Initiating renal replacement therapy through incremental haemodialysis: Protocol for a randomized multicentre clinical trial

M Fernández Lucas, G Ruíz-Roso, J L Merino, R Sánchez, H Bouarich, J A Herrero, A Muriel, J Zamora, A Collado, M Fernández Lucas, G Ruíz-Roso, J L Merino, R Sánchez, H Bouarich, J A Herrero, A Muriel, J Zamora, A Collado

Abstract

Background: Thrice-weekly haemodialysis is the usual dose when starting renal replacement therapy; however, this schedule is no longer appropriate since it does not consider residual renal function. Several reports have suggested the potential benefit of beginning haemodialysis less frequently and incrementally increasing the dose as the residual renal function decreases. However, all the data published so far are from observational studies. Thus, this clinical trial avoids any potential selection bias and will assess the possible benefits that have been observed in observational studies.

Methods/design: This report describes the study protocol of a randomized prospective multi-centre open-label clinical trial to evaluate whether starting renal replacement therapy with twice-weekly haemodialysis sessions preserves residual renal function better than the standard thrice-weekly regimen. We also explore other clinical parameters, such as concentrations of uremic toxins, dialysis doses, control of anaemia, removal of medium-weight uremic toxins, nutritional status, quality of life, hospital admissions and mortality. Only incident haemodialysis patients who can maintain a urea clearance rate KrU ≥ 2.5 mL/min/1.73 m2 are eligible. Patient recruitment began on 1 January 2017 and will last for 2 years or until the required sample size has been recruited to ensure the established statistical power has been reached. The minimum follow-up period will be 1 year. Anuric patients with acute renal failure and patients who return to haemodialysis after a kidney transplant failure are excluded. It has been calculated that 44 patients should be recruited into each group to achieve a power of 80% in a two-sided comparison of means with a usual significance level of 0.05. A time-to-event analysis will estimate the probability of kidney function survival in both groups using the Kaplan-Meier method. Survival curves will be compared with log-rank tests. This survival analysis will be complemented with a proportional hazard model to estimate the hazard ratio of kidney function survival adjusted for any confounding factors. Analyses will be carried out in accordance with the intention-to-treat principle.

Discussion: The incremental initiation of dialysis may preserve residual renal function better than the conventional treatment, with similar or higher survival rates, as reported by observational studies. To our knowledge, this is the first clinical trial to evaluate whether initiating renal replacement therapy with twice-weekly haemodialysis sessions preserves residual renal function better than beginning with the standard thrice-weekly regimen.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03302546. Registered on 5 October 2017.

Keywords: Haemodialysis; Incremental Haemodialysis; Renal replacement therapy.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Schedule of enrolment, interventions and assessments * Patients receiving twice-weekly haemodialysis sessions are switched to the conventional arm if KrU 2 in two determinations made in a 2-week interval, or if they develop uncontrolled hypertension, heart failure or a clinical event that indicates that the number of haemodialysis sessions should be increased. BNP brain-derived natriuretic peptide, CRP C-reactive protein, HD haemodialysis, KDQOL-SF Kidney Disease Quality of Life Short Form, KrCr creatinine clearance rate, KrU urea clearance rate, PTH parathyroid hormone

References

    1. Bieber B, Qian J, Anand S, et al. Two-times weekly haemodialysis in China: frequency, associated patient and treatment characteristics and quality of life in the China Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns study. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2014;29:1770–1777. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gft472.
    1. Gotch FA, Keen ML. Care of the patient on haemodialysis. In: CogBan MG, Garovoy MR, editors. Introduction to Dialysis. New York: Churchill Livingston; 1985. pp. 73–143.
    1. National Kidney Foundation KDOQI clinical practice guideline for hemodialysis adequacy: 2015 update. Am J Kidney Dis. 2015;66:884–930. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2015.07.015.
    1. Fernández Lucas M, Teruel JL, Gomis A, et al. Maintaining residual renal function in patients on haemodialysis: five year experience using a progressively increasing dialysis regimen. Nefrologia. 2012;32:767–843.
    1. Teruel JL, Fernández Lucas M, Rivera M, et al. Progression of residual renal function with an increase in dialysis: haemodialysis versus peritoneal dialysis. Nefrologia. 2013;33:640–649.
    1. Zhang M, Wang M, Li H, et al. Association of initial twice weekly haemodialysis treatment with preservation of residual kidney function in ESRD patients. Am J Nephrol. 2014;40:140–150. doi: 10.1159/000365819.
    1. Fernández Lucas M, Teruel JL, Ruiz Roso G, et al. Incremental haemodialysis schedule in patients with higher residual renal function at the start of dialysis. Adv Nephrol. 2014:236245.
    1. Obi Y, Rhee CM, Mathew AT, et al. Residual kidney function decline and mortality in incident hemodialysis patients. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2016;27:3758–3768. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2015101142.
    1. Rhee CM, Unruh M, Chen J, et al. Infrequent dialysis: A new paradigm for haemodialysis initiation. Semin Dial. 2013;26:720–727. doi: 10.1111/sdi.12133.
    1. Vanholder R, Van Biesen W, Lameire N. Is starting haemodialysis on a twice-weekly regimen a valid option? Am J Kidney Dis. 2014;64:165–167. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2014.06.003.
    1. Libetta C, Nissani P, Dal CA. Progressive Hemodialysis: Is It The Future? Semin Dial. 2016;29:179–183. doi: 10.1111/sdi.12455.
    1. Obi Y, Streja E, Rhee CM, et al. Incremental Haemodialysis, Residual Kidney Function, and Mortality Risk in Incident Dialysis Patients: A Cohort Study. Am J Kidney Dis. 2016;68:256–265. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2016.01.008.
    1. Shafi T, Jaar BG, Plantinga LC, et al. Association of residual urine output with mortality, quality of life, and inflammation in incident haemodialysis patients: for the choices for healthy outcomes in caring for end-stage renal disease (CHOICE) study. Am J Kidney Dis. 2010;56:348–358. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2010.03.020.
    1. Termorshuizen F, Dekker FW, van Manen JG, et al. Relative contribution of residual renal function and different measures of adequacy to survival in hemodialysis patients: an analysis of the Netherlands cooperative study on the adequacy of Dialysis (NECOSAD)-2. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2004;15:1061–1070. doi: 10.1097/01.ASN.0000117976.29592.93.
    1. Vilar E, Wellsted D, Chandna SM, et al. Residual renal function improves outcome in incremental haemodialysis despite reduced dialysis dose. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2009;24:2502–2510. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfp071.
    1. Kalantar-Zadeh K, Crowley ST, Beddhu S, et al. Renal Replacement Therapy and Incremental Hemodialysis for Veterans with Advanced Chronic Kidney Disease. Semin Dial. 2017;30:251–261. doi: 10.1111/sdi.12601.
    1. Fernández-Lucas M, Teruel JL. Incremental haemodialysis schedule at the start of renal replacement therapy. Nefrología. 2017;37:1–4. doi: 10.1016/j.nefro.2016.08.002.
    1. Mathew A, Obi Y, Rhee CM, et al. Treatment frequency and mortality among incident haemodialysis patients in the United States comparing incremental with standard and more frequent dialysis. Kidney Int. 2016;90:1071–1079. doi: 10.1016/j.kint.2016.05.028.
    1. Park JI, Park JT, Kim YL, et al. Comparison of outcomes between the incremental and the three times-weekly initiation of haemodialysis: a propensity-matched study of a prospective cohort in Korea. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2017;32:355–336.
    1. Lin X, Yan Y, Ni Z, et al. Clinical outcome of twice-weekly haemodialysis patients in Shanghai. Blood Purif. 2012;33:66–72. doi: 10.1159/000334634.
    1. Deira J, Suárez MA, López F, et al. IHDIP: a controlled randomized trial to assess the security and effectiveness of the incremental hemodialysis in incident patients. BMC Nephrol. 2019;20:8. doi: 10.1186/s12882-018-1189-6.
    1. Gotch FA. Kinetic modeling in hemodialysis. In: Nissenson AR, Fine RN, Gentile DE, editors. Clinical Dialysis. Norwalk: Appleton & Lange; 1992. pp. 118–146.
    1. Watson PE, Watson ID, Batt RD. Total body water volumes for adults males and females estimated from simple anthropometric measurements. Am J Clin Nutr. 1980;33:27–39. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/33.1.27.
    1. Casino FG, López T. The equivalent renal urea clearance: a new parameter to assess dialysis dose. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 1996;11(8):1574–1581. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.ndt.a027616.
    1. Stata Corp . Stata Statistical Software: Release 14. College Station: Stata Corp LP; 2015.
    1. O'Brien PC, Fleming TR. A multiple testing procedure for clinical trials. Biometrics. 1979;35:549–556. doi: 10.2307/2530245.
    1. Shafi T. CKD to ESRD transition: does assessment of kidney function matter? Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2017;32:1–3. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfw327.
    1. Wong J, Vilar E, Davenport A, et al. Incremental haemodialysis. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2015;30:1639–1648. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfv231.

Source: PubMed

3
Subscribe