recovery Programme makes this a comparison between two complex pain packages and not simply two analgesic techniques, in order to ascertain if RSC is a viable alternative to TEA.

Trial registration: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN81223298 (16 January 2014).

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Trial schema. Diagram illustrating timelines and patient pathways for both study arms.

References

    1. Gustafsson UO, Scott MJ, Schwenk W, Demartines N, Roulin D, Francis N, McNaught CE, Macfie J, Liberman AS, Soop M, Hill A, Kennedy RH, Lobo DN, Fearon K, Ljungqvist O. Guidelines for perioperative care in elective colonic surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Society Recommendations. World J Surg. 2013;37:259–284. doi: 10.1007/s00268-012-1772-0.
    1. Cook TM, Eaton JM, Goodwin AP. Epidural analgesia following upper abdominal surgery: United Kingdom practice. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1997;41:18–24. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.1997.tb04608.x.
    1. Wheatley RG, Schug SA, Watson D. Safety and efficacy of postoperative epidural analgesia. Br J Anaesth. 2001;87:47–61. doi: 10.1093/bja/87.1.47.
    1. Rigg JR, Jamrozik K, Myles PS, Silbert BS, Peyton PJ, Parsons RW, Collins KS. Epidural anaesthesia and analgesia and outcome of major surgery: a randomised trial. Lancet. 2002;359(9314):1276–1282. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)08266-1.
    1. Peyton PJ, Myles PS, Silbert BS, Rigg JA, Jamrozik K, Parsons R. Perioperative epidural analgesia and outcome after major abdominal surgery in high-risk patients. Anesth Analg. 2003;96(2):548.
    1. Block BM, Liu SS, Rowlingson AJ, Cowan AR, Cowan JA, Jr, Wu CL. Efficacy of postoperative epidural analgesia: a meta-analysis. JAMA. 2003;290(18):2455–2463. doi: 10.1001/jama.290.18.2455.
    1. Werawatganon T, Charuluxananan S. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005. Patient controlled intravenous opioid analgesia versus continuous epidural analgesia for pain after intra-abdominal surgery.
    1. Bonnet F, Marret E. Influence of anaesthetic and analgesic techniques on outcome after surgery. Br J Anaesth. 2005;95(1):52–58. doi: 10.1093/bja/aei038.
    1. Wood JD, Galligan JJ. Function of opioids in the enteric nervous system. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2004;16(Suppl 2):17–28. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-3150.2004.00554.x.
    1. Behm B, Stollman N. Postoperative ileus: etiologies and interventions. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2003;1(2):71–80. doi: 10.1053/cgh.2003.50012.
    1. Wells C, Tinckler L, Rawlinson K, Jones H, Saunders J. Postoperative gastrointestinal motility. Lancet. 1964;1(7323):4–10. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(64)92156-7.
    1. Liu SS, Carpenter RL, Mackey DC, Thirlby RC, Rupp SM, Shine TS, Feinglass NG, Metzger PP, Fulmer JT, Smith SL. Effects of perioperative analgesic technique on rate of recovery after colon surgery. Anesthesiology. 1995;83(4):757–765. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199510000-00015.
    1. Steinbrook RA. Epidural anesthesia and gastrointestinal motility. Anesth Analg. 1998;86(4):837–844.
    1. Jørgensen H, Wetterslev J, Møiniche S, Dahl JB. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2001. Epidural local anaesthetics versus opioid-based analgesic regimens for postoperative gastrointestinal paralysis, PONV and pain after abdominal surgery.
    1. Nakayoshi T, Kawasaki N, Suzuki Y, Urashima M, Hanyu N, Yanaga K. Epidural analgesia and gastrointestinal motility after open abdominal surgery - a review. J Smooth Muscle Res. 2008;44(2):57–64. doi: 10.1540/jsmr.44.57.
    1. Morimoto H, Cullen JJ, Messick JM, Jr, Kelly KA. Epidural analgesia shortens postoperative ileus after ileal pouch-anal canal anastomosis. Am J Surg. 1995;169(1):79–82. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9610(99)80113-5.
    1. Scott AM, Starling JR, Ruscher AE, DeLessio ST, Harms BA. Thoracic versus lumbar epidural anesthesia’s effect on pain control and ileus resolution after restorative proctocolectomy. Surgery. 1996;120(4):688–695. doi: 10.1016/S0039-6060(96)80018-3.
    1. Cook TM, Counsel D, Wildsmith JAW. Major complications of central neuraxial block: report on the 3rd National Audit Project of the Royal College of Anaesthetists. Br J Anaesth. 2009;102:179–190. doi: 10.1093/bja/aen360.
    1. Gould TH, Grace K, Thorne G, Thomas M. Effect of thoracic epidural anaesthesia on colonic blood flow. Br J Anaesth. 2002;89:446–451. doi: 10.1093/bja/89.3.446.
    1. Ulf O, Gustafsson MD, Hausel J, Thorell A, Ljungqvist O, Soop M, Nygren J, for the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Study Group Adherence to the enhanced recovery after surgery protocol and outcomes after colorectal cancer surgery. Arch Surg. 2011;146(5):571–577. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.2010.309.
    1. Motamed C, Farhat F, Remerand F, Stéphanazzi J, Laplanche A, Jayr C. An analysis of postoperative epidural analgesia failure by computed tomography epidurography. Anaesthesia. 2006;103(4):1026–1032.
    1. Krige A, Kelly L, Bannard-Smith J. Epidural failure and a rescue protocol: influence on hospital stay in colorectal surgery. Anaesthesia. 2011;66(Suppl 1):56.
    1. Webster K. Ultrasound guided rectus sheath block - analgesia for abdominal surgery. Update Anaesth. 2010;26:12–17.
    1. Sandeman DJ, Dilley AV. Ultrasound-guided rectus sheath block and catheter placement. ANZ J Surg. 2008;78:621–623. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.2008.04592.x.
    1. Marhofer P, Greher M, Kapral S. Ultrasound guidance in regional anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth. 2005;94:7–17. doi: 10.1093/bja/aei002.
    1. Willschke H, Bosenberg A, Marhofer P, Johnston S, Kettner SC, Wanzel O, Kapral S. Ultrasonography-guided rectus sheath block in paediatric anaesthesia - a new approach to an old technique. Br J Anaesth. 2006;97(2):244–249. doi: 10.1093/bja/ael143.
    1. Ferguson S, Thomas V, Lewis I. The rectus sheath block in paediatric anaesthesia: new indications for an old technique? Paediatr Anaesth. 1996;6(6):463–466. doi: 10.1046/j.1460-9592.1996.d01-24.x.
    1. Smith BE, Suchak M, Siggins D, Challands J. Rectus sheath block for diagnostic laparoscopy. Anaesthesia. 1988;43(11):947–948. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1988.tb05658.x.
    1. Dolan J, Lucie P, Geary T, Smith M, Kenny G. The rectus sheath block for laparoscopic surgery in adults: a comparison between the loss of resistance and ultrasound guided techniques. Anaesthesia. 2007;62:302. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2006.04944_2.x.
    1. Wada M, Kitayama M, Hashimoto H, Kudo T, Takada N, Hirota K. Plasma ropivacaine concentrations after ultrasound-guided rectus sheath block in patients undergoing lower abdominal surgery. Anesth Analg. 2012;114(1):230–232. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3182367a68.
    1. Hessian EC, Evans BE, Woods JA, Taylor DJ, Kinkel E, Bjorksten AR. Plasma ropivacaine concentrations during bilateral transversus abdominis plane infusions. Br J Anaesth. 2013;111(3):488–495. doi: 10.1093/bja/aet065.
    1. Petersen PL, Hilsted KL, Dahl JB, Mathiesen O. Bilateral transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block with 24 hours ropivacaine infusion via TAP catheters: a randomized trial in healthy volunteers. BMC Anesthesiol. 2013;13:30. doi: 10.1186/1471-2253-13-30.
    1. Gill AM, Scott NB, Abbas M. Ropivacaine plasma levels following local infiltration analgesia for primary total hip arthroplasty. Anaesthesia. 2014;69(4):368–373. doi: 10.1111/anae.12559.
    1. Watson D, Farquhar XX, Dennison A, Cole J, McAllister S. Postoperative analgesia by infusion of local anaesthetic into the rectus sheath. Br J Anaesth. 1991;67:656.
    1. Padmanabhan J, Rohatgi A, Niaz A, Chojnowska E, Baig K, Woods WGA. Does rectus sheath infusion of bupivacaine reduce postoperative opioid requirement? Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2007;89:229–232. doi: 10.1308/003588407X168398.
    1. Cornish P, Deacon A. Rectus sheath catheters for continuous analgesia after upper abdominal surgery. ANZ J Surg. 2007;77(12):84. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.2006.03982.x.
    1. Shido A, Imamachi N, Doi K, Sakura S, Saito Y. Continuous local anesthetic infusion through ultrasound-guided rectus sheath catheters. Can J Anaesth. 2010;57(11):1046–1047. doi: 10.1007/s12630-010-9377-2.
    1. Parsons B, Aning J, Daugherty M, McGrath JS. The use of rectus sheath catheters for patients undergoing radical cystectomy. BJMSU. 2011;4:24–30.
    1. Khorgami Z, Shoar S, Hosseini Araghi N, Mollahosseini F, Nasiri S, Ghaffari MH, Aminian A. Randomized clinical trial of subcutaneous versus interfascial bupivacaine for pain control after midline laparotomy. BJS. 2013;100(6):743–748. doi: 10.1002/bjs.9090.
    1. Dutton TJ, McGrath JS, Daugherty MO. Use of rectus sheath catheters for pain relief in patients undergoing major pelvic urological surgery. BJU Int. 2014;113:246–253. doi: 10.1111/bju.12316.
    1. Morse J, Stern P, Corbin J, Bowers B, Clarke A, Charmaz K. Developing Grounded Theory: The Second Generation (Developing Qualitative Inquiry) Walnut Creek: Left Coast Press; 2009.
    1. McCormack HM, Horne DJ, Sheather S. Clinical applications of visual analogue scales: a critical review. Psychol Med. 1988;18:1007–1019. doi: 10.1017/S0033291700009934.
    1. Huskisson EC. Measurement of pain. Lancet. 1974;2:1127–1131. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(74)90884-8.
    1. Royse CF, Newman S, Chung F, Stygall J, McKay RE, Boldt J, Servin FS, Hurtado I, Hannallah R, Yu B, Wilkinson DJ. Development and feasibility of a scale to assess postoperative recovery: the post-operative quality recovery scale. Anaesthesiology. 2010;113(4):892–905. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181d960a9.
    1. Fiore J, Jr, Browning P, Bialocerkowski A, Gruen RL, Faragher IG, Denehy L. Hospital discharge criteria following colorectal surgery: a systematic review. Colorectal Dis. 2012;14(3):270–281. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2010.02477.x.
    1. Krige A, Kelly L, Bannard-Smith J. Surgical approach, analgesic techniques and length of stay in colorectal surgery. Anaesth. 2011;66(Suppl 1):56.
    1. Ludwig K, Enker WE, Delaney CP, Wolff BG, Du W, Fort JG, Cherubini M, Cucinotta J, Techner L. Gastrointestinal tract recovery in patients undergoing bowel surgery. Arch Surg. 2008;143(11):1098–1105. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.143.11.1098.
    1. Grocott M, Browneb J, Van der Meulen J, Matejowsky C, Mutch M, Hamilton MA, Levett DZ, Emberton M, Haddad FS, Mythen MG. The postoperative morbidity survey was validated and used to describe morbidity after major surgery. J Clin Epidemiol. 2007;60:919–928. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.12.003.
    1. Dindo D, Desmartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications. Ann Surg. 2004;240:205–213. doi: 10.1097/.
    1. Tilleul P, Aissou M, Bocquet F, Thiriat N, le Grelle O, Burke MJ, Hutton J, Beaussier M. Cost-effectiveness analysis comparing epidural, patient-controlled intravenous morphine, and continuous wound infiltration for postoperative pain management after open abdominal surgery. Br J Anaesth. 2012;108(6):998–1005. doi: 10.1093/bja/aes091.
    1. Kelly AM. The minimum clinically significant difference in visual analogue scale pain score does not differ with severity of pain. Emerg Med J. 2001;18:205–207. doi: 10.1136/emj.18.3.205.
    1. American Society of Anesthesiologists: ASA Physical Status Classification System. []
    1. Tekkis PP, Kessaris N, Kocher HM, Poloniecki JD, Lyttle J, Windsor AC. Evaluation of POSSUM and P-POSSUM scoring systems in patients undergoing colorectal surgery. Br J Surg. 2003;90(3):340–345. doi: 10.1002/bjs.4037.
    1. Grant AM, Altman DG, Babiker AB, Campbell MK, Clemens FJ, Darbyshire JH, Elbourne DR, McLeer SK, Parmar MK, Pocock SJ, Spiegelhalter DJ, Sydes MR, Walker AE, Wallace SA, for the DAMOCLES study group Issues in data monitoring and interim analysis of trials. Health Technol Assess. 2005;9(7):1–238. doi: 10.3310/hta9070.
    1. DAMOCLES study group A proposed charter for clinical trial data monitoring committees: helping them to do their job well. Lancet. 2005;365:711–722. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)17965-3.
    1. Scott N, Smith J, Hill J. National Bowel Cancer Audit Annual Report. 2013.

Source: PubMed

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

3
Subscribe