The Good School Toolkit for reducing physical violence from school staff to primary school students: a cluster-randomised controlled trial in Uganda

Karen M Devries, Louise Knight, Jennifer C Child, Angel Mirembe, Janet Nakuti, Rebecca Jones, Joanna Sturgess, Elizabeth Allen, Nambusi Kyegombe, Jenny Parkes, Eddy Walakira, Diana Elbourne, Charlotte Watts, Dipak Naker, Karen M Devries, Louise Knight, Jennifer C Child, Angel Mirembe, Janet Nakuti, Rebecca Jones, Joanna Sturgess, Elizabeth Allen, Nambusi Kyegombe, Jenny Parkes, Eddy Walakira, Diana Elbourne, Charlotte Watts, Dipak Naker

Abstract

Background: Violence against children from school staff is widespread in various settings, but few interventions address this. We tested whether the Good School Toolkit-a complex behavioural intervention designed by Ugandan not-for-profit organisation Raising Voices-could reduce physical violence from school staff to Ugandan primary school children.

Methods: We randomly selected 42 primary schools (clusters) from 151 schools in Luwero District, Uganda, with more than 40 primary 5 students and no existing governance interventions. All schools agreed to be enrolled. All students in primary 5, 6, and 7 (approximate ages 11-14 years) and all staff members who spoke either English or Luganda and could provide informed consent were eligible for participation in cross-sectional baseline and endline surveys in June-July 2012 and 2014, respectively. We randomly assigned 21 schools to receive the Good School Toolkit and 21 to a waitlisted control group in September, 2012. The intervention was implemented from September, 2012, to April, 2014. Owing to the nature of the intervention, it was not possible to mask assignment. The primary outcome, assessed in 2014, was past week physical violence from school staff, measured by students' self-reports using the International Society for the Prevention of Child Abuse and Neglect Child Abuse Screening Tool-Child Institutional. Analyses were by intention to treat, and are adjusted for clustering within schools and for baseline school-level means of continuous outcomes. The trial is registered at clinicaltrials.gov, NCT01678846.

Findings: No schools left the study. At 18-month follow-up, 3820 (92·4%) of 4138 randomly sampled students participated in a cross-sectional survey. Prevalence of past week physical violence was lower in the intervention schools (595/1921, 31·0%) than in the control schools (924/1899, 48·7%; odds ratio 0·40, 95% CI 0·26-0·64, p<0·0001). No adverse events related to the intervention were detected, but 434 children were referred to child protective services because of what they disclosed in the follow-up survey.

Interpretation: The Good School Toolkit is an effective intervention to reduce violence against children from school staff in Ugandan primary schools.

Funding: MRC, DfID, Wellcome Trust, Hewlett Foundation.

Copyright © 2015 Devries et al. Open access article published under the terms of CC BY. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Figures

Figure
Figure
Trial profile

References

    1. Norman RE, Byambaa M, De R, Butchart A, Scott J, Vos T. The long-term health consequences of child physical abuse, emotional abuse, and neglect: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS Med. 2012;9:e1001349.
    1. Boden JM, Horwood LJ, Fergusson DM. Exposure to childhood sexual and physical abuse and subsequent educational achievement outcomes. Child Abuse Neglect. 2007;31:1101–1114.
    1. Fang X, Corso PS. Child maltreatment, youth violence, and intimate partner violence : developmental relationships. Am J Prevent Med. 2007;33:281–290.
    1. Ehrensaft MK, Cohen P, Brown J, Smailes E, Chen H, Johnson JG. Intergenerational transmission of partner violence: a 20-year prospective study. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2003;71:741–753.
    1. UNICEF Tanzania. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences . Violence against children in tanzania: findings from a national survey, 2009. summary report on the prevalence of sexual, physical and emotional violence, context of sexual violence, and health and behavioural consequences of violence experienced in childhood. UNICEF Tanzania, Division of Violence Prevention, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences; Dar es Salaam: 2011.
    1. UNICEF Kenya Country Office. Division of Violence Prevention. National Center for Injury Prevention and Control. US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Kenya National Bureau of Statistics . Violence against children in Kenya: findings from a 2010 national survey. UNICEF Kenya Country Office, Division of Violence Prevention, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Kenya National Bureau of Statistics; Nairobi: 2012.
    1. Devries K, Child J, Allen E. School violence, mental health and educational performance in Ugandan primary school children: a cross-sectional survey. Pediatrics. 2014;133:e129–e137.
    1. Bonell C, Jamal F, Harden A. Systematic review of the effects of schools and school environment interventions on health: evidence mapping and synthesis. NIHR Journals Library; Southampton: 2013.
    1. Baker-Henningham H, Walker S, Powell C, Gardner JM. A pilot study of the Incredible Years Teacher Training programme and a curriculum unit on social and emotional skills in community pre-schools in Jamaica. Child Care Health Dev. 2009;1:1–13.
    1. Baker-Henningham H, Scott S, Jones K, Walker S. Reducing child conduct problems and promoting social skills in a middle-income country: cluster randomised controlled trial. Br J Psychiatry. 2012;201:101–108.
    1. Devries KM, Allen E, Child C. The Good Schools Toolkit to prevent violence against children in Ugandan primary schools: study protocol for cluster-randomised controlled trial. Trials. 2013;14:232.
    1. Child J, Walakira E, Naker D, Devries K. Responding to abuse: children's experiences of child protection in a central district, Uganda. Child Abuse Neglect. 2014;38:1647–1658.
    1. Prochaska JO, Velicer WF. The transtheoretical model of health behavior change. Am J Health Promot. 1997;12:38–48.
    1. Abraham C, Michie S. A taxonomy of behavior change techniques used in interventions. Health Psychol. 2008;27:379–387.
    1. Webster-Stratton C. Quality training, supervision, ongoing monitoring, and agency support: key ingredients to implementing the Incredible Years programs with fidelity. University of Washington; Washington: 2004.
    1. Jewkes R, Nduna M, Levin J. Impact of Stepping Stones on incidence of HIV and HSV-2 and sexual behaviour in rural South Africa: cluster randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2008;337:a506.
    1. International Society for the Prevention of Child Abuse and Neglect . ICAST-C: the ISPCAN Child Abuse Screening Tool—Child Version. Manual and proposed guidelines for pilot administration. International Society for the Prevention of Child Abuse and Neglect; Aurora: 2006.
    1. Goodman R, Ford T, Simmons H, Gatward R, Meltzer H. Using the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) to screen for child psychiatric disorders in a community sample. Br J Psychiatry. 2000;177:534–539.
    1. Frankenberg SJ, Holmqvist R, Rubenson B. The care of corporal punishment: conceptions of early childhood discipline strategies among parents and grandparents in a poor and urban area in Tanzania. Childhood. 2010;17:455–469.
    1. Payet JP, Franchi V. The rights of the child and the good of the learners: a compartive ethnographical survey on the abolition of corporal punishment in South African schools. Childhood. 2008;15:157–176.
    1. Global Initiative to End All Corporal Punishment of Children Corporal punishment of children in the USA. (accessed Oct 3, 2014).
    1. Durrant JE. Evaluating the success of Sweden's corporal punishment ban. Child Abuse Neglect. 1999;23:435–448.
    1. Stoltenborgh M, van IJzendoorn MH, Euser EM, Bakermans-Kranenburg MJ. A global perspective on child sexual abuse: meta-analysis of prevalence around the world. Child Maltreatment. 2011;16:79–101.

Source: PubMed

3
Subscribe