Physical fitness of Latin America children and adolescents: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis

Andrés Godoy-Cumillaf, Bruno Bizzozero-Peroni, Grant R Tomkinson, Javier Brazo-Sayavera, Andrés Godoy-Cumillaf, Bruno Bizzozero-Peroni, Grant R Tomkinson, Javier Brazo-Sayavera

Abstract

Introduction: Physical fitness (PF) is an important indicator of health in children and adolescents. Internationally, test batteries have been used to assess overall PF. In Latin America, however, while PF has been widely measured, there is no accepted test battery, making it difficult to monitor and/or compare the PF levels of Latin children. The aim of this study, therefore, is to systematically review and potentially meta-analyse the peer-reviewed literature regarding the assessment of PF in Latin American children and adolescents.

Methods and analysis: This systematic review and meta-analysis will follow the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Protocols statement. The systematic literature search will be performed in MEDLINE, Scopus, SciELO, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, SPORTDiscus, LILACS and Latindex (Spanish) to locate articles published up to April 2021. Eligible studies will include both descriptive and analytic study designs. Meta-analyses are planned for sufficiently homogeneous PF outcomes with regard to statistical and methodological characteristics. Narrative syntheses are planned for PF outcomes that are considered to be too heterogeneous. The statistical program STATA V.15 will be used for meta-analyses, with subgroup analyses performed according to the characteristics of included studies.

Ethics and dissemination: This systematic review and meta-analysis protocol is designed to provide updated evidence on the PF of Latin American children and adolescents. Findings from this review may be useful for teachers, researchers and other professionals responsible for paediatric fitness and health promotion/surveillance. The results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed scientific publications, conferences, educational talks and infographics.

Prospero registration number: CRD42020189892.

Keywords: paediatrics; public health; sports medicine.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
PRISMA flow diagram for identifying, screening and determining the eligibility of and whether to include studies. PRISMA, Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses.

References

    1. World Health Organization . Global recommendations on physical activity for health. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO, 2010.
    1. Bull FC, Al-Ansari SS, Biddle S, et al. . World Health Organization 2020 guidelines on physical activity and sedentary behaviour. Br J Sports Med 2020;54:1451–62. 10.1136/bjsports-2020-102955
    1. Martínez-Vizcaíno V, Sánchez-López M. [Relationship between physical activity and physical fitness in children and adolescents]. Rev Esp Cardiol 2008;61:108–11. 10.1016/S1885-5857(08)60084-5
    1. Smith JJ, Eather N, Weaver RG, et al. . Behavioral correlates of muscular fitness in children and adolescents: a systematic review. Sports Med 2019;49:887–904. 10.1007/s40279-019-01089-7
    1. Ruiz JR, Castro-Piñero J, Artero EG, et al. . Predictive validity of health-related fitness in youth: a systematic review. Br J Sports Med 2009;43:909–23. 10.1136/bjsm.2008.056499
    1. Ortega FB, Ruiz JR, Castillo MJ, et al. . Physical fitness in childhood and adolescence: a powerful marker of health. Int J Obes 2008;32:1–11. 10.1038/sj.ijo.0803774
    1. Gomes TN, Dos Santos FK, Katzmarzyk PT, et al. . Active and strong: physical activity, muscular strength, and metabolic risk in children. Am J Hum Biol 2017;29:e22904–8. 10.1002/ajhb.22904
    1. Castillo-Garzón MJ, Ruiz JR, Ortega FB, et al. . A Mediterranean diet is not enough for health: physical fitness is an important additional contributor to health for the adults of tomorrow. World Rev Nutr Diet 2007;97:114–38. 10.1159/000097913
    1. Lopes L, Póvoas S, Mota J, et al. . Flexibility is associated with motor competence in schoolchildren. Scand J Med Sci Sports 2017;27:1806–13. 10.1111/sms.12789
    1. García-Hermoso A, Ramírez-Campillo R, Izquierdo M. Is muscular fitness associated with future health benefits in children and adolescents? A systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Sports Med 2019;49:1079–94. 10.1007/s40279-019-01098-6
    1. Högström G, Nordström A, Nordström P. Aerobic fitness in late adolescence and the risk of early death: a prospective cohort study of 1.3 million Swedish men. Int J Epidemiol 2016;45:1159–68. 10.1093/ije/dyv321
    1. Ortega FB, Silventoinen K, Tynelius P, et al. . Muscular strength in male adolescents and premature death: cohort study of one million participants. BMJ 2012;345:e7279. 10.1136/bmj.e7279
    1. Castro-Piñero J, Artero EG, España-Romero V, et al. . Criterion-related validity of field-based fitness tests in youth: a systematic review. Br J Sports Med 2010;44:934–43. 10.1136/bjsm.2009.058321
    1. Tomkinson GR, Lang JJ, Tremblay MS, et al. . International normative 20 m shuttle run values from 1 142 026 children and youth representing 50 countries. Br J Sports Med 2017;51:1545–54. 10.1136/bjsports-2016-095987
    1. Tomkinson GR, Kaster T, Dooley FL, et al. . Temporal trends in the standing broad jump performance of 10,940,801 children and adolescents between 1960 and 2017. Sports Med 2021;51:531–48. 10.1007/s40279-020-01394-6
    1. Tomkinson GR, Lang JJ, Tremblay MS. Temporal trends in the cardiorespiratory fitness of children and adolescents representing 19 high-income and upper middle-income countries between 1981 and 2014. Br J Sports Med 2019;53:478–86. 10.1136/bjsports-2017-097982
    1. Kolimechkov S. Physical fitness assessment in children and adolescents : A systematic review. Eur J Phys Educ Sport Sci 2017;3:65–79. 10.5281/zenodo.495725
    1. Lang JJ, Tremblay MS, Ortega FB, et al. . Review of criterion-referenced standards for cardiorespiratory fitness: what percentage of 1 142 026 international children and youth are apparently healthy? Br J Sports Med 2019;53:953–8. 10.1136/bjsports-2016-096955
    1. Ruiz JR, Cavero-Redondo I, Ortega FB, et al. . Cardiorespiratory fitness cut points to avoid cardiovascular disease risk in children and adolescents; what level of fitness should raise a red flag? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Sports Med 2016;50:1451–8. 10.1136/bjsports-2015-095903
    1. Tomkinson GR, Carver KD, Atkinson F, et al. . European normative values for physical fitness in children and adolescents aged 9-17 years: results from 2 779 165 Eurofit performances representing 30 countries. Br J Sports Med 2018;52:1445–56. 10.1136/bjsports-2017-098253
    1. Gaya A, Gaya A. Manual do Projeto Esporte Brasil PROESP-Br. Manual de testes e avaliação. UFRGS, 2016.
    1. Hernández Mosqueira CM, Fernandes Da Silva S, Fernandes Filho J. Tablas de referencia de condición física en niñas de 10 a 14 años de Chillan, Chile. Revista de Salud Pública 2015;17:667–76. 10.15446/rsap.v17n5.41674
    1. Ramos-Sepúlveda JA, Ramírez-Vélez R, Correa-Bautista JE, et al. . Physical fitness and anthropometric normative values among Colombian-Indian schoolchildren. BMC Public Health 2016;16:962–77. 10.1186/s12889-016-3652-2
    1. Hernández C, Hernández Caniuqueo D D, et al. . Tablas de referencia para aspectos antropométricos y de condición física en estudiantes varones chilenos de 10 a 14 años. Nutrición Hospitalaria 2016;33:1379–84.
    1. García-Hermoso A, Cofré-Bolados C, Andrade-Schnettler R, et al. . Normative reference values for handgrip strength in Chilean children at 8–12 years old using the empirical distribution and the lambda, mu, and sigma statistical methods. J Strength Cond Res 2021;35:260–6. 10.1519/JSC.0000000000002631
    1. Prieto-Benavides DH, García-Hermoso A, Izquierdo M, et al. . Cardiorespiratory fitness Cut-Points are related to body adiposity parameters in Latin American adolescents. Medicina 2019;55:508. 10.3390/medicina55090508
    1. Godoy-Cumillaf A, Bruneau-Chávez J, Fuentes-Merino P, et al. . Reference values for fitness level and gross motor skills of 4–6-Year-Old Chilean children. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2020;17:197. 10.3390/ijerph17030797
    1. Silva DAS, Christofaro DGD, Ferrari GLdeM, et al. . Results from Brazil's 2018 report card on physical activity for children and youth. J Phys Act Health 2018;15:S323–5. 10.1123/jpah.2018-0421
    1. Aguilar-Farias N, Miranda-Márquez S, Sadarangani KP, et al. . Results from Chile's 2018 report card on physical activity for children and youth. J Phys Act Health 2018;15:S331–2. 10.1123/jpah.2018-0553
    1. Andrade S, Ochoa-Avilés A, Freire W, et al. . Results from Ecuador's 2018 report card on physical activity for children and youth. J Phys Act Health 2018;15:S344–6. 10.1123/jpah.2018-0536
    1. González SA, Triana CA, Abaunza C, et al. . Results from Colombia's 2018 report card on physical activity for children and youth. J Phys Act Health 2018;15:S335–7. 10.1123/jpah.2018-0507
    1. Galaviz KI, Garcia GA, Gaytán-González A, et al. . Results from Mexico's 2018 report card on physical activity for children and youth. J Phys Act Health 2018;15:S384–5. 10.1123/jpah.2018-0462
    1. Brazo-Sayavera J, Del Campo C, Rodríguez MJ, et al. . Results from Uruguay's 2018 report card on physical activity for children and youth. J Phys Act Health 2018;15:S425–6. 10.1123/jpah.2018-0466
    1. Herrera-Cuenca M, Méndez-Pérez B, Landaeta-Jiménez M, et al. . Results from Venezuela's 2018 report card on physical activity for children and youth. J Phys Act Health 2018;15:S427–9. 10.1123/jpah.2018-0467
    1. Godoy-Cumillaf A, Fuentes-Merino P, Díaz-González A, et al. . The effects of physical activity and diet interventions on body mass index in Latin American children and adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Nutrients 2020;12:1378. 10.3390/nu12051378
    1. Moher D, Shamseer L, Clarke M, et al. . Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Syst Rev 2015;4:1. 10.1186/2046-4053-4-1
    1. Higgins J, Green S. Cochrane handbook for systematic review of interventions. Version 5.1.0. [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available: [Accessed 15 Sep 2020].
    1. Ma L-L, Wang Y-Y, Yang Z-H. Methodological quality (risk of bias) assessment tools for primary and secondary medical studies: what are they and which is better? Military Med Res 2020;7:7. 10.1186/s40779-020-00238-8

Source: PubMed

3
Subscribe