Population pharmacokinetics and exposure-response analyses of varenicline in adolescent smokers

Daryl J Fediuk, Kevin Sweeney, Vaishali Sahasrabudhe, Thomas McRae, Wonkyung Byon, Daryl J Fediuk, Kevin Sweeney, Vaishali Sahasrabudhe, Thomas McRae, Wonkyung Byon

Abstract

Varenicline is an approved smoking cessation aid in adults. Population pharmacokinetics (popPK) and exposure-response (ER) (continuous abstinence rates [CAR] weeks 9-12 and nausea/vomiting incidence) for varenicline in adolescent smokers were characterized using data from two phase 1 and one phase 4 studies. A one-compartment popPK model with first-order absorption and elimination adequately fitted the observed data. The effect of female sex on apparent clearance was significant. Apparent volume of distribution increased with body weight and decreased by 24%, 15%, and 14% for black race, "other" race, and female sex, respectively. The observed range of exposure in the phase 4 study was consistent with that expected for each dose and body-weight group from the results obtained in adolescent PK studies, supporting that varenicline dose and administration were appropriate in the study. The relationship between CAR9-12 and varenicline area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) from 0 to 24 hours (AUC24 ) was nonsignificant (p = 0.303). Nausea/vomiting incidence increased with AUC24 (p < 0.001) and was higher in females. Varenicline PK and ER for tolerability in adolescent smokers were comparable with adults, while ER for efficacy confirmed the negative results reported in the phase 4 study.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00463918 NCT01312909.

Conflict of interest statement

DF, KS, VS, TM and WB are employees of Pfizer and may own shares/stock options in Pfizer.

© 2021 Pfizer Inc. CPT: Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Visual predictive check. Circles represent observed plasma concentrations. Solid yellow line represents median observed plasma concentrations. Dashed yellow lines represent 2.5% and 97.5% observed percentiles. Solid black line represents simulated median. Dashed black lines represent 2.5% and 97.5% simulated percentiles. Shaded yellow area represents simulation‐based 95% CI for simulated median. Shaded blue areas represent simulation‐based 95% CI for 2.5% and 97.5% percentiles. b.i.d., twice daily; CI, confidence interval; q.d., once daily
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Covariate effects on AUC24 (95% CI). 95% CI of ratio generated from 1,400 nonparametric bootstrapped sets of population parameter values using final popPK model (50 runs with minimization terminated and 241 runs with estimates near a boundary skipped when calculating bootstrap results). AUC24 was derived from the final apparent clearance estimate. Solid squares represent ratio of typical predicted AUC24 relative to reference subject of white male weighing 70 kg. Thus, a value of 1 (1.0) represents unity or a null covariate effect. Error bars represent 95% CI of ratio. AUC24, area under the concentration–time curve from 0 to 24 hours; CI, confidence interval; popPK, population pharmacokinetics
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Varenicline ER relationships in adolescent smokers for (a) CAR9–12 and (b) nausea/vomiting incidence. (a) Dotted line represents predicted probability of continuous abstinence at weeks 9‒12. (b) Dotted line represents predicted probability of nausea/vomiting incidence. (a and b) Circles show observed probabilities in each of the six AUCss (0–24) bins. Exposure was set to 0 for placebo group. Box‐and‐whisker plots (lower panels) describe distribution of exposure data. Box indicates difference between first and third quartiles of data, showing spread of data. Solid line represents median value; whiskers indicate range of data or 1.5× interquartile distance, whichever is less. Circles plotted outside whiskers exceed these limits and may be considered outliers. AUCss (0–24), area under the concentration–time curve at steady‐state from 0 to 24 hours; b.i.d., twice daily; CAR, continuous abstinence rate; ER, exposure–response; HBW, high body weight (>55 kg); LBW, low body weight (≤55 kg); q.d., once daily
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4
Covariate effects on nausea/vomiting incidence (95% CI). 95% CI of ratio generated from 2,800 nonparametric bootstrapped sets of population parameter values using final nausea/vomiting incidence model (754 runs with minimization terminated skipped when calculating bootstrap results). Solid squares represent point estimate for covariate effect relative to representative subject. Error bars represent 95% CI of ratio. AUC24, area under the concentration–time curve from 0 to 24 hours; CI, confidence interval; cig., cigarette; FSQ1, Fagerström Test for Nicotine Dependence score for question 1

References

    1. The 2004 United States Surgeon General's report: the health consequences of smoking. NSW Public Health Bull. 2004;15:107.
    1. World Health Organization . WHO global report: mortality attributable to tobacco, 2012. . Accessed August 14, 2020.
    1. Centres for Disease Control and Prevention . Youth and tobacco use, 2019. . Accessed August 14, 2020.
    1. Wang TW, Gentzke AS, Creamer MR, et al. Tobacco product use and associated factors among middle and high school students ‐ United States, 2019. MMWR Surveill Summ. 2019;68:1‐22.
    1. Reducing tobacco use . A report of the Surgeon General. Executive Summary. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2000;49:1‐27.
    1. Pfizer Laboratories Division of Pfizer Inc . CHANTIX (varenicline tartrate) highlights of prescribing information, 2018. . Accessed August 14, 2020.
    1. Pfizer . CHAMPIX abbreviated prescribing information – UK, 2018. . Accessed August 14, 2020.
    1. Rollema H, Hurst RS. The contribution of agonist and antagonist activities of alpha4beta2* nAChR ligands to smoking cessation efficacy: a quantitative analysis of literature data. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2018;235:2479‐2505.
    1. Cahill K, Lindson‐Hawley N, Thomas KH, Fanshawe TR, Lancaster T. Nicotine receptor partial agonists for smoking cessation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;2016:CD006103.
    1. Gonzales D, Rennard SI, Nides M, et al. Varenicline, an alpha4beta2 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor partial agonist, vs sustained‐release bupropion and placebo for smoking cessation: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2006;296:47‐55.
    1. Jorenby DE, Hays JT, Rigotti NA, et al. Efficacy of varenicline, an alpha4beta2 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor partial agonist, vs placebo or sustained‐release bupropion for smoking cessation: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2006;296:56‐63.
    1. Anthenelli RM, Benowitz NL, West R, et al. Neuropsychiatric safety and efficacy of varenicline, bupropion, and nicotine patch in smokers with and without psychiatric disorders (EAGLES): a double‐blind, randomised, placebo‐controlled clinical trial. Lancet. 2016;387:2507‐2520.
    1. Faessel HM, Smith BJ, Gibbs MA, Gobey JS, Clark DJ, Burstein AH. Single‐dose pharmacokinetics of varenicline, a selective nicotinic receptor partial agonist, in healthy smokers and nonsmokers. J Clin Pharmacol. 2006;46:991‐998.
    1. Faessel HM, Obach RS, Rollema H, Ravva P, Williams KE, Burstein AH. A review of the clinical pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of varenicline for smoking cessation. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2010;49:799‐816.
    1. Ravva P, Gastonguay MR, Tensfeldt TG, Faessel HM. Population pharmacokinetic analysis of varenicline in adult smokers. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2009;68:669‐681.
    1. Zhao Q, Schwam E, Fullerton T, O'Gorman M, Burstein AH. Pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability following multiple oral doses of varenicline under various titration schedules in elderly nonsmokers. J Clin Pharmacol. 2011;51:492‐501.
    1. Faessel H, Ravva P, Williams K. Pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability of varenicline in healthy adolescent smokers: a multicenter, randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, parallel‐group study. Clin Ther. 2009;31:177‐189.
    1. Gray KM, Rubinstein ML, Prochaska JJ, et al. High‐dose and low‐dose varenicline for smoking cessation in adolescents: a randomised, placebo‐controlled trial. Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2020;4:837‐845.
    1. Gray KM, Baker NL, McClure EA, et al. Efficacy and safety of varenicline for adolescent smoking cessation: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Pediatr. 2019;173:1146‐1153.
    1. Fagerström K. Determinants of tobacco use and renaming the FTND to the Fagerstrom Test for Cigarette Dependence. Nicotine Tob Res. 2012;14:75‐78.
    1. Keizer RJ, Karlsson MO, Hooker A. Modeling and simulation workbench for NONMEM: tutorial on Pirana, PsN, and Xpose. CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol. 2013;2:e50.
    1. Gastonguay MR. Full covariate models as an alternative to methods relying on statistical significance for inferences about covariate effects: a review of methodology and 42 case studies. . Accessed August 14, 2020.
    1. Cockcroft DW, Gault MH. Prediction of creatinine clearance from serum creatinine. Nephron. 1976;16:31‐41.
    1. Byon W, Smith MK, Chan P, et al. Establishing best practices and guidance in population modeling: an experience with an internal population pharmacokinetic analysis guidance. CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol. 2013;2:e51.
    1. Fanshawe TR, Halliwell W, Lindson N, Aveyard P, Livingstone‐Banks J, Hartmann‐Boyce J. Tobacco cessation interventions for young people. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;11:CD003289.
    1. Sussman S, Sun P. Youth tobacco use cessation: 2008 update. Tob Induc Dis. 2009;5:3.
    1. Towns S, DiFranza JR, Jayasuriya G, Marshall T, Shah S. Smoking cessation in adolescents: targeted approaches that work. Paediatr Respir Rev. 2017;22:11‐22.
    1. Myung SK, Park JY. Efficacy of pharmacotherapy for smoking cessation in adolescent smokers: a meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials. Nicotine Tob Res. 2019;21:1473‐1479.
    1. Squeglia LM, Fadus MC, McClure EA, Tomko RL, Gray KM. Pharmacological treatment of youth substance use disorders. J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol. 2019;29:559‐572.
    1. Kim MJ, Fleming CB, Catalano RF. Individual and social influences on progression to daily smoking during adolescence. Pediatrics. 2009;124:895‐902.
    1. Ravva P, Gastonguay MR, French JL, Tensfeldt TG, Faessel HM. Quantitative assessment of exposure‐response relationships for the efficacy and tolerability of varenicline for smoking cessation. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2010;87:336‐344.
    1. Mandl P, Kiss JP. Role of presynaptic nicotinic acetylcholine receptors in the regulation of gastrointestinal motility. Brain Res Bull. 2007;72:194‐200.
    1. Sanger GJ, Andrews PL. Treatment of nausea and vomiting: gaps in our knowledge. Auton Neurosci. 2006;129:3‐16.
    1. Swan GE, Javitz HS, Jack LM, et al. Varenicline for smoking cessation: nausea severity and variation in nicotinic receptor genes. Pharmacogenomics J. 2012;12:349‐358.

Source: PubMed

3
Subscribe