Statistical analysis plan for the EuroHYP-1 trial: European multicentre, randomised, phase III clinical trial of the therapeutic hypothermia plus best medical treatment versus best medical treatment alone for acute ischaemic stroke
Per Winkel, Philip M Bath, Christian Gluud, Jane Lindschou, H Bart van der Worp, Malcolm R Macleod, Istvan Szabo, Isabelle Durand-Zaleski, Stefan Schwab, EuroHYP-1 trial investigators, Per Winkel, Philip M Bath, Christian Gluud, Jane Lindschou, H Bart van der Worp, Malcolm R Macleod, Istvan Szabo, Isabelle Durand-Zaleski, Stefan Schwab, EuroHYP-1 trial investigators
Abstract
Background: Cooling may reduce infarct size and improve neurological outcomes in patients with ischaemic stroke. In phase II trials, cooling awake patients with ischaemic stroke has been shown to be feasible and safe, but the effects in functional outcomes has not yet been investigated in an adequately sized randomised clinical trial.
Methods/design: The EuroHYP-1 trial is a multinational, randomised, superiority phase III clinical trial with masked outcome assessment testing the benefits and harms of therapeutic cooling in awake adult patients with acute ischaemic stroke. The outcomes dealt with here include the primary outcome the Rankin score (mRS) at day 91 +/-14 days after randomisation. The secondary and exploratory outcomes at day 91 +/-14 days unless otherwise stated encompassing: (1) death or dependency, defined as mRS score > 2; (2) death; (3) National Institutes of Health Stroke Score; (4) brain infarct size at 48 +/-24 hours; (5) EQ-5D-5 L score, and (6) WHODAS 2.0 score. Other outcomes are: the primary safety outcome serious adverse events; and the incremental cost-effectiveness, and cost utility ratios. The analysis sets include (1) the intention-to-treat population, and (2) the per protocol population. The sample size is estimated to 800 patients (5% type 1 and 20% type 2 errors). All analyses are adjusted for the protocol-specified stratification variables (nationality of centre), and the minimisation variables. In the analysis, we use ordinal regression (the primary outcome), logistic regression (binary outcomes), general linear model (continuous outcomes), and the Poisson or negative binomial model (rate outcomes).
Discussion: Major adjustments compared with the original statistical analysis plan encompass: (1) adjustment of analyses by nationality; (2) power calculations for the secondary outcomes; (3) to address the multiplicity problem using of a fixed-sequence testing procedure starting with the primary outcome followed by the secondary outcomes ordered according to falling power; (4) assignment of worst possible score to patients who are not alive at the planned date of measurement of the continuous scores; (5) improved imputations; (6) outline of a supplementary exploratory analysis of the temperature measurements and time to death; and (7) substantial reduction of sample size.
Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov, identifier: NCT01833312 . 4 April 2013.
Keywords: Acute ischaemic stroke; Cooling; Cost-effectiveness; Modified Ranking scale; Quality of life; Randomised clinical trial.
Conflict of interest statement
Authors’ informationNot applicable.
Ethics approval and consent to participateAll included participants have provided verbal and written consent before inclusion in the trial. The trial has been approved by the relevant ethics committees in all participating countries (Belgium (AZ Sint Jan Brugge–Oostende AV Ethics Committee OG 065, ref no. 1759, 7 May 2015), Denmark (Regional Ethics Committee for Region Hovedstaden, ref no. 30113713, 10 Oct 2013), Finland (Hospital District of South-West Finland, ref no. 161/1800/2014, 28 Jun 2016), France (Comité de Protection des Personnes Nord Ouest IV, ref no. CPP 14/21, 13 Jun 2014), Germany (Ethik-Kommission der FAU, Erlangen, ref no 63_13 Az and 67_13 Mz, 7 Jun 2013), Ireland (SJH/AMNCH Research Ethics Committee, ref no. 2015-11 List 43 (4), 26 Nov 2915), Italy (Comitato Etico Dell' Universita' "Sapienza", ref no. 161 SA/2016, 8 May 2015), Lithuania (Lietuvos Bioetikos Komitetas, ref no. L-15-04/1, 18 Feb 2015), Poland (Instytut Psychiatrii I Neurologii Komisja Bioetyczna, ref no. 8/2014, 12 Jun 2014), Spain (CEIC del Hospital Universitari Vall d’Hebrón, 4 Apr 2014), Sweden (Regionala Etikprovningsnamden Lund, ref no. 2016/1088, 2 Feb 2017), Turkey (Hacettepe Universitesi Klinik Arastirmalar Etik Kurulu Karar Formu, ref no. KA 14039, 19 Mar 2015), UK England (North East - Newcastle & North Tyneside 2 Research Ethics Committee, ref no. 3/NE/0299, 2 Dec 2013), UK Scotland (Scotland A Research Ethics Committee, ref no. 13/SS/0194, 9 Dec 2013).
Consent for publicationNot applicable (no individual details will be published based from the EuroHYP-1 trial, only summary data will be used, thus assuring the anonymity of the trial participants).
Competing interestsThe authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Publisher’s NoteSpringer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Figures
References
- van der Worp HB, Macleod MR, Bath PM, Demotes J, Durand-Zaleski I, Gebhardt B, Gluud C, Kollmar R, Krieger DW, Lees KR, Molina C, Montaner J, Roine RO, Petersson J, Staykov D, Szabo I, Wardlaw JM, Schwab S. EuroHYP-1: European multicenter, randomized, phase III clinical trial of therapeutic hypothermia plus best medical treatment vs. best medical treatment alone for acute ischemic stroke. Int J Stroke. 2014;9(5):642–5. doi: 10.1111/ijs.12294.
- Fergusson D, Aaron SD, Guyatt G, Hebert P. Post-randomisation exclusions: the intention to treat principle and excluding patients from analysis. BMJ. 2002;325(7365):652–4. doi: 10.1136/bmj.325.7365.652.
- Allison DB. Handling missing data by maximum likelihood. SAS Global Forum; 2012. . Accessed 13 Nov 2017.
- Carpenter JR, Kenward MG. Multiple imputation and its application. Statistics in practice. Chichester: Wiley; 2013.
- The National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke rt-PA Stroke Study Group Tissue plasminogen activator for acute ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med. 1995;333(24):1581–7. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199512143332401.
- CLOTS (Clots in Legs Or sTockings after Stroke) Trials Collaboration Effect of intermittent pneumatic compression on disability, living circumstances, quality of life, and hospital costs after stroke: secondary analyses from CLOTS 3, a randomised trial. Lancet Neurol. 2014;13(12):1186–92. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(14)70258-3.
- Dennis M, Sandercock P, Reid J, Graham C, Murray G, Venables G, Rudd A, Bowler G. The effect of graduated compression stockings on long-term outcomes after stroke: the CLOTS trials 1 and 2. Stroke. 2013;44(4):1075–9. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.680298.
- Rangaraju S, Frankel M, Jovin TG. Prognostic value of the 24-hour neurological examination in anterior circulation ischemic stroke: a post hoc analysis of two randomized controlled stroke trials. Interv Neurol. 2016;4(3-4):120–9. doi: 10.1159/000443801.
- The IST-3 collaborative group Effect of thrombolysis with alteplase within 6 h of acute ischaemic stroke on long-term outcomes (the third International Stroke Trial [IST-3]): 18-month follow-up of a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Neurol. 2013;12(8):768–76. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(13)70130-3.
- Krongold M, Almekhlafi MA, Demchuk AM, Coutts SB, Frayne R, Eilaghi A. Final infarct volume estimation on 1-week follow-up MR imaging is feasible and is dependent on recanalization status. Neuroimage Clin. 2014;7:1–6. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2014.10.010.
- Hemmen TM, Raman R, Guluma KZ, Meyer BC, Gomes JA, Cruz-Flores S, Wijman CA, Rapp KS, Grotta JC, Lyden PD. Intravenous thrombolysis plus hypothermia for acute treatment of ischemic stroke (ICTuS-L): final results. Stroke. 2010;41(10):2265–70. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.592295.
- Dmitrienko A, Tamhane AC, Bretz F. Multiple testing problems in pharmaceutical statistics. Boca Raton: CRC Biostatistics Series: Chapman and Hall; 2010. pp. 52–70.
- Husereau D, Drummond M, Petrou S, Carswell C, Moher D, Greenberg D, Augustovski F, Briggs AH, Mauskopf J, Loder E. Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS)-explanation and elaboration: a report of the ISPOR Health Economic Evaluation Publication Guidelines Good Reporting Practices Task Force. Value Health. 2013;16(2):231–50. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2013.02.002.
- Raikou M, Briggs A, Gray A, McGuire A. Centre-specific or average unit costs in multi-centre studies? Some theory and simulation. Health Econ. 2000;9(3):191–8. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1050(200004)9:3<191::AID-HEC510>;2-1.
- Kahan BC, Morris TP. Improper analysis of trials randomised using stratified blocks or minimisation. Stat Med. 2012;31(4):328–40. doi: 10.1002/sim.4431.
- Dwan K, Gamble C, Williamson PR, Altman DG. Reporting of clinical trials: a review of research funders' guidelines. Trials. 2008;9:66. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-9-66.
- Finfer S, Bellomo R. Why publish statistical analysis plans? Crit Care. Resusc. 2009;11(1):5–8.
- Winkel P, Jakobsen JC, Hilden J, Lange T, Jensen G, Kjøller E, Sajadiah A, Kastrup J, Kolmos HJ, Larsson A, Arnlov A, Gluud C. Predictors for major cardiovascular outcomes in stable ischaemic heart disease (PREMAC): Statistical analysis plan for data originating from the CLARICOR (clarithromycin for patients with stable coronary heart disease) trial. Diagn Prognost Res. 2017;1:1–10.
Source: PubMed