Mosaic vs. Single Image Analysis with Confocal Microscopy of the Corneal Nerve Plexus for Diagnosis of Early Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy

Aleksandra Matuszewska-Iwanicka, Bernd Stratmann, Oliver Stachs, Stephan Allgeier, Andreas Bartschat, Karsten Winter, Rudolf Guthoff, Diethelm Tschoepe, Hans-Joachim Hettlich, Aleksandra Matuszewska-Iwanicka, Bernd Stratmann, Oliver Stachs, Stephan Allgeier, Andreas Bartschat, Karsten Winter, Rudolf Guthoff, Diethelm Tschoepe, Hans-Joachim Hettlich

Abstract

Introduction: The assessment of the corneal nerve fibre plexus with corneal confocal microscopy (CCM) is an upcoming but still experimental method in the diagnosis of early stage diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN). Using an innovative imaging technique-Heidelberg Retina Tomograph equipped with the Rostock Cornea Module (HRT-RCM) and EyeGuidance module (EG)-we were able to look at greater areas of subbasal nerve plexus (SNP) in order to increase the diagnostic accuracy. The aim of our study was to evaluate the usefulness of EG instead of single image analysis in diagnosis of early stage DPN.

Methods: This prospective study was performed on 60 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, classified equally into two subgroups based on neuropathy deficient score (NDS): patients without DPN (group 1) or with mild DPN (group 2). The following parameters were analysed in the two subgroups: corneal nerve fibre length (CNFL; mm/mm2), corneal nerve fibre density (CNFD; no./mm2), corneal nerve branch density (CNBD; no./mm2). Furthermore, we compared the data calculated with the novel mosaic, EG-based method with those received from single image analysis using different quantification tools.

Results: Using EG we did not find a significant difference between group 1 and group 2: CNFL (16.81 ± 5.87 mm/mm2 vs. 17.19 ± 7.19 mm/mm2, p = 0.895), CNFD (254.05 ± 115.36 no./mm2 vs. 265.91 ± 161.63 no./mm2, p = 0.732) and CNBD (102.68 ± 62.28 no./mm2 vs. 115.38 ± 96.91 no./mm2, p = 0.541). No significant difference between the EG method of analysing the SNP and the single image analysis of 10 images per patient was detected.

Conclusion: On the basis of our results it was not possible to differentiate between early stages of large nerve fibre DPN in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus via SNP analysis. To improve sensitivity and specificity of this method newer technologies are under current evaluation.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT05326958.

Keywords: Corneal subbasal nerve plexus; Diabetic neuropathy; EyeGuidance; In vivo corneal confocal microscopy.

© 2022. The Author(s).

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Segmentation of nerve fibres from CCM image. Example of three steps from the initial confocal corneal microscopy (CCM) image (from Winter et al. [9]). a Via the segmented nerve fibre network, b to pixel classification, c as a prerequisite to calculate nerve fibre parameters
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Acquired CCM image of subbasal nerve plexus from a patient with T2DM with NDS = 4; a HRT-RCM image with EyeGuidance; b original single CCM image (0.16 mm2)

References

    1. Heidemann C, Du Y, Scheidt-Nave C. Diabetes mellitus in Deutschland. 2011. Hrsg. Robert Koch-Institut Berlin GBE kompakt 2(3) (Stand: 06.05.2011). 10.25646/3019
    1. Young M, Boulton AJM, Macleod AF, Williams DRR, Sonksen PH. A multicentre study of the prevalence of diabetic peripheral neuropathy in the United Kingdom hospital clinic population. Diabetologia. 1993;36(2):150–154. doi: 10.1007/bf00400697.
    1. Ziegler D, Strom A, Lobmann R, Reiners K, Rett K, Schnell O. High prevalence of diagnosed and undiagnosed polyneuropathy in subjects with and without diabetes participating in a nationwide educational initiative (PROTECT study) J Diabetes Complications. 2015;29(8):998–1002. doi: 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2015.09.008.
    1. Boulton AJ, Vinik AI, Arezzo JC, et al. Diabetic neuropathies: a statement by the American Diabetes Association. Diabetes Care. 2005;28(4):956–962. doi: 10.2337/diacare.28.4.956.
    1. Tesfaye S, Selvarajah D. Advances in the epidemiology, pathogenesis and management of diabetic peripheral neuropathy. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2012;28:8–14. doi: 10.1002/dmrr.2239.
    1. Quattrini C, Tavakoli M, Jeziorska M, et al. Surrogate markers of small fiber damage in human diabetic neuropathy. Diabetes. 2007;56(8):2148–2154. doi: 10.2337/db07-0285.
    1. Tesfaye S, Vileikyte L, Rayman G, et al. Painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy: consensus recommendations on diagnosis, assessment and management. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2011;27(7):629–638. doi: 10.1002/dmrr.1225.
    1. Marfurt CF, Cox J, Deek S, Dvorscak L. Anatomy of the human corneal innervation. Exp Eye Res. 2010;90(4):478–492. doi: 10.1016/j.exer.2009.12.010.
    1. Winter K, Scheibe P, Guthoff RF, Allgeier S, Stachs O. Morphometrische Charakterisierung des subbasalen Nervenplexus. Ophthalmologe. 2017;114(7):608–616. doi: 10.1007/s00347-017-0465-3.
    1. Köhler B, Allgeier S, Bartschat A, et al. In-vivo-Bildgebung des kornealen Nervenplexus. Ophthalmologe. 2017;114(7):601–607. doi: 10.1007/s00347-017-0464-4.
    1. Sumner CJ, Sheth S, Griffin JW, Cornblath DR, Polydefkis M. The spectrum of neuropathy in diabetes and impaired glucose tolerance. Neurology. 2003;60(1):108–111. doi: 10.1212/wnl.60.1.108.
    1. Kalteniece A, Ferdousi M, Petropoulos I, et al. Greater corneal nerve loss at the inferior whorl is related to the presence of diabetic neuropathy and painful diabetic neuropathy. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):3283. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-21643-z.
    1. Ziegler D, Papanas N, Zhivov A, et al. Early detection of nerve fiber loss by corneal confocal microscopy and skin biopsy in recently diagnosed type 2 diabetes. Diabetes. 2014;63(7):2454–2463. doi: 10.2337/db13-1819.
    1. Ahmed A, Bril V, Orszag A, et al. Detection of diabetic sensorimotor polyneuropathy by corneal confocal microscopy in type 1 diabetes: a concurrent validity study. Diabetes Care. 2012;35(4):821–828. doi: 10.2337/dc11-1396.
    1. Petropoulos IN, Alam U, Fadavi H, et al. Corneal nerve loss detected with corneal confocal microscopy is symmetrical and related to the severity of diabetic polyneuropathy. Diabetes Care. 2013;36(11):3646–3651. doi: 10.2337/dc13-0193.
    1. Malik RA, Kallinikos P, Abbott CA, et al. Corneal confocal microscopy: a non-invasive surrogate of nerve fibre damage and repair in diabetic patients. Diabetologia. 2003;46(5):683–688. doi: 10.1007/s00125-003-1086-8.
    1. De Clerck EE, Schouten JS, Berendschot TT, et al. New ophthalmologic imaging techniques for detection and monitoring of neurodegenerative changes in diabetes: a systematic review. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2015;3(8):653–663. doi: 10.1016/s2213-8587(15)00136-9.
    1. Jiang M-S, Yuan Y, Gu ZX, Zhuang SL. Corneal confocal microscopy for assessment of diabetic peripheral neuropathy: a meta-analysis. Br J Ophthalmol. 2016;100(1):9–14. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2014-306038.
    1. Allgeier S, Maier S, Mikut R, et al. Mosaicking the subbasal nerve plexus by guided eye movements. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2014;55(9):6082–6089. doi: 10.1167/iovs.14-14698.
    1. Köhler B, Bretthauer G, Guthoff RF, et al. EyeGuidance–a computer controlled system to guide eye movements. Curr Dir Biomed Eng. 2016;2(1):433–436. doi: 10.1515/cdbme-2016-0096.
    1. Winter K, Scheibe P, Köhler B, Allgeier S, Guthoff RF, Stachs O. Local variability of parameters for characterization of the corneal subbasal nerve plexus. Curr Eye Res. 2016;41(2):186–198. doi: 10.3109/02713683.2015.1010686.
    1. Allgeier S, Winter K, Bretthauer G, et al. A novel approach to analyze the progression of measured corneal sub-basal nerve fiber length in continuously expanding mosaic images. Curr Eye Res. 2017;42(4):549–556. doi: 10.1080/02713683.2016.1221977.
    1. Tavakoli M, Kallinikos P, Iqbal A, et al. Corneal confocal microscopy detects improvement in corneal nerve morphology with an improvement in risk factors for diabetic neuropathy. Diabet Med. 2011;28(10):1261–1267. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2011.03372.x.
    1. Tavakoli M, Mitu-Pretorian M, Petropoulos IN, et al. Corneal confocal microscopy detects early nerve regeneration in diabetic neuropathy after simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplantation. Diabetes. 2013;62(1):254–260. doi: 10.2337/db12-0574.
    1. Tavakoli M, Quattrini C, Abbott C, et al. Corneal confocal microscopy: a novel noninvasive test to diagnose and stratify the severity of human diabetic neuropathy. Diabetes Care. 2010;33(8):1792–1797. doi: 10.2337/dc10-0253.
    1. De Cilla S, Ranno S, Carini E, et al. Corneal subbasal nerves changes in patients with diabetic retinopathy: an in vivo confocal study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2009;50(11):5155–5158. doi: 10.1167/iovs.09-3384.
    1. Grupcheva CN, Wong T, Riley AF, McGhee CN. Assessing the sub-basal nerve plexus of the living healthy human cornea by in vivo confocal microscopy. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2002;30(3):187–190. doi: 10.1046/j.1442-9071.2002.00507.x.
    1. Rosenberg ME, Tervo TM, Immonen IJ, Müller LJ, Grönhagen-Riska C, Vesaluoma MH. Corneal structure and sensitivity in type 1 diabetes mellitus. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2000;41(10):2915–2921.
    1. Vagenas D, Pritchard N, Edwards K, et al. Optimal image sample size for corneal nerve morphometry. Optom Vis Sci. 2012;89(5):812–817. doi: 10.1097/opx.0b013e31824ee8c9.
    1. Dabbah MA, Graham J, Petropoulos IN, Tavakoli M, Malik RA. Automatic analysis of diabetic peripheral neuropathy using multi-scale quantitative morphology of nerve fibres in corneal confocal microscopy imaging. Med Image Anal. 2011;15(5):738–747. doi: 10.1016/j.media.2011.05.016.
    1. Dehghani C, Pritchard N, Edwards K, Russell AW, Malik RA, Efron N. Fully automated, semiautomated, and manual morphometric analysis of corneal subbasal nerve plexus in individuals with and without diabetes. Cornea. 2014;33(7):696–702. doi: 10.1097/ico.0000000000000152.
    1. Dabbah MA, Graham J, Petropoulos I, Tavakoli M, Malik RA. Dual-model automatic detection of nerve-fibres in corneal confocal microscopy images. Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv. 2010;13(Pt 1):300–307. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-15705-9_37.
    1. Chen X, Graham J, Dabbah MA, Petropoulos IN, Tavakoli M, Malik RA. An automatic tool for quantification of nerve fibers in corneal confocal microscopy images. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2016;64(4):786–794. doi: 10.1109/tbme.2016.2573642.
    1. Kalteniece A, Ferdousi M, Adam S, et al. Corneal confocal microscopy is a rapid reproducible ophthalmic technique for quantifying corneal nerve abnormalities. PLoS ONE. 2017;12(8):e0183040. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0183040.
    1. Azmi S, Ferdousi M, Petropoulos IN, et al. Corneal confocal microscopy identifies small-fiber neuropathy in subjects with impaired glucose tolerance who develop type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2015;38(8):1502–1508. doi: 10.2337/dc14-2733.
    1. Efron N. The Glenn A. Fry award lecture 2010: Ophthalmic markers of diabetic neuropathy. Optom Vis Sci. 2011;88(6):661–683. doi: 10.1097/opx.0b013e3182171020.
    1. Alam U, Jeziorska M, Petropoulos IN, et al. Diagnostic utility of corneal confocal microscopy and intra-epidermal nerve fibre density in diabetic neuropathy. PLoS ONE. 2017;12(7):e0180175. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0180175.
    1. Tavakoli M, Petropoulos IN, Malik RA. Corneal confocal microscopy to assess diabetic neuropathy: an eye on the foot. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2013;7(5):1179–1189. doi: 10.1177/193229681300700509.
    1. Edwards K, Pritchard N, Vagenas D, Russell A, Malik RA, Efron N. Utility of corneal confocal microscopy for assessing mild diabetic neuropathy: baseline findings of the LANDMark study. Clin Exp Optom. 2012;95(3):348–354. doi: 10.1111/j.1444-0938.2012.00740.x.
    1. Efron N, Edwards K, Roper N, et al. Repeatability of measuring corneal subbasal nerve fiber length in individuals with type 2 diabetes. Eye Contact Lens. 2010;36(5):245–248. doi: 10.1097/icl.0b013e3181eea915.
    1. Hertz P, Bril V, Orszag A, et al. Reproducibility of in vivo corneal confocal microscopy as a novel screening test for early diabetic sensorimotor polyneuropathy. Diabet Med. 2011;28(10):1253–1260. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2011.03299.x.
    1. Petropoulos IN, Ponirakis G, Khan A, et al. Corneal confocal microscopy: ready for prime time. Clin Exp Optom. 2020;103(3):265–277. doi: 10.1111/cxo.12887.
    1. Kalteniece A, Ferdousi M, Azmi S, et al. Corneal confocal microscopy detects small nerve fibre damage in patients with painful diabetic neuropathy. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):1–9. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-60422-7.
    1. Azmi S, Jeziorska M, Ferdousi M, et al. Early nerve fibre regeneration in individuals with type 1 diabetes after simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplantation. Diabetologia. 2019;62(8):1478–1487. doi: 10.1007/s00125-019-4897-y.
    1. Ponirakis G, Abdul-Ghani MA, Jayyousi A, et al. Effect of treatment with exenatide and pioglitazone or basal-bolus insulin on diabetic neuropathy: a substudy of the Qatar Study. BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2020 doi: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2020-001420.
    1. Lagali NS, Allgeier S, Guimaraes P, et al. Wide-field corneal subbasal nerve plexus mosaics in age-controlled healthy and type 2 diabetes populations. Sci Data. 2018;5(1):1–12. doi: 10.1038/sdata.2018.75.
    1. Allgeier S, Bartschat A, Bohn S, et al. 3D confocal laser-scanning microscopy for large-area imaging of the corneal subbasal nerve plexus. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):1–10. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-25915-6.
    1. Lagali NS, Allgeier S, Guimaraes P, et al. Reduced corneal nerve fiber density in type 2 diabetes by wide-area mosaic analysis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2017;58(14):6318–6327. doi: 10.1167/iovs.17-22257.
    1. Stem MS, Hussain M, Lentz SI, et al. Differential reduction in corneal nerve fiber length in patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes mellitus. J Diabetes Complications. 2014;28(5):658–661. doi: 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2014.06.007.
    1. Ferdousi M, Kalteniece A, Azmi S, et al. Diagnosis of neuropathy and risk factors for corneal nerve loss in type 1 and type 2 diabetes: a corneal confocal microscopy study. Diabetes Care. 2021;44(1):150–156. doi: 10.2337/dc20-1482.
    1. Kheirkhah A, Muller R, Mikolajczak J, et al. Comparison of standard versus wide-field composite images of the corneal subbasal layer by in vivo confocal microscopy. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2015;56(10):5801–5807. doi: 10.1167/iovs.15-17434.

Source: PubMed

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

3
Subscribe