Telehealth Interventions Delivering Home-based Support Group Videoconferencing: Systematic Review

Annie Banbury, Susan Nancarrow, Jared Dart, Leonard Gray, Lynne Parkinson, Annie Banbury, Susan Nancarrow, Jared Dart, Leonard Gray, Lynne Parkinson

Abstract

Background: Group therapy and education and support sessions are used within health care across a range of disciplines such as chronic disease self-management and psychotherapy interventions. However, there are barriers that constrain group attendance, such as mobility, time, and distance. Using videoconferencing may overcome known barriers and improve the accessibility of group-based interventions.

Objective: The aim of this study was to review the literature to determine the feasibility, acceptability, effectiveness, and implementation of health professional-led group videoconferencing to provide education or social support or both, into the home setting.

Methods: Electronic databases were searched using predefined search terms for primary interventions for patient education and/or social support. The quality of studies was assessed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. We developed an analysis framework using hierarchical terms feasibility, acceptability, effectiveness, and implementation, which were informed by subheadings.

Results: Of the 1634 records identified, 17 were included in this review. Home-based groups by videoconferencing are feasible even for those with limited digital literacy. Overall acceptability was high with access from the home highly valued and little concern of privacy issues. Some participants reported preferring face-to-face groups. Good information technology (IT) support and training is required for facilitators and participants. Communication can be adapted for the Web environment and would be enhanced by clear communication strategies and protocols. A range of improved outcomes were reported but because of the heterogeneity of studies, comparison of these across studies was not possible. There was a trend for improvement in mental health outcomes. Benefits highlighted in the qualitative data included engaging with others with similar problems; improved accessibility to groups; and development of health knowledge, insights, and skills. Videoconference groups were able to replicate group processes such as bonding and cohesiveness. Similar outcomes were reported for those comparing face-to-face groups and videoconference groups.

Conclusions: Groups delivered by videoconference are feasible and potentially can improve the accessibility of group interventions. This may be particularly useful for those who live in rural areas, have limited mobility, are socially isolated, or fear meeting new people. Outcomes are similar to in-person groups, but future research on facilitation process in videoconferencing-mediated groups and large-scale studies are required to develop the evidence base.

Keywords: patient education as topic; review; social support; telemedicine; videoconferencing.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

©Annie Banbury, Susan Nancarrow, Jared Dart, Leonard Gray, Lynne Parkinson. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 02.02.2018.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study selection flow diagram.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Analysis framework. VC: videoconferencing; IT: information technology.

References

    1. Smith C, McNaughton DA, Meyer S. Client perceptions of group education in the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus in South Australia. Aust J Prim Health. 2016;22(4):360–367. doi: 10.1071/PY15008.
    1. Yalom I, Leszcz M. The Theory and Practice of Group Therapy. New York: The Perseus Books Group; 2005.
    1. Galinsky MJ, Schopler JH, Abell MD. Connecting group members through telephone and computer groups. Health Soc Work. 1997 Aug;22(3):181–8.
    1. Steinsbekk A, Rygg L, Lisulo M, Rise MB, Fretheim A. Group based diabetes self-management education compared to routine treatment for people with type 2 diabetes mellitus. A systematic review with meta-analysis. BMC Health Serv Res. 2012;12:213. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-12-213.
    1. Eysenbach G, Powell J, Englesakis M, Rizo C, Stern A. Health related virtual communities and electronic support groups: systematic review of the effects of online peer to peer interactions. Br Med J. 2004 May 15;328(7449):1166. doi: 10.1136/bmj.328.7449.1166.
    1. Griffiths KM, Calear AL, Banfield M. Systematic review on Internet Support Groups (ISGs) and depression (1): do ISGs reduce depressive symptoms? J Med Internet Res. 2009 Sep 30;11(3):e40. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1270.
    1. Chung JE. Social networking in online support groups for health: how online social networking benefits patients. J Health Commun. 2014;19(6):639–59. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2012.757396.
    1. Maher CA, Lewis LK, Ferrar K, Marshall S, De Bourdeaudhuij I, Vandelanotte C. Are health behavior change interventions that use online social networks effective? A systematic review. J Med Internet Res. 2014;16(2):e40. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2952.
    1. van der Zanden R, Kramer J, Gerrits R, Cuijpers P. Effectiveness of an online group course for depression in adolescents and young adults: a randomized trial. J Med Internet Res. 2012;14(3):e86. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2033.
    1. Shoebotham A, Coulson NS. Therapeutic affordances of online support group use in women with endometriosis. J Med Internet Res. 2016 May 09;18(5):e109. doi: 10.2196/jmir.5548.
    1. van Uden-Kraan CF, Drossaert CH, Taal E, Seydel ER, van de Laar MA. Self-reported differences in empowerment between lurkers and posters in online patient support groups. J Med Internet Res. 2008 Jun 30;10(2):e18. doi: 10.2196/jmir.992.
    1. Heinicke BE, Paxton SJ, McLean SA, Wertheim EH. Internet-delivered targeted group intervention for body dissatisfaction and disordered eating in adolescent girls: a randomized controlled trial. J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2007 Jun;35(3):379–91. doi: 10.1007/s10802-006-9097-9.
    1. Fatehi F, Armfield NR, Dimitrijevic M, Gray LC. Clinical applications of videoconferencing: a scoping review of the literature for the period 2002-2012. J Telemed Telecare. 2014 Oct;20(7):377–83. doi: 10.1177/1357633X14552385.
    1. Jaglal SB, Haroun VA, Salbach NM, Hawker G, Voth J, Lou W, Kontos P, Cameron JE, Cockerill R, Bereket T. Increasing access to chronic disease self-management programs in rural and remote communities using telehealth. Telemed J E Health. 2013 Jun;19(6):467–73. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2012.0197.
    1. Kearns JW, Bowerman D, Kemmis K, Izquierdo RE, Wade M, Weinstock RS. Group diabetes education administered through telemedicine: tools used and lessons learned. Telemed J E Health. 2012 Jun;18(5):347–53. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2011.0165.
    1. Taylor DM, Stone SD, Huijbregts MP. Remote participants' experiences with a group-based stroke self-management program using videoconference technology. Rural Remote Health. 2012;12:1947.
    1. Morland LA, Greene CJ, Rosen CS, Foy D, Reilly P, Shore J, He Q, Frueh BC. Telemedicine for anger management therapy in a rural population of combat veterans with posttraumatic stress disorder: a randomized noninferiority trial. J Clin Psychiatry. 2010 Jul;71(7):855–63. doi: 10.4088/JCP.09m05604blu.
    1. Frueh BC, Henderson S, Myrick H. Telehealth service delivery for persons with alcoholism. J Telemed Telecare. 2005;11(7):372–5. doi: 10.1258/135763305774472060.
    1. King VL, Stoller KB, Kidorf M, Kindbom K, Hursh S, Brady T, Brooner RK. Assessing the effectiveness of an Internet-based videoconferencing platform for delivering intensified substance abuse counseling. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2009 Apr;36(3):331–8. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2008.06.011.
    1. Johnson C, Feinglos M, Pereira K, Hassell N, Blascovich J, Nicollerat J, Beresford HF, Levy J, Vorderstrasse A. Feasibility and preliminary effects of a virtual environment for adults with type 2 diabetes: pilot study. JMIR Res Protoc. 2014;3(2):e23. doi: 10.2196/resprot.3045.
    1. Im E, Chang SJ, Chee W, Chee E. Attitudes of women in midlife to web-based interventions for promoting physical activity. J Telemed Telecare. 2012 Oct;18(7):419–22. doi: 10.1258/jtt.2012.120514.
    1. Kozlowski KA, Holmes CM. Experiences in online process groups: a qualitative study. JSGW. 2014 Aug 21;39(4):276–300. doi: 10.1080/01933922.2014.948235.
    1. Davis RM, Hitch AD, Salaam MM, Herman WH, Zimmer-Galler IE, Mayer-Davis EJ. TeleHealth improves diabetes self-management in an underserved community: diabetes TeleCare. Diabetes Care. 2010 Aug;33(8):1712–7. doi: 10.2337/dc09-1919.
    1. Marton K, Kanas N. Telehealth modalities for group therapy: comparisons to in-person group therapy. Int J Group Psychother. 2015 Dec 14;66(1):145–150. doi: 10.1080/00207284.2015.1096109.
    1. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Br Med J. 2009;339:b2535.
    1. Pluye P, Hong QN. Combining the power of stories and the power of numbers: mixed methods research and mixed studies reviews. Annu Rev Public Health. 2014;35:29–45. doi: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-032013-182440.
    1. National Collaborating Centre for Methods and Tools. Hamilton, ON: McMaster University; 2015. Mar 20, Appraising Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Studies included in Mixed Studies Reviews: The MMAT .
    1. Whitaker R, Hendry M, Booth A, Carter B, Charles J, Craine N, Edwards RT, Lyons M, Noyes J, Pasterfield D, Rycroft-Malone J, Williams N. Intervention Now To Eliminate Repeat Unintended Pregnancy in Teenagers (INTERUPT): a systematic review of intervention effectiveness and cost-effectiveness, qualitative and realist synthesis of implementation factors and user engagement. BMJ Open. 2014 Apr 10;4(4):e004733. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-004733.
    1. Renzi C, Whitaker KL, Wardle J. Over-reassurance and undersupport after a 'false alarm': a systematic review of the impact on subsequent cancer symptom attribution and help seeking. BMJ Open. 2015 Feb 04;5(2):e007002. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-007002.
    1. Dagenais C, Malo M, Robert E, Ouimet M, Berthelette D, Ridde V. Knowledge transfer on complex social interventions in public health: a scoping study. PLoS One. 2013;8(12):e80233. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0080233.
    1. Adamski T, Alfaro MW. Virtual psycho-educative support groups for caregivers of persons diagnosed with dementia. Caring. 2009 Aug;28(8):44–6.
    1. Austrom MG, Geros KN, Hemmerlein K, McGuire SM, Gao S, Brown SA, Callahan CM, Clark DO. Use of a multiparty web based videoconference support group for family caregivers: innovative practice. Dementia (London) 2015 Sep;14(5):682–90. doi: 10.1177/1471301214544338.
    1. Banbury A, Parkinson L, Nancarrow S, Dart J, Gray L, Buckley J. Multi-site videoconferencing for home-based education of older people with chronic conditions: the Telehealth Literacy Project. J Telemed Telecare. 2014 Oct;20(7):353–9. doi: 10.1177/1357633X14552369.
    1. Burkow TM, Vognild LK, Østengen G, Johnsen E, Risberg MJ, Bratvold A, Hagen T, Brattvoll M, Krogstad T, Hjalmarsen A. Internet-enabled pulmonary rehabilitation and diabetes education in group settings at home: a preliminary study of patient acceptability. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2013 Mar 05;13:33. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-13-33.
    1. Burkow TM, Vognild LK, Johnsen E, Risberg MJ, Bratvold A, Breivik E, Krogstad T, Hjalmarsen A. Comprehensive pulmonary rehabilitation in home-based online groups: a mixed method pilot study in COPD. BMC Res Notes. 2015 Dec 10;8:766. doi: 10.1186/s13104-015-1713-8.
    1. Damianakis T, Tough A, Marziali E, Dawson DR. Therapy online: a web-based video support group for family caregivers of survivors with traumatic brain injury. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2016;31(4):E12–20. doi: 10.1097/HTR.0000000000000178.
    1. Ehlers DK, Huberty JL, de Vreede G. Can an evidence-based book club intervention delivered via a tablet computer improve physical activity in middle-aged women? Telemed J E Health. 2015 Feb;21(2):125–31. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2013.0360.
    1. Khatri N, Marziali E, Tchernikov I, Shepherd N. Comparing telehealth-based and clinic-based group cognitive behavioral therapy for adults with depression and anxiety: a pilot study. Clin Interv Aging. 2014;9:765–70. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S57832. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S57832.
    1. Lundberg S. The results from a two-year case study of an information and communication technology support system for family caregivers. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2014 Jul;9(4):353–8. doi: 10.3109/17483107.2013.814170.
    1. Marziali E, Donahue P. Caring for others: internet video-conferencing group intervention for family caregivers of older adults with neurodegenerative disease. Gerontologist. 2006 Jun;46(3):398–403. doi: 10.1093/geront/46.3.398.
    1. Marziali E, Damianakis T, Donahue P. Internet-based clinical services: virtual support groups for family caregivers. J Technol Hum Serv. 2006;24(2-3):39–54. doi: 10.1300/J017v24n02_03.
    1. Marziali E. E-health program for patients with chronic disease. Telemed J E Health. 2009 Mar;15(2):176–81. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2008.0082.
    1. Marziali E, Garcia LJ. Dementia caregivers' responses to 2 Internet-based intervention programs. Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen. 2011 Feb;26(1):36–43. doi: 10.1177/1533317510387586.
    1. Nyström K, Ohrling K. Parental support: mothers' experience of electronic encounters. J Telemed Telecare. 2006;12(4):194–7. doi: 10.1258/135763306777488726.
    1. Nyström K, Ohrling K. Electronic encounters: fathers' experiences of parental support. J Telemed Telecare. 2008 Mar;14(2):71–4. doi: 10.1258/jtt.2007.070605.
    1. Tsaousides T, D'Antonio E, Varbanova V, Spielman L. Delivering group treatment via videoconference to individuals with traumatic brain injury: a feasibility study. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2014;24(5):784–803. doi: 10.1080/09602011.2014.907186.
    1. Wild B, Hünnemeyer K, Sauer H, Hain B, Mack I, Schellberg D, Müller-Stich BP, Weiner R, Meile T, Rudofsky G, Königsrainer A, Zipfel S, Herzog W, Teufel M. A 1-year videoconferencing-based psychoeducational group intervention following bariatric surgery: results of a randomized controlled study. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2015;11(6):1349–60. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2015.05.018.
    1. Hebert M. Telehealth success: evaluation framework development. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2001;84(Pt 2):1145–9.
    1. Fatehi F, Smith AC, Maeder A, Wade V, Gray LC. How to formulate research questions and design studies for telehealth assessment and evaluation. J Telemed Telecare. 2016 Oct 16;23(9):759–763. doi: 10.1177/1357633X16673274.
    1. Agboola S, Hale TM, Masters C, Kvedar J, Jethwani K. “Real-world” practical evaluation strategies: a review of telehealth evaluation. JMIR Res Protoc. 2014 Dec 17;3(4):e75. doi: 10.2196/resprot.3459.
    1. Glasgow RE, Vogt TM, Boles SM. Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions: the RE-AIM framework. Am J Public Health. 1999 Sep;89(9):1322–7.
    1. Edirippulige S, Martin-Khan M, Beattie E, Smith AC, Gray LC. A systematic review of telemedicine services for residents in long term care facilities. J Telemed Telecare. 2013 Apr;19(3):127–132. doi: 10.1177/1357633X13483256.
    1. Bowen DJ, Kreuter M, Spring B, Cofta-Woerpel L, Linnan L, Weiner D, Bakken S, Kaplan CP, Squiers L, Fabrizio C, Fernandez M. How we design feasibility studies. Am J Prev Med. 2009 May;36(5):452–7. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2009.02.002.
    1. Jennett PA, Affleck HL, Hailey D, Ohinmaa A, Anderson C, Thomas R, Young B, Lorenzetti D, Scott RE. The socio-economic impact of telehealth: a systematic review. J Telemed Telecare. 2003;9(6):311–20. doi: 10.1258/135763303771005207.
    1. Pluye P. mixedmethodsappraisaltoolpublic. 2016. Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool Public .
    1. Booth A, Papaioannou D, Sutton A. Systematic approaches to a successful literature review. London: SAGE Publications Ltd; 2012.
    1. Stewart AL, Hays RD, Ware JE. The MOS short-form general health survey: reliability and validity in a patient population. Med Care. 1988 Jul;26(7):724–35.
    1. Dickens AP, Richards SH, Greaves CJ, Campbell JL. Interventions targeting social isolation in older people: a systematic review. BMC Public Health. 2011 Aug 15;11:647. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-647.
    1. Deeks J, Higgins J, Altman D. handbook.cochrane. 2009. Mar 20, [2017-03-02]. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions .
    1. Song Y. “Bring Your Own Device (BYOD)” for seamless science inquiry in a primary school. Comput Educ. 2014 May;74:50–60. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2014.01.005.
    1. Jamieson-Proctor R, Redmond P, Zagami J, Albion P, Twining P. Redefining education for the digital age: a snapshot of the state of play in three Queensland schools. The ACEC2014 Now IT’s Personal; Australian Computers in Education Conference 2014; September 30 - October 3; Adelaide. 2014.
    1. Jang-Jaccard J, Nepal S, Celler B, Yan B. WebRTC-based video conferencing service for telehealth. Computing. 2014 Sep 25;98(1-2):169–193. doi: 10.1007/s00607-014-0429-2.
    1. Calvillo J, Román I, Roa LM. How technology is empowering patients? A literature review. Health Expect. 2013 May 28;18(5):643–52. doi: 10.1111/hex.12089.
    1. Essén A. The two facets of electronic care surveillance: an exploration of the views of older people who live with monitoring devices. Soc Sci Med. 2008 Jul;67(1):128–36. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.03.005.
    1. Sanders C, Rogers A, Bowen R, Bower P, Hirani S, Cartwright M, Fitzpatrick R, Knapp M, Barlow J, Hendy J, Chrysanthaki T, Bardsley M, Newman SP. Exploring barriers to participation and adoption of telehealth and telecare within the Whole System Demonstrator trial: a qualitative study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2012;12:220. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-12-220.
    1. Taylor S, Pinnock H, Epiphaniou E, Pearce G, Parke H, Schwappach A, Purushotham N, Jacob S, Griffiths CJ, Greenhalgh T, Sheikh A. A rapid synthesis of the evidence on interventions supporting self-management for people with long-term conditions: PRISMS - Practical systematic Review of Self-Management Support for long-term conditions. Health Services and Delivery Research. 2014;2(53):1–7. doi: 10.3310/hsdr02530.PMID:.
    1. Molyneaux H, O'Donnell S, Liu S, Hagerman V, Gibson K, Matthews B. National Research Council Canada. 2007. Mar 20, Good practice guidelines for participatory multi-site videoconferencing .
    1. Short J, Williams E, Christie B. The Social Psychology of Telecommunications. London: Wiley; 1976.
    1. Sellen A. Remote conversations: the effects of mediating talk with technology. HCI. 1995 Dec 1;10(4):401–444. doi: 10.1207/s15327051hci1004_2.
    1. Banbury A, Parkinson L, Nancarrow S, Dart J, Gray LC, Buckley J. Delivering patient education by group videoconferencing into the home: lessons learnt from the Telehealth Literacy Project. J Telemed Telecare. 2016 Dec;22(8):483–488. doi: 10.1177/1357633X16674359.
    1. Steel K, Cox D, Garry H. Therapeutic videoconferencing interventions for the treatment of long-term conditions. J Telemed Telecare. 2011;17(3):109–17. doi: 10.1258/jtt.2010.100318.
    1. Keating A, Lee A, Holland AE. What prevents people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease from attending pulmonary rehabilitation? A systematic review. Chron Respir Dis. 2011;8(2):89–99. doi: 10.1177/1479972310393756.
    1. Osborne RH, Batterham R, Livingston J. The evaluation of chronic disease self-management support across settings: the international experience of the health education impact questionnaire quality monitoring system. Nurs Clin North Am. 2011 Sep;46(3):255–70, v. doi: 10.1016/j.cnur.2011.05.010.
    1. Steptoe A, Shankar A, Demakakos P, Wardle J. Social isolation, loneliness, and all-cause mortality in older men and women. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Apr 9;110(15):5797–801. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1219686110.
    1. Cohen S, Wills TA. Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis. Psychol Bull. 1985 Sep;98(2):310–57.
    1. Davies A, Newman S. kingsfund. London: The Kings Fund; 2011. [2017-03-01]. Evaluating telecare and telehealth interventions, WSDAN Briefing Paper .
    1. Collie K, Kreshka MA, Ferrier S, Parsons R, Graddy K, Avram S, Mannell P, Chen XH, Perkins J, Koopman C. Videoconferencing for delivery of breast cancer support groups to women living in rural communities: a pilot study. Psychooncology. 2007 Aug;16(8):778–82. doi: 10.1002/pon.1145.
    1. Wild B, Hünnemeyer K, Sauer H, Schellberg D, Müller-Stich BP, Königsrainer A, Weiner R, Zipfel S, Herzog W, Teufel M. Sustained effects of a psychoeducational group intervention following bariatric surgery: follow-up of the randomized controlled BaSE study. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2017 Apr 01;13(9):1612–18. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2017.03.034.
    1. Chang JE, Sequeira A, McCord CE, Garney WR. Videoconference Grief Group counseling in rural Texas: outcomes, challenges, and lessons learned. JSGW. 2016 Mar 03;41(2):140–160. doi: 10.1080/01933922.2016.1146376.
    1. Rogers A, Kennedy A, Bower P, Gardner C, Gately C, Lee V, Reeves D, Richardson G. The United Kingdom Expert Patients Programme: results and implications from a national evaluation. Med J Aust. 2008 Nov 17;189(10 Suppl):S21–4.
    1. Chan KC, Chan DB. Targeting zero non-attendance in healthcare clinics. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2012;182:52–7.
    1. Hirani SP, Rixon L, Beynon M, Cartwright M, Cleanthous S, Selva A, Sanders C, Newman SP. Quantifying beliefs regarding telehealth: development of the Whole Systems Demonstrator Service User Technology Acceptability Questionnaire. J Telemed Telecare. 2017 May;23(4):460–469. doi: 10.1177/1357633X16649531.

Source: PubMed

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

3
Subscribe