Assessing the organizational context for EBP implementation: the development and validity testing of the Implementation Climate Scale (ICS)

Mark G Ehrhart, Gregory A Aarons, Lauren R Farahnak, Mark G Ehrhart, Gregory A Aarons, Lauren R Farahnak

Abstract

Background: Although the importance of the organizational environment for implementing evidence-based practices (EBP) has been widely recognized, there are limited options for measuring implementation climate in public sector health settings. The goal of this research was to develop and test a measure of EBP implementation climate that would both capture a broad range of issues important for effective EBP implementation and be of practical use to researchers and managers seeking to understand and improve the implementation of EBPs.

Methods: Participants were 630 clinicians working in 128 work groups in 32 US-based mental health agencies. Items to measure climate for EBP implementation were developed based on past literature on implementation climate and other strategic climates and in consultation with experts on the implementation of EBPs in mental health settings. The sample was randomly split at the work group level of analysis; half of the sample was used for exploratory factor analysis (EFA), and the other half was used for confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). The entire sample was utilized for additional analyses assessing the reliability, support for level of aggregation, and construct-based evidence of validity.

Results: The EFA resulted in a final factor structure of six dimensions for the Implementation Climate Scale (ICS): 1) focus on EBP, 2) educational support for EBP, 3) recognition for EBP, 4) rewards for EBP, 5) selection for EBP, and 6) selection for openness. This structure was supported in the other half of the sample using CFA. Additional analyses supported the reliability and construct-based evidence of validity for the ICS, as well as the aggregation of the measure to the work group level.

Conclusions: The ICS is a very brief (18 item) and pragmatic measure of a strategic climate for EBP implementation. It captures six dimensions of the organizational context that indicate to employees the extent to which their organization prioritizes and values the successful implementation of EBPs. The ICS can be used by researchers to better understand the role of the organizational context on implementation outcomes and by organizations to evaluate their current climate as they consider how to improve the likelihood of implementation success.

References

    1. Proctor LK, Landsverk J, Aarons GA, Chambers D, Glisson C, Mittman B. Implementation research in mental health services: an emerging science with conceptual, methodological, and training challenges. Adm Policy Ment Hlth. 2009;36:24–34. doi: 10.1007/s10488-008-0197-4.
    1. Dusenbury L, Brannigan R, Hansen WB, Walsh J, Falco M. Quality of implementation: developing measures crucial to understanding the diffusion of preventive interventions. Health Educ Res. 2005;20:308–313. doi: 10.1093/her/cyg134.
    1. Emmons KM, Weiner B, Fernandez ME, Tu S. Systems antecedents for dissemination and implementation: a review and analysis of measures. Health Educ Behav. 2012;39:87–105. doi: 10.1177/1090198111409748.
    1. Aarons GA, Sommerfeld DH, Willging CE. The soft underbelly of system change: the role of leadership and organizational climate in turnover during statewide behavioral health reform. Psychol Serv. 2011;8:269–281. doi: 10.1037/a0026196.
    1. Aarons GA, Sommerfeld DH, Walrath-Greene CM. Evidence-based practice implementation: the impact of public versus private sector organization type on organizational support, provider attitudes, and adoption of evidence-based practice. Implement Sci. 2009;4:83–96. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-4-83.
    1. Glisson C, Schoenwald SK, Hemmelgarn A, Green P, Dukes D, Armstrong KS, Chapman JE. Randomized trial of MST and ARC in a two-level evidence-based treatment implementation strategy. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2010;78:537–550. doi: 10.1037/a0019160.
    1. Ehrhart MG, Schneider B, Macey WH. Organizational climate and culture: an introduction to theory, research, and practice. New York, NY: Routledge; 2014.
    1. Schneider B, Ehrhart MG, Macey WA. Organizational climate research: achievements and the road ahead. In: Ashkanasy NM, Wilderom CPM, Peterson MF, editors. Handbook of organizational culture and climate. 2. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications; 2011. pp. 29–49.
    1. Campbell JP, Dunnette MD, Lawler EE, Weick KE. Managerial behavior, performance, and effectiveness. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1970.
    1. Hellriegel D, Slocum JW., Jr Organizational climate: measures, research and contingencies. Acad Manage J. 1974;17:255–280. doi: 10.2307/254979.
    1. Schneider B, Parkington JJ, Buxton VM. Employee and customer perceptions of service in banks. Admin Sci Q. 1980;25:252–267. doi: 10.2307/2392454.
    1. Zohar D. Safety climate in industrial organizations: theoretical and applied implications. J Appl Psychol. 1980;65:96–102. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.65.1.96.
    1. Hong Y, Liao H, Hu J, Jiang K. Missing link in the service profit chain: a meta-analytic review of the antecedents, consequences, and moderators of service climate. J Appl Psychol. 2013;98:237–267. doi: 10.1037/a0031666.
    1. Beus JM, Payne SC, Bergman ME, Arthur W. Safety climate and injuries: an examination of theoretical and empirical relationships. J Appl Psychol. 2010;95:713–727. doi: 10.1037/a0019164.
    1. Christian MS, Bradley JC, Wallace JC, Burke MJ. Workplace safety: a meta-analysis of the roles of person and situation factors. J Appl Psychol. 2009;94:1103–1127. doi: 10.1037/a0016172.
    1. Whitman DS, Caleo S, Carpenter NC, Horner MT, Bernerth JB. Fairness at the collective level: a meta-analytic examination of the consequences and boundary conditions of organizational justice climate. J Appl Psychol. 2012;97:776–791. doi: 10.1037/a0028021.
    1. Schneider B. Organizational Climate and Culture. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 1990.
    1. Klein KJ, Conn AB, Smith DB, Sorra JS. Is everyone in agreement? An exploration of within-group agreement in employee perceptions of the work environment. J Appl Psychol. 2001;86:3–16. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.86.1.3.
    1. Klein KJ, Sorra JS. The challenge of innovation implementation. Acad Manage Rev. 1996;21:1055–1080.
    1. Weiner BJ, Belden CM, Bergmire DM, Johnston M. The meaning and measurement of implementation climate. Implement Sci. 2011;6:78–89. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-6-78.
    1. Klein KJ, Conn AB, Sorra JS. Implementing computerized technology: an organizational analysis. J Appl Psychol. 2001;86:811–824. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.86.5.811.
    1. Aarons GA, Wells RS, Zagursky K, Fettes DL, Palinkas LA. Implementing evidence-based practice in community mental health agencies: a multiple stakeholder analysis. Am J Public Health. 2009;99:2087–2095. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2009.161711.
    1. Griffin MA, Neal A. Perceptions of safety at work: a framework for linking safety climate to safety performance, knowledge, and motivation. J Occup Health Psychol. 2000;5:347–358. doi: 10.1037/1076-8998.5.3.347.
    1. Schneider B, White SS, Paul MC. Linking service climate and customer perceptions of service quality: test of a causal model. J Appl Psychol. 1998;83:150–163. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.83.2.150.
    1. Sosna T, Marsenich L. Community development team model: supporting the model adherent implementation of programs and practices. Sacramento: California Institute for Mental Health; 2006.
    1. Patterson MG, West MA, Shackleton VJ, Dawson JF, Lawthom R, Maitlis S, Robinson DL, Wallace AM. Validating the organizational climate measure: links to managerial practices, productivity and innovation. J Organ Behav. 2005;26:379–408. doi: 10.1002/job.312.
    1. Rafferty AE, Griffin MA. Perceptions of organizational change: a stress and coping perspective. J Appl Psychol. 2006;91:1154–1162. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.91.5.1154.
    1. Lehman WEK, Greener JM, Simpson DD. Assessing organizational readiness for change. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2002;22:197–209. doi: 10.1016/S0740-5472(02)00233-7.
    1. Fabrigar LR, Wegener DT, MacCallum RC, Strahan EJ. Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. Psychol Methods. 1999;4:272–299. doi: 10.1037/1082-989X.4.3.272.
    1. Zwick WR, Velicer WF. Comparison of five rules for determining the number of components to retain. Psychol Bull. 1986;99:432–442. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.99.3.432.
    1. Patil VH, Singh SN, Mishra S, Donavan DT. Efficient theory development and factor retention criteria: a case for abandoning the ‘Eigenvalue Greater Than One’ criterion. J Bus Res. 2008;61:162–170. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2007.05.008.
    1. Horn JL. A rationale and test for the number of factors in factor analysis. Psychometrika. 1965;30:179–185. doi: 10.1007/BF02289447.
    1. Patil VH, Singh SN, Mishra S, Donavan DT: Parallel analysis engine to aid determining number of factors to retain [computer software]. 2007. Available from .
    1. Muthén LK, Muthén BO. Mplus user’s guide. 7. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén; 1998–2012.
    1. Hu L-T, Bentler PM. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equ Modeling. 1999;6:1–55. doi: 10.1080/10705519909540118.
    1. Guo Q, Li F, Chen X, Wang W, Meng Q. Performance of fit indices in different conditions and selection of cut-off values. Acta Psychologica Sinica. 2008;40:109–118. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2008.00109.
    1. Brown RD, Hauenstein NMA. Interrater agreement reconsidered: an alternative to the rwg indices. Organ Res Methods. 2005;8:165–184. doi: 10.1177/1094428105275376.
    1. LeBreton JM, Senter JL. Answers to twenty questions about interrater reliability and interrater agreement. Organ Res Methods. 2008;11:815–852. doi: 10.1177/1094428106296642.
    1. Shea CM, Jacobs SR, Esserman DA, Bruce K, Weiner BJ. Organizational readiness for implementing change: a psychometric assessment of a new measure. Implement Sci. 2014;9:7. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-9-7.
    1. Weiner BJ. A theory of organizational readiness for change. Implement Sci. 2009;4:67. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-4-67.
    1. Aarons GA, Hurlburt M, Horwitz SM. Advancing a conceptual model of evidence-based practice implementation in public service sectors. Adm Policy Ment Hlth. 2011;38:4–23. doi: 10.1007/s10488-010-0327-7.
    1. Aarons GA. Mental health provider attitudes toward adoption of evidence-based practice: the Evidence-Based Practice Attitude Scale (EBPAS) Ment Health Serv Res. 2004;6:61–74. doi: 10.1023/B:MHSR.0000024351.12294.65.
    1. Aarons GA, Farahnak LR, Ehrhart MG. Leadership and strategic organizational climate to support evidence-based practice implementation. In: Beidas RS, Kendall PC, editors. Child and adolescent therapy: Dissemination and implementation of empirically supported treatments. New York, NY: Guilford Press; 2014.
    1. Aarons GA, Ehrhart MG, Farahnak LR. The implementation leadership scale (ILS): development of a brief measure of unit level implementation leadership. Implement Sci. 2014;9:45. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-9-45.
    1. Aarons GA, Ehrhart MG, Farahnak LR, Hurlburt M: Leadership and organizational change for implementation (LOCI): a mixed-method pilot study of a leadership and organization development intervention for evidence-based practice implementation. Manuscript submitted for publication. In review
    1. Aarons GA, Ehrhart MG, Farahnak LR, Sklar M. Aligning leadership across systems and organizations to develop a strategic climate for evidence-based practice implementation. Annu Rev Public Health. 2014;35:255–274. doi: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-032013-182447.
    1. Glisson C. The organizational context of children’s mental health services. Clin Child Fam Psych. 2002;5:233–253. doi: 10.1023/A:1020972906177.
    1. Glisson C, James L. The cross-level effects of culture and climate in human service teams. J Organ Behav. 2002;23:767–794. doi: 10.1002/job.162.
    1. Glisson C, Landsverk J, Schoenwald S, Kelleher K, Hoagwood K, Mayberg S, Green P. Assessing the Organizational Social Context (OSC) of mental health services: implications for research and practice. Adm Policy Ment Health Ment Health Serv Res Spec Issue Improving Ment Health Serv. 2008;35:98–113. doi: 10.1007/s10488-007-0148-5.
    1. Helfrich C, Li Y, Sharp N, Sales A. Organizational readiness to change assessment (ORCA): development of an instrument based on the Promoting Action on Research in Health Services (PARIHS) framework. Implementation Sci. 2009;4:38. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-4-38.
    1. Jacobs SR, Weiner BJ, Bunger AC. Context matters: measuring implementation climate among individuals and groups. Implement Sci. 2014;9:46. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-9-46.

Source: PubMed

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

3
Subscribe