Ethical theory, ethnography, and differences between doctors and nurses in approaches to patient care
D W Robertson, D W Robertson
Abstract
Objectives: To study empirically whether ethical theory (from the mainstream principles-based, virtue-based, and feminist schools) usefully describes the approaches doctors and nurses take in everyday patient care.
Design: Ethnographic methods: participant observation and interviews, the transcripts of which were analysed to identify themes in ethical approaches.
Setting: A British old-age psychiatry ward.
Participants: The more than 20 doctors and nurses on the ward.
Results: Doctors and nurses on the ward differed in their conceptions of the principles of beneficence and respect for patient autonomy. Nurses shared with doctors a commitment to liberal and utilitarian conceptions of these principles, but also placed much greater weight on relationships and character virtues when expressing the same principles. Nurses also emphasised patient autonomy, while doctors were more likely to advocate beneficence, when the two principles conflicted.
Conclusion: The study indicates that ethical theory can, contrary to the charges of certain critics, be relevant to everyday health care-if it (a) attends to social context and (b) is flexible enough to draw on various schools of theory.
References
- J Med Ethics. 1990 Sep;16(3):141-5
- J Med Ethics. 1993 Sep;19(3):157-63
- Perspect Biol Med. 1984 Spring;27(3):336-60
- J Health Soc Behav. 1987 Sep;28(3):215-31
- J Med Ethics. 1993 Dec;19(4):230-6
- Arch Intern Med. 1990 Dec;150(12):2509-13
- Nurse Educ Today. 1991 Dec;11(6):461-6
- Soc Sci Med. 1992 Dec;35(12):1421-31
Source: PubMed