Surgical Methods of Zygomaticomaxillary Complex Fracture

So Young Ji, Seung Soo Kim, Moo Hyun Kim, Wan Suk Yang, So Young Ji, Seung Soo Kim, Moo Hyun Kim, Wan Suk Yang

Abstract

Background: Zygoma is a major buttress of the midfacial skeleton, which is frequently injured because of its prominent location. Zygoma fractures are classified according to Knight and North based on the direction of anatomic displacement and the pattern created by the fracture. In zygomaticomaxillary complex (ZMC) fracture many incisions (lateral eyebrow, lateral upper blepharoplasty, transconjunctival, subciliary, subtarsal, intraoral, direct percutaneous approach) are useful. We reviewed various approaches for the treatment of ZMC fractures and discussed about incisions and fixation methods.

Methods: A retrospective review was conducted of patients with ZMC fracture at a single institution from January 2005 to December 2014. Patients with single zygomatic arch fracture were excluded.

Results: The identified 694 patients who were admitted for zygomatic fractures from which 192 patients with simple arch fractures were excluded. The remaining 502 patients consisted of 439 males and 63 females, and total 532 zygomatic bone was operated. Orbital fracture was the most common associated fracture. According to the Knight and North classification the most frequent fracture was Group IV. Most fractures were fixated at two points (73%).

Conclusion: We reviewed our cases over 10 years according to fracture type and fixation methods. In conclusion, minimal incision, familiar approach and fixation methods of the surgeon are recommended.

Keywords: Maxillary fractures; Maxillofacial injuries; Zygomatic fractures.

Conflict of interest statement

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Figures

Fig. 1. Reduction with plate and screw.…
Fig. 1. Reduction with plate and screw. A 1.5 mm plate with a 4.0 mm screw fixed on the lateral fracture segment of the inferior orbital rim, and the fracture is reduced by pulling the plate anterior-laterally with a small bone hook. After the reduction screw is fixed on the medial segment of the inferior orbital rim.
Fig. 2. Group IV zygomaticomaxillary complex fracture.…
Fig. 2. Group IV zygomaticomaxillary complex fracture. (A) Preoperative computed tomography. (B) Postoperative computed tomography. The displaced and medially rotated fracture segment reduced and fixated with plates and screws.
Fig. 3. Reduction with plate and screw.…
Fig. 3. Reduction with plate and screw. A 1.5 mm plate with a 4.0 mm screw fixed with the lateral fracture segment of the inferior orbital rim, and pulling the plate antero-medially with a small bone hook. After the reduction screw is fixed on the medial segment of the inferior orbital rim.
Fig. 4. Group V zygomaticomaxillary complex fracture.…
Fig. 4. Group V zygomaticomaxillary complex fracture. (A) Preoperative computed tomography. (B) Postoperative computed tomography. The displaced and laterally rotated fracture segment reduced and fixated with plates and screws.

References

    1. Ellstrom CL, Evans GR. Evidence-based medicine: zygoma fractures. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013;132:1649–1657.
    1. Meslemani D, Kellman RM. Zygomaticomaxillary complex fractures. Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2012;14:62–66.
    1. Knight JS, North JF. The classification of malar fractures: an analysis of displacement as a guide to treatment. Br J Plast Surg. 1961;13:325–339.
    1. Pau CY, Barrera JE, Kwon J, Most SP. Three-dimensional analysis of zygomatic-maxillary complex fracture patterns. Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr. 2010;3:167–176.
    1. Park BY, Song SY, Yun IS, Lee DW, Rah DK, Lee WJ. First percutaneous reduction and next external suspension with Steinmann pin and Kirschner wire of isolated zygomatic fractures. J Craniofac Surg. 2010;21:1060–1065.
    1. Kim CY, Kim KW. Fractured facial bone reduction and resorbable plate fixation using tapper. J Craniofac Surg. 2011;22:1215–1218.
    1. Uda H, Kamochi H, Sugawara Y, Sarukawa S, Sunaga A. The concept and method of closed reduction and internal fixation: a new approach for the treatment of simple zygoma fractures. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013;132:1231–1240.
    1. Ward Booth P, Schendel SA, Hausamen JE. Maxillofacial surgery. London: Churchill Livingstone; 1999.
    1. Rinehart GC, Marsh JL, Hemmer KM, Bresina S. Internal fixation of malar fractures: an experimental biophysical study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1989;84:21–25.
    1. Ahn HC, Youn DH, Choi MS, Chang JW, Lee JH. Wire or hook traction for reducing zygomatic fracture. Arch Craniofac Surg. 2015;16:131–135.
    1. Lee PK, Lee JH, Choi YS, Oh DY, Rhie JW, Han KT, et al. Single transconjunctival incision and two-point fixation for the treatment of non-comminuted zygomatic complex fracture. J Korean Med Sci. 2006;21:1080–1085.
    1. Langsdon PR, Rohman GT, Hixson R, Stumpe MR, Metzinger SE. Upper lid transconjunctival versus transcutaneous approach for fracture repair of the lateral orbital rim. Ann Plast Surg. 2010;65:52–55.
    1. Burm JS, Kim BY, Kim YW. Prevention of lower eyelid complications caused by a subciliary approach: temporary lower eyelid suspension. J Korean Soc Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;33:465–468.
    1. Hwang K. One-point fixation of tripod fractures of zygoma through a lateral brow incision. J Craniofac Surg. 2010;21:1042–1044.
    1. Mohammadinezhad C. Evaluation of a single miniplate use in treatment of zygomatic bone fracture. J Craniofac Surg. 2009;20:1398–1402.
    1. Hwang K, Kim DH. Analysis of zygomatic fractures. J Craniofac Surg. 2011;22:1416–1421.
    1. Kim ST, Go DH, Jung JH, Cha HE, Woo JH, Kang IG. Comparison of 1-point fixation with 2-point fixation in treating tripod fractures of the zygoma. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011;69:2848–2852.
    1. Zhang QB, Dong YJ, Li ZB, Zhao JH. Minimal incisions for treating zygomatic complex fractures. J Craniofac Surg. 2011;22:1460–1462.
    1. Choi KY, Ryu DW, Yang JD, Chung HY, Cho BC. Feasibility of 4-point fixation using the preauricular approach in a zygomaticomaxillary complex fracture. J Craniofac Surg. 2013;24:557–562.

Source: PubMed

3
Subscribe