Impact of drug release kinetics on vascular response to different zotarolimus-eluting stents implanted in patients with long coronary stenoses: the LongOCT study (Optical Coherence Tomography in Long Lesions)
Giulio Guagliumi, Hideyuki Ikejima, Vasile Sirbu, Hiram Bezerra, Giuseppe Musumeci, Nikoloz Lortkipanidze, Luigi Fiocca, Satoko Tahara, Angelina Vassileva, Aleksandre Matiashvili, Orazio Valsecchi, Marco Costa, Giulio Guagliumi, Hideyuki Ikejima, Vasile Sirbu, Hiram Bezerra, Giuseppe Musumeci, Nikoloz Lortkipanidze, Luigi Fiocca, Satoko Tahara, Angelina Vassileva, Aleksandre Matiashvili, Orazio Valsecchi, Marco Costa
Abstract
Objectives: We assessed the in vivo vascular response to a new generation of zotarolimus-eluting stents (ZES) with prolonged drug release (Resolute ZES-SR, Medtronic Vascular, Santa Rosa, California) compared with ZES with faster kinetics (Endeavor ZES-FR, Medtronic Vascular) by optical coherence tomography.
Background: Local drug release kinetics has been implicated with antirestenosis efficacy of drug-eluting stents. However, the impact of different release kinetics on vascular response of diseased human coronary arteries remains to be investigated.
Methods: The study population consisted of 43 patients with long lesions in native coronary vessels treated with multiple overlapping ZES. Twenty-one patients treated with ZES-SR were compared with 22 patients treated with ZES-FR from the ODESSA (Optical coherence tomography for DES SAfety) study. The primary endpoint was in-stent neointimal hyperplasia as assessed by optical coherence tomography at 6-month follow-up. Coprimary endpoints were the percentage of uncovered and malapposed struts.
Results: Strut-level median neointimal thickness was 0.11 mm (interquartile range [IQR]: 0.07 to 0.15 mm) in ZES-SR and 0.31 mm (IQR: 0.27 to 0.42 mm) in ZES-FR, respectively (p < 0.001). The 6-month rate of uncovered struts per patient was 7.38% (IQR: 3.06% to 12.72%) in ZES-SR and 0.00% (IQR: 0.00% to 0.00%) in ZES-FR (p < 0.001); rate of malapposed and uncovered struts was 1.47% (IQR: 0.32% to 4.23%) in ZES-SR and 0.00% (IQR: 0.00% to 0.00%) in ZES-FR (p < 0.001).
Conclusions: This study demonstrated the impact of different release kinetics on human in vivo vascular response to ZES implantation. The new generation of ZES-SR compared with ZES-FR had better suppression of the neointimal response but higher proportion of uncovered and malapposed struts at 6-month optical coherence tomography follow-up. (Optical Coherence Tomography in Long Lesions [LongOCT]; NCT01133925).
Copyright © 2011 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Source: PubMed