Adherence of popular smoking cessation mobile applications to evidence-based guidelines

Nikita B Rajani, Dominik Weth, Nikolaos Mastellos, Filippos T Filippidis, Nikita B Rajani, Dominik Weth, Nikolaos Mastellos, Filippos T Filippidis

Abstract

Background: Smoking remains one of the major preventable causes of chronic diseases. Considering the promising evidence on the effectiveness of mobile technology for health behaviour change, along with the increasing adoption of smartphones, this review aims to systematically assess the adherence of popular mobile apps for smoking cessation to evidence-based guidelines.

Methods: The United Kingdom Android and iOS markets were searched in February 2018 to identify smoking cessation apps. After screening, 125 Android and 15 iOS apps were tested independently by two reviewers for adherence to the National Institute of Care and Excellence (NICE) Smoking Cessation Guidelines for Self-Help Materials and the Five A Guidelines for Smoking Cessation. Pearson chi square tests were run to examine differences between the two operating systems.

Results: A majority of apps across both operating systems had low adherence (fulfils 1-2 out of 5 guidelines) to the Five A Guidelines (65.7%) and low adherence (fulfils 1-3 out of 9 guidelines) to the NICE Smoking Cessation Guidelines for Self-Help Materials (63.6%). Only 15% of mobile apps provided information about the benefits of nicotine replacement therapy (NRT), and even fewer provided information regarding types of NRT products (7.1%) or how to use them (2.1%). In addition, only a minority of apps arrange follow-up appointments or provide additional support to help smokers quit.

Conclusion: Similar to previous mobile app reviews dating back to 2014, our findings show that most mobile apps do not follow existing smoking cessation treatment guidelines, indicating little change regarding the availability of evidence-based mobile apps for smoking cessation in the UK market. Smokers seeking to quit, tobacco control policy makers and software developers need to work together to develop apps that are in line with the latest clinical guidelines and strategies to maximise effectiveness.

Keywords: Cessation guidelines; Mobile applications; Smoking cessation; mHealth.

Conflict of interest statement

Filippos Filippidis is an Associate Editor for BMC Public Health. The rest of the authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

    1. World Health Organisation. (2015) Prevalence of tobacco smoking. Available from:
    1. Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation. (2016) United Kingdom. Available from: (accessed 7th Sept 2018).
    1. Public Health England. (2015) Health matters: smoking and quitting in England. Available from: (accessed 7th Sept 2018).
    1. Hughes JR, Keely J, Naud S. Shape of the relapse curve and long-term abstinence among untreated smokers. Addiction. 2004;99(1):29–38. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2004.00540.x.
    1. Regmi K, Kassim N, Ahmad N, et al. Effectiveness of Mobile apps for smoking cessation: Α review. Tobacco Prevention & Cessation. 2017;3(12):1–11.
    1. Whittaker R, McRobbie H, Bullen C, et al. Mobile phone-based interventions for smoking cessation. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2016;(4):Cd006611.
    1. Zeng EY, Vilardaga R, Heffner JL, et al. Predictors of utilization of a novel smoking cessation smartphone App. Telemed J E Health. 2015;21(12):998–1004. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2014.0232.
    1. Bricker JB, Copeland W, Mull KE, et al. Single-arm trial of the second version of an acceptance and commitment therapy smartphone application for smoking cessation. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2017;170:37–42. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2016.10.029.
    1. Ahmed I, Ahmad NS, Ali S, et al. Medical adherence apps: review and content analysis. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2018;6(3):e62. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.6432.
    1. Hoeppner Bettina B., Hoeppner Susanne S., Seaboyer Lourah, Schick Melissa R., Wu Gwyneth W. Y., Bergman Brandon G., Kelly John F. How Smart are Smartphone Apps for Smoking Cessation? A Content Analysis. Nicotine & Tobacco Research. 2015;18(5):1025–1031. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntv117.
    1. Abroms LC, Lee Westmaas J, Bontemps-Jones J, et al. A content analysis of popular smartphone apps for smoking cessation. Am J Prev Med. 2013;45(6):732–736. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2013.07.008.
    1. Choi J, Noh GY, Park DJ. Smoking cessation apps for smartphones: content analysis with the self-determination theory. J Med Internet Res. 2014;16(2):e44. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3061.
    1. Thornton L, Quinn C, Birrell L, et al. Free smoking cessation mobile apps available in Australia: a quality review and content analysis. Aust NZ J Public Health. 2017;41(6):1–6. doi: 10.1111/1753-6405.12688.
    1. Bennett ME, Toffey K, Dickerson F, et al. A review of android apps for smoking cessation. J Smok Cessat. 2015;10(2):106–115. doi: 10.1017/jsc.2014.1.
    1. Ubhi KH, Kotz D, Michie S, et al. Comparative analysis of smoking cessation smartphone applications available in 2012 versus 2014. Addict Behav. 2016;58:175–181. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2016.02.026.
    1. Ubhi KH, Michie S, Kotz D, et al. Characterising smoking cessation smartphone applications in terms of behaviour change techniques, engagement and ease-of-use features. Transl Behav Med. 2016;6(3):410–417. doi: 10.1007/s13142-015-0352-x.
    1. Statista: The Statistics Portal. (2018) Technology & Telecommunications. Global mobile OS market share in sales to end users from 1st quarter 2009 to 2nd quarter 2017. Available from: (accessed 8th Sept 2018).
    1. Smith, A. (2013) Smartphone ownership – 2013 update. Pew Research Center. Available from: . (accessed 8th Sept 2018).
    1. Hiscock R, Bauld L, Amos A, Platt S. Smoking and socioeconomic status in England: the rise of the never smoker and the disadvantaged smoker. J Public Health (Oxf) 2012;34(3):390–396. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fds012.
    1. Hiscock R, Dobbie F, Bauld L. Smoking cessation and socioeconomic status: an update of existing evidence from a National Evaluation of English stop smoking services. Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:1–10. doi: 10.1155/2015/274056.
    1. National Institute of Care and Excellence. (2013) Smoking: harm reduction. Available from: (accessed 7th Sept 2018).
    1. App Market API [Internet]. Available from: (accessed 19th Feb 2018).
    1. Azar KM, Lesser LI, Laing BY, et al. Mobile applications for weight management: theory-based content analysis. Am J Prev Med. 2013;45(5):583–589. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2013.07.005.
    1. Breton ER, Fuemmeler BF, Abroms LC. Weight loss—there is an app for that! But does it adhere to evidence-informed practices? Transl Behav Med. 2011;1(4):523–529. doi: 10.1007/s13142-011-0076-5.
    1. Cowan LT, Van Wagenen SA, Brown BA, et al. Apps of steel: are exercise apps providing consumers with realistic expectations? A content analysis of exercise apps for presence of behavior change theory. Health Educ Behav. 2013;40(2):133–139. doi: 10.1177/1090198112452126.
    1. Perski O, Blandford A, Ubhi HK, et al. Smokers' and drinkers' choice of smartphone applications and expectations of engagement: a think aloud and interview study. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making. 2017;17(1):17–25. doi: 10.1186/s12911-017-0422-8.
    1. Harman M, Jia Y, Zhang Y. 9th IEEE working conference on mining software repositories. Available from. 2012. App store mining and analysis: MSR for app stores.
    1. Finkelstein Anthony, Harman Mark, Jia Yue, Martin William, Sarro Federica, Zhang Yuanyuan. Investigating the relationship between price, rating, and popularity in the Blackberry World App Store. Information and Software Technology. 2017;87:119–139. doi: 10.1016/j.infsof.2017.03.002.
    1. Barnes J, Dong CY, McRobbie H, et al. Hypnotherapy for smoking cessation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010(10). Available from: 10.1002/14651858.CD001008.pub2/full (accessed 14th Mar 2019).
    1. World Health Organisation. (2014) Toolkit for delivering the 5A's and 5R's brief tobacco interventions in primary care. Geneva. Available from: (accessed 8th Sept 2018).
    1. Hoeppner B, Hoeppner S, Seaboyer L, et al. How smart are smartphone apps for smoking cessation? A content analysis. Nicotine Tobacco Res. 2016;18(5):1025–1031. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntv117.
    1. Hartmann-Boyce J, Chepkin SC, Ye W, et al. Nicotine replacement therapy versus control for smoking cessation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. (2018, 5):Cd000146.
    1. Arigo D, Jake-Schoffman DE, Wolin K, et al. The history and future of digital health in the field of behavioral medicine. J Behav Med. 2019;42(1):67–83. doi: 10.1007/s10865-018-9966-z.
    1. National Health Service. (2019) Digital Assessment Questions. Available from: (accessed 5th Mar 2019).
    1. Filippidis FT, Laverty AA, Mons U, et al. Changes in smoking cessation assistance in the European Union between 2012 and 2017: pharmacotherapy versus counselling versus e-cigarettes. Tob Control 2018;0:1–6. (accessed 5 Sept 2018).
    1. Ubhi HK, Kotz D, Michie S, et al. A comparison of the characteristics of iOS and android users of a smoking cessation app. Transl Behav Med. 2017;7(2):166–171. doi: 10.1007/s13142-016-0455-z.
    1. Caro-Alvaro S, Garcia-Lopez E, Garcia-Cabot A, et al. A systematic evaluation of Mobile applications for instant messaging on iOS devices. Mob Inf Syst. 2017;2017:17.

Source: PubMed

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

3
Subscribe