Stroke motor recovery: active neuromuscular stimulation and repetitive practice schedules
J H Cauraugh, S B Kim, J H Cauraugh, S B Kim
Abstract
Objective: To investigate progress toward motor recovery in patients with chronic hemiparesis (mean time since stroke 3.2 years), comparing different types of practice schedules.
Design: To increase voluntary control of the upper extremity, active neuromuscular stimulation was administered during blocked and random practice schedules as patients performed three specific movements: wrist/finger extension, elbow joint extension, and shoulder joint abduction.
Methods: 34 stroke subjects volunteered to participate and were randomly assigned to one of three treatment groups: blocked practice (the same movement was repetitively performed on successive trials) combined with active neuromuscular stimulation; random practice (different movements on successive trials) along with active stimulation; or no active stimulation assistance control group. Subjects completed two days of 90 minute training for each of two weeks with at least 24 hours of rest between sessions. A session was three sets of 30 successful active neuromuscular stimulation trials with the three movements executed 10 times/set.
Results: Mixed design analyses on three categories of behavioural measures indicated motor improvements for the blocked and random practice/stimulation groups in comparison with the control group during the post-test period, with a larger number of blocks moved, faster premotor and motor reaction times, and less variability in the sustained muscular contraction task.
Conclusions: Upper extremity rehabilitation intervention of active stimulation and blocked practice performed as well as stimulation/random practice. Moreover, these purposeful voluntary movement findings support and extend sensorimotor integration theory to both practice schedules.
References
- Neuropharmacology. 2000 Mar 3;39(5):842-51
- Stroke. 2000 Jun;31(6):1360-4
- Eur J Appl Physiol. 2000 Aug;82(5-6):418-24
- Stat Med. 2000 Dec 15;19(23):3275-89
- J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2001 Apr;27(2):423-37
- BMJ. 2001 Aug 25;323(7310):446-7
- Brain Res Brain Res Rev. 2001 Oct;36(2-3):169-74
- Muscle Nerve. 2002 Apr;25(4):568-75
- Stroke. 2002 Jun;33(6):1589-94
- Arch Neurol. 2002 Aug;59(8):1278-82
- J Neurol Sci. 2003 Mar 15;207(1-2):25-9
- Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2002 Jun;16(2):211-7
- J Exp Psychol. 1966 Jan;71(1):9-15
- Am J Occup Ther. 1985 Jun;39(6):386-91
- J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 1998 Oct;8(5):279-85
- J Gerontol. 1965 Jan;20:60-4
Source: PubMed