Evaluation of the pharmacokinetics and food effects of a novel formulation tamsulosin 0.4 mg capsule compared with a 0.2 mg capsule in healthy male volunteers

Mu Seong Ban, Yu Kyong Kim, Byungwook Kim, Jina Jung, Yong-Il Kim, Jaeseong Oh, Kyung-Sang Yu, Mu Seong Ban, Yu Kyong Kim, Byungwook Kim, Jina Jung, Yong-Il Kim, Jaeseong Oh, Kyung-Sang Yu

Abstract

Tamsulosin, an alpha-1 adrenoreceptor antagonist, has been used as a primary option for medical treatment of benign prostate hyperplasia. An open-label, single-dose, randomized, three-treatment, three-period, three sequence crossover study was conducted to evaluate the pharmacokinetics (PKs) of 0.2 and 0.4 mg tamsulosin hydrochloride (HCl) in the fed versus the fasted state. Subjects were randomly assigned to three sequences and received one of the following treatments at each period: tamsulosin HCl 0.2 or 0.4 mg in the fed state with a high-fat meal, or tamsulosin HCl 0.4 mg in the fasted state. Blood samples for the PK analysis were collected at pre-dose and up to 48 h post-dose. The PK parameters were calculated by a non-compartmental method. The geometric mean ratio (GMR) and its 90% confidence intervals (CIs) of the plasma maximum concentration (Cmax) and area under concentration curve from time zero to last measurable concentration (AUClast) were calculated. Twenty-two subjects completed the study. The systemic exposure of tamsulosin 0.4 mg decreased approximately 9% in the fed state compared to the fasted state, and the time to reach peak concentration was slightly delayed in the fed state. The dose normalized GMR and its 90% CIs of Cmax and AUClast for 0.2 and 0.4 mg tamsulosin in the fed state were within 0.8 and 1.25 range. Systemic exposure of tamsulosin was decreased in the fed condition compared to the fasted condition. Linear PK profiles were observed between 0.2 and 0.4 mg tamsulosin in the fed state.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02529800.

Keywords: Bioavailability; Pharmacokinetics; Tamsulosin.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: - Authors: Jung J and Kim YI are employees of Hanmi Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. The other authors report no conflicts of interest in this work. - Reviewers: Nothing to declare - Editors: Nothing to declare

Copyright © 2020 Translational and Clinical Pharmacology.

Figures

Figure 1. Study design.
Figure 1. Study design.
0.2 mg, single administration of tamsulosin 0.2 mg; 0.4 mg, single administration of tamsulosin 0.4 mg.
Figure 2. Mean plasma concentration-time profiles of…
Figure 2. Mean plasma concentration-time profiles of tamsulosin (A) in linear scale and (B) in semi-log scale after single oral administration of tamsulosin 0.2 mg (filled triangles) and tamsulosin 0.4 mg under fed conditions (filled circles) and tamsulosin 0.4 mg under fasting conditions (blank circles). Error bars denote the standard deviations.
Figure 3. Comparison of dose-normalized (A) C…
Figure 3. Comparison of dose-normalized (A) Cmax and (B) AUClast between the tamsulosin 0.2 mg and tamsulosin 0.4 mg capsule under fed condition.
Cmax, maximum plasma concentration; AUClast, area under the curve from the time of administration to last measurable concentration.
Figure 4. Comparison of (A) C max…
Figure 4. Comparison of (A) Cmax and (B) AUClast of tamsulosin after oral administration of tamsulosin 0.4 mg with or without food.
Cmax, maximum plasma concentration; AUClast, area under the curve from the time of administration to last measurable concentration.

References

    1. Napalkov P, Maisonneuve P, Boyle P. Worldwide patterns of prevalence and mortality from benign prostatic hyperplasia. Urology. 1995;46(Suppl A):41–46.
    1. Barkin J. Benign prostatic hyperplasia and lower urinary tract symptoms: evidence and approaches for best case management. Can J Urol. 2011;18(Suppl):14–19.
    1. Yeo JK, Choi H, Bae JH, Kim JH, Yang SO, Oh CY, et al. Korean clinical practice guideline for benign prostatic hyperplasia. Investig Clin Urol. 2016;57:30–44.
    1. Wilde MI, McTavish D. Tamsulosin. A review of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic potential in the management of symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia. Drugs. 1996;52:883–898.
    1. Franco-Salinas G, de la Rosette JJ, Michel MC. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of tamsulosin in its modified-release and oral controlled absorption system formulations. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2010;49:177–188.
    1. Boehringer Ingelheim. Flomax (tamsulosin hydrochloride) [package insert] Ridgefield (CT): Boehringer Ingelheim; 2007.
    1. Dunn CJ, Matheson A, Faulds DM. Tamsulosin: a review of its pharmacology and therapeutic efficacy in the management of lower urinary tract symptoms. Drugs Aging. 2002;19:135–161.
    1. Park CH, Chang HS, Oh BR, Kim HJ, Sul CK, Chung SK, et al. Efficacy of low-dose tamsulosin on lower urinary tract symptoms suggestive of benign prostatic hyperplasia: a nonblind multicentre Korean study. Clin Drug Investig. 2004;24:41–47.
    1. Lee E. Comparison of tamsulosin and finasteride for lower urinary tract symptoms associated with benign prostatic hyperplasia in Korean patients. J Int Med Res. 2002;30:584–590.
    1. Li NC, Chen S, Yang XH, Du LD, Wang JY, Na YQ, et al. Efficacy of low-dose tamsulosin in Chinese patients with symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia. Clin Drug Investig. 2003;23:781–787.
    1. Kim JJ, Han DH, Sung HH, Choo SH, Lee SW. Efficacy and tolerability of tamsulosin 0.4 mg in Asian patients with lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia refractory to tamsulosin 0.2 mg: a randomized placebo controlled trial. Int J Urol. 2014;21:677–682.
    1. Chung JH, Oh CY, Kim JH, Ha US, Kim TH, Lee SH, et al. Efficacy and safety of tamsulosin 0.4 mg single pills for treatment of Asian patients with symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia with lower urinary tract symptoms: a randomized, double-blind, phase 3 trial. Curr Med Res Opin. 2018;34:1793–1801.
    1. Food and Drug Administration. Assessing the effects of food on drugs in INDs and NDAs – clinical pharmacology considerations. Silver Spring (MD): Food and Drug Administration; 2019.
    1. Michel MC, Korstanje C, Krauwinkel W. Cardiovascular safety of tamsulosin modified release in the fasted and fed state in elderly healthy subjects. Eur Urol Suppl. 2005;4:9–14.
    1. Koziolek M, Alcaro S, Augustijns P, Basit AW, Grimm M, Hens B, et al. The mechanisms of pharmacokinetic food-drug interactions - a perspective from the UNGAP group. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2019;134:31–59.
    1. Food and Drug Administration. Bioavailability and bioequivalence studies submitted in NDAs or INDs — general considerations (draft guidance) Silver Spring (MD): Food and Drug Administration; 2014.
    1. Mangoni AA, Jackson SH. Age-related changes in pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics: basic principles and practical applications. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2004;57:6–14.
    1. Wolzt M, Fabrizii V, Dorner GT, Zanaschka G, Leufkens P, Krauwinkel WJ, et al. Pharmacokinetics of tamsulosin in subjects with normal and varying degrees of impaired renal function: an open-label single-dose and multiple-dose study. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1998;54:367–373.

Source: PubMed

3
Subscribe