Vi capsular polysaccharide-protein conjugates for prevention of typhoid fever. Preparation, characterization, and immunogenicity in laboratory animals

S C Szu, A L Stone, J D Robbins, R Schneerson, J B Robbins, S C Szu, A L Stone, J D Robbins, R Schneerson, J B Robbins

Abstract

The Vi has proven to be a protective antigen in two double masked, controlled clinical trials in areas with high rates of typhoid fever (approximately 1% per annum). In both studies the protective efficacy of the Vi was approximately 70%. Approximately 75% of subjects in these areas responded with a fourfold or greater rise of serum Vi antibodies. In contrast, the Vi elicited a fourfold or greater rise in 95-100% of young adults in France and the United States. Methods were devised, therefore, to synthesize Vi-protein conjugates in order to both enhance the antibody response and confer T-dependent properties to the Vi (and theoretically increase its protective action in populations at high risk for typhoid fever). We settled on a method that used the heterobifunctional crosslinking reagent, N-succinimidyl-3-(2-pyridyldithio)-propionate (SPDP), to bind thiol derivatives of the Vi to proteins. This synthetic scheme was reproducible, provided high yields of Vi-protein conjugates, and was applicable to several medically relevant proteins such as diphtheria and tetanus toxoids. The resultant conjugates were more immunogenic in mice and juvenile Rhesus monkeys than the Vi alone. In contrast to the T-independent properties of the Vi, conjugates of this polysaccharide with several medically relevant proteins induced booster responses in mice and in juvenile Rhesus monkeys. Clinical studies with Vi-protein conjugates are planned. This scheme is also applicable to synthesize protein conjugates with other polysaccharides that have carboxyl functions.

References

    1. Prog Immunobiol Stand. 1971;5:485-91
    1. Am J Epidemiol. 1965 May;81:350-5
    1. J Immunol. 1974 Sep;113(3):729-39
    1. Infect Immun. 1976 Feb;13(2):581-9
    1. Anal Biochem. 1976 May 7;72:248-54
    1. J Hyg (Lond). 1977 Oct;79(2):161-80
    1. Lancet. 1978 Jun 24;1(8078):1328-9
    1. J Exp Med. 1978 Sep 1;148(3):817-22
    1. Biochem J. 1978 Sep 1;173(3):723-37
    1. Immunochemistry. 1978 Nov;15(10-11):839-54
    1. J Exp Med. 1980 Aug 1;152(2):361-76
    1. J Clin Microbiol. 1980 Jul;12(1):22-6
    1. Infect Immun. 1981 May;32(2):497-502
    1. J Immunol. 1983 Feb;130(2):586-9
    1. Infect Immun. 1983 Apr;40(1):245-56
    1. Lancet. 1983 Aug 20;2(8347):441-3
    1. Infect Immun. 1984 Sep;45(3):582-91
    1. J Immunol. 1985 Aug;135(2):930-2
    1. Lancet. 1985 Jul 20;2(8447):114-8
    1. Rev Infect Dis. 1985 Jul-Aug;7(4):536-46
    1. J Biol Stand. 1986 Jan;14(1):25-33
    1. J Infect Dis. 1986 Aug;154(2):342-5
    1. Rev Infect Dis. 1986 May-Jun;8(3):329-49
    1. J Immunol. 1986 Aug 15;137(4):1181-6
    1. Carbohydr Res. 1986 Sep 1;152:7-20
    1. Infect Immun. 1986 Nov;54(2):448-55
    1. Nature. 1965 Aug 7;207(997):614-6
    1. Trans Am Clin Climatol Assoc. 1967;78:70-8
    1. J Immunol. 1969 Sep;103(3):491-5
    1. Acta Sch Med Univ Kioto. 1970 Mar;40(3):284-90
    1. J Chromatogr. 1972 Oct 5;72(1):105-11
    1. Appl Microbiol. 1972 Oct;24(4):628-33
    1. J Infect Dis. 1987 Jan;155(1):155-6
    1. J Clin Microbiol. 1987 Mar;25(3):531-5
    1. Lancet. 1987 May 9;1(8541):1049-52
    1. J Hyg (Lond). 1953 Jun;51(2):260-7
    1. Am J Hyg. 1954 Jul;60(1):52-62
    1. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1959 May;82(1):70-7
    1. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1960 Aug-Sep;104:602-5
    1. J Exp Med. 1961 Sep 1;114:327-42
    1. J Immunol. 1961 May;86:538-42
    1. J Bacteriol. 1974 Sep;119(3):913-22

Source: PubMed

3
Subscribe