Estimating relative intensity using individualized accelerometer cutpoints: the importance of fitness level

Cemal Ozemek, Heather L Cochran, Scott J Strath, Wonwoo Byun, Leonard A Kaminsky, Cemal Ozemek, Heather L Cochran, Scott J Strath, Wonwoo Byun, Leonard A Kaminsky

Abstract

Background: Accelerometer cutpoints based on absolute intensity may under or overestimate levels of physical activity due to the lack of consideration for an individual's current fitness level. The purpose of this study was to illustrate the interindividual variability in accelerometer activity counts measured at relative intensities (40 and 60% heart rate reserve (HRR)) and demonstrate the differences between relative activity counts between low, moderate and high fitness groups.

Methods: Seventy-three subjects (38 men, 35 women) with a wide range of cardiorespiratory fitness (maximal oxygen consumption (VO2max): 27.9 to 58.5 ml · kg⁻¹ · min⁻¹), performed a submaximal exercise test with measures of heart rate (HR) and accelerometer activity counts. Linear regression equations were developed for each subject to determine accelerometer activity counts for moderate and vigorous intensity physical activity corresponding to 40% and 60% of HRR. Interindividual variability of activity counts between subjects at both 40% and 60% of HRR was demonstrated by plotting values using a box and whisker plot. To examine the difference between absolute and relative activity cutpoints, subjects were categorized into 3 fitness groups based on metabolic equivalents (MET) (<10 MET, 10-13 MET, >13 MET).

Results: At 40 and 60% of HRR, activity counts ranged from 1455-7520, and 3459-10066 counts · min-1, respectively. Activity counts at 40% HRR (3385 ± 850, 4048 ± 1090, and 5037 ± 1019 counts · min⁻¹) and 60% HRR (5159 ± 765, 5995 ± 1131 and 7367 ± 1374 counts · min-1) significantly increased across fitness groups (<10 MET, 10-13 MET, and >13 MET, respectively).

Conclusion: This study revealed interindividual variability in activity counts at relative moderate (40% HRR) and vigorous (60% HRR) intensities, while fitness level was shown to have a significant influence on relative activity counts measured at these intensities. Individualizing activity count cutpoints may be more representative of an individual's PA level relative to their fitness capacity, compared to absolute activity count cutpoints.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Box plot of individual activity counts calculated at 40 and 60% HRR. Dashed horizontal lines indicate absolute cutpoints for moderate (1927 counts · min-1) and vigorous (5725 counts · min-1) activity counts.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Regression lines of activity counts at measured HRR% between fitness groupings. Data collected during treadmill speeds of 3.2, 4.8, 6.4 kph, or 4.8, 6.4, 8.0 kph, or 4.8, 6.4, 9.6 kph. (<10 MET) low fit group, (10–13 MET) moderate fit group, and (>13 MET) high fit group.

References

    1. American College of Sports Medicine position statement on the recommended quantity and quality of exercise for developing and maintaining fitness in healthy adults. Med Sci Sports. 1978;10(3):vii-x.
    1. American College of Sports Medicine position stand. The recommended quantity and quality of exercise for developing and maintaining cardiorespiratory and muscular fitness in healthy adults. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1990;22(2):265–274.
    1. American College of Sports Medicine Position Stand. The recommended quantity and quality of exercise for developing and maintaining cardiorespiratory and muscular fitness, and flexibility in healthy adults. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1998;30(6):975–991. doi: 10.1097/00005768-199806000-00032.
    1. Garber CE, Blissmer B, Deschenes MR, Franklin BA, Lamonte MJ, Lee IM, Nieman DC, Swain DP. American College of Sports Medicine position stand. Quantity and quality of exercise for developing and maintaining cardiorespiratory, musculoskeletal, and neuromotor fitness in apparently healthy adults: guidance for prescribing exercise. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2011;43(7):1334–1359. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e318213fefb.
    1. Morris JN, Heady JA, Raffle PA, Roberts CG, Parks JW. Coronary heart-disease and physical activity of work. Lancet. 1953;265(6796):1111–1120.
    1. Paffenbarger RS Jr, Wolf PA, Notkin J, Thorne MC. Chronic disease in former college students. I. Early precursors of fatal coronary heart disease. Am J Epidemiol. 1966;83(2):314–328.
    1. Freedson PS, Melanson E, Sirard J. Calibration of the Computer Science and Applications, Inc. accelerometer. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1998;30(5):777–781. doi: 10.1097/00005768-199805000-00021.
    1. Physical activity and cardiovascular health. NIH Consens Statement. 1995;13(3):1–33.
    1. Pollock ML. The quantification of endurance training programs. Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 1973;1:155–188.
    1. Pollock ML, Broida J, Kendrick Z, Miller HS Jr, Janeway R, Linnerud AC. Effects of training two days per week at different intensities on middle-aged men. Med Sci Sports. 1972;4(4):192–197.
    1. Warren JM, Ekelund U, Besson H, Mezzani A, Geladas N, Vanhees L. Assessment of physical activity - a review of methodologies with reference to epidemiological research: a report of the exercise physiology section of the European Association of Cardiovascular Prevention and Rehabilitation. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2010;17(2):127–139. doi: 10.1097/HJR.0b013e32832ed875.
    1. Ainsworth BE, Bassett DR Jr, Strath SJ, Swartz AM, O'Brien WL, Thompson RW, Jones DA, Macera CA, Kimsey CD. Comparison of three methods for measuring the time spent in physical activity. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2000;32(9 Suppl):S457–S464.
    1. Chase JA. Systematic review of physical activity intervention studies after cardiac rehabilitation. J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2011;26(5):351–358.
    1. King WC, Belle SH, Eid GM, Dakin GF, Inabnet WB, Mitchell JE, Patterson EJ, Courcoulas AP, Flum DR, Chapman WH. Physical activity levels of patients undergoing bariatric surgery in the Longitudinal Assessment of Bariatric Surgery study. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2008;4(6):721–728. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2008.08.022.
    1. Tudor-Locke C, Johnson WD, Katzmarzyk PT. Accelerometer-determined steps per day in US adults. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2009;41(7):1384–1391. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e318199885c.
    1. Loprinzi PD, Lee H, Cardinal BJ, Crespo CJ, Andersen RE, Smit E. The relationship of actigraph accelerometer cut-points for estimating physical activity with selected health outcomes: results from NHANES 2003–06. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2012;83(3):422–430.
    1. Behnke M, Wewel AR, Kirsten D, Jorres RA, Magnussen H. Exercise training raises daily activity stronger than predicted from exercise capacity in patients with COPD. Respir Med. 2005;99(6):711–717. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2004.10.016.
    1. Meijer EP, Westerterp KR, Verstappen FT. Effect of exercise training on physical activity and substrate utilization in the elderly. Int J Sports Med. 2000;21(7):499–504. doi: 10.1055/s-2000-7419.
    1. Pinto BM, Goldstein MG, Papandonatos GD, Farrell N, Tilkemeier P, Marcus BH, Todaro JF. Maintenance of exercise after phase II cardiac rehabilitation: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Prev Med. 2011;41(3):274–283. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2011.04.015.
    1. Santos-Lozano A, Torres-Luque G, Marin PJ, Ruiz JR, Lucia A, Garatachea N. Intermonitor Variability of GT3X Accelerometer. Int J Sports Med. 2012.
    1. Sirard JR, Forsyth A, Oakes JM, Schmitz KH. Accelerometer test-retest reliability by data processing algorithms: results from the Twin Cities Walking Study. J Phys Act Health. 2011;8(5):668–674.
    1. VanSwearingen JM, Perera S, Brach JS, Wert D, Studenski SA. Impact of exercise to improve gait efficiency on activity and participation in older adults with mobility limitations: a randomized controlled trial. Phys Ther. 2011;91(12):1740–1751. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20100391.
    1. Freedson PS, Miller K. Objective monitoring of physical activity using motion sensors and heart rate. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2000;71(2 Suppl):S21–29.
    1. Miller NE, Strath SJ, Swartz AM, Cashin SE. Estimating absolute and relative physical activity intensity across age via accelerometry in adults. J Aging Phys Act. 2010;18(2):158–170.
    1. Fleg JL, Morrell CH, Bos AG, Brant LJ, Talbot LA, Wright JG, Lakatta EG. Accelerated longitudinal decline of aerobic capacity in healthy older adults. Circulation. 2005;112(5):674–682. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.545459.
    1. Jackson AS, Sui X, Hebert JR, Church TS, Blair SN. Role of lifestyle and aging on the longitudinal change in cardiorespiratory fitness. Arch Intern Med. 2009;169(19):1781–1787. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2009.312.
    1. Stathokostas L, Jacob-Johnson S, Petrella RJ, Paterson DH. Longitudinal changes in aerobic power in older men and women. J Appl Physiol. 2004;97(2):781–789. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00447.2003.
    1. Bruce RA, Kusumi F, Hosmer D. Maximal oxygen intake and nomographic assessment of functional aerobic impairment in cardiovascular disease. Am Heart J. 1973;85(4):546–562. doi: 10.1016/0002-8703(73)90502-4.
    1. Kaminsky LA, Whaley MH. Evaluation of a new standardized ramp protocol: the BSU/Bruce Ramp protocol. J Cardiopulm Rehabil. 1998;18(6):438–444. doi: 10.1097/00008483-199811000-00006.
    1. Kaminsky LA, Ozemek C. A comparison of the Actigraph GT1M and GT3X accelerometers under standardized and free-living conditions. Physiol Meas. 2012;33(11):1869–1876. doi: 10.1088/0967-3334/33/11/1869.
    1. Sasaki JE, John D, Freedson PS. Validation and comparison of ActiGraph activity monitors. J Sci Med Sport. 2011;14(5):411–416. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2011.04.003.
    1. Thompson WG, Gordon NF, Pescatello LS, editor. American College of Sports Medicine. American College of Sports Medicine Guidelines for Exercise Testing and Prescription. 8. Philadelphia, PA: Wolters Kluwer/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2010.
    1. Lopes VP, Magalhaes P, Bragada J, Vasques C. Actigraph calibration in obese/overweight and type 2 diabetes mellitus middle-aged to old adult patients. J Phys Act Health. 2009;6(Suppl 1):S133–140.
    1. Stevenson TG, Riggin K, Nagelkirk PR, Hargens TA, Strath SJ, Kaminsky LA. Physical activity habits of cardiac patients participating in an early outpatient rehabilitation program. J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev. 2009;29(5):299–303.
    1. Ades PA, Savage PD, Brawner CA, Lyon CE, Ehrman JK, Bunn JY, Keteyian SJ. Aerobic capacity in patients entering cardiac rehabilitation. Circulation. 2006;113(23):2706–2712. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.606624.
    1. Lee DC, Sui X, Artero EG, Lee IM, Church TS, McAuley PA, Stanford FC, Kohl HW 3rd, Blair SN. Long-term effects of changes in cardiorespiratory fitness and body mass index on all-cause and cardiovascular disease mortality in men: the Aerobics Center Longitudinal Study. Circulation. 2011;124(23):2483–2490. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.038422.

Source: PubMed

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

3
Subscribe