A multicenter phase II randomized trial of durvalumab (MEDI-4736) versus physician's choice chemotherapy in recurrent ovarian clear cell adenocarcinoma (MOCCA)

Natalie Yl Ngoi, Valerie Heong, Samuel Ow, Wen Yee Chay, Hee Seung Kim, Chel Hun Choi, Geraldine Goss, Jeffrey C Goh, Bee Choo Tai, Diana Gz Lim, Nivashini Kaliaperumal, Veonice B Au, John E Connolly, Jae-Weon Kim, Michael Friedlander, Kidong Kim, David Sp Tan, Natalie Yl Ngoi, Valerie Heong, Samuel Ow, Wen Yee Chay, Hee Seung Kim, Chel Hun Choi, Geraldine Goss, Jeffrey C Goh, Bee Choo Tai, Diana Gz Lim, Nivashini Kaliaperumal, Veonice B Au, John E Connolly, Jae-Weon Kim, Michael Friedlander, Kidong Kim, David Sp Tan

Abstract

Background: The optimal treatment of recurrent ovarian clear cell carcinoma remains unknown. There is increasing rationale to support the role of immune checkpoint inhibitors targeting the programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1)/programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) axis in ovarian clear cell carcinoma.

Primary objective: To evaluate the efficacy of durvalumab (MEDI-4736) compared with standard chemotherapy in patients with recurrent ovarian clear cell carcinoma.

Study hypothesis: Patients with recurrent ovarian clear cell carcinoma treated with durvalumab will have improved progression-free survival compared with those treated with chemotherapy of physician's choice.

Trial design: The MOCCA study is a multicenter, open-label, randomized phase II trial in patients with recurrent ovarian clear cell carcinoma, which recruited from eight sites across Gynecologic Cancer Group Singapore (GCGS), Korean Gynecologic-Oncology Group (KGOG), and Australia New Zealand Gynecological Oncology Group (ANZGOG). Enrolled patients were randomized in a 2:1 ratio to receive durvalumab or physician's choice of chemotherapy until disease progression, intolerable toxicity, or withdrawal of patient consent.

Major inclusion/exclusion criteria: Eligible patients required histologically documented diagnosis of recurrent ovarian clear cell carcinoma, as evidenced by WT1 negativity. All patients must have been of Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 2 or better, and have had previous treatment with, and progressed or recurred after prior platinum-based chemotherapy. No more than four prior lines of treatment were allowed and prior immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment was not permitted.

Primary endpoints: The primary endpoint was the median progression-free survival following treatment with durvalumab, compared with physician's choice of chemotherapy. Progression-free survival was defined as the time from the first day of treatment to the first observation of disease progression, or death due to any cause, or last follow-up.

Sample size: The target sample size was 46 patients.

Estimated dates for completing accrual and presenting results: Accrual has been completed and results are expected to be presented by mid-2021.

Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT03405454.

Keywords: ovarian cancer.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: VH has received honoraria from AstraZeneca. SO has received honoraria from AstraZeneca. JCG has received honoraria and sponsorship to attend a conference from AstraZeneca. DT has received honoraria and research funding from AstraZeneca. MF has received honoraria and research funding from Astra Zeneca.

© IGCS and ESGO 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. Published by BMJ.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
MOCCA trial schema. Patients with recurrent ovarian clear cell carcinoma who have progressed after at least one prior line of platinum-based chemotherapy, and who have histologically-proven clear cell carcinoma evidenced by WT1-negativity were enrolled and randomized 2:1 to receive durvalumab or physician’s choice chemotherapy. The primary endpoint of the study is the progression-free survival of patients receiving durvalumab compared with chemotherapy. A total of 46 patients have been recruited across sites from Singapore, Australia, and the Republic of Korea. WT1: wilm’s tumor 1; RECIST: Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors; ECOG: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; PFS: progression-free survival; GCGS: Gynecologic Cancer Group Singapore; KGOG: Korean Gynecologic Oncology Group; AZGOG: Australia New Zealand Gynecological Oncology Group.

References

    1. Saito T, Takahashi F, Katabuchi H, et al. . Annual report of the Committee on Gynecologic Oncology, Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology: patient annual report for 2014 and treatment annual report for 2009. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2017;43:1667–77. 10.1111/jog.13450
    1. Kim SI, Lim MC, Lim J, et al. . Incidence of epithelial ovarian cancer according to histologic subtypes in Korea, 1999 to 2012. J Gynecol Oncol 2016;27:e5. 10.3802/jgo.2016.27.e5
    1. Fujiwara K, Shintani D, Nishikawa T. Clear-cell carcinoma of the ovary. Ann Oncol 2016;27 Suppl 1:i50–2. 10.1093/annonc/mdw086
    1. Devlin M-J, Chandrasekaran D, Singh N, et al. . Clear cell ovarian cancer (CCOC): 115 patient (pt) series showing access to experimental therapy may improve response rates in recurrent disease. J Clin Oncol 2018;36:5581 10.1200/JCO.2018.36.15_suppl.5581
    1. Chan JK, Teoh D, Hu JM, et al. . Do clear cell ovarian carcinomas have poorer prognosis compared to other epithelial cell types? A study of 1411 clear cell ovarian cancers. Gynecol Oncol 2008;109:370–6. 10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.02.006
    1. Takano M, Sugiyama T, Yaegashi N, et al. . Low response rate of second-line chemotherapy for recurrent or refractory clear cell carcinoma of the ovary: a retrospective Japan clear cell carcinoma study. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2008;18:937–42. 10.1111/j.1525-1438.2007.01158.x
    1. Takahashi K, Takenaka M, Kawabata A, et al. . Rethinking of treatment strategies and clinical management in ovarian clear cell carcinoma. Int J Clin Oncol 2020;25:425–31. 10.1007/s10147-020-01625-w
    1. Oda K, Hamanishi J, Matsuo K, et al. . Genomics to immunotherapy of ovarian clear cell carcinoma: unique opportunities for management. Gynecol Oncol 2018;151:381–9. 10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.09.001
    1. Katagiri A, Nakayama K, Rahman MT, et al. . Loss of ARID1A expression is related to shorter progression-free survival and chemoresistance in ovarian clear cell carcinoma. Mod Pathol 2012;25:282–8. 10.1038/modpathol.2011.161
    1. Shen J, Ju Z, Zhao W, et al. . ARID1A deficiency promotes mutability and potentiates therapeutic antitumor immunity unleashed by immune checkpoint blockade. Nat Med 2018;24:556–62. 10.1038/s41591-018-0012-z
    1. Hamanishi J, Mandai M, Ikeda T, et al. . Safety and antitumor activity of anti-PD-1 antibody, nivolumab, in patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer. J Clin Oncol 2015;33:4015–22. 10.1200/JCO.2015.62.3397
    1. Matulonis UA, Shapira-Frommer R, Santin AD, et al. . Antitumor activity and safety of pembrolizumab in patients with advanced recurrent ovarian cancer: results from the phase II KEYNOTE-100 study. Ann Oncol 2019;30:5511:1080–7. 10.1093/annonc/mdz135
    1. DSP T, Rye T, Barrie C, et al. . Analysis of outcomes in patients (pts) with recurrent ovarian clear cell carcinoma (ROCCC): time to rethink our approach to treatment. J Clin Oncol 2014;32.
    1. Tan TZ, Ye J, Yee CV, et al. . Analysis of gene expression signatures identifies prognostic and functionally distinct ovarian clear cell carcinoma subtypes. EBioMedicine 2019;50:203–10. 10.1016/j.ebiom.2019.11.017
    1. Makker V, Taylor MH, Aghajanian C, et al. . Lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab in patients with advanced endometrial cancer. J Clin Oncol 2020:JCO1902627. 10.1200/JCO.19.02627

Source: PubMed

3
Subscribe