Healing architecture and Snoezelen in delivery room design: a qualitative study of women's birth experiences and patient-centeredness of care

Jane Hyldgaard Nielsen, Charlotte Overgaard, Jane Hyldgaard Nielsen, Charlotte Overgaard

Abstract

Background: The physical place and environment has a profound influence on experiences, health and wellbeing of birthing women. An alternatively designed delivery room, inspired by the principles of healing architecture and Snoezelen, was established in a Danish regional hospital. These principles provided knowledge of how building and interior design affects the senses, including users' pain experience and stress levels. The aim of the study was to explore women's experience of the environment and its ability to support the concept of patient-centeredness in the care of birthing women.

Methods: Applying a hermeneutical-phenomenological methodology, fourteen semi-structured interviews with low-risk women giving birth in an alternative delivery room at an obstetric unit in Denmark were undertaken 3-7 weeks after birth.

Results: Overall, women's experiences of given birth in the alternative delivery room were positive. Our analysis suggests that the environment was well adapted to the women's needs, as it offered a stress- and anxiety-reducing transition to the hospital setting, at the same time as it helped them obtain physical comfort. The environment also signaled respect for the family's needs as it supported physical and emotional interaction between the woman and her partner and helped relieve her concern for the partner's well-being. The psychosocial support provided by the midwives appeared inseparable from the alternative delivery room, as both affected, amplified, and occasionally restricted the women's experience of the physical environment.

Conclusion: Our findings support the use of principles of healing architecture and Snoezelen in birth environments and add to the evidence on how the physical design of hospital environments influence on both social and physical aspects of the well-being of patients. The environment appeared to encompass several dimensions of the concept of patient-centered care.

Keywords: Birth environment; Birth experience; Hospital design; Patient-centered care; Qualitative methods; Semi-structured interviews.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

    1. Larkin P, Begley C, Devane D. Women’s experiences of labour and birth: an evolutionary concept analysis. Midwifery. 2009. 10.1016/j.midw.2007.07.010.
    1. Lundgren I. Swedish women ’ s experience of childbirth 2 years after birth. Midwifery. 2005. 10.1016/j.midw.2005.01.001.
    1. Waldenstrom U, Hildingsson I, Raadestad I. A negative birth experience : prevalence and risk factors in a national sample. Birth. 2004. 10.1111/j.0730-7659.2004.0270.x.
    1. Aune I, Torvik HM. Promoting a normal birth and a positive birth experience — Norwegian women’ s perspectives. Midwifery. 2015. 10.1016/j.midw.2015.03.016.
    1. Lavender T, Walkinshaw SA, Walton I. A prospective study of women’s views of factors contributing to a positive birth experience. Midwifery. 1999. 10.1016/S0266-6138(99)90036-0.
    1. Bell AF, Andersson E. The birth experience and women's postnatal depression: a systematic review. Midwifery. 2016. 10.1016/j.midw.2016.04.014.
    1. Garthus-Niegel S, Knoph C, Von Soest T, Nielsen CS, Eberhard-Gran M. The role of labor pain and overall birth experience in the development of posttraumatic stress symptoms: a longitudinal cohort study. Birth. 2014. 10.1111/birt.12093.
    1. Størksen HT, Garthus-Niegel S, Vangen S, Eberhard-Gran M. The impact of previous birth experiences on maternal fear of childbirth. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2012. 10.1111/aogs.12072.
    1. Brown A, Jordan S. Impact of birth complications on breastfeeding duration: an internet survey. J Adv Nurs. 2013. 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2012,06067.x.
    1. Elmir R, Schmied V, Wilkes I, Jackson D. Women's perceptions and experience of a traumatic birth: a meta-ethnography. J Advanced Nursing. 2010. 10.1111/j.1365-2648-2010.05391.x.
    1. Fahy KM, Parratt JA. Birth territory: a theory for midwifery practice. Women and birth. 2006. 10.1016/j.wombi.2006.05.001.
    1. Hodnett ED, Downe S, Walsh D. Alternative versus conventional institutional settings for birth. Cochrane. 2012. 10.1002/14651858.CD000012.pub3.
    1. Raynor MD, England C. Psychology for midwives : pregnancy, childbirth and puerperium. 1. Berkshire: Open University Press; 2010.
    1. Ulrich RS, Zimring C, Zhu X, DuBose J, Seo HB, Choi YS, Quan X, Joseph A. A review of the research literature on evidence-based healthcare design. HERD Heal Environ Res Des J. 2008. 10.1177/193758670800100306.
    1. Hammond A, Foureur M, Homer CSE, Davis D. Space , place and the midwife : Exploring the relationship between the birth environment , neurobiology and midwifery practice. Women Birth 2013; doi:10.1016/j.wombi.2013.09.001.
    1. Foureur M, Davis D, Fenwick J, Leap N, Ledema R, Forbes I, Homer CSE. The relationship between birth unit design and safe, satisfying birth: developing a hypothetical model. Midwifery. 2010. 10.1016/j.midw.2010.05.015.
    1. Institute of Medicine. Crossing the Quality Chasm . A New Health System for the 21st Century. National Academies Press (US) 2001.
    1. De Labrusse C, Ramelet AS, Humphrey T, Maclennan SJ. Patient-centered Care in Maternity Services: a critical appraisal and synthesis of the literature. Women’s Heal. 2016. 10.1016/j.whi.2015.09.003.
    1. Hauck Y, Rivers C, Doherty K. Women’s experiences of using a Snoezelen room during labour in Western Australia. Midwifery. 2008. 10.1016/j.midw.2007.03.007.
    1. Manesh MJ. Snoezelen room and childbirth outcome : a randomized clinical trial. Iran Red Crescent Med J. 2015. 10.5812/ircmj.17(5)2015.18373.
    1. Kafle NP. Hermeneutic phenomenological research method simplified. Bodhi: An Interdisciplinary Journal. 2011, ISSN:2091–0479.
    1. Sloan A, Bowe B. Phenomenology and hermeneutic phenomenology: the philisophy, the methodologies, and using hermeneutic phenomenology to investigate lecturers' experiences of curriculum design. Qual Quant. 2014. 10.1007/s11135-+13-9835-3.
    1. Dahlager L, Fredslund H. Hermeneutic analysis. In: Kock L, Vallgårda S, editors. Research methods in public health. Copenhagen: Gyldendal Akademisk; 2008. pp. 157–181.
    1. Gerteis M. Through the patient’s eyes: understanding and promoting patient-centered care. New York: Wiley.; 1993.
    1. Lorentzen I, Andersen GS, Jensen HS, Foogsgaard A, Foureur M, Lauszuz FF, Nohr E. A. Study protocol for a randomised trial evaluating the effect of a "birth environment room" versus a standart labour room on birth outcomes and the birth experience. Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2019. 10.1016/j.conctc.2019.100336.
    1. Lawrence AP, Horwitz SM, Green CA, Wisdom JP, Duan N, Hoagwood K. Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Admin Pol Ment Health. 2015. 10.1007/s10488-013-0528-y.
    1. Overgaard C, Fenger-Grøn M, Sandall J. Freestanding midwifery units versus obstetric units: does the effect of place of birth differ with level of social disadvantage? BMC Public Health. 2012a. 10.1186/1471-2458-12-478.
    1. Brinkmann S, Kvale S. InterViews : learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing. 3. Thousand Oaks Cal: Sage Publications, inc; 2014.
    1. Andrade CC, Devlin AS. Stress reduction in the hospital room: applying Ulrich’s theory of supportive design. J Environ Psychol. 2015. 10.1016/j.jenvp.2014.12.001.
    1. Overgaard C, Fenger-Grøn M, Sandall J. The impact of birthplace on women’s birth experiences and perceptions of care. Soc Sci Med. 2012b. 10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.12.023.
    1. Andrade CC, Devlin AS, Pereira CR, Lima ML. Do the hospital rooms make a difference for patients’ stress? A multilevel analysis of the role of perceived control, positive distraction, and social support. J Environ Psychol. 2017. 10.1016/j.jenvp.2017.06.008.
    1. Kirkham M. The midwife-mother relationship. 2nd. Palgrave Macmillan: Hampshire; 2010.
    1. Guest G, Bunce A, Johnson L. How many interviews are enough? Field methods. 2006. 10.1177/1525822X05279903.
    1. Lov, 1083. Lov om videnskabsetisk behandling af sundhedsvidenskabelige forskningsprojekter [WWW Document]. Rets information. Minist. Sundh. og Forebygg. URL (2011) Accessed 12.Aug.17.
    1. Lov, 429. Lov om behandling af personoplysninger [WWW Document]. Rets information. Minist. Sundh. og Forebygg. URL (2000 ) Accessed 12.Aug.17.
    1. National Research Ethics Committee [WWW Document]. URL (2017) Accessed 12.Aug.17.

Source: PubMed

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

3
Subscribe