Impact of a progressive stepped care approach in an improving access to psychological therapies service: An observational study

Lisa Boyd, Emma Baker, Joe Reilly, Lisa Boyd, Emma Baker, Joe Reilly

Abstract

England's national Improving Access to Psychological Therapies (IAPT) programme advocates stepped care as its organizational delivery of psychological therapies to common mental health problems. There is limited evidence regarding the efficacy of stepped care as a service delivery model, heterogeneity of definition and differences in model implementation in both research and routine practice, hence outcome comparison in terms of effectiveness of model is difficult. Despite sound evidence of the efficacy of low intensity interventions there appears to be a perpetuation of the notion that severity and complexity should only be treated by a high intensity intervention through the continuation of a stratified care model. Yet no psychotherapy treatment is found to be more superior to another, and not enough is known about what works for whom to aid the matching of treatment decision. In the absence of understanding precise treatment factors optimal for recovery, it may be useful to better understand the impact of a service delivery model, and whether different models achieve different outcomes. This study aims to contribute to the discussion regarding the stepped care definition and delivery, and explores the impact on clinical outcomes where different types of stepped care have been implemented within the same service. An observational cohort study analysed retrospective data (n = 16,723) over a 4 year period, in a single IAPT service, where delivery changed from one type of stepped care model to another. We compared the outcomes of treatment completers with a stratified care model and a progression care model. We also explored the assumption that patients who score severe on psychological measures, and therefore are potentially complex, would achieve better outcomes in a stratified model. Outcomes in each model type were compared, alongside baseline factor variables. A significant association was observed between a recovery outcome and model type, with patients 1.5 times more likely to recover in the progression delivery model. The potential implications are that with a progression stepped care model of service delivery, more patients can be treated with a lower intensity intervention, even with initial severe presentations, ensuring that only those that need high intensity CBT or equivalent are stepped up. This could provide services with an effective clinical model that is efficient and potentially more cost effective.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

References

    1. Department of Health. (2008). Improving access to psychological therapies (IAPT) commissioning toolkit. Department of Health. Retrieved from
    1. Layard R. (2006). The depression report: A new deal for depression and anxiety disorders. Centre for Economic Performance, LSE; retrieved from
    1. Layard R. Clark D. Knapp M. & Mayraz G. (2007) Cost-benefit analysis of psychological therapy. National Institute Economic Review. October 1;202(1):90–8.
    1. Bower P., Kontopantelis E., Sutton A., Kendrick T., Richards D. A., Gilbody S., & & Meyer B. (2013). Influence of initial severity of depression on effectiveness of low intensity interventions: meta-analysis of individual patient data. Bmj, 346, f540 10.1136/bmj.f540
    1. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) (2011)common mental health disorders identification and pathways to care retrieved from
    1. National Collaborating Centre for Mental Health. (2018). The improving access to psychological therapies manual. Retrieved from
    1. Bower P., & Gilbody S. (2005). Stepped care in psychological therapies: access, effectiveness and efficiency: narrative literature review. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 186(1), 11–17. 10.1192/bjp.186.1.11
    1. Richards D. A., Bower P., Pagel C., Weaver A., Utley M., Cape J., & & Owens L. (2012). Delivering stepped care: an analysis of implementation in routine practice. Implementation Science, 7(1), 3 10.1186/1748-5908-7-3
    1. van Straten A., Hill J., Richards D. A., & Cuijpers P. (2015). Stepped care treatment delivery for depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychological medicine, 45(2), 231–246. 10.1017/S0033291714000701
    1. Firth N., Barkham M., & Kellett S. (2015). The clinical effectiveness of stepped care systems for depression in working age adults: a systematic review. Journal of Affective Disorders, 170, 119–130. 10.1016/j.jad.2014.08.030
    1. Chan S. W., & Adams M. (2014). Service use, drop-out rate and clinical outcomes: a comparison between high and low intensity treatments in an IAPT Service. Behavioural and cognitive psychotherapy, 42(6), 747–759. 10.1017/S1352465813000544
    1. Vaillancourt K., Manley J., & McNulty N. (2015). Why has our recovery rate dropped? An audit examining waiting times, starting scores and length of treatment in relation to recovery within an IAPT service. The Cognitive Behaviour Therapist, 8 10.1017/S1754470X15000148
    1. Barth J., Munder T., Gerger H., Nüesch E., Trelle S., Znoj H., & & Cuijpers P. (2013). Comparative efficacy of seven psychotherapeutic interventions for patients with depression: a network meta-analysis. Focus, 14(2), 229–243. 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001454
    1. Department of Health. (2011). Improving access to psychological therapies (IAPT) The IAPT Data Handbook. Department of Health; Retrieved from
    1. Gyani A., Shafran R., Layard R., & Clark D. M. (2013). Enhancing recovery rates: lessons from year one of IAPT. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 51(9), 597–606. 10.1016/j.brat.2013.06.004
    1. Kroenke K., Spitzer R. L., & Williams J. B. (2001). The PHQ‐9: validity of a brief depression severity measure. Journal of general internal medicine, 16(9), 606–613. 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016009606.x
    1. Spitzer R. L., Kroenke K., Williams J. B., & Löwe B. (2006). A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder: the GAD-7. Archives of internal medicine, 166(10), 1092–1097. 10.1001/archinte.166.10.1092
    1. NHS Digital. (2014). Psychological Therapies, Annual Report on the use of IAPT services: England– 2013/14 Experimental Statistics. retrieved from
    1. Van Straten A., Tiemens B., Hakkaart L., Nolen W. A., & Donker M. C. H. (2006). Stepped care vs. matched care for mood and anxiety disorders: a randomized trial in routine practice. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 113(6), 468–476. 10.1111/j.1600-0447.2005.00731.x
    1. Richards D. A., Ekers D., McMillan D., Taylor R. S., Byford S., Warren F. C., & & H. (2016). Cost and Outcome of Behavioural Activation versus Cognitive Behavioural Therapy for Depression (COBRA): a randomised, controlled, non-inferiority trial. The Lancet, 388(10047), 871–880. 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31140-0

Source: PubMed

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

3
Subscribe