Effect of Text Messaging on Bowel Preparation and Appointment Attendance for Outpatient Colonoscopy: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Nadim Mahmud, David A Asch, Jessica Sung, Catherine Reitz, Mary S Coniglio, Caitlin McDonald, Donna Bernard, Shivan J Mehta, Nadim Mahmud, David A Asch, Jessica Sung, Catherine Reitz, Mary S Coniglio, Caitlin McDonald, Donna Bernard, Shivan J Mehta

Abstract

Importance: Outpatient colonoscopy is important for colorectal cancer screening. However, nonadherence and poor bowel preparation are common.

Objective: To determine if an automated text messaging intervention with a focus on informational and reminder functions could improve attendance rates and bowel preparation quality for outpatient colonoscopy.

Design, setting, and participants: This randomized clinical trial was conducted in an endoscopy center at an urban academic medical center. Adult patients scheduled for outpatient colonoscopy between January and September 2019 were enrolled by telephone call (early phase) or by automated text message (late phase). Data were analyzed from October 2019 to January 2020.

Interventions: After enrollment, patients were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to usual care (ie, written instructions and nurse telephone call) or to the intervention (ie, usual care plus an automated series of 9 educational or reminder text messages in the week prior to scheduled colonoscopy).

Main outcomes and measures: The primary outcome was appointment attendance rate with good or excellent bowel preparation. Secondary outcomes included appointment attendance rate, bowel preparation quality (poor or inadequate, fair or adequate, and good or excellent), and cancellation lead time (in days).

Results: Among 753 patients included and randomized in the trial (median [interquartile range] age, 56 [49-64] years; 364 [48.3%] men; 429 [57.2%] Black), 367 patients were randomized to the intervention group and 386 patients were randomized to the control group. There was no significant difference in the primary outcome between groups (patients attending appointments with good or excellent bowel preparation: intervention, 195 patients [53.1%]; control, 210 patients [54.4%]; P = .73), including when stratified by early or late phase enrollment groups. Similarly, there were no significant differences in secondary outcomes.

Conclusions and relevance: This randomized clinical trial found no significant difference in appointment attendance or bowel preparation quality with an automated text messaging intervention compared with the usual care control. Future work could optimize the content and delivery of text message interventions or identify patient subgroups that may benefit from this approach.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03710213.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Asch reported owning stock in Berkshire Hathaway, serving as a partner in and part owner of VAL Health, and receiving compensation and/or travel support for speaking, writing, or consulting for Salzburg Global Seminars, GlaxoSmithKline, JFK Health System, Cosmetic Boot Camp, Meeting Designs, Capital Consulting, Healthcare Financial Management Association, Joslin Diabetes Center, National Academy of Medicine, the Commonwealth Fund, Massachusetts Medical Society, Endocrine Society, Osteoarthritis Research Society International, Baystate Medical Center, Weill-Cornell Medical College, Association of American Medical Colleges, TEDMED, National Alliance of Health Care Purchaser Coalitions, Deloitte, Harvard University, American Association for Physician Leadership, Brandeis University, University of Rochester, Partner’s Health Care System, Virginia Medical Center, Johns Hopkins University, The MITRE Corporation, and University of Chicago. No other disclosures were reported.

Figures

Figure 1.. Patient Recruitment Flowchart
Figure 1.. Patient Recruitment Flowchart
Figure 2.. Primary Outcome of Appointment Attendance…
Figure 2.. Primary Outcome of Appointment Attendance With Good or Excellent Bowel Preparation

References

    1. Siegel R, Desantis C, Jemal A. Colorectal cancer statistics, 2014. CA Cancer J Clin. 2014;64(2):104-117. doi:10.3322/caac.21220
    1. Issa IA, Noureddine M. Colorectal cancer screening: an updated review of the available options. World J Gastroenterol. 2017;23(28):5086-5096. doi:10.3748/wjg.v23.i28.5086
    1. White A, Thompson TD, White MC, et al. . Cancer screening test use—United States, 2015. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2017;66(8):201-206. doi:10.15585/mmwr.mm6608a1
    1. Doubeni CA, Corley DA, Quinn VP, et al. . Effectiveness of screening colonoscopy in reducing the risk of death from right and left colon cancer: a large community-based study. Gut. 2018;67(2):291-298. doi:10.1136/gutjnl-2016-312712
    1. Shuja A, Harris C, Aldridge P, Malespin M, de Melo SW Jr. Predictors of no-show rate in the GI endoscopy suite at a safety net academic medical center. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2019;53(1):29-33. doi:10.1097/MCG.0000000000000928
    1. Chang JT, Sewell JL, Day LW. Prevalence and predictors of patient no-shows to outpatient endoscopic procedures scheduled with anesthesia. BMC Gastroenterol. 2015;15:123. doi:10.1186/s12876-015-0358-3
    1. Fang J, Fu HY, Ma D, et al. . Constipation, fiber intake and non-compliance contribute to inadequate colonoscopy bowel preparation: a prospective cohort study. J Dig Dis. 2016;17(7):458-463. doi:10.1111/1751-2980.12376
    1. Mahmood S, Farooqui SM, Madhoun MF. Predictors of inadequate bowel preparation for colonoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018;30(8):819-826. doi:10.1097/MEG.0000000000001175
    1. Guillaume E, Dejardin O, Bouvier V, et al. . Patient navigation to reduce social inequalities in colorectal cancer screening participation: a cluster randomized controlled trial. Prev Med. 2017;103:76-83. doi:10.1016/j.ypmed.2017.08.012
    1. De Mil R, Guillaume E, Guittet L, et al. . Cost-effectiveness analysis of a navigation program for colorectal cancer screening to reduce social health inequalities: a French cluster randomized controlled trial. Value Health. 2018;21(6):685-691. doi:10.1016/j.jval.2017.09.020
    1. Mahmud N, Doshi SD, Coniglio MS, et al. . An automated text message navigation program improves the show rate for outpatient colonoscopy. Health Educ Behav. 2019;46(6):942-946. doi:10.1177/1090198119869964
    1. Asch DA, Volpp KG. On the way to health. LDI Issue Brief. 2012;17(9):1-4.
    1. Aronchick C, Lipshutz W, Wright S, et al. . Validation of an instrument to assess colon cleansing. Am J Gastroenterol. 1999;94:2667.
    1. Beets MW, Weaver RG, Ioannidis JPA, et al. . Identification and evaluation of risk of generalizability biases in pilot versus efficacy/effectiveness trials: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2020;17(1):19. doi:10.1186/s12966-020-0918-y
    1. Walter B, Klare P, Strehle K, et al. . Improving the quality and acceptance of colonoscopy preparation by reinforced patient education with short message service: results from a randomized, multicenter study (PERICLES-II). Gastrointest Endosc. 2019;89(3):506-513.e4. doi:10.1016/j.gie.2018.08.014
    1. Lam TYT, Hui AJ, Sia F, et al. . Short message service reminders reduce outpatient colonoscopy nonattendance rate: a randomized controlled study. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020. doi:10.1111/jgh.15218
    1. Rogers BD, Shy C, Ramgopal R, et al. . Patient engagement with interactive text message system improves successful colonoscopy rates in an outpatient endoscopy center. Dig Dis. 2020. doi:10.1159/000511767
    1. Patel V, Patel H, Cavanagh Y, et al. . The role of mobile phone text message reminders in adherence to bowel preparation for outpatient colonoscopies. Gastroenterology 2018;155:e45-e46. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2018.06.072
    1. Lee YJ, Kim ES, Choi JH, et al. . Impact of reinforced education by telephone and short message service on the quality of bowel preparation: a randomized controlled study. Endoscopy. 2015;47(11):1018-1027. doi:10.1055/s-0034-1392406
    1. Maxwell AE, Bastani R, Crespi CM, Danao LL, Cayetano RT. Behavioral mediators of colorectal cancer screening in a randomized controlled intervention trial. Prev Med. 2011;52(2):167-173. doi:10.1016/j.ypmed.2010.11.007
    1. Mehta SJ, Asch DA. How to help gastroenterology patients help themselves: leveraging insights from behavioral economics. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014;12(5):711-714. doi:10.1016/j.cgh.2014.02.022

Source: PubMed

3
Subscribe