#BlackBreastsMatter: Process Evaluation of Recruitment and Engagement of Pregnant African American Women for a Social Media Intervention Study to Increase Breastfeeding

Cassy Dauphin, Nikia Clark, Renee Cadzow, Frances Saad-Harfouche, Elisa Rodriguez, Kathryn Glaser, Marc Kiviniemi, Maria Keller, Deborah Erwin, Cassy Dauphin, Nikia Clark, Renee Cadzow, Frances Saad-Harfouche, Elisa Rodriguez, Kathryn Glaser, Marc Kiviniemi, Maria Keller, Deborah Erwin

Abstract

Background: In the United States, there are lower rates of breastfeeding among African American mothers, particularly those who are younger women. Recent epidemiological studies have shown a strong association of more aggressive types of breast cancer (estrogen receptor negative) among African American women, with a higher risk in African American women who did not breastfeed their children.

Objective: This study aims to describe the process evaluation of recruitment and educational strategies to engage pregnant African American participants for a pilot study designed to determine whether social media messaging about breast cancer risk reduction through breastfeeding may positively influence breastfeeding rates.

Methods: This pilot study is conducted in collaboration with a local Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) organization and hospital and prenatal clinics of a local health care network. To engage African American women to enroll in the study, several methods and monitoring processes were explored, including WIC electronic text-based messages sent out to all phones of current WIC recipients (referred to as e-blasts); keyword responses to texts from flyers and posters in local community-based organizations, hospitals, and prenatal clinics; keyword responses using electronic links posted in established Facebook groups; and snowball recruitment of other pregnant women by current participants through Facebook. Once enrolled, participants were randomized to 2 study conditions: (1) an intervention group receiving messages about breast cancer risk reduction and breastfeeding or (2) a control group receiving breastfeeding-only messages. Data were obtained through electronic monitoring, SurveyMonkey, qualitative responses on Facebook, focus groups, and interviews.

Results: More than 3000 text messages were sent and received through WIC e-blasts and keyword responses from flyers. A total of 472 women were recruited through WIC e-blast, and 161 responded to flyers and contacts through the local health care network, community-based organizations, Facebook, and friend referrals. A total of 633 women were assessed for eligibility to participate in the study. A total of 288 pregnant African American women were enrolled, consented, and completed presurvey assessments (102.8% of the goal), and 22 participants attended focus groups or interviews reporting on their experiences with Facebook and the educational messages.

Conclusions: This process evaluation suggests that using electronic, smartphone apps with social media holds promise for both recruitment and conduct of health education intervention studies for pregnant African American women. Providing messaging and resources through social media to reinforce and educate women about breastfeeding and potentially provide lactation support is intriguing. Convenience (for researchers and participants) is an attribute of social media for this demographic of women and worthy of further research as an educational tool.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03680235; https://ichgcp.net/clinical-trials-registry/NCT03680235.

Keywords: African American mothers; Facebook; breast cancer education; breastfeeding; mobile phone, social media.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

©Cassy Dauphin, Nikia Clark, Renee Cadzow, Frances Saad-Harfouche, Elisa Rodriguez, Kathryn Glaser, Marc Kiviniemi, Maria Keller, Deborah Erwin. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 10.08.2020.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study schema. WIC: Women, Infants, and Children.

References

    1. Johnson A, Kirk R, Rosenblum K, Muzik M. Enhancing breastfeeding rates among African American women: a systematic review of current psychosocial interventions. Breastfeed Med. 2015;10(1):45–62. doi: 10.1089/bfm.2014.0023.
    1. Breastfeeding Facts. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2019. [2019-08-01]. .
    1. Palmer JR, Viscidi E, Troester M, Hong C, Schedin P, Bethea T, Bandera E, Borges V, McKinnon C, Haiman C, Lunetta K, Kolonel L, Rosenberg L, Olshan A, Ambrosone C. Parity, lactation, and breast cancer subtypes in African American women: results from the AMBER consortium. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2014 Oct;106(10):237. doi: 10.1093/jnci/dju237.
    1. Colen CG, Ramey DM. Is breast truly best? Estimating the effects of breastfeeding on long-term child health and wellbeing in the United States using sibling comparisons. Soc Sci Med. 2014 May;109:55–65. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.01.027.
    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Progress in increasing breastfeeding and reducing racial/ethnic differences - United States, 2000-2008 births. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2013 Feb 8;62(5):77–80.
    1. Forste R, Hoffmann JP. Are US mothers meeting the healthy people 2010 breastfeeding targets for initiation, duration, and exclusivity? The 2003 and 2004 national immunization surveys. J Hum Lact. 2008 Aug;24(3):278–88. doi: 10.1177/0890334408317617.
    1. 2017 New York State Pediatric Nutrition Surveillance System Report. New York State Department of Health. 2017. [2019-08-01].
    1. Guendelman S, Kosa J, Pearl M, Graham S, Goodman J, Kharrazi M. Juggling work and breastfeeding: effects of maternity leave and occupational characteristics. Pediatrics. 2009 Jan;123(1):e38–46. doi: 10.1542/peds.2008-2244.
    1. Cricco-Lizza R. Infant-feeding beliefs and experiences of black women enrolled in WIC in the New York metropolitan area. Qual Health Res. 2004 Nov;14(9):1197–210. doi: 10.1177/1049732304268819.
    1. Bentley ME, Caulfield L, Gross S, Bronner Y, Jensen J, Kessler L, Paige D. Sources of influence on intention to breastfeed among African-American women at entry to WIC. J Hum Lact. 1999 Mar;15(1):27–34. doi: 10.1177/089033449901500109.
    1. Ogbuanu CA, Probst J, Laditka SB, Liu J, Baek J, Glover S. Reasons why women do not initiate breastfeeding: a southeastern state study. Womens Health Issues. 2009;19(4):268–78. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2009.03.005.
    1. Kaufman L, Deenadayalan S, Karpati A. Breastfeeding ambivalence among low-income African American and Puerto Rican women in north and central Brooklyn. Matern Child Health J. 2010 Sep;14(5):696–704. doi: 10.1007/s10995-009-0499-5.
    1. O'Brian A, Cadzow RB. Adolescent Perceptions of Breastfeeding and Future Infant Feeding Intentions. DocPlayer. 2015. [2020-06-26]. .
    1. Perrin A, Turner E. Smartphones Help Blacks, Hispanics Bridge Some – But Not All – Digital Gaps With Whites. Pew Research Center. 2019. [2019-06-01].
    1. Social Media Fact Sheet. Pew Research Center. 2019. [2019-09-10].
    1. Persad MD, Mensinger JL. Maternal breastfeeding attitudes: association with breastfeeding intent and socio-demographics among urban primiparas. J Community Health. 2008 Apr;33(2):53–60. doi: 10.1007/s10900-007-9068-2.
    1. Asiodu IV, Waters C, Dailey D, Lee K, Lyndon A. Breastfeeding and use of social media among first-time African American mothers. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2015;44(2):268–78. doi: 10.1111/1552-6909.12552.
    1. Baker B, Yang I. Social media as social support in pregnancy and the postpartum. Sex Reprod Healthc. 2018 Oct;17:31–34. doi: 10.1016/j.srhc.2018.05.003.
    1. New York State Community Health Indicator Reports (CHIRS) New York State Prevention Agenda Dashboard - State Level. 2018. [2018-09-12]. .
    1. duPont NC, Mahoney M, Kahn L, Vest BM, Widman CA, Clark-Hargrave N, Erwin D. Developing a smoking cessation intervention for low income and minority women. J Womens Health Care. 2016 Apr;5(2):309. doi: 10.4172/2167-0420.1000309.
    1. Martin J, Hamilton B, Osterman M, Driscoll A, Drake P. Births: Final Data for 2017. National Vital Statistics Report: Center for Disease Control and Prevention. 2018. [2020-06-26]. .

Source: PubMed

3
Subscribe