Primary school students' mental health in Uganda and its association with school violence, connectedness, and school characteristics: a cross-sectional study

Barbara F Thumann, Ula Nur, Dipak Naker, Karen M Devries, Barbara F Thumann, Ula Nur, Dipak Naker, Karen M Devries

Abstract

Background: Few studies have explored risk factors for poor mental health in Ugandan primary schools. This study investigated whether individual- and contextual-level school-related factors including violence from school staff and other students, connectedness to school and peers, as well as school size and urban/rural location, were associated with mental health difficulties in Ugandan children. We also examined whether associations between violence exposure at school and mental health were mediated by connectedness as well as whether associations were different for boys and girls.

Methods: The analytic sample consisted of 3,565 students from 42 primary schools participating in the Good Schools Study. Data were collected through individual interviews conducted in June and July 2012. Mental health was measured using the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire. Multilevel logistic regression was applied to investigate factors associated with mental health difficulties.

Results: Experiences of violence from school staff and other students in the past week were strongly associated with mental health difficulties (OR = 1.58, 95 % CI 1.31 to 1.90 and 1.81, 1.47 to 2.23, respectively). Children with a low school connectedness had 1.43 times (1.11 to 1.83) the odds of mental health difficulties compared to those with a high school connectedness. The OR comparing children never feeling close to other students at their school with those always feeling close was 1.86 (1.18 to 2.93). The effect of violence on mental health was not mediated through the connectedness variables. School size was not related to mental health difficulties, but attending an urban school increased the odds of mental health difficulties after accounting for other factors. We did not find evidence that the effect of one or more of the exposures on the outcome differed between boys and girls.

Conclusions: These findings suggest that violence in school and low connectedness to school and peers are independently associated with mental health difficulties and interventions should address both concurrently. Extra support may be needed for students in urban schools.

Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT01678846 . Registered 24 August 2012.

Keywords: Adolescents; Children; Mental health; School; Uganda; Violence.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Conceptual framework of the hypothesized associations between the school-related factors of interest (in bold) and mental health difficulties (in italics) of students under consideration of various confounders (unformatted). Variables measured at school-level are denoted with an asterisk (*)

References

    1. Kieling C, Baker-Henningham H, Belfer M, Conti G, Ertem I, Omigbodun O, et al. Child and adolescent mental health worldwide: evidence for action. Lancet. 2011;378(9801):1515–25. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60827-1.
    1. Patel V, Flisher AJ, Hetrick S, McGorry P. Mental health of young people: a global public-health challenge. Lancet. 2007;369(9569):1302–13. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60368-7.
    1. Bloom DE, Cafiero ET, Jané-Llopis E, Abrahams-Gessel S, Bloom LR, Fathima S, et al. The global economic burden of non-communicable diseases. Geneva: World Economic Forum; 2011.
    1. World Health Organization . Mental health action plan 2013–2020. Geneva: World Health Organization;; 2013.
    1. Demyttenaere K, Bruffaerts R, Posada-Villa J, Gasquet I, Kovess V, Lepine JP, et al. Prevalence, severity, and unmet need for treatment of mental disorders in the World Health Organization World Mental Health Surveys. JAMA. 2004;291(21):2581–90. doi: 10.1001/jama.291.21.2581.
    1. World Health Organization . Prevention of mental disorders: effective interventions and policy options: summary report. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2004.
    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention . School connectedness: strategies for increasing protective factors among youth. Atlanta: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; 2009.
    1. Brière FN, Pascal S, Dupéré V, Janosz M. School environment and adolescent depressive symptoms: a multilevel longitudinal study. Pediatrics. 2013;131(3):e702–8. doi: 10.1542/peds.2012-2172.
    1. Bond L, Butler H, Thomas L, Carlin J, Glover S, Bowes G, et al. Social and school connectedness in early secondary school as predictors of late teenage substance use, mental health, and academic outcomes. J Adolesc Health. 2007;40(4):357e9–18. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2006.10.013.
    1. Shochet IM, Dadds MR, Ham D, Montague R. School connectedness is an underemphasized parameter in adolescent mental health: results of a community prediction study. J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2006;35(2):170–9. doi: 10.1207/s15374424jccp3502_1.
    1. Joyce HD, Early TJ. The impact of school connectedness and teacher support on depressive symptoms in adolescents: a multilevel analysis. Child Youth Serv Rev. 2014;39:101–7. doi: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2014.02.005.
    1. De Róiste A, Kelly C, Molcho M, Gavin A, Nic Gabhainn S. Is school participation good for children? Associations with health and wellbeing. Health Educ. 2012;112(2):88–104. doi: 10.1108/09654281211203394.
    1. Denny SJ, Robinson EM, Utter J, Fleming TM, Grant S, Milfont TL, et al. Do schools influence student risk-taking behaviors and emotional health symptoms? J Adolesc Health. 2011;48(3):259–67. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2010.06.020.
    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. About School Violence. . Accessed 11 April 2016.
    1. Nansel TR, Overpeck M, Pilla RS, Ruan WJ, Simons-Morton B, Scheidt P. Bullying behaviors among US youth: prevalence and association with psychosocial adjustment. JAMA. 2001;285(16):2094–100. doi: 10.1001/jama.285.16.2094.
    1. Due P, Holstein BE, Lynch J, Diderichsen F, Gabhain SN, Scheidt P, et al. Bullying and symptoms among school-aged children: international comparative cross sectional study in 28 countries. Eur J Public Health. 2005;15(2):128–32. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/cki105.
    1. Glew GM, Fan MY, Katon W, Rivara FP, Kernic MA. Bullying, psychosocial adjustment, and academic performance in elementary school. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2005;159(11):1026–31. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.159.11.1026.
    1. Janosz M, Archambault I, Pagani LS, Pascal S, Morin AJ, Bowen F. Are there detrimental effects of witnessing school violence in early adolescence? J Adolesc Health. 2008;43(6):600–8. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2008.04.011.
    1. Fleming LC, Jacobsen KH. Bullying among middle-school students in low and middle income countries. Health Promot Int. 2010;25(1):73–84. doi: 10.1093/heapro/dap046.
    1. Siziya S, Rudatsikira E, Muula AS. Victimization from bullying among school-attending adolescents in grades 7 to 10 in Zambia. J Inj Violence Res. 2012;4(1):30–5. doi: 10.5249/jivr.v4i1.84.
    1. Devries KM, Kyegombe N, Zuurmond M, Parkes J, Child JC, Walakira EJ, et al. Violence against primary school children with disabilities in Uganda: a cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health. 2014;14:1017. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-1017.
    1. Devries KM, Child JC, Allen E, Walakira E, Parkes J, Naker D. School violence, mental health, and educational performance in Uganda. Pediatrics. 2014;133(1):e129–37. doi: 10.1542/peds.2013-2007.
    1. Devries KM, Allen E, Child JC, Walakira E, Parkes J, Elbourne D, et al. The Good Schools Toolkit to prevent violence against children in Ugandan primary schools: study protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial. Trials. 2013;14:232. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-14-232.
    1. Raising Voices. Good School Toolkit Study. . Accessed 26 March 2015.
    1. Child JC, Naker D, Horton J, Walakira EJ, Devries KM. Responding to abuse: Children’s experiences of child protection in a central district, Uganda. Child Abuse Negl. 2014;38(10):1647–58. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2014.06.009.
    1. Zolotor AJ, Runyan DK, Dunne MP, Jain D, Peturs HR, Ramirez C, et al. ISPCAN Child Abuse Screening Tool Children’s Version (ICAST-C): Instrument development and multi-national pilot testing. Child Abuse Negl. 2009;33(11):833–41. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2009.09.004.
    1. García-Moreno C, Jansen HAFM, Ellsberg M, Heise L, Watts C. WHO multi-country study on women’s health and domestic violence against women: initial results on prevalence, health outcomes and women’s responses. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2005.
    1. Goodman R. Psychometric properties of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2001;40(11):1337–45. doi: 10.1097/00004583-200111000-00015.
    1. Goodman R, Meltzer H, Bailey V. The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire: a pilot study on the validity of the self-report version. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 1998;7(3):125–30. doi: 10.1007/s007870050057.
    1. Jones L, Bellis MA, Wood S, Hughes K, McCoy E, Eckley L, et al. Prevalence and risk of violence against children with disabilities: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. Lancet. 2012;380(9845):899–907. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60692-8.
    1. Ho MY, Cheung FM. The differential effects of forms and settings of exposure to violence on adolescents’ adjustment. J Interpers Violence. 2010;25(7):1309–37. doi: 10.1177/0886260509340548.
    1. Rabe-Hesketh S, Skrondal A. Multilevel and longitudinal modeling using stata. Volume II: categorical responses, counts, and survival. 3. United States: Stata Press; 2012.
    1. Hox JJ. Multilevel analysis: techniques and applications. 2. Great Britain: Routledge; 2010.
    1. Merlo J, Chaix B, Ohlsson H, Beckman A, Johnell K, Hjerpe P, et al. A brief conceptual tutorial of multilevel analysis in social epidemiology: using measures of clustering in multilevel logistic regression to investigate contextual phenomena. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2006;60(4):290–7. doi: 10.1136/jech.2004.029454.
    1. Victora CG, Huttly SR, Fuchs SC, Olinto MT. The role of conceptual frameworks in epidemiological analysis: a hierarchical approach. Int J Epidemiol. 1997;26(1):224–7. doi: 10.1093/ije/26.1.224.
    1. StataCorp . Stata statistical software: release 12. College station. TX: StataCorp LP; 2011.
    1. Farrington DP, Ttofi MM. School-based programs to reduce bullying and victimization. Campbell Syst Rev. 2009;6.
    1. Peen J, Schoevers RA, Beekman AT, Dekker J. The current status of urban-rural differences in psychiatric disorders. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2010;121(2):84–93. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.2009.01438.x.
    1. Lederbogen F, Haddad L, Meyer-Lindenberg A. Urban social stress--risk factor for mental disorders. The case of schizophrenia. Environ Pollut. 2013;183:2–6. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2013.05.046.
    1. Chapman RL, Buckley L, Sheehan M, Shochet I. School-based programs for increasing connectedness and reducing risk behavior: a systematic review. Educ Psychol Rev. 2013;25(1):95–114. doi: 10.1007/s10648-013-9216-4.

Source: PubMed

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

3
Subscribe