Internal Carotid Artery Tortuosity: Impact on Mechanical Thrombectomy

Junpei Koge, Kanta Tanaka, Takeshi Yoshimoto, Masayuki Shiozawa, Yuji Kushi, Tsuyoshi Ohta, Tetsu Satow, Hiroharu Kataoka, Masafumi Ihara, Masatoshi Koga, Noriko Isobe, Kazunori Toyoda, Junpei Koge, Kanta Tanaka, Takeshi Yoshimoto, Masayuki Shiozawa, Yuji Kushi, Tsuyoshi Ohta, Tetsu Satow, Hiroharu Kataoka, Masafumi Ihara, Masatoshi Koga, Noriko Isobe, Kazunori Toyoda

Abstract

Background: Although tortuosity of the internal carotid artery (ICA) can pose a significant challenge when performing mechanical thrombectomy, few studies have examined the impact of ICA tortuosity on mechanical thrombectomy outcomes.

Methods: In a registry-based hospital cohort, consecutive patients with anterior circulation stroke in whom mechanical thrombectomy was attempted were divided into 2 groups: those with tortuosity in the extracranial or cavernous ICA (tortuous group) and those without (nontortuous group). The extracranial ICA tortuosity was defined as the presence of coiling or kinking. The cavernous ICA tortuosity was defined by the posterior deflection of the posterior genu or the shape resembling Simmons-type catheter. Outcomes included first pass effect (FPE; extended Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction score 2c/3 after first pass), favorable outcome (3-month modified Rankin Scale score of 0-2), and intracranial hemorrhage.

Results: Of 370 patients, 124 were in the tortuous group (extracranial ICA tortuosity, 35; cavernous ICA tortuosity, 70; tortuosity at both sites, 19). The tortuous group showed a higher proportion of women and atrial fibrillation than the nontortuous group. FPE was less frequently achieved in the tortuous group than the nontortuous group (21% versus 39%; adjusted odds ratio, 0.45 [95% CI, 0.26-0.77]). ICA tortuosity was independently associated with the longer time from puncture to extended Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction ≥2b reperfusion (β=23.19 [95% CI, 13.44-32.94]). Favorable outcome was similar between groups (46% versus 48%; P=0.87). Frequencies of any intracranial hemorrhage (54% versus 42%; adjusted odds ratio, 1.61 [95% CI, 1.02-2.53]) and parenchymal hematoma (11% versus 6%; adjusted odds ratio, 2.41 [95% CI, 1.04-5.58]) were higher in the tortuous group. In the tortuous group, the FPE rate was similar in patients who underwent combined stent retriever and contact aspiration thrombectomy and in those who underwent either procedure alone (22% versus 19%; P=0.80). However, in the nontortuous group, the FPE rate was significantly higher in patients who underwent combined stent retriever and contact aspiration (52% versus 35%; P=0.02).

Conclusions: ICA tortuosity was independently associated with reduced likelihood of FPE and increased risk of postmechanical thrombectomy intracranial hemorrhage.

Registration: URL: https://www.

Clinicaltrials: gov; Unique identifier: NCT02251665.

Keywords: catheters; intracranial hemorrhages; punctures; reperfusion; thrombectomy.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Classification of extracranial and cavernous internal carotid artery (ICA) tortuosity. A, Tortuosity of the extracranial ICA was classified into 4 types as follows: straight (angle between the centerlines of the common carotid artery and the ICA was <15°), tortuous (angle between the common carotid artery and the ICA centerlines was >15; or S- or C-shaped course of the ICA), coiled (an exaggerated S-shaped curve or circular configuration of the ICA), and kinked (acute [<90°] angulation associated with stenosis). The extracranial ICA was considered tortuous if it was coiled or kinked. B, Cavernous ICA tortuosity was classified into 4 types based on the geometry of the anterior and posterior genus. Type I has open configurations/angles of anterior and posterior genus (the posterior genu angle [P] ≥90°). Type II is characterized by a closed configuration of the anterior genu (more acute angle of the anterior genu [A] than type I). Type III is defined by posterior deflection of the posterior genu, which gives it a buckled appearance. Type IV is the most tortuous and has a shape characteristic of the Simmons-style angiography catheter where the posterior genu is buckled superiorly compared with the anterior genu. H is the height difference of the anterior and posterior genus, measured from the peak of the posterior genu to the trough of the anterior genu. Types III and IV were considered tortuous cavernous ICA.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Study flowchart. ICA indicates internal carotid artery; M1, first segment of the middle cerebral artery; M2, second segment of the middle cerebral artery; MT, mechanical thrombectomy; and NCVC, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Procedural outcomes according to the location of internal carotid artery (ICA) tortuosity. Outcomes according to location of ICA tortuosity are shown for (A) reperfusion status after first pass, (B) final reperfusion status, and (C) intracranial hemorrhage. eTICI indicates extended Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
First pass effect according to the first-line mechanical thrombectomy strategy. The rate of first pass effect according to the first-line mechanical thrombectomy strategy in the (A) nontortuous and (B) tortuous internal carotid artery groups. CA indicates contact aspiration; NS, nonsignificant; and SR, stent retriever. *Fisher exact test.

References

    1. Powers WJ, Rabinstein AA, Ackerson T, Adeoye OM, Bambakidis NC, Becker K, Biller J, Brown M, Demaerschalk BM, Hoh B, et al. ; American Heart Association Stroke Council. 2018 guidelines for the early management of patients with acute ischemic stroke: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2018;49:e46–e110. doi: 10.1161/STR.0000000000000158
    1. LeCouffe NE, Kappelhof M, Treurniet KM, Lingsma HF, Zhang G, van den Wijngaard IR, van Es ACGM, Emmer BJ, Majoie CBLM, Roos YBWEM, et al. ; MR CLEAN Registry Investigators. 2B, 2C, or 3: what should be the angiographic target for endovascular treatment in ischemic stroke? Stroke. 2020;51:1790–1796. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.028891
    1. Baek JH, Kim BM, Heo JH, Nam HS, Kim YD, Park H, Bang OY, Yoo J, Kim DJ, Jeon P, et al. . Number of stent retriever passes associated with futile recanalization in acute stroke. Stroke. 2018;49:2088–2095. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.021320
    1. Flottmann F, Brekenfeld C, Broocks G, Leischner H, McDonough R, Faizy TD, Deb-Chatterji M, Alegiani A, Thomalla G, Mpotsaris A, et al. ; GSR Investigators. Good clinical outcome decreases with number of retrieval attempts in stroke thrombectomy: beyond the first-pass effect. Stroke. 2021;52:482–490. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.029830
    1. Maros ME, Brekenfeld C, Broocks G, Leischner H, McDonough R, Deb-Chatterji M, Alegiani A, Thomalla G, Fiehler J, Flottmann F; GSR Investigators. Number of retrieval attempts rather than procedure time is associated with risk of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage. Stroke. 2021;52:1580–1588. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.031242
    1. Zaidat OO, Castonguay AC, Linfante I, Gupta R, Martin CO, Holloway WE, Mueller-Kronast N, English JD, Dabus G, Malisch TW, et al. . First pass effect: a new measure for stroke thrombectomy devices. Stroke. 2018;49:660–666. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.117.020315
    1. Leischner H, Flottmann F, Hanning U, Broocks G, Faizy TD, Deb-Chatterji M, Bernhardt M, Brekenfeld C, Buhk JH, Gellissen S, et al. . Reasons for failed endovascular recanalization attempts in stroke patients. J Neurointerv Surg. 2019;11:439–442. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2018-014060
    1. Kaneko N, Komuro Y, Yokota H, Tateshima S. Stent retrievers with segmented design improve the efficacy of thrombectomy in tortuous vessels. J Neurointerv Surg. 2019;11:119–122. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2018-014061
    1. Schwaiger BJ, Kober F, Gersing AS, Kleine JF, Wunderlich S, Zimmer C, Poppert H, Prothmann S. The pREset stent retriever for endovascular treatment of stroke caused by MCA occlusion: safety and clinical outcome. Clin Neuroradiol. 2016;26:47–55. doi: 10.1007/s00062-014-0329-z
    1. Kyselyova AA, Fiehler J, Leischner H, Flottmann F, Buhk JH, Frölich AM. Vessel diameter and catheter-to-vessel ratio affect the success rate of clot aspiration. J Neurointerv Surg. 2021;13:605–608. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2020-016459
    1. Nagata T, Masumoto K, Hayashi Y, Watanabe Y, Kato Y, Katou F. Three-dimensional computed tomographic analysis of variations of the carotid artery. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2016;44:734–742. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2016.02.011
    1. Lin LM, Colby GP, Jiang B, Uwandu C, Huang J, Tamargo RJ, Coon AL. Classification of cavernous internal carotid artery tortuosity: a predictor of procedural complexity in Pipeline embolization. J Neurointerv Surg. 2015;7:628–633. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2014-011298
    1. Leker RR, Kasner SE, El Hasan HA, Sacagiu T, Honig A, Gomori JM, Guan S, Choudhry O, Hurst RW, Kung D, et al. . Impact of carotid tortuosity on outcome after endovascular thrombectomy. Neurol Sci. 2021;42:2347–2351. doi: 10.1007/s10072-020-04813-8
    1. Sato S, Uehara T, Ohara T, Suzuki R, Toyoda K, Minematsu K; Stroke Unit Multicenter Observational (SUMO) Study Investigators. Factors associated with unfavorable outcome in minor ischemic stroke. Neurology. 2014;83:174–181. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000000572
    1. Yoshimoto T, Inoue M, Tanaka K, Kanemaru K, Koge J, Shiozawa M, Kamogawa N, Kimura S, Chiba T, Satow T, et al. . Identifying large ischemic core volume ranges in acute stroke that can benefit from mechanical thrombectomy. J Neurointerv Surg. 2021;13:1081–1087. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2020-016934
    1. Koge J, Tanaka K, Yoshimoto T, Shiozawa M, Yamagami H, Satow T, Takahashi JC, Ihara M, Koga M, Kira JI, et al. . Early recurrent ischemic events after mechanical thrombectomy: effect of post-treatment intracranial hemorrhage. J Neurol. 2021;268:2810–2820. doi: 10.1007/s00415-021-10449-1
    1. Fujita K, Tanaka K, Yamagami H, Ide T, Ishiyama H, Sonoda K, Satow T, Takahashi JC, Ihara M, Koga M, et al. . Detrimental effect of chronic hypertension on leptomeningeal collateral flow in acute ischemic stroke. Stroke. 2019;50:1751–1757. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.025142
    1. von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gøtzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP; STROBE Initiative. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Ann Intern Med. 2007;147:573–577. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-147-8-200710160-00010
    1. Lapergue B, Labreuche J, Blanc R, Marnat G, Consoli A, Rodesch G, Saleme S, Costalat V, Bracard S, Desal H, et al. . Combined use of contact aspiration and the stent retriever technique versus stent retriever alone for recanalization in acute cerebral infarction: the randomized ASTER 2 study protocol. J Neurointerv Surg. 2020;12:471–476. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2019-014735
    1. Liebeskind DS, Bracard S, Guillemin F, Jahan R, Jovin TG, Majoie CB, Mitchell PJ, van der Lugt A, Menon BK, San Román L, et al. ; HERMES Collaborators. eTICI reperfusion: defining success in endovascular stroke therapy. J Neurointerv Surg. 2019;11:433–438. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2018-014127
    1. Toyoda K, Koga M, Iguchi Y, Itabashi R, Inoue M, Okada Y, Ogasawara K, Tsujino A, Hasegawa Y, Hatano T, et al. . Guidelines for intravenous thrombolysis (recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator), the third edition, March 2019: a guideline from the Japan Stroke Society. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 2019;59:449–491. doi: 10.2176/nmc.st.2019-0177
    1. Hacke W, Kaste M, Fieschi C, von Kummer R, Davalos A, Meier D, Larrue V, Bluhmki E, Davis S, Donnan G, et al. . Randomised double-blind placebo-controlled trial of thrombolytic therapy with intravenous alteplase in acute ischaemic stroke (ECASS II). Second European-Australasian Acute Stroke Study investigators. Lancet. 1998;352:1245–1251. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(98)08020-9
    1. Mokin M, Waqas M, Chin F, Rai H, Senko J, Sparks A, Ducharme RW, Springer M, Borlongan CV, Levy EI, et al. . Semi-automated measurement of vascular tortuosity and its implications for mechanical thrombectomy performance. Neuroradiology. 2021;63:381–389. doi: 10.1007/s00234-020-02525-6
    1. Di Maria F, Kyheng M, Consoli A, Desilles JP, Gory B, Richard S, Rodesch G, Labreuche J, Girot JB, Dargazanli C, et al. ; ETIS Investigators. Identifying the predictors of first-pass effect and its influence on clinical outcome in the setting of endovascular thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke: results from a multicentric prospective registry. Int J Stroke. 2021;16:20–28. doi: 10.1177/1747493020923051
    1. Benson JC, Brinjikji W, Messina SA, Lanzino G, Kallmes DF. Cervical internal carotid artery tortuosity: a morphologic analysis of patients with acute ischemic stroke. Interv Neuroradiol. 2020;26:216–221. doi: 10.1177/1591019919891295
    1. Peschillo S, Diana F, Berge J, Missori P. A comparison of acute vascular damage caused by ADAPT versus a stent retriever device after thrombectomy in acute ischemic stroke: a histological and ultrastructural study in an animal model. J Neurointerv Surg. 2017;9:743–749. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2016-012533
    1. Lee YB, Yoon W, Lee YY, Kim SK, Baek BH, Kim JT, Park MS. Predictors and impact of hemorrhagic transformations after endovascular thrombectomy in patients with acute large vessel occlusions. J Neurointerv Surg. 2019;11:469–473. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2018-014080
    1. Desai SM, Tonetti DA, Morrison AA, Gross BA, Jankowitz BT, Jovin TG, Jadhav AP. Relationship between reperfusion and intracranial hemorrhage after thrombectomy. J Neurointerv Surg. 2020;12:448–453. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2019-015337
    1. Bernava G, Rosi A, Boto J, Brina O, Kulcsar Z, Czarnetzki C, Carrera E, Schaller K, Lovblad KO, Machi P. Direct thromboaspiration efficacy for mechanical thrombectomy is related to the angle of interaction between the aspiration catheter and the clot. J Neurointerv Surg. 2020;12:396–400. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2019-015113
    1. Kang DH, Park J. Endovascular stroke therapy focused on stent retriever thrombectomy and direct clot aspiration: historical review and modern application. J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2017;60:335–347. doi: 10.3340/jkns.2016.0809.005

Source: PubMed

3
Subscribe